| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Pavel Bidermann
whips chains and ballgags Care Factor
28
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 06:58:00 -
[61] - Quote
Confirming low sec is terrible mining. There's no depth of defense in low sec. High sec has no depth to intel so it's a challenge there too. Ganking isn't new. Null has both depth of intel and depth of defense so much safer. That makes null potentially safer to mine. Again though, you own alliance will probably kill you so it's best not to start.  |

Perdomo Solymani
Aces wild mining corporation The I.D.E.A.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 07:22:00 -
[62] - Quote
I feel the ore is being largely forgotten in this conversation. You can't PvP ore out of an asteroid. It needs to come out somehow. And people use those minerals to make stuff. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
73
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 08:07:00 -
[63] - Quote
Perdomo Solymani wrote:I feel the ore is being largely forgotten in this conversation. You can't PvP ore out of an asteroid. It needs to come out somehow. And people use those minerals to make stuff.
*coughcough*Drone Regions*coughcoughcoughcoughcough* *coughGASPcoughcoughcoughcough* |

Valei Khurelem
Khurelem Corporation
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 08:10:00 -
[64] - Quote
So you're complaining that high sec players are smart enough to stay entirely out of low sec and 0.0 altogether while making plenty of ISK there and so you're resorting to gate camping 24/7 in order to blow up a ship or two because people won't play your version of what the game should be anymore?
Yeah, that makes sense, frankly I think all these gankers are complaining that the industrials and miners have beaten them at their own game, the only difference is CONCORD is doing their ganking for them. |

Ten Bulls
Sons of Olsagard
14
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 09:32:00 -
[65] - Quote
Hellen Kurvora wrote:It is risk equals reward.
Hang on a minute, can you explain "risk equals reward" to me ?
If i fly my retriever out to low sec, thats risky becasue i might got blown up, does that mean i qualify for a reward... is it a good reward... what do i get, what do i get... i want it now, please can i have it now ?
Or do you mean Risk v's Reward ? |

Anshio Tamark
Avitus Lugus
37
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 09:55:00 -
[66] - Quote
And what if we actually like being in High-sec? What about the corps that don't have enough members to protect their mining fleets in null-sec? You do realize that there's a reason miners stay the **** out of low-sec and null-sec, right? |

Anshio Tamark
Avitus Lugus
37
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 09:57:00 -
[67] - Quote
Pavel Bidermann wrote:Again though, you own alliance will probably kill you so it's best not to start.  And what exactly would such an alliance gain from shooting their own? Free space in the member-register? The way I choose to see it, alliances are meant to be groups of players who work together to achieve a common goal, not just blow eachother up for fun and no profit. |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation
226
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 10:12:00 -
[68] - Quote
Hellen Kurvora wrote:
Well, we are making more isk out here at the gate then the guys complaining in high sec and getting suicide ganked. No probs here. Just would be more fun with some more variety and people with some balls to fight.
Wanna bet? |

Lucien Visteen
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
49
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 10:16:00 -
[69] - Quote
Suicide gankers still don't impress me. Maybe they will if they start to go after mission runners. For now though they are nothing but hot air trying to be cool. The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't. |

RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
73
|
Posted - 2011.12.05 13:11:00 -
[70] - Quote
Lucien Visteen wrote:Suicide gankers still don't impress me. Maybe they will if they start to go after mission runners. For now though they are nothing but hot air trying to be cool.
Suicide gankers take out loot pi+Ķata Tengus and BSes all the time. They're easier than freighters due to their lack of EHP. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |