|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.07 08:23:00 -
[1]
Well so far I like all the BCs, Drake may be not overpowered, but overtanked.
All I can say is touch the Hurricane and I'll kill you!!! I love that ship, everything I hoped for! All I have to say.
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.11 17:07:00 -
[2]
Quote: It's a very cheap and insurable vaga.
God forbid that something might actually drive Vaga prices down, besides you can place those same stabilizers on a Vaga, try it, I did it's nuts.
Players have been doing that for ages, look at the Nano-phoon, it can fly cicles around any BC and almost most crusiers, it's one tactic in a million that one can have.
Besides the fact that, to me, is not a very viable setup, I'd much rather have a decent tank (Armor) then orbit beyond the tracking of my ACs.
People can setup there ships how they want and I'd happily take a nice tanked Hurricane to fight a 'Vaganized' Hurricane (or for that matter any BC with stabilizers).
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 01:34:00 -
[3]
Ya know it's not very often I get mad at a game or something done to a game, because it's just that but screwing up the hurricane, yeah that's just pitiful... I really hope people don't let this one die.
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 20:15:00 -
[4]
Yup the myr could use more drone bay, insted of always taking the nice ships and nefring them to mach the not so nice, do the opposite for once. Try it you might like it, I know we sure would.
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 23:45:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Protunia Edited by: Protunia on 17/11/2006 22:05:50
Originally by: Derran This may sound off the wall as I am not great with graphs and math, etc, but since only half the BCs seemed designed with firepower in mind and the other half had tanking ability, why not make them both with bonuses that affect their damage ability since there were supposed to be originally all about damage from what Tux originally said about them.
Drake: 5% RoF bonus per level, 10% Kinetic Missile Damage per level Hurricane: 5% RoF bonus per level, 5% projectile turret damage per level (original bonus) Harbinger: 10% Laser turret damage per level, 10% Laser cap bonus per level (to please you amarrian sobs) Myrmidon: 15% drone damage and HP per level, 10% drone MWD speed per level? (shooting in the dark there)
Harbringer: 15% bonus to thermal damage per lvl, 10% reduction in laser cap usage.
Hurricane: as it was before
Myridon: 10% Drone hp and damage per level, 15% increase in drone bay size per level
Drake: 5% ROF for Missile launchers, 5% damage increase for Missile Launchers per level
Hows that?
um 25 m3 drone bay per level then maybe. the rest can sink far as im concerned.
Sounds good to me, I'd like to see an amarr ship with a thermal bonus, my alt is amarr it would be fun!
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.18 04:39:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Kaylana Syi I am sorry TUX but to be quite frank the changes to the hurricane and drake are very rubbish.
The biggest problem to cruisers and battlecruisers would be the ability to fit oversized plates. The resistance bonus on the drake is obscene but not more obscene than clipping a launcher and adding a kinetic bonus to missiles. A kinetic bonus AND rate of fire on 7 launchers would have been better.
The hurricane should have staid the same and you should do something about oversized armor plates as well as adding more sig radius to shield extenders.
Fix it please.
/QFT
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.18 15:28:00 -
[7]
All I ever remember is people saying the drake was SLIGHTLY overpowered, and the myr needs more drone. I saw very little mention of the Hurricane and Harbringer, again the problem is the tank not the damage.
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.22 14:33:00 -
[8]
50m3 drone space for the Hurricane? Heck no! The point is we want a ship that is a single weapon platform. Minmatar already have enough split weapons almost every ship, last thing needed is another ship to use Projectile, missile, and Drones on.
Just put back the 7th turret and all is happy. I understand the PG nerf and it's fine but the turret nope. All that's going to happen is it's going to get 2 missiles or 2 nos.
As far as I'm concerned give back the 7th, and take away all launcher slots, don't need em, just want a one weapon platform ship.
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.24 17:30:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Amy Wang Does anyone really think the Hurricane would be overpowered if it got its grid reverted back to pre nerf value while the 6 turret layot stays?
I say the nerf was over the top and the ship needs its grid back.
Screw the grid, I want the turret.
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 16:21:00 -
[10]
If the drake has 7 launchers, then I'm not going to stand for the hurricane with 6!
I can fit 6 425s (6 720s), with 2 t2 gyros, and 5 orge IIs on a myrmidon with a tank, but can't fit 7 on a hurricane, that's absurd.
Give it 7 turrets, no lauchers and no extra PG!
|
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 19:30:00 -
[11]
It's about gank not tank, there are plenty of ways to make 720s work.
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 04:42:00 -
[12]
I hate to say it, but the tank on these caldari ships is to the point of silly, I can get 18000 shield with a 400 recharge and 70%+ on all resits totally passive tank, including passive hardeners with a full rack of heavy missiles!
Yeah....
|
Atar
Perpetua Umbra Brotherhood Of Steel
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 16:50:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Leandro Salazar I can't believe they really have the gall to give the Drake back its 7th launcher and NOT the hurricane its 7th turret. Thats like holding up a big sign saying 'We offically hate Minmatar'. What's next, Drake gets back its RoF bonus and Hurricane gets back its 50 PG to balance that?
To True! I just cannot understand how we are saying give a 7th turret back and TAKE AWAY all launchers how that will ever unbalance the hurricane is beyond me, we are asking to take away damage, becasue now we can have 6 turrets and 2 launchers. The idea here isn't more damage it's one weapon type, I have 9mil in gunnery I don't want to or should need to train up missiles too, carry around 2 types of ammo (4 damage type for missiles) For god sake give us a one weapon ship. This isn't whining this is common sense!
|
|
|
|