EVE Search - Half year, 200B collected, 1T destroyed: donate for destruction

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

Half year, 200B collected, 1T destroyed: donate for destruction

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2767	Posted - 2015.03.25 11:01:29 - [1] - Quote Now de-***** the data from the rest of the year 2014 .Compare that with the kills since you have been sponsoring them , make a montly average and tell me how much more kill% your 200 B added. We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2767	Posted - 2015.03.25 11:08:51 - [2] - Quote d0cTeR9 wrote: If you guys could read/hear the jokes about MOA LOL! They are so bad at pvp, it's hilarious :) We like them, they provide easy kills (content) when we are bored lol The best I have seen, is them hot dropping stealth bombers to try to kill a ratting battleship hehe 17 B in kills while in the blob and only one solo kill ever , come on dude if you want to trash others for sucking at pvp at least have a better kb then my trade/research alt has . We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2769	Posted - 2015.03.25 19:51:03 - [3] - Quote Joseph Soprano wrote: flakeys wrote: d0cTeR9 wrote: If you guys could read/hear the jokes about MOA LOL! They are so bad at pvp, it's hilarious :) We like them, they provide easy kills (content) when we are bored lol The best I have seen, is them hot dropping stealth bombers to try to kill a ratting battleship hehe 17 B in kills while in the blob and only one solo kill ever , come on dude if you want to trash others for sucking at pvp at least have a better kb then my trade/research alt has . @Flakeys 'And on topic of the donation , it was a donation but probably mostly to the ''plexwafflesaccountsforthenextyears'' charity .Ah well , as long as he also invests some of it into pvp i'd say money well spend' Isn't that what Gevlon's doing. Investing in PvP? PS. Sorry for your loss. I think you took the wrong quote from me and meant to take the one above it where i asked gevlon how much of the total kills where thanks to his investment and not this quote where a pve monkey with a shitrecord laughs at moa's pvp ability. So assuming you meant that one then yes he is investing in pvp.The thing is he is claiming that the damage done was purely because of that investment.Now go look at the MOA killboard and look for the months before gevlon invested last year.Their best months where when he was not even investing.I am not claiming he isn't helping MOA recover their losses , i am however highly doubting that his investment in MOA is actually imrpoving the amount of kills a month as he claims they are. I've had my share of donations to a few pvp corps over the last year , not 150 B like gevlon but at least 50B for sure , yet i would never claim they made X amount extra kills that month because of it.I see it as nothing more then making their losses less time consuming and giving them more 'fun time' on a montly base.But then i am not doing it to ''hire them against the evils of eve'' but donating spare isk so that new players who venture into their first steps in pvp can do this freely without thinking too much of the risk it involves. Nice of you to link a reply i made in regards to that investment of around a month ago , but you should see that my remark in that thread was a smile remark as i expect most of it did go to plex's.That was a bad investment wich i hadn't had for years so i could only face it with a smile .Something you dont need to say ''sorry' for btw as it is part of the gamble one takes.If you can't handle a loss you shouldn't aim for a win . We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2775	Posted - 2015.03.26 12:00:33 - [4] - Quote d0cTeR9 wrote: flakeys wrote: d0cTeR9 wrote: If you guys could read/hear the jokes about MOA LOL! They are so bad at pvp, it's hilarious :) We like them, they provide easy kills (content) when we are bored lol The best I have seen, is them hot dropping stealth bombers to try to kill a ratting battleship hehe 17 B in kills while in the blob and only one solo kill ever , come on dude if you want to trash others for sucking at pvp at least have a better kb then my trade/research alt has . OHHHHHHH SNAP! I mostly run logi and POS's on this alt! SNAP! But hey good one! Don't let my 2004 alt scare you! Come say hi in fade! Keep on blobing! Gosh i so didn't expect you to say 'boohoo but it's an alt , my main who i don't mention has an awsome record' .Nope totally not ... ow but i did i said my trade/research alt had more kills didn't i .. yup i did. Talking **** about MOA is all fine and dandy but coming from the Alliance that brought us let's undock this kessie full of plex in jita what can go wrong ' and 'sure goons we'll kill our fellow titanmate if you say so' is pure gold. We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2775	Posted - 2015.03.26 14:25:52 - [5] - Quote Joseph Soprano wrote: flakeys wrote: So assuming you meant that one then yes he is investing in pvp.The thing is he is claiming that the damage done was purely because of that investment.Now go look at the MOA killboard and look for the months before gevlon invested last year.Their best months where when he was not even investing.I am not claiming he isn't helping MOA recover their losses , i am however highly doubting that his investment in MOA is actually imrpoving the amount of kills a month as he claims they are. flakeys wrote: Now de-***** the data from the rest of the year 2014 .Compare that with the kills since you have been sponsoring them , make a montly average and tell me how much more kill% your 200 B added. Does this help? http://greedygoblin.blogspot.hu/2014/05/mordus-angels-data.html Yup , that looks like what i was aiming at and if these stats are correct then it seems GG's investment does give an increase to the total damage done.Offcourse it is hard to pinpoint it exaclty as you have to take wardeployements into account and i rrrrrrrreally don't feel like giving that a look . Unlike gevlon i absolutely hate spreadsheets . Well if correct then it does surprise me and my assumption was wrong as to the effect GG's investment has.When you look at the killboard you will notice the total amounts killed per month give another impression but that is before that data is de-whored.As such my first look at the killboards made me think GG's investment had no influence what so ever but with the figures given it seems it does. Still doesn't let me believe it has any reall impact on the CFC though . We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2775	Posted - 2015.03.27 07:32:22 - [6] - Quote d0cTeR9 wrote: flakeys wrote: d0cTeR9 wrote: flakeys wrote: d0cTeR9 wrote: If you guys could read/hear the jokes about MOA LOL! They are so bad at pvp, it's hilarious :) We like them, they provide easy kills (content) when we are bored lol The best I have seen, is them hot dropping stealth bombers to try to kill a ratting battleship hehe 17 B in kills while in the blob and only one solo kill ever , come on dude if you want to trash others for sucking at pvp at least have a better kb then my trade/research alt has . OHHHHHHH SNAP! I mostly run logi and POS's on this alt! SNAP! But hey good one! Don't let my 2004 alt scare you! Come say hi in fade! Keep on blobing! Gosh i so didn't expect you to say 'boohoo but it's an alt , my main who i don't mention has an awsome record' .Nope totally not ... ow but i did i said my trade/research alt had more kills didn't i .. yup i did. Talking **** about MOA is all fine and dandy but coming from the Alliance that brought us let's undock this kessie full of plex in jita what can go wrong ' and 'sure goons we'll kill our fellow titanmate if you say so' is pure gold. Goons do what ever they want... pretty sure no one can stop them, so if you have a problem with goons... take it up with goons? Maybe you can donate to this legendary donation drive As for the titan incident... he got a new one right after sooooooooooooo yeah. But as for your elite blue blob gank of a killboard... huh, good for you! I'm not huge into zerging targets, even though i have plenty of super kills, POS kills, fleet overwhelming kills... but it doesn't mean anything. Well except we have a lot of blue friends to kill everyone The one who has to awox a friend because of light suspicions and does so has a problem with goons but then they mostly have a problem as an Alliance themselves as they trust people from the outside better then their inner circle.I would call that a toxic enviremont. So as such , nope i don't have a problem with goons , never had to do anything i didn't want to because of them so why would i ? We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2776	Posted - 2015.03.28 09:16:02 - [7] - Quote Gevlon Goblin wrote: Since many were curious, how the donation affected MoA, here is a chart of older MoA kills against the minions of Evil: Chart It ends with December, you can add January: 198B, February: 155B. Still sceptical i looked at memberbase assuming that an increase in that would give a higher kb number and would again diminish the investment-effect.Oddly enough since september last year instead of an increase MOA actually had an 18.26 % decrease in members. I'm 'allmost' inclined to believe it does have an effect ... Ah well as long as it keeps you from posting on EN24 then it's all for a good cause .... We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2780	Posted - 2015.03.29 14:00:09 - [8] - Quote Danalee wrote: All sides in this debate are equally funny; Gevlon promoting his burn all the goons schtick and his detractors (mostly goons) posting walls of text to show how little they care. :popcorn time D. You mean like the mercthreads in here battling it out in each others threads how bad the other one is and how good they are , you know marmite and the likes .... wich kinda hurts your sides badly from laughing considering they are battling over ''the high-sec pvp trophy'' . But then my kids also tend to fight over their crappy happy meal gifts , so i can relate to it ... In that regard topics like these are quite in their place in crime and punishment . The cesspool of the eve forum where true heroes are self-claimed every minute , wich probably also is the reason why i like this part of the forums the most. We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2780	Posted - 2015.03.29 14:05:35 - [9] - Quote Alp Khan wrote: Gevlon Goblin wrote: Since many were curious, how the donation affected MoA, here is a chart of older MoA kills against the minions of Evil: Chart It ends with December, you can add January: 198B, February: 155B. Which still blissfully ignores the fluctuations of the MoA corporation numbers, and the individual member size of member corps going in and out from MoA. For a second ignoring all the rest as i'm sure gevlon has some charts laying left and right to counter whatever arguement you have , in the above regard it actually works in his favour.As i said above your post i immediatly had that ide too so i looked up their memberbase changes and since gevlon has been donating the memberbase actually went down by allmost 1/5th . Not surprised the memberbase did went down though as the idea of fighting ''gevlons holy crusade'' , even when accidently , would leave a sour taste among many players.But then on the other side you get to kill goons so it really is choosing for the worst and best in eve when you join MOA at this point. We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2794	Posted - 2015.04.06 07:03:44 - [10] - Quote Berrik Radhok wrote: Gevlon isn't the first crazy neckbeard to promise death to goons, and he won't be the last. Wich reminds me , what was the name of that one guy who sat cloaked in VFK for months last year being thrilled at killing a handfull of T1 haulers and shuttles.He was entertaining on the forums ... and annoying as hell . We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

flakeys Arkham Innovations 2795	Posted - 2015.04.07 09:26:33 - [11] - Quote Gallowmere Rorschach wrote: flakeys wrote: Berrik Radhok wrote: Gevlon isn't the first crazy neckbeard to promise death to goons, and he won't be the last. Wich reminds me , what was the name of that one guy who sat cloaked in VFK for months last year being thrilled at killing a handfull of T1 haulers and shuttles.He was entertaining on the forums ... and annoying as hell . At least Harry actually attacked Deklein. That's more than most of the grr Goons crowd can claim. You are right there .He was more of a village idiot then gevlon though as gevlon at least has the small amount of brains needed to work the market , speaking of own experience here , wich is something harry lacked big time as he showed with his one and only thread in market discussion BUT harry was there all by himself in null-sec trying to 'make a difference ' where as gevlon sits in the safety of a station enviremont trying to do the same. Still , if you look at it from a point of 'making a difference' most would see it as i do that both don't 'do the job enough' but gevlons approach is far more effective.I'm sure gevlon will be busy pointing that out yet again with some new graphs , spreadsheets and more boring crap seeing the recent victory MOA and friends has over the CFC . We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2795	Posted - 2015.04.07 14:46:28 - [12] - Quote Tora Bushido wrote: Gevlon Goblin wrote: Tora Bushido wrote: Today I was the only one who got coffee at work while smiling at this beautiful new Eve day. Tora Bushido : The #1 smiling coffee drinker at my work! So awesome....... get my point ? Sure. Few months ago you were #1 CFC killer, but then you lost your cool and now all you have left is being #1 coffee drinker. You see.... if I put my mind to something, I'll go for the #1 spot every time To bad, you didnt see the point. You could try it with a touch of ''van gaal's '' next time We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2803	Posted - 2015.04.10 08:05:00 - [13] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Akballah Kassan wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Really depends on how you define winning. We're being fed content . . . . . . Well if content is being fed to you perhaps you should take it upon yourself to take advantage of it, because looking at your killboard you sure as hell haven't bothered so far. Indeed, the only time this char (being primarily industrial/trading) takes to PvP is as logi, and that doesn't generate killmails. Luckily, some of us don't actually care where zkb ranks us. Depends , if your mostly talking about how awsome your Alliance is at pvp and how others suck bananas the point comes across better if you do it with a character who doesn't give the impression you yourself are nothing more then a leecher of said Alliance.A bit like saying your group is awsome and the others suck big time while in the same week your group lost a hell of a lot more versus that 'sucky group' while you also outnumbered them twice. But then it's internet spaceships so even if your point is made or not , it's as relevant as to talk about what kind of turd you left at the toilet that morning. Speaking of wich , i need to go to the toilet ... We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2803	Posted - 2015.04.10 10:18:48 - [14] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: flakeys wrote: Depends , if your mostly talking about how awsome your Alliance is at pvp and how others suck bananas the point comes across better if you do it with a character who doesn't give the impression you yourself are nothing more then a leecher of said Alliance.A bit like saying your group is awsome and the others suck big time while in the same week your group lost a hell of a lot more versus that 'sucky group' while you also outnumbered them twice. *We're not though, are we?* At no point have I stated how awesome my alliance is at PvP. What's being addressed here is this mysterious "winning at EVE" metric, which varies from player to player - as far as I'm concerned while I continue to roll around in a ludicrous amount of isk and am able to enjoy playing the game in any way I wish, I'm winning at EVE. This thread is here to insult and ridicule players who still continue to enjoy playing because they've lost some ships to PvP, and it's put up by a player who actively refuses to participate in PvP because he considers players who do that to be morons. At the end of the day, we play the game for entertainment, and the creation and destruction of ships is a massive part of that. If someone else wants to pay for a group to generate more of that entertainment, great! Stretching graphs and bending stats to try to show it as anything more than raw content though is incredibly dumb. People know this, and rather than try to counter properly, or even just agreeing that this is all just content creation, the even weaker choice is made to attack an industrialists killboard stats, like that somehow renders the point moot. Yes you are : d0cTeR9 wrote: If you guys could read/hear the jokes about MOA LOL! They are so bad at pvp, it's hilarious :) We like them, they provide easy kills (content) when we are bored lol The best I have seen, is them hot dropping stealth bombers to try to kill a ratting battleship hehe That's your Alliance mate's words , yours are just how terrible MOA is.He btw also had the excuse of posting on a pve toon. Would be fun to have someone from SMA who's kb actually shows some pvp ability would post.That is assuming you have anyone with that .... We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2803	Posted - 2015.04.10 10:52:19 - [15] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: flakeys wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: flakeys wrote: Depends , if your mostly talking about how awsome your Alliance is at pvp and how others suck bananas the point comes across better if you do it with a character who doesn't give the impression you yourself are nothing more then a leecher of said Alliance.A bit like saying your group is awsome and the others suck big time while in the same week your group lost a hell of a lot more versus that 'sucky group' while you also outnumbered them twice. *We're not though, are we?* At no point have I stated how awesome my alliance is at PvP. What's being addressed here is this mysterious "winning at EVE" metric, which varies from player to player - as far as I'm concerned while I continue to roll around in a ludicrous amount of isk and am able to enjoy playing the game in any way I wish, I'm winning at EVE. This thread is here to insult and ridicule players who still continue to enjoy playing because they've lost some ships to PvP, and it's put up by a player who actively refuses to participate in PvP because he considers players who do that to be morons. At the end of the day, we play the game for entertainment, and the creation and destruction of ships is a massive part of that. If someone else wants to pay for a group to generate more of that entertainment, great! Stretching graphs and bending stats to try to show it as anything more than raw content though is incredibly dumb. People know this, and rather than try to counter properly, or even just agreeing that this is all just content creation, the even weaker choice is made to attack an industrialists killboard stats, like that somehow renders the point moot. Yes you are : d0cTeR9 wrote: If you guys could read/hear the jokes about MOA LOL! They are so bad at pvp, it's hilarious :) We like them, they provide easy kills (content) when we are bored lol The best I have seen, is them hot dropping stealth bombers to try to kill a ratting battleship hehe That's your Alliance mate's words , yours are just how terrible MOA is.He btw also had the excuse of posting on a pve toon. How in any way is that me? Or do I have to be personally responsible for everything said by anyone in my alliance? You said we We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2803	Posted - 2015.04.10 10:58:02 - [16] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: flakeys wrote: Would be fun to have someone from SMA who's kb actually shows some pvp ability would post.That is assuming you have anyone with that .... lol, so I take it from the tone you're quite biased in where you stand here. Quite honestly I don't care who posts, whether you feel they have PvP ability or not. MOA are constantly jumping up and down about how superior they are while they have to be propped up by donations, yet I should for some reason feel bad because nobody from my alliance with a kb that you like wants to post in a troll thread? I stand by my original point. MOA provide entertaining content as I hope we do to them and that's as far as the interaction extends. If a third party wants to pay for that, great, but it doesn't mean anything beyond entertaining content. I agree on the cfontent part and that in the end is the only thing that matters.Don't call me biased though , i have laughed and ridiculed gevlon enough times in this and other threads but why would i pass on ridiculing someone else who starts to show the same grandeure ?I gotta spend my time too eh , trolling is just one of many ways to do that. We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2822	Posted - 2015.04.18 09:34:15 - [17] - Quote SmilingVagrant wrote: Gevlon Goblin wrote: There are 3 observable facts that hint that it's not the case: - Deklein has more ratting than any other region in nullsec. Which means line Goons rat. Do you rat? Because I sure don't and laugh on anyone who presses buttons for pitiful 50M/hour income. Do I rat? No. Have I ratted? Yes. 50M hour doesn't sound like much, but it's honestly closer to 75m/h. Still not much I agree. But you are failing to take into account that this is almost entirely AFK income. I can do it at work having to only check it every 30 minutes or so. SmilingVagrant wrote: erg cz wrote: Hiro Kaichi wrote: Hi, i'm pretty new to the game almost a month in and I was wondering how profitable is it? Right now i'm piloting a Shield Tank Gnosis and I have been able to go there and kill some NPCs but yeah. I need some tips on what to do and such and if the Gnosis is the right ship to use, oh and i'm sorry if this it's in the wrong place but its my first time on the forums -Thanks :D As Goons keep showing you null is not profitable at all. You are slave of some soverenity holding corp so you play as they time schedule you or you are a meat there. You can do some ISK for a while, but than gank comes and you lose pretty much all you have made so far. As I understood, ratting belts NPC is like doing L4 missions in terms of ISK income. So go back to Sinq Laison, find yourself a nice friendly mission agent and start doing missions for him. Same income, less frustraition from local bullies. As I see it null, wormhole or low sec is where you go for PVP fun, not for money. Unless you are in a really good corp and spend each and every evening defending you soverenity space you are pretty much done there. (Hint: I never was in null sec ;) , do they really eat babies in Tribute region?) Ratting belts is garbage tier isk. Anoms is where it's at, but then it's about 75m/h with a lot of red dodging. That's the difference between 'you lot' and gevlon though , he may be dellusional , a tad odd and a spreadsheet freak but at least he is more consistent to the garbage he spouts versus the garbage you guys produce. We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2822	Posted - 2015.04.18 10:09:32 - [18] - Quote Gevlon Goblin wrote: The Midget Ani (obviously a troll reference for The Mittani) donated 10B for the glorious cause! That's almost as much as my donation this month! Follow this example people and the Evil will be cleansed from New Eden! If you would be less spreadsheets online and show yourself to be a bit less of an asshat i'm sure that would happen more.For example stating you laugh at ratters and their measily income per hour whilst you ask the missioners and miners of high-sec to contribute kinda shows you absolutely have no clue how to 'mold people'.Something wich you tend to do quite frequently. I'm sure mittens could teach you a lot there. We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2884	Posted - 2015.05.03 07:10:45 - [19] - Quote Gevlon Goblin wrote: Also, I'm just one man, how on Earth could I destroy a 40K coalition? In 2014 the damage increase of MoA since the donations and the permawar of Marmite caused 5% of CFC losses. +5% damage obviously won't destroy anything. *But imagine 20 Gevlons*. That's +100% damage. That would clearly make difference. Winning 20 v 40000 would be pretty good. SHIVERRRRRRRRR , HELL no . We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2900	Posted - 2015.05.16 20:53:41 - [20] - Quote d0cTeR9 wrote: MMMmmm tears BTW some of your 'fellow' hired lackee's are stuck in NPC stations unable to undock (unless running away in interceptors). Might want to send more content* down! I use the word content very loosely. Every time it's grrr goons, its when blobbing a solo non-pvp ship. Anything else and the content scatters in every direction. It's called grrr goons for a reason , don't worry no one will ever say '' grrr SMA'' .You have more chance of ''who SMA?'' . We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

flakeys Arkham Innovations 2901	Posted - 2015.05.17 11:14:53 - [21] - Quote Syds Sinclair wrote: flakeys wrote: d0cTeR9 wrote: MMMmmm tears BTW some of your 'fellow' hired lackee's are stuck in NPC stations unable to undock (unless running away in interceptors). Might want to send more content* down! I use the word content very loosely. Every time it's grrr goons, its when blobbing a solo non-pvp ship. Anything else and the content scatters in every direction. It's called grrr goons for a reason , don't worry no one will ever say '' grrr SMA'' .You have more chance of ''who SMA?'' , either that or ''lol SMA'' . ..SMA and the rest of the coalition being ok with that is the prime example of the benefits of diplomacy. The entire CFC coalition has decided that banding together and winning is more important then personal glory. If you truly believe that then you are delussional.I didn't believe that before i joined FCON , not when i was in FCON and not after i left FCON.What you meant to say was that the coalition as a whole is fine by one of their members taking the glory and calling the shots.Wich in itself isn't bad , it works as has been shown over the past years , but thinking anyone in that coalition outside of goons can or will not be replaced over time is being verry shortsighted. Simple example being the incident where SMA awoxed one of their own titan pilots because goons told them to as they ''assumed'' he was a spy.Now tell me with a straight face that if it was the other way around , or any of the other coalition members for that matter , goons would do the same.NO ******* way. As said , that's not a bad thing , just don't be so ignorant as to think it is anything more then what it is. We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2901	Posted - 2015.05.17 14:29:41 - [22] - Quote Syds Sinclair wrote: ..Then tell me what it is that contradicts what I said in my previous post. Why would i repeat myself ?I clearly stated the difference and if you don't see it then no harm done . We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2903	Posted - 2015.05.18 07:27:49 - [23] - Quote Syds Sinclair wrote: flakeys wrote: Syds Sinclair wrote: ..Then tell me what it is that contradicts what I said in my previous post. Why would i repeat myself ?I clearly stated the difference and if you don't see it then no harm done . ..It seems as if you would like to disagree for the sake of disagreement. I don't believe either of our posts are in conflict with each other. You wanted to poke at SMA, and I stated that SMA and the other alliances are ok with "Grrr Goons" being the default reaction to CFC victories. You've grown trollish over the past few years =/ Details mate , the above was the middle of your post wich i agreed with and the bottom was sayng everyone was ok with taking a step into the shades for the greater good of the CFC to wich my response was that that claim was false.It's a small detail but one that makes a huge difference as to who get's to call the shots. As for being a troll , i can not help nor care how others perceive my posts.It's just there to pass the time mate , it's not like we are discussing world changing problems . We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2903	Posted - 2015.05.19 12:26:19 - [24] - Quote Strawberry Mooses wrote: Tora Bushido wrote: Lim Yoona wrote: Every single last CFC alliance including goons is waay up or steady growth. So again I ask, where is the progress? People just arent leaving the CFC because they lost a ratting ship, they're not, prove to me otherwise. I wonder where they came from http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Greater_Western_Co-Prosperity_Sphere/corporations http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Fatal_Ascension/corporations Like I said..... Hire Marmites today. The end is near. Ummm. Wat? GWCPS is a renter alliance. We don't even do renters anymore. FA merged into GSF member corps a month ago as well. Keep camping the Amarr undock and grrrrr goning, my love. That is what he was saying .... We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2906	Posted - 2015.05.20 10:57:02 - [25] - Quote Lim Yoona wrote: Gevlon Goblin wrote: how the previous hellcamps affected MoA spoiler: they didnt So riddle me this: if a 13,000 man alliance like GSF cant affect a 1,000 man alliance like MOA then how is MOA supposed to affect/destroy GSF? Even if something catastrophic happened and GSF lost all sov, The Imperium imploded and everyone reset each other then wouldnt GSF become MOA? Living in NPC space like Syndicate or Pure Blind and harassing bigger groups? Yes that sounds familiar because all this has happened before. I know its a longshot expecting or hoping for a logical answer but cmon nobody can be this delusional can they?? Uhm , you're talking to gevlon mate ..... We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
flakeys Arkham Innovations 2983	Posted - 2015.06.01 09:58:27 - [26] - Quote Royally wrote: Ofcourse, its an alt of DBRB that he got into MOA to wreck our kb efficiency or something.... That we only care about our kb is a piece of propaganda the CFC actually started to believe itself. . I think it has more to do with your ''top donator'' showing spreadsheet after spreadsheet how your kb efficiency is doing.It probably also is the reason why DBRB came to the idea of doing it this way. We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.