EVE Search - Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2042	Posted - 2015.03.03 15:46:10 - [1] - Quote are those numbers for entosis module right? 20km for T1 and 25okm for T2?
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2042	Posted - 2015.03.03 16:37:22 - [2] - Quote ok before anyone else freekin says it, point me to the damn ceptor that can target out to 250km.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2043	Posted - 2015.03.03 17:03:49 - [3] - Quote Proton Stars wrote: Why is no one else concerned that GM's are once again playing in and influencing sov warfare with hidden alts. Cause that went so well before in BoB, didint it! 'Oi Fozzie im poor, spawn me an officer in this belt please' 'Oi Fozziee, Have a look on that ccp graph and tell me the best t3's to build over a 6 month period' 'Oi Fozzie, Develop me a sov system that breaks the current gameplay cause im too lazy to try to take sov and invest me time right now' cuz i left my tinfoil hat at home
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2043	Posted - 2015.03.03 17:10:50 - [4] - Quote ok this is really important, Dreads just lost half of their purpose and im willing to geuss more than half of their usage. Please tell me there are plans to change that. E: the same might be said for supercarriers
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2045	Posted - 2015.03.03 17:38:06 - [5] - Quote also what happens when a character in an NPC corp tries to use this module? does it count and can they actually take anything?
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2047	Posted - 2015.03.03 18:02:54 - [6] - Quote Total Newbie wrote: Since the proposed change is out, I would think that the meeting minutes of The current CSM and it's members who are supporting this be published as well. The NDA seems to be null and void now. what makes you say that
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2050	Posted - 2015.03.03 18:12:45 - [7] - Quote Proton Stars wrote: claw, 10mn mwd, snakes, 249km mod. 20k m/s. good luck keeping up or applying webs long enough with a cruiser gang good luck targeting the structure
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2050	Posted - 2015.03.03 18:13:46 - [8] - Quote X Gallentius wrote: xartin wrote: gment the nullsec playerbase as entire major regions of eve's active timezones will be excluded from participating in content. Think from the perspective of an attacker wanting to capture alliance held space that is only vulnerable during EUtz. UStz and AUtz will be completely excluded from any ability to be useful or participate. the same scenario would apply for defenders as well. How is this different than properly stronting a timer, or a POCO timer? Defender picks his advantageous time, and everybody adjusts accordingly. stront timers can differ, this primetime thing cannot. Some towers and structures may come out at different times than others for whatever purpose.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2055	Posted - 2015.03.03 18:36:56 - [9] - Quote Olya Tsarev wrote: Aryndel Vyst wrote: Sounds like you should report this to security and provide proof instead of being a big baby *****. Well actually here's the thing, I don't need to provide proof whatsoever. I can make these claims all I want. #FreedomOfSpeechYo I also like how you had to throw in a really petty insult to drive across the fact I struck a nerve. Thanks Vystypoo <4 #IHaveZeroValidity Free speech means people can gab their gob, doesnt mean what comes out means anything, or is worth the spent O2.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2055	Posted - 2015.03.03 18:38:09 - [10] - Quote could the timer be switched to be based on the corp that owns it? you can still have multiple TZs but then its can be determined by the smaller groups within the alliance what TZ needs to be covered.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2055	Posted - 2015.03.03 18:55:33 - [11] - Quote Callic Veratar wrote: Bubble immune 2-second align 250km locking 10mn MWD interceptors really are the bane of this new sov model. i hope your not serious i cant tell anymore here
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2059	Posted - 2015.03.03 19:21:54 - [12] - Quote M1k3y Koontz wrote: Rowells wrote: X Gallentius wrote: xartin wrote: gment the nullsec playerbase as entire major regions of eve's active timezones will be excluded from participating in content. Think from the perspective of an attacker wanting to capture alliance held space that is only vulnerable during EUtz. UStz and AUtz will be completely excluded from any ability to be useful or participate. the same scenario would apply for defenders as well. How is this different than properly stronting a timer, or a POCO timer? Defender picks his advantageous time, and everybody adjusts accordingly. stront timers can differ, this primetime thing cannot. Some towers and structures may come out at different times than others for whatever purpose. Then how is it different from current Ihub timers? You cant have timers spread across 24hrs anymore with this. Only four. Not every (in fact not many) alliances are single-TZ.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2073	Posted - 2015.03.03 23:14:06 - [13] - Quote I'm gonna quote an alliance buddy here: Q: How many EVE players does it take to change a lightbulb? A: CHANGE???????? NNOOOOOOOOOOO
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2073	Posted - 2015.03.03 23:16:12 - [14] - Quote Also, advocating again to base the prime time on corp that owns structure rather than alliance
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2075	Posted - 2015.03.03 23:18:50 - [15] - Quote epicurus ataraxia wrote: Rowells wrote: Also, advocating again to base the prime time on corp that owns structure rather than alliance That does make sense if we are going to local defence, that tends to happen at corp level rather than alliance level. Worst case you can still help out another corp that has similar TZ if your in a diverse corp.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2090	Posted - 2015.03.04 00:11:51 - [16] - Quote Proton Stars wrote: Also why on earth are fcon defending this? They'll be wiped off the map quicker than a *** stain in a nudey booth we'll still be here. Most likely a lot smaller space, but assuming systems are changed to support more most of us can and will stick it. It gets pretty boring up here in branch to be honest. Only way I see us folding is if goons decide to reset everyone and put their sights on the north.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2099	Posted - 2015.03.04 03:06:21 - [17] - Quote Rain6637 wrote: Proton Stars wrote: Rain6637 wrote: So the best way to take sov is by constellation-wide deployments. heh. I thought one of the main premises was allowing sov to be local to a system? FC was the old hotness, now there will be a CC or Constellation Coordinator? Anyone would think they are trying to boost large alliance groups like goons Most of the discussion assumes there will be conflict at all. I'm pretty sure there will be NEPs or Non Entosis Pacts. That's why I'm worried about neutral Alts.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2099	Posted - 2015.03.04 03:44:22 - [18] - Quote Rain6637 wrote: Rowells wrote: Rain6637 wrote: Proton Stars wrote: Rain6637 wrote: So the best way to take sov is by constellation-wide deployments. heh. I thought one of the main premises was allowing sov to be local to a system? FC was the old hotness, now there will be a CC or Constellation Coordinator? Anyone would think they are trying to boost large alliance groups like goons Most of the discussion assumes there will be conflict at all. I'm pretty sure there will be NEPs or Non Entosis Pacts. That's why I'm worried about neutral Alts. What happens when an NPC corp character activates an entosis module? Can the station's control still drop? Idk. If a neut can do the initial interruptions of station services and such I don't have an issue, but if it can run down the timer at all on the capture/destroy phase, it might be undesirable.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2099	Posted - 2015.03.04 03:45:21 - [19] - Quote Milla Goodpussy wrote: how come this SOV Change doesn't even mention the change or supposed changed for moons.. its like he's purposely protecting interest in this area.. and no Im never taking my tinfoil hat off.. wassup wit dat! Moon changes?
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2099	Posted - 2015.03.04 03:49:29 - [20] - Quote Ncc 1709 wrote: will be fleets of T3 destroyers orbiting at 180km doing 15km/s+ cap stable nuking station services etc And all you need is one ship with your own link to stop them. Any additional ships will be for picking off the T3s
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2099	Posted - 2015.03.04 03:53:11 - [21] - Quote Quote: The Entosis Link module represents the central interaction mechanic of the new Sovereignty system (among its other uses) i wonder what that bolder part means...
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2111	Posted - 2015.03.04 23:07:38 - [22] - Quote maybe an MMJD RLML drake would become the new counter?
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2112	Posted - 2015.03.04 23:42:39 - [23] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: I'm gonna call it a night, but expect some of the first issue breakout threads tomorrow (we'll link to them from this thread) and try to leave me with a reasonable number of posts to catch up on in the morning ok? Big smile yay blogs \o/
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2113	Posted - 2015.03.04 23:52:41 - [24] - Quote Promiscuous Female wrote: afkalt wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: afkalt wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: i guess if they are standing still, sure if you rig for misl distance you are getting about 125km range on a cerb with a flight time of 12s an interceptor orbiting at 120km covers 48 km in this time 120 + 48 > 125 They cut corners, that only applies if they inty is straight lining away. Alternatively, use an orth with 20+km/s light missiles. a misl range rigged orthrus only has an engagement envelope of 100km, and that is while further gimping the tank to include the sensor booster needed to lock that far an interceptor also beats a heated orthrus's speed by a good kilometer a second or so And the trollceptor will kill it, right? Or not. People are talking about snakes and quafe, what is a missile speed implant against that? it doesn't have to beat the orthrus, just not die to it until the artosis link finishes the job also i do like that you are having to use a 280m ship and 750m of implants to kill a 20m frig with an 80m module 1 keres with its own link, damp them down back to normal target range and then bring in a cheap caracal. isk balanced enough?
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2117	Posted - 2015.03.06 01:29:25 - [25] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: baltec1 wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Arrendis wrote: Once again: There is not, and in all of human history never has been a problem that cannot be solved better using the application of more brainpower. Cancer? Invading Russia in the winter. The perpetual motion law. Erectile dysfunction
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2117	Posted - 2015.03.06 01:30:28 - [26] - Quote Shuckstar wrote: Two step wrote: Suggestions for addressing the timezone issues: 1) Expand the window to 8 hours 2) If you pick a 4 hour window, you also get a 2 hour window 10 hours from the end of your chosen window. This would mean that a US TZ window would have an opposite time that would be RUS friendly and an EU window would have AUS friendly times. This, the prime time 4 hours needs to be changed to 8 at least. Should be switched to the corps owning the structure. Offers very good flexibility.
Rowells ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans 2133	Posted - 2015.03.19 19:32:10 - [27] - Quote anyone have a link to the video?