Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Celly S
Concord Attraction Services
361
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 23:24:50 -
[121] - Quote
Whisker Lickins wrote: I had a rorqual ORE edition parked in a POS ship maintenance area. The rorqual is still there, but the skins is gone, I looked everywhere.
Anyone have any idea where it could be?
in market deliveries area of your corp's home station...
o/ Celly Smunt
Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal.
Perception is unique in that it can be shared or singular.
Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself.
A sandwich can be a great motivator.
|
Whisker Lickins
Starpaws Intergalactic Cat Herding Collective
0
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 23:26:25 -
[122] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Whisker Lickins wrote: I had a rorqual ORE edition parked in a POS ship maintenance area. The rorqual is still there, but the skins is gone, I looked everywhere.
Anyone have any idea where it could be?
Check Corp HQ.
Yup, they're there. Thanks for the info.
Only 48 hops from here to there... good times. |
Clyde Gibson
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
0
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 23:28:23 -
[123] - Quote
Wouldn't make it past 10% on updating until I ran as admin. The application was crashing. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5210
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 23:34:47 -
[124] - Quote
Clyde Gibson wrote:Wouldn't make it past 10% on updating until I ran as admin. The application was crashing.
One way to avoid that, is to update the privileges on the cache directory, and on the game directory, to be writable by your regular account, without the admin flag. (yay for UAC. It's a good thing, but it sometimes gets in the way)
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Noreolle
Ship Trading Company Fidelas Constans
0
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 23:39:32 -
[125] - Quote
Why are my Rorqual Ore Development Edtion now the normal Version? have logged Yesterday in in the Savepos :/ |
Leon Razor
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
32
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 23:56:54 -
[126] - Quote
Enabling 2-factor authentication should invalidate (log you out of) all existing sessions.
For example, I enabled 2-factor auth via my web browser on Computer A this morning. My browser on Computer B has been logged into my account for a while now. This afternoon I was able to access my secure account page on Computer B without entering any password or authentication code. I should have been required to login again using an auth code on Computer B. |
Exdios Jar'go
Mythic Inc Gentlemen's.Parlor
1
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 23:58:22 -
[127] - Quote
OK who's stupid idea was it to remove the Titles from displaying in Show Info??!?! Sorry but we and by the look of it, many others use this feature within the corp structure to identify who does what job within the corp, it makes it 10 times harder to workout who does what now and for new members to a corp it just confuses the hell out of people.
I honestly don't know what secret hiding titles is meant to protect, especially for those who use titles as a fun option and assign roles without titles.
Bring back the titles! |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5210
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 00:04:43 -
[128] - Quote
Exdios Jar'go wrote:OK who's stupid idea was it to remove the Titles from displaying in Show Info??!?! Sorry but we and by the look of it, many others use this feature within the corp structure to identify who does what job within the corp, it makes it 10 times harder to workout who does what now and for new members to a corp it just confuses the hell out of people.
I honestly don't know what secret hiding titles is meant to protect, especially for those who use titles as a fun option and assign roles without titles.
Bring back the titles!
You know there are vanity titles, if you edit members?
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Exdios Jar'go
Mythic Inc Gentlemen's.Parlor
1
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 00:08:19 -
[129] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Exdios Jar'go wrote:OK who's stupid idea was it to remove the Titles from displaying in Show Info??!?! Sorry but we and by the look of it, many others use this feature within the corp structure to identify who does what job within the corp, it makes it 10 times harder to workout who does what now and for new members to a corp it just confuses the hell out of people.
I honestly don't know what secret hiding titles is meant to protect, especially for those who use titles as a fun option and assign roles without titles.
Bring back the titles! You know there are vanity titles, if you edit members?
Yes and that is used for other things. Plus the fact I have never managed to get colors in that area to work.
|
d0cTeR9
Astro Technologies SpaceMonkey's Alliance
148
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 00:11:49 -
[130] - Quote
Noreolle wrote:Why are my Rorqual Ore Development Edtion now the normal Version? have logged Yesterday in in the Savepos :/
Redeem your skins, activate to character, open ship fitting (anywhere, even in space), click on left arrows, apply skin. |
|
Marius Labo
Licence To Kill Mercenary Coalition
62
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 00:15:00 -
[131] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Exdios Jar'go wrote:OK who's stupid idea was it to remove the Titles from displaying in Show Info??!?! Sorry but we and by the look of it, many others use this feature within the corp structure to identify who does what job within the corp, it makes it 10 times harder to workout who does what now and for new members to a corp it just confuses the hell out of people.
I honestly don't know what secret hiding titles is meant to protect, especially for those who use titles as a fun option and assign roles without titles.
Bring back the titles! You know there are vanity titles, if you edit members? First off, who came up with the issue of Titles for Roles "shouldn't be displayed"? I can't see anywhere that this was an issue.
It's now more work to find out who has what in this regard. Directors can use the Corp UI and/or the Edit Member and TItle tab, and other corp members have to use "View Member Details" and see who has what.
That's a lot of extra clicking for simply what was before a simple "Show info" on a member (one click).
If it's an issue of sensitive information then make it a toggle feature for Directors/CEOs to enable/disable.
And it was a nice feature to have colours (for those that enjoy colours) on titles. That part still exists afaik, they just don't display.
And as for using vanity titles alone... what a damn headache (major PITA) for directors in large corps to go through and have to manually add them all after double checking in the Corp UI to see who should have what.
Recruiter
Mercenary Coalition Forums
E-UNI Wiki
|
Ereilian
Mythic Inc Gentlemen's.Parlor
80
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 00:41:58 -
[132] - Quote
CCP Explorer wrote:Ereilian wrote:Maybe whoever thought it was a good idea not to limit Opportunities to new players should be looking for opportunities at the unemployment queue themselves. Do you actually have any tangible feedback for us?
You are replacing a fundamental part of the new player experience and rather than limiting it to new players you are forcing it on everyone. Tangible feedback? Its annoying and the circus act you have to go through to remove this trash is ridiculous and ultimately totally pointless for anyone who has been here longer than a week.
However can you please add "Posted on the Forums" and "ISIS is actually used by people" opportunities?
Is that tangible enough for you? |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1414
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 01:07:22 -
[133] - Quote
Ereilian wrote:CCP Explorer wrote:Ereilian wrote:Maybe whoever thought it was a good idea not to limit Opportunities to new players should be looking for opportunities at the unemployment queue themselves. Do you actually have any tangible feedback for us? You are replacing a fundamental part of the new player experience and rather than limiting it to new players you are forcing it on everyone. Tangible feedback? Its annoying and the circus act you have to go through to remove this trash is ridiculous. Ultimately totally pointless for anyone who has been here longer than a week. However can you please add "Posted on the Forums" and "You actually used ISIS" opportunities? Is that tangible enough for you? I haven't been able to log in yet but it seems most have no issue with turning it off for the very reasons you cite. Is that not the case? If it is trivial to turn off why is it an issue?
Edit: Nvm, looks like there are parts you can't get rid of. |
Marius Labo
Licence To Kill Mercenary Coalition
66
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 01:23:27 -
[134] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Exdios Jar'go wrote:OK who's stupid idea was it to remove the Titles from displaying in Show Info??!?! Sorry but we and by the look of it, many others use this feature within the corp structure to identify who does what job within the corp, it makes it 10 times harder to workout who does what now and for new members to a corp it just confuses the hell out of people.
I honestly don't know what secret hiding titles is meant to protect, especially for those who use titles as a fun option and assign roles without titles.
Bring back the titles! You know there are vanity titles, if you edit members? Also, you know that you can assign roles and grantable roles without using the Title feature? It seems that the "sensitive data" feature was already in place.
Recruiter
Mercenary Coalition Forums
E-UNI Wiki
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
5211
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 01:27:01 -
[135] - Quote
Marius Labo wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Exdios Jar'go wrote:OK who's stupid idea was it to remove the Titles from displaying in Show Info??!?! Sorry but we and by the look of it, many others use this feature within the corp structure to identify who does what job within the corp, it makes it 10 times harder to workout who does what now and for new members to a corp it just confuses the hell out of people.
I honestly don't know what secret hiding titles is meant to protect, especially for those who use titles as a fun option and assign roles without titles.
Bring back the titles! You know there are vanity titles, if you edit members? Also, you know that you can assign roles and grantable roles without using the Title feature? It seems that the "sensitive data" feature was already in place.
It's just a total pita.
you set up the titles, and grant those to people as needed.
Woo! CSM X!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Grant Kerst
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 01:36:05 -
[136] - Quote
IVeige wrote:open launcher , enter acount name and passwork. Eve isnt responding. Message.
Same here, any fixes for this? |
Marius Labo
Licence To Kill Mercenary Coalition
69
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 01:44:27 -
[137] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Marius Labo wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Exdios Jar'go wrote:OK who's stupid idea was it to remove the Titles from displaying in Show Info??!?! Sorry but we and by the look of it, many others use this feature within the corp structure to identify who does what job within the corp, it makes it 10 times harder to workout who does what now and for new members to a corp it just confuses the hell out of people.
I honestly don't know what secret hiding titles is meant to protect, especially for those who use titles as a fun option and assign roles without titles.
Bring back the titles! You know there are vanity titles, if you edit members? Also, you know that you can assign roles and grantable roles without using the Title feature? It seems that the "sensitive data" feature was already in place. It's just a total pita. you set up the titles, and grant those to people as needed. And you can always leave a Title with the default "Untitled #" and it wouldn't have displayed a Title if displaying a Title was a concern.
The idea behind having Roles/Grantable Roles assigned to a Title was to display a Title, and to make assignment of certain sets of roles easy.
What's the source of discussion and such for the removal of the display of these Titles? It all seems this was an issue that wasn't.
Give it back, give it back, give it back....
Recruiter
Mercenary Coalition Forums
E-UNI Wiki
|
Exdios Jar'go
Mythic Inc Gentlemen's.Parlor
1
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 02:00:47 -
[138] - Quote
I too would be interested in the discussion behind the removal of these, as everyone I have spoken too so far has no issue with Titles being displayed. |
Zepheros Naeonis
TinklePee
31
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 02:01:15 -
[139] - Quote
Repeating the same outcry in previous messages... I want to be able to disable 'Opportunities' as it is completely useless for me. |
Halets Thellere
Incident Command Southern Star Dominion
3
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 02:30:33 -
[140] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:[quote=Halets Thellere] You know what else is funny? I never said that and I actually agree with you, I don't want to avoid the launcher, I want to use it but with this many people having issues you would think after a while that it's the software not the users. I have worked in qa for software comps and I know this. If we received this many complaints every time we made changes we will be finding some new programmers. :-) Even if the complaints started with... "Hi, I have a problem with your software, I've been ignoring the standard launch instructions you gave, and forcing it to start from a different EXE for months, and now I'm having some issues." That's what I mean by operator caused issues.
You are right, if people are not using it as intended then they have to fix it and that would be fine if, and only if, it actually worked.
On a side note CCP I do have a idea for you guys and I think it will help .............get...............rid....................of...........the...............launcher. I know that is a crazy idea. But hey, you have tried everything from the go-to repair tool, remove this file(s), it's your fault, it's your computer, it's your isp, it's your network. Have you thought just for a moment however brief, however small that just fixing the issue yourself would help your company better insure the on going relationship with your customer? I'm not mad. Please don't misunderstand and I don't mean to be nasty but I am a bit upset that I am paying for a product that I am having to fix every other day. Also, you need to have a more active presence in these treads after the shitstorm that is a patch/update. I see too many post of people that feel that the devs don't care/ aren't listening. At the very lest you need to have people in the update threads for 73+ hrs after a patch goes out answer question and helping as much as they can and I think that would make people feel that you guys actually care. You do care don't you? I hope you understand that I am rooting for you but I am seriously close to quitting. It simply isn't worth it but I guess there is not other MMO's on the market huh? :-) |
|
Sniper Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
371
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 03:09:21 -
[141] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Sniper Smith wrote: If not permanent, then at least until destruction of the ship. Just as the originals were.
I had a Bloodraider Proph that I used for some missions, maybe only a few times a month, but it was never destroyed, it had the skin since one of the first days, now for no good reason that's been explained, I need to purchase it every 30 days?
I'm also not a huge fan of injected skins being permanent.. I do agree they shouldn't be easy to remove and trade again, but there should be a way.. like a PLEX to un-inject a skin. I mean last night I could run missions in my Quafe Megathron, dock up, and then sell it at full price. Today, either I can use the ship, or I can save it to sell, I no longer get the choice.
It has been explained. If loot drop skins were permanent, after a while the loot would become worthless. By the loot drop skins being temporary value is maintained. And while you never needed to repurchase the ship, now you can fly prophecies with blood raider colours and get them blown up and not have to buy a new one, just apply the same skin again instead within that 30 days. So you lost some, but you also gained some. I know reading can be hard in a big thread, but the FIRST LINE of what I said was "until destruction of the ship. Just as the originals were". That is me NOT asking it it to be Perma.
And since I wasn't LOSING my Bloodraider Proph's, then all this does is add an additional monthly cost for me to be able to continue to enjoy my whip with 0 benefit to me at all. It has, in essence, removed from me I ship I had from week 1 of them being available.
I'm not asking for drops to be Perma Skins.. I agree, that would tank the market. I'm asking for them to last until destruction. Or if you want be timed (30 days or whatever) where it can be used unlimited times, but once the time is up, keep it till a ship with it gets destroyed. This system is a great change for players that blow up a lot, but for those that don't it's just a kick in the teeth for these Pirate Skins. |
Commander Nina Hanomaa
Chapter Six Chapters.
4
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 03:12:27 -
[142] - Quote
Hello,
Quote:(Added April 28) Titles are no longer publicly displayed in the "Show Info" window of a character, allowing corps to use them without leaking sensitive data.
Please consider reversing this change.
Enemies getting info from these titles was a complete non-issue. For all we know you can set Roles silently, without assigning a title. Title could also be something obscure that doesn't give out Roles involved with it.
We (my corporation) use the titles because it is the easiest way to give someone multiple roles and see at a glance what roles & access rights your corpmates have. View Member Details lists bunch of unuseful information that is mostly distracting.
Lastly I have to say the UI changes you made aren't consistent across the Role Management and Title Management menus.
Also for future it would be nice if you'd implement Grantable Titles. |
Sniper Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
371
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 03:14:32 -
[143] - Quote
With all the talk of Launcher issues, mine isn't as bad as people have been saying here. It generally works. MY issue with it is that it doesn't cache the content. I have a slow connection, connecting with the launcher often takes several minutes while once again is re-downloads the background image, which it seems it has to do before it will give you the client ready. It's annoying as hell. Just save the BG image and any other static content with the launcher update, that way you don't need to redownload it every single time. That or update the main Eve EXE so it can use the NES store, and Redeem Items, without the launcher.
On a related note, ask since I've told the game to download Everything, not as I go, can CCP include the NES Store images in that? It took me an hr to be able to scroll through the ships. Sure it's cached now, but come on, I told the client to update and save everything, it downloads all the icons for Eve, it should download the icons for the NES too. |
Virgil McMacset
InterSun Freelance SONS of BANE
3
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 03:27:43 -
[144] - Quote
Fierar wrote:The release broke cloaking, please fix.
1. Equip Cloak 2. Undock 3. Warp to BM 4. Enable Cloak
Ship no longer rendered in space, previously rendered as translucent frame. Tactical Overlay doesn't render ship r-click > Look at my ship > again nothing
I have the same problem |
Jane Idoka
gratia aeternum bellum Comatose Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 03:56:18 -
[145] - Quote
I installed the patch and now my pie is cold. Why wasn't pie tested with this patch?? |
Leon Razor
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
33
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 04:05:55 -
[146] - Quote
People & Places window: I do not like these giant green square backgrounds on the "eye" icons which indicate what bookmarks are visible in space. Very distracting and jarring for a minor UI element.
Is this a bug?
https://i.imgur.com/pxBTVTu.png |
Rekkr Nordgard
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
427
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 04:43:13 -
[147] - Quote
Whoever decided that forcing veterans to endure this horrible "opportunities" system and notifications with no way to turn it off should be canned immediately. |
Woke Up Dead
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 06:13:08 -
[148] - Quote
Makkuro Tatsu wrote:Lara Divinity wrote:why r my previous permanent skinned ships stripped of there skins n my bpc skins converted to "30day timed skins"??? permanent should stay permanent Previously your skinned ships could be blown up and blueprint copies could use up all their runs, so they were not permanent.
Yes.. but there are some people that "collect" ships. They purchase a few copies. some to fly but some just to "have in their collection". they may never fly outside of high sec and in relatively safe space if ever. Why are they penalized by now having those skins expire? |
Arist en Daire
Eclipse Front llc Ouroboros Collective
5
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 06:19:35 -
[149] - Quote
Two hours later - finally got client to log in --- only had to un-install and then re-install the game. One should not have to un-install and re-install a game just because it has been updated.
I like the new cloaking affect. I can only presume there was a fix applied fairly quickly - as I cannot see what all the chatter is about on the ship being invisible while cloaked. This appears to be a cross between the older affect (say that of a year ago) and the affect that was most recently used prior to this patch update. Admittedly, the affect being used just prior to this one was more "useful" it was not as aesthetic as this one. I fly a cloaky (Viator) about 85% of the time - so this affect is nice.
Due to the length of time to get into night -- will be checking out other aspects tomorrow.
|
White 0rchid
EVE University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 07:26:58 -
[150] - Quote
Marius Labo wrote:Add it back, and for those that feel there is sensitive data involved in the display of a Title allow a toggle for CEOs/Directors. Seems like an easy reversion and actual improvement if you add the ability to toggle it.
Yes, please do this, add a toggle and problem solved. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |