| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jobb
   |
Posted - 2003.06.02 23:32:00 -
[1]
There is somthing wrong with using "Basic Nanofiber Internal Structure" on my Badger I ship. It takes FOREVER to start a warp and even longer to change the desired speed.
What wrong? Does anyone know.
And, Yes I have done a bug-report about it.
/Lyker
|
Zyrla Bladestorm
|
Posted - 2003.06.02 23:50:00 -
[2]
its a bug that has been in from at least a fortnight before beta ended to the best of my knowledge - if you fit any hull modification which alters agility onto an industrial/battleship (certainly most, I think the Wreathe managed to avoid being effected when it went 160m/s and had the lowest mass of any indy) the ship acts as though the mod/s were reducing agility by several powers and the ship takes an age to turn (when I first got a mammoth a few days after they made it into beta 7 I made the mistake of fitting 5 OD's .. it took me 20 minutes to turn around to redock with the station heh)
.
-----
Apologys for any rambling that may have just occurred.
|
Haunty Moto
|
Posted - 2003.06.03 01:01:00 -
[3]
Are you sure it's a bug? I thought it might've been a balancing feature to prevent indies from going too fast
|
Zyrla Bladestorm
|
Posted - 2003.06.03 01:05:00 -
[4]
I'm Very sure its a bug :) an annoying one at that
.
-----
Apologys for any rambling that may have just occurred.
|
Jobb
|
Posted - 2003.06.03 10:11:00 -
[5]
Could we please get an official statment?
Is it a bug or a balance issue?
|
Allaina
|
Posted - 2003.06.03 11:27:00 -
[6]
If you've flown a nanomodded industrial ship you would have no doubt it was a bug. It appears that instead of reducing the ships agility to 95% of standard it is reducing it by 95%.....quite a big difference.
|
Haunty Moto
|
Posted - 2003.06.03 15:45:00 -
[7]
Nanomods are supposed to increase agility according to the description... and both nanofibers and overdrive injectors have the same effect on industrials.
|
Jobb
|
Posted - 2003.06.03 16:30:00 -
[8]
Devs? hello?
|
Jane Vladmir
|
Posted - 2005.04.12 01:17:00 -
[9]
<_<
>_>
hihihihi
|
Alexi Borizkova
|
Posted - 2005.04.12 01:20:00 -
[10]
Why, WHY do you disturb the dead so? Returning this thread to a mockery of life is an abomination!
|
|
|
ErrorS
|
Posted - 2005.04.12 01:28:00 -
[11]
i wish you people who were bumping threads would stop.. or the mods would stop you
in other forums I visit bumping old threads without anything to add gets you banned.
________
I'm strict Caldari
"The grass is always greener on the other side" - Maybe they're not as uber as you think?
-ErrorS |
Ereph
|
Posted - 2005.04.12 01:29:00 -
[12]
Being an ass and bumping 2 year old threads seems to be all the rage these days.
|
Weston McArthur
|
Posted - 2005.04.12 03:01:00 -
[13]
Onos! Ban the forum terrorists 4tw!
|
Kuolematon
|
Posted - 2005.04.12 06:30:00 -
[14]
... and there I was about to reply that my Sigil with 5 nanofibres are as fast as shuttle but luckily I looked post dates 
_______________________________________________
My opinions aren't my corporations opinions.
(\_/)
(x.x) This is what's left of Bunny, the rest tasted delicious. |
Saucerhead
|
Posted - 2005.04.12 08:35:00 -
[15]
This thread needs to fall back into oblivion, where it belongs. Locked
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |