EVE Search - Desires of the New Order

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Desires of the New Order

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Niobe Song Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 86	Posted - 2015.04.06 20:51:47 - [31] - Quote If CCP really wanted high sec to be "anti-conflict" they would have made it impossible for players even to target and attack other players in high sec.
Paranoid Loyd 4547	Posted - 2015.04.06 20:53:35 - [32] - Quote Kalissa Ropol wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: Why does balance need to be brought to High-sec at all? It creates conflict. Not to get into a game of Why, but why does High Sec need conflict when it was not designed to be as such and other areas of the game are designed as such? It's not the question you asked but the way you asked it that shows what you really think. I refer you to my first post in this thread. "Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata Fix the Prospect!!!
Avaelica Kuershin 19	Posted - 2015.04.06 20:54:13 - [33] - Quote Kalissa Ropol wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: Why does balance need to be brought to High-sec at all? It creates conflict. Not to get into a game of Why, but why does High Sec need conflict when it was not designed to be as such and other areas of the game are designed as such? Ultimately because it is a game of the sandbox type. Not a themepark and most certainly not a place for 'gold-farmers' to afk in. (RP) As to CODE... They are a necessary evil rather like the Amarrian Empire. Liberties are hard won.
Eve Solecist Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 521	Posted - 2015.04.06 20:57:03 - [34] - Quote Paranoid Loyd wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: Why does balance need to be brought to High-sec at all? It creates conflict. Not to get into a game of Why, but why does High Sec need conflict when it was not designed to be as such and other areas of the game are designed as such? It's not the question you asked but the way you asked it that shows what you really think. I refer you to my first post in this thread. I agree... but let's keep this going. This one is one of my better posts. You should see the others ....
Mr Epeen It's All About Me 8311	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:00:03 - [35] - Quote Kalissa Ropol wrote: I cannot admit to having read 100% of what is out there or retaining 100% of what I read, but I donGÇÖt recall seeing anywhere in the manifestos from James315 what he wants Highsec to be like. Here's all you need to understand about James and his CODE dogma: Miner bumping is a scam set up to take a ton of ISK from stupid people while at the same time promoting risk free PVP and trying to sell it as somehow elite. Anything CODE can safely be ignored. Mr Epeen There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass!
John E Normus New Order Logistics CODE. 541	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:00:32 - [36] - Quote Manifesto I Manifesto II Between Ignorance and Wisdom
Eve Solecist Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 521	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:02:00 - [37] - Quote Mr Epeen wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: I cannot admit to having read 100% of what is out there or retaining 100% of what I read, but I donGÇÖt recall seeing anywhere in the manifestos from James315 what he wants Highsec to be like. Here's all you need to understand about James and his CODE dogma: Miner bumping is a scam set up to take a ton of ISK from stupid people while at the same time promoting risk free PVP and trying to sell it as somehow elite. Anything CODE can safely be ignored. Mr Epeen Please don't talk like that ass on the first page. You are better than that. Advising ignornance is a dumb and hatefull thing to do. This one is one of my better posts. You should see the others ....
Mr Epeen It's All About Me 8311	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:04:46 - [38] - Quote Eve Solecist wrote: Mr Epeen wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: I cannot admit to having read 100% of what is out there or retaining 100% of what I read, but I donGÇÖt recall seeing anywhere in the manifestos from James315 what he wants Highsec to be like. Here's all you need to understand about James and his CODE dogma: Miner bumping is a scam set up to take a ton of ISK from stupid people while at the same time promoting risk free PVP and trying to sell it as somehow elite. Anything CODE can safely be ignored. Mr Epeen Please don't talk like that ass on the first page. You are better than that. Advising ignornance is a dumb and hatefull thing to do. Please tell me you didn't actually buy shares, Sol. Mr Epeen There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass!
Hengle Teron Just Another Corp XIV 44947	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:06:05 - [39] - Quote Mr Epeen wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: I cannot admit to having read 100% of what is out there or retaining 100% of what I read, but I donGÇÖt recall seeing anywhere in the manifestos from James315 what he wants Highsec to be like. Here's all you need to understand about James and his CODE dogma: Miner bumping is a scam set up to take a ton of ISK from stupid people while at the same time promoting risk free PVP and trying to sell it as somehow elite. Anything CODE can safely be ignored. Mr Epeen Every time I think you might be a reasonable poster, you turn up and post something like this.
Paranoid Loyd 4547	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:07:23 - [40] - Quote Hengle Teron wrote: Mr Epeen wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: I cannot admit to having read 100% of what is out there or retaining 100% of what I read, but I donGÇÖt recall seeing anywhere in the manifestos from James315 what he wants Highsec to be like. Here's all you need to understand about James and his CODE dogma: Miner bumping is a scam set up to take a ton of ISK from stupid people while at the same time promoting risk free PVP and trying to sell it as somehow elite. Anything CODE can safely be ignored. Mr Epeen Every time I think you might be a reasonable poster, you turn up and post something like this. And that's exactly why he posts things like this. "Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata Fix the Prospect!!!
Eve Solecist Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 524	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:09:35 - [41] - Quote Mr Epeen wrote: Eve Solecist wrote: Mr Epeen wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: I cannot admit to having read 100% of what is out there or retaining 100% of what I read, but I donGÇÖt recall seeing anywhere in the manifestos from James315 what he wants Highsec to be like. Here's all you need to understand about James and his CODE dogma: Miner bumping is a scam set up to take a ton of ISK from stupid people while at the same time promoting risk free PVP and trying to sell it as somehow elite. Anything CODE can safely be ignored. Mr Epeen Please don't talk like that ass on the first page. You are better than that. Advising ignornance is a dumb and hatefull thing to do. Please tell me you didn't actually buy shares, Sol. Mr Epeen I would never. :) Still ... there needs to be a line that seperates actual people from the haters and it shouldn't be too blurry. In general, advising ignorance is a bad and hatefull thing to do. It spawns only more ignorance and you yourself see what that brings us. More haters. More stupid. More self entitlement. This one is one of my better posts. You should see the others ....
Candi LeMew Isogen 5 26429	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:09:37 - [42] - Quote All these RP references in CODE threads make me cringe. I mean, sure, technically we're all RPing to some extent when we login but nothing worse than when someone notices you're a RPer and says something like "Oh, RP? Yeah I met some CODE guys once." headdesk Please don't confuse it with the 'dedicated' RP community itself, per say. Having said that, I have no problem with what CODE does personally. A lot of us love blowing things up just because it's there and enjoy attaching fun reasoning to it. At the end of the day no part of space is ever meant to be completely safe and people like blowing other people up everywhere in EVE for essentially the same reason. It's fun, and conflict is what this game is about. =ƒÉÆ Bob Is Always Watching ... Jack Miton > everyone knows im the best dusette "I been kicked out of better homes than this" - Rick James GÖ¬ -ér-à-ò-é -ôew, -ôear none, -òave yo-àr love -ôor only one.
Eve Solecist Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 524	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:11:16 - [43] - Quote Banana. ^_^ This one is one of my better posts. You should see the others ....
Tuttomenui II Aliastra Gallente Federation 292	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:14:14 - [44] - Quote Kalissa Ropol wrote: Eve Solecist wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: I donGÇÖt necessarily have anything negative to say about them ganking what looks like a valid bot. It is when you carry that attitude to all people in high sec are helping bots by allowing bots to hide in plain sight I think they have lost their way. Why not just admit that they are a high sec suicide squad there to cause mayhem, because that is what they currently do according to their killboard. Based on what I have read on the site my alt wasnGÇÖt even offered an opportunity to pay the 10 mill a year. So low I presume itGÇÖs a joke and a scam for those stupid enough to pay it. It's a game. Do you understand that? If yes, do you understand that in a game there is kind of a point to play followers of a cult, when the game allows you to do so for fun? Just checking if you are one of those wackos who can't seperate game from RL ...... And the fee exists because GMs demanded it. There is a thread about bumping in C&P. Not sure why you are quoting me here as I am not opposed to CODEs originally stated goal - I think it is a very valiant position to take. I do take issue with how the mandate has grown such that the original vision of CODE no longer applies. But as the Code says it is a living document and subject to change. I believe we all know that EVE is a game and everyone is able to play how they want in the sandbox. I never said that CODE should not do what pleases it. You have to have fun. The argument these threads normally get to is that their fun is wrecking my fun - which is a valid statement. How is real life applicable to anything in EVE? Why bring this up? So if someone pays 10 mil to CODE, is there some database you enter the name in and you cant be ganked anymore? Is that even a realistic thing that would be recognized by the GM? Is there some link to prove this statement? I'm not complaining about bumping or being ganked. I am simply asking to what end does the CODE serve other than to justify to their selves ganking people. Maybe it has evolved beyond the control of james315. Like the experiment in 'The Wave' getting out of hand.
Black Pedro Yammerschooner 822	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:15:02 - [45] - Quote Kalissa Ropol wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: Why does balance need to be brought to High-sec at all? It creates conflict. Not to get into a game of Why, but why does High Sec need conflict when it was not designed to be as such and other areas of the game are designed as such? You need to check your premises. Highsec was always intended to have conflict - that is why CCP put ganking and wardecs into the game. They are not mistakes and have been there from the beginning. Ganking could be removed from highsec with no effort at all on CCP's side yet they don't. Why? Because highsec ISK not intended to be safesec. There are very good reasons related to risk vs. reward as to why there should not be a risk- and conflict-free in a sandbox game which James 315 covers better than I could in his manifestos and elsewhere. But the main point is that many people, including the developers at CCP, think the game is better off with risk and conflict in highsec.
Chewytowel Haklar Project RESET 135	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:15:17 - [46] - Quote I personally thought they just liked the idea of shooting miners and freighters because they avoid taking part in any other aspect of the game. This was an attempt at getting them out of their shell perhaps? And perhaps it was also to create content?
Kalissa Ropol Aliastra Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:25:27 - [47] - Quote Black Pedro wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: Why does balance need to be brought to High-sec at all? It creates conflict. Not to get into a game of Why, but why does High Sec need conflict when it was not designed to be as such and other areas of the game are designed as such? You need to check your premises. Highsec was always intended to have conflict - that is why CCP put ganking and wardecs into the game. They are not mistakes and have been there from the beginning. Ganking could be removed from highsec with no effort at all on CCP's side yet they don't. Why? Because highsec ISK not intended to be safesec. There are very good reasons related to risk vs. reward as to why there should not be a risk- and conflict-free in a sandbox game which James 315 covers better than I could in his manifestos and elsewhere. But the main point is that many people, including the developers at CCP, think the game is better off with risk and conflict in highsec. He actually does not cover it better, hence the original question.
Paranoid Loyd 4547	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:28:53 - [48] - Quote Did you read the manifestos John linked? You couldn't possibly "cover" it any better than that. "Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata Fix the Prospect!!!
Tyberius Franklin Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 1386	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:33:11 - [49] - Quote Paranoid Loyd wrote: Did you read the manifestos John linked? You couldn't possibly "cover" it any better than that. James' manifestos are really rather lacking in content compared to their word count. I'd hate to sentence anyone to trudge through them for deeper meaning.
Paranoid Loyd 4548	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:38:59 - [50] - Quote Yes, I know reading lots of words is hard and it's even harder to read between the lines. "Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata Fix the Prospect!!!
Kalissa Ropol Aliastra Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:39:54 - [51] - Quote Paranoid Loyd wrote: Did you read the manifestos John linked? You couldn't possibly "cover" it any better than that. Sure did. One is from 2011 the other from 2012 and deal only with mining and how everyone in high sec should die because they could be or may as well be bots. Near the end of his second manifesto it talks about why. Now they are long, he likes to use really long sentence structures which is fine, hes preaching, but lets ask the serious question. What does High Sec look like when all the PvE is gone? Where would you rather be? In sov protected by known friends and enemies and the ability to fight back or stuck in high sec where you cant fight back without going full boar war dec. I see that as my problem with it all. If you could be proactive and kill CODE before they got to -5 then sure, but you can't/ And I dont mean to limit that statement to CODE, that is not a fair comment. The ability to be proactive against anyone of negative standing regardless if they are criminal or not. I shouldn't even have to think about if Id rather mission protected by CONCORD or in Sov. Now CONCORD isn't protection, its Punishment, but it does not really punish at all when you get down to the risk isk reward part of it all.
Nerath Naaris Pink Winged Unicorns for Peace Love and Anarchy 985	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:39:59 - [52] - Quote I have yet to see definite proof that CODE ganks miners that obey and adhere to THE CODE. What I do see, though, is miners that believe paying 10 million ISK allows them to continue their AFK-behavior. Now I am not a member of CODE but I do think that not holding a mining permit while doing at-keyboard mining in a properly fitted ship is a lot more important than the other way round. That said, miners also seem unable to understand that CODE might actually work in their favour by eliminating their competition and thus potentially raising the mineral prices. Instead, apparently most miners choose to cling to some unwarranted "solitarity".... Hell, if I would ever actually start mining (not likely), I would set up a second account just to gank anyone else mining in my belt. Forum-unbanned since 2011.10.20.
Kalissa Ropol Aliastra Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:45:09 - [53] - Quote Nerath Naaris wrote: I have yet to see definite proof that CODE ganks miners that obey and adhere to THE CODE. What I do see, though, is miners that believe paying 10 million ISK allows them to continue their AFK-behavior. Now I am not a member of CODE but I do think that not holding a mining permit while doing at-keyboard mining in a properly fitted ship is a lot more important than the other way round. That said, miners also seem unable to understand that CODE might actually work in their favour by eliminating their competition and thus potentially raising the mineral prices. Instead, apparently most miners choose to cling to some unwarranted "solitarity".... Hell, if I would ever actually start mining (not likely), I would set up a second account just to gank anyone else mining in my belt. Well it was said earlier that the Code is actually meaningless to CODE. So 10 mill or not, if they want to they will gank you for just being there.
Tyberius Franklin Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 1386	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:45:57 - [54] - Quote Paranoid Loyd wrote: Yes, I know reading lots of words is hard and it's even harder to read between the lines. I've read them both. It wasn't hard, there just wasn't anything there to justify the time investment. Maybe because James takes a strange detour from the simple reasoning that ganking is part of the game and thus in need of no justification.
Paranoid Loyd 4548	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:48:39 - [55] - Quote Kalissa Ropol wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: Did you read the manifestos John linked? You couldn't possibly "cover" it any better than that. Sure did. One is from 2011 the other from 2012 and deal only with mining and how everyone in high sec should die because they could be or may as well be bots. Near the end of his second manifesto it talks about why. Now they are long, he likes to use really long sentence structures which is fine, hes preaching, but lets ask the serious question. What does High Sec look like when all the PvE is gone? Where would you rather be? In sov protected by known friends and enemies and the ability to fight back or stuck in high sec where you cant fight back without going full boar war dec. If these are your thoughts after reading what he wrote, you either didn't read what he wrote or you did but failed to understand it. Kalissa Ropol wrote: I see that as my problem with it all. If you could be proactive and kill CODE before they got to -5 then sure, but you can't/ And I dont mean to limit that statement to CODE, that is not a fair comment. The ability to be proactive against anyone of negative standing regardless if they are criminal or not. I shouldn't even have to think about if Id rather mission protected by CONCORD or in Sov. Now CONCORD isn't protection, its Punishment, but it does not really punish at all when you get down to the risk isk reward part of it all. I shoot criminals, not all the time but I do, usually when they are annoying me and occasionally when there is nothing else around to shoot. It's really not hard to hunt them, but it does require more effort than shooting rocks. "Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata Fix the Prospect!!!
Kalissa Ropol Aliastra Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.04.06 21:50:32 - [56] - Quote Paranoid Loyd wrote: ...snip... I admit I may miss his point because he meanders alot and never says anything directly.
Eve Solecist Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 537	Posted - 2015.04.06 22:06:15 - [57] - Quote Kalissa Ropol wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: Did you read the manifestos John linked? You couldn't possibly "cover" it any better than that. Sure did. One is from 2011 the other from 2012 and deal only with mining and how everyone in high sec should die because they could be or may as well be bots. Near the end of his second manifesto it talks about why. Now they are long, he likes to use really long sentence structures which is fine, hes preaching, but lets ask the serious question. What does High Sec look like when all the PvE is gone? Where would you rather be? In sov protected by known friends and enemies and the ability to fight back or stuck in high sec where you cant fight back without going full boar war dec. I see that as my problem with it all. If you could be proactive and kill CODE before they got to -5 then sure, but you can't/ And I dont mean to limit that statement to CODE, that is not a fair comment. The ability to be proactive against anyone of negative standing regardless if they are criminal or not. I shouldn't even have to think about if Id rather mission protected by CONCORD or in Sov. Now CONCORD isn't protection, its Punishment, but it does not really punish at all when you get down to the risk isk reward part of it all. Everyone can fight back. People can group up. People can create alts to gank the gankers, or gank the lootwrecks if it's gate gankers. AFK people generally can't be proactive though ... ... and thus they die, because they should have known better. People asking for more security are those who deserve it the least, because they are the ones neglecting it in the first place. This is the most important part the haters conviniently ignore. Furthermore isn't there enough suicide ganking going on to halt anything at all. This one is one of my better posts. You should see the others ....
Vic Jefferson The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple 230	Posted - 2015.04.06 22:14:49 - [58] - Quote Jade Blackwind wrote: Kalissa Ropol wrote: what is it that CODE desires Highsec to be like? I think they want it removed. Then they would have no content. I would think they rather enjoy their killmail farm. Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X
Ned Thomas Signal Cartel EvE-Scout Enclave 1511	Posted - 2015.04.06 22:21:15 - [59] - Quote Haven't been keeping up....is this different enough from other code/ganking threads to warrent a read? Don't get lost alone - Join Signal Cartel, New Eden's premier haven for explorers! Onward to Thera with Eve Scout
Aphsala Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 42	Posted - 2015.04.06 22:21:22 - [60] - Quote Hopefully with the introduction of new structures, but more importantly the modules you can place in said structures, gradually we will see a decline, an eventual elimination of, "security" rated space I envision the full of New Eden being nothing but Null space with us the players having the tools to build an have our space the way wee want it, the quicker the illusion of hi and low security is dispersed the better. I've also been known to be really wrong alot :D

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,06s, ref 20250925/0935
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.