T3 Destroyers only point out how completely crappy AFs are atm. Else, they're great at being a glorified destroyer that shreds any other small hull (what'd you expect, seriously) and becomes useless once you put a cruiser with a competent pilot on the field. Their sig/speed is just not good.
The confessor is a sheet of paper. The svipul got either a tank and fights in spitting range, or it's got artillery and not much of a tank.

Fact that people use them to kill cruisers 1v1 left and right would rather be incompetent pilots on one side rather than T3 dessis OP. In case: A thrasher can kill a ratting tengu, you don't need a svipul for that.

Well, they are way too OP for 40kk. But for 100-120 kk they would be just the next tier ships comparing to assault frigates and destroyers. I think CCP should look into the problem.

lemme break it down for ya

theres this thing called supply and demand

when demand fluctuates positively, prices rise, when it falls, prices fall

the fact that the confessor has hovered around 40m for a while a now means that we, as a player base, have decided how much this ship is worth.

besides, saying something is op without evidence is really just an opinion and unfounded. however, if the ship was to be found as op, changing the materials to make 1 of these ships is not the correct action.

why? you ask? because if the ship is truly op, people will keep buying it regardless of the price (looks at the price disparity between the worm and cruor)

in short, the t3 dessies are fine as is atm

I've said this before, but If I sell an Ibis for 500bil that Ibis does not become better than a titan.

TL;DR Cost is irrelevant, look to actual ship balance if you have an issue and provide real feedback/suggestions

In that case you won't mind if CCP changed the materials/effort so that production cost goes up to 250m.

I think there is another way to fix T3 destroyers - to prohibit using oversized modules. Like 10 MN AB on ships smaller than cruisers. Or 100 MN ABs on ships smaller than BSs.

That doesn't make any logical sense, not even Ishtars cost that much, and we all know how OP they are right?

Also you appear to have misread my point, when I say cost is irrelevant, I dion't mean you can go and screw with it as much as you want, I mean it's not even something that should be considered. Why not look at why the ship is OP: over sized prop mod as standard? Lower PG. too much damage? lower the damage bonus to 7.5 or 5%/level.

Stop trying to use cost as a balancing factor when it is simply a non-factor regarding ship balance. yes it affects how much those ships are used, but look at why they're being used and so effectively and fix that.

pricing has nothing to do with CCP, if the ship itself is too overpowered (sentry ishtars) then they will rebalance.

Price is significant. Otherwise everyone would just use the best ships in the game, all the time.

pricing has nothing to do with CCP, if the ship itself is too overpowered (sentry ishtars) then they will rebalance.

Which is what ship? Please do tell what one ship is the best in the game.

Btw, the other 2 T3D are coming and as feared: the Caldari one is lml/rocket. The Gallente one is just silly.

Silly? on which point of view?

The caldari one is going to be stupid. Beyond stupid.