| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
   |
Posted - 2006.10.17 22:49:00 -
[1]
Edited by: James Lyrus on 17/10/2006 22:51:57
[
 Originally by: Aurel Senia
I'm going to include a -- fourth point, just because I'm feeling particularly spiteful today. You allow your dearest ex-admiral of ISSN Butter Dog full access to your private forums for intelligence and tactical discussion, and yet he is not bound by the standard ISS forum-posting rules. Do you want to explain why you allow such a loud-mouthed pseudo-member of your alliance to rampantly troll nearly every single thread posted in the Corp/Alliance forum? I'm sure many people don't know that he is still intricately linked to your dear organization, but it speaks volumes for your supposed 'neutrality.'
Originally by: Aurel Senia
And for Butter Dog? Case in point:
Proof Positive
And Again
Don't lie when you can't erase the truth.
That's not a very solid argument. If you use forum access as your membership criterion, that makes you a member of ISS too.
|
James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.10.18 07:11:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Nyphur
Originally by: arkarsk
Originally by: Nyphur
I'm not sure I'm allowed to tell you that but it's a lot less than some people think.
See... being secretive of your funding to an alliance doesnt make you out to be the most neutral of all parties....
I just said I'm not sure I am allowed to tell you. In fact, now that I think about it, I don't actually have that information. I could hazard a rough guess but I am regional coordinator for Providence, not the Calico area.
In any case, you'd have to ask Count TaSessine about that. It's his decision whether or not to release that info.
Would that actually change anyone's opinion? Serious question, if ISS were to do approximately the same as the outpost projects, and publish it's accounts and financial reports, and maybe issue shares and pay dividends, would that really make any difference to general opinion?
|
James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.10.18 08:41:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kaganis Warmonkey
Originally by: Rodney Caston
Funny, it was called ISS Calico after downtime when I was putting the minerals in the egg.
That was an oversight. It got renamed shortly afterwoods.
Actually, it took a few weeks - outpost names were bugged and so couldn't be renamed for a while, so it carried the name of the corp involved in the construction.
|
James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.10.20 08:36:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Master OlavPancrazio
Not speaking for d2 personally but whether or not ISS is doing what they do right is of no concern to me. The more stuff I can shoot at, the better.
Therefore I vote never turn ISS blue again.
That's fair enough. That reaction may surprise you, but ... well, there's always going to be _someone_ wanting to do the shooty shooty thing. ISS, much like ... well any other alliance of it's size, presents a potential target. More red with just one little standings change.
But I still don't feel that a simple thing like mutual KOS lists or whatever actually need to get in the way of the serious business of ISS - making EVE a better place. |
| |
|