EVE Search - All Hail The New King of Blasters In Gangs

All Channels

Ships and Modules

All Hail The New King of Blasters In Gangs

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Tsar Maul	Posted - 2006.10.26 12:47:00 - [1] Rokh Neutron II x 8 MWD II x 1 XL Booster II x 1 Boost Amp x 1 Invul II x 2 Heavy Elec Cap Booster x 1 RCU x 1 Internal DC x 1 Magfield II x 3 9km optimal and 12.5k falloff before ammo, 66/86/79/73 resistances.
starship enginer	Posted - 2006.10.26 12:52:00 - [2] needs a webber range will be nice, and your 9km is off, you forgot the +10% range of the ship, before ammo its 13.5km optimal. with null that is 20.25km optimal and 12.5km falloff with 20km optimal you probably dont need a mwd though which is nice oh and the hyp is still much better, and also the megathron, although it might be a nice suprise expecting it to snipe yet it hits close
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.10.26 12:54:00 - [3] hehe, does this actually fit?
Kunming Amarr adeptus gattacus Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:01:00 - [4] Raven does more dmg at the same range, tanks better too
MECTO	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:03:00 - [5] Originally by: Kunming Raven does more dmg at the same range, tanks better too meh, u don't read forums this days? It's Great Being Carebear in Kali - aint it? Originally by: Tuxford In this picture you might think that Gallente totally pwn. Well they're alright
Old Geeza The Retirement Home	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:05:00 - [6] Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 26/10/2006 12:57:15 hehe, does this actually fit? nvm, just ran some calculations and this thing does LESS DPS than an electron II hyperion. and it cant scram/web... unimpressed 1. It's a gang setup. No need for web/tackle as you should have support. 2. It has a full tank and 3 damage mods and a damage control. Please show me the Megathron or the Hyperion do that 3. Range. With Null it'll be able to sit on a gate and will be in range to do full dps to anything that jumps through without having to move. _______________________________________ Sign the petition against jump queues!
Tsar Maul	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:06:00 - [7] Originally by: Old Geeza Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 26/10/2006 12:57:15 hehe, does this actually fit? nvm, just ran some calculations and this thing does LESS DPS than an electron II hyperion. and it cant scram/web... unimpressed 1. It's a gang setup. No need for web/tackle as you should have support. 2. It has a full tank and 3 damage mods and a damage control. Please show me the Megathron or the Hyperion do that 3. Range. With Null it'll be able to sit on a gate and will be in range to do full dps to anything that jumps through without having to move. ^^ The thread was more to laugh at the current problems Gallente are having trying to fit a hyperion and to show the Tuxford that there is a reason why Caldari railships don't get a full rack of turrets.
lofty29 Tolarri Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:07:00 - [8] Originally by: Old Geeza 3. Range. With Null it'll be able to sit on a gate and will be in range to do full dps to anything that jumps through without having to move. As can a megathron It's useless with blasters tbh. Over 20km you cant scram (sensibly ) and definately cant web. --- Praxiteles Inc. is Recruiting!
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:12:00 - [9] Originally by: Old Geeza Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 26/10/2006 12:57:15 hehe, does this actually fit? nvm, just ran some calculations and this thing does LESS DPS than an electron II hyperion. and it cant scram/web... unimpressed 1. It's a gang setup. No need for web/tackle as you should have support. 2. It has a full tank and 3 damage mods and a damage control. Please show me the Megathron or the Hyperion do that 3. Range. With Null it'll be able to sit on a gate and will be in range to do full dps to anything that jumps through without having to move. Well I can fit a Hype with a shield tank and fitting mods, call it a 'gang ship' and totally own your little Rokh with about 50% more DPS.
Old Geeza The Retirement Home	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:18:00 - [10] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Old Geeza Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 26/10/2006 12:57:15 hehe, does this actually fit? nvm, just ran some calculations and this thing does LESS DPS than an electron II hyperion. and it cant scram/web... unimpressed 1. It's a gang setup. No need for web/tackle as you should have support. 2. It has a full tank and 3 damage mods and a damage control. Please show me the Megathron or the Hyperion do that 3. Range. With Null it'll be able to sit on a gate and will be in range to do full dps to anything that jumps through without having to move. Well I can fit a Hype with a shield tank and fitting mods, call it a 'gang ship' and totally own your little Rokh with about 50% more DPS. Good. Except, with 5 mids, you're either going to cap out (no injector), have a rubbish tank (3 slot tank \o/) or have no speed mod. Also, you'll be losing your tanking bonus. As for owning the Rokh with 50% more dps, the last time I checked having identical turrets as another ship but with a 25% damage bonus gives you about 25% more DPS. I suggest you try the for beginners section of the forums if you want to "win" with made-up facts like that. _______________________________________ Sign the petition against jump queues!
Magunus The Forsakened Few The ARR0W Project	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:25:00 - [11] Originally by: Twilight Moon Isn't the tracking on that going to be pure crap? Lock time isn't going to be all that great either. --- In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. -- Douglas Adams, 'The Restaurant at the End of the Universe'
Twilight Moon Minmatar Malicious Intentions	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:25:00 - [12] Isn't the tracking on that going to be pure crap? ...on the other hand using a banana might be a viable alternative.
Razin	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:32:00 - [13] Originally by: Twilight Moon Isn't the tracking on that going to be pure crap? Same as on Hype, though Rohk's optimal bonus would allow to engage at longer range making it better. ...
Twilight Moon Minmatar Malicious Intentions	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:32:00 - [14] Edited by: Twilight Moon on 26/10/2006 13:33:32 Originally by: Magunus Originally by: Twilight Moon Isn't the tracking on that going to be pure crap? Lock time isn't going to be all that great either. Hmm, can one Heavy Cap Booster even sustain 8 x Neutrons, and those shield mid lots? Don't get me wrong, I'd love to use a Blaster Rokh (because that ship model is like something out of Babylon 5) but it just didn't seem like such a wise idea to me. ...on the other hand using a banana might be a viable alternative.
Magunus The Forsakened Few The ARR0W Project	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:39:00 - [15] Originally by: Twilight Moon Edited by: Twilight Moon on 26/10/2006 13:33:32 Originally by: Magunus Originally by: Twilight Moon Isn't the tracking on that going to be pure crap? Lock time isn't going to be all that great either. Hmm, can one Heavy Cap Booster even sustain 8 x Neutrons, and those shield mid lots? Don't get me wrong, I'd love to use a Blaster Rokh (because that ship model is like something out of Babylon 5) but it just didn't seem like such a wise idea to me. Correct, it should be able to sustain it for about 80 seconds. If you don't use the shield booster at all, it should run forever, but that wouldn't happen. --- In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. -- Douglas Adams, 'The Restaurant at the End of the Universe'
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.10.26 13:39:00 - [16] Originally by: Old Geeza Good. Except, with 5 mids, you're either going to cap out (no injector), have a rubbish tank (3 slot tank \o/) or have no speed mod. Also, you'll be losing your tanking bonus. As for owning the Rokh with 50% more dps, the last time I checked having identical turrets as another ship but with a 25% damage bonus gives you about 25% more DPS. I suggest you try the for beginners section of the forums if you want to "win" with made-up facts like that. Well with Null and in a gang with webber you don't need a speed mod. Also its vastly more agile than the Rohk anyway. Bascially, you can adapt any ship to be 'good in a gang' with bizarre setups, but the point here is that the Rohk is a crappy blasterboat and nothing you say or do is going to change that fact. You're totally right about the DPS thing though, dunno why i put 50%, not concentrating. But still, 25% is a lot more damage. You wont need an uber shield tank when you are ripping through the opponents that much quicker. Also, you can fit two LAR II, EANM II, two RCU II and as you are in a gang you can use the mids for painting/damping. So whatever the circumstances or setup, the hyperion is a vastly superior blasterboat than the rohk. Fact.
Nicose Caldari Wreckless Abandon	Posted - 2006.10.26 14:04:00 - [17] lol this reminds me of the "blaster eagle's are crappy threads" ppl just have no imagination. sheild tanking blaster boats 4TW!
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.10.26 14:12:00 - [18] Originally by: Nicose lol this reminds me of the "blaster eagle's are crappy threads" ppl just have no imagination. sheild tanking blaster boats 4TW! Its not crap, just nowhere near as good as the Hype
Galen Silas Gallente Digital assassins	Posted - 2006.10.26 14:34:00 - [19] Sorry, i just dont see this becoming the king of blasters. Range bonus is nice but you stick blasters on something like an astarte ormega, theres the king of blasters, you will have the range bonus but not the damage output your gonna want.
Galen Silas Gallente Digital assassins	Posted - 2006.10.26 14:35:00 - [20] plus, if you use a tracking distruptor II on large blasters, or any large gun for that matter and you keep moving its hard to hit anything BC or smaller
Bazman Caldari Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.10.26 14:48:00 - [21] Whether it is as good as a Hype or Astarte is neither here nor there, a Blaster Rohk is quite simply one of the most dangerous concepts I've seen for a Blasterboat. Shield Tanked, Cap Injected with Neutrons spitting out gank level firepower (Even without a damage bonus) It's a nice surprise setup, and I think you will see this beating a few of the less wary hyperion and Mega pilots. It will even challenge a skilled Thron pilot. Don't dismiss it just because its not designated a blasterboat. Just look at Blaster Eagles vs Deimos' if you want a similar example. ----- Hi TUXFORD! Blasterboat for tier 3 Gallente battleship please! Make it look cool too. Thanks. I am a Gallente Whiner. Minmatar Whining is currently in training.
Tsar Maul	Posted - 2006.10.26 14:54:00 - [22] Btw, I copyright the name Blokh :P
Toaster Oven	Posted - 2006.10.26 14:55:00 - [23] Originally by: Twilight Moon Isn't the tracking on that going to be pure crap? Compare with maxed skills: Rokh with Neutron Blaster II and Null Optimal: 16.875 km Falloff: 15.625 km Tracking: .0270625 rad/s Armageddon with Mega Pulse II and Conflag Optimal: 15 km Falloff: 10 km Tracking: .016875 rad/s LOL, still 60% better tracking and better range than Gankageddon
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.10.26 14:59:00 - [24] Originally by: Toaster Oven Originally by: Twilight Moon Isn't the tracking on that going to be pure crap? Compare with maxed skills: Rokh with Neutron Blaster II and Null Optimal: 16.875 km Falloff: 15.625 km Tracking: .0270625 rad/s Armageddon with Mega Pulse II and Conflag Optimal: 15 km Falloff: 10 km Tracking: .016875 rad/s LOL, still 60% better tracking and better range than Gankageddon Why are you comparing Null to Conflag?
Bazman Caldari Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.10.26 15:01:00 - [25] Originally by: Toaster Oven Originally by: Twilight Moon Isn't the tracking on that going to be pure crap? Compare with maxed skills: Rokh with Neutron Blaster II and Null Optimal: 16.875 km Falloff: 15.625 km Tracking: .0270625 rad/s Armageddon with Mega Pulse II and Conflag Optimal: 15 km Falloff: 10 km Tracking: .016875 rad/s LOL, still 60% better tracking and better range than Gankageddon Compare it to Scorch crystals, or Gleam, nm, never bothered with amarr :P ----- Hi TUXFORD! Blasterboat for tier 3 Gallente battleship please! Make it look cool too. Thanks. I am a Gallente Whiner. Minmatar Whining is currently in training.
Toaster Oven	Posted - 2006.10.26 15:01:00 - [26] Originally by: Butter Dog Why are you comparing Null to Conflag? Because if you're going to use either ship to sit on a gate and gank some passing fool, that's what ammo you'd pick.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.10.26 15:04:00 - [27] Originally by: Toaster Oven Originally by: Butter Dog Why are you comparing Null to Conflag? Because if you're going to use either ship to sit on a gate and gank some passing fool, that's what ammo you'd pick. I would have thought Scorch would be better.
Toaster Oven	Posted - 2006.10.26 15:04:00 - [28] Originally by: Bazman Compare it to Scorch crystals Scorch and Null may be in the same class of ammo, but you wouldn't use em in the same way here. It's a pointless comparison. Besides, with 82% of your dmg as EM, Scorch is just LOLtastic against armor tanks
Twilight Moon Minmatar Malicious Intentions	Posted - 2006.10.26 15:04:00 - [29] Originally by: Twilight Moon Isn't the tracking on that going to be pure crap? I meant in comparison to the Megathron. ...on the other hand using a banana might be a viable alternative.
Toaster Oven	Posted - 2006.10.26 15:09:00 - [30] Originally by: Butter Dog I would have thought Scorch would be better. Then it's obvious you've never used Scorch. Any dual LAR omnitanked BS can fully absorb a Gankageddon's dmg when using Scorch crystals. It's stupidly EM biased which makes it useless except for paper comparisons.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.