Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Snuffed Out
7926
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 14:53:59 -
[31] - Quote
Ishkur is an armor tanker. You want to use low-slots for that.
The mid-slots CAN be shoehorned into a shield tank... but honestly the Tristan does it better. Instead, you can fit for "full tackle" (web, scram, AB/MWD) for better range control over the field.
How did you start?
The SP System
IFW
|

Syrilian
Ascending Angels
70
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 16:02:35 -
[32] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:Syrilian wrote:True but with more mid slots, the Ishkur has a better tank right? I guess you meant more low slots and yes that can help tank, if it's armor and depending on the fit (you also get 1 less rig slot though). But the main reasons AFs are much beefier are 1) much higher native resists as all T2 ships (though they almost always have a big hole vs. 1 dmg type) and 2) higher native shield/armor/structure hit points.
You're right. Duh, sorry about that. |

Syrilian
Ascending Angels
70
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 16:26:52 -
[33] - Quote
One other question: I have exclusively used blasters in PVP but I have noticed that most Ishkur's are fit with rails. Is it a bad idea to use blasters on a Ishkur? |

Cara Forelli
Green Skull LLC
1059
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 19:09:33 -
[34] - Quote
Syrilian wrote:Is Ishkur too much of a isk investment? That depends entirely on how much ISK you have and how much you make. However, IMO it is more difficult to get a "good" fight in an Ishkur in FW than say a Tristan or Comet. Remember, the more expensive your ship the more people will bring to kill it. You want people to underestimate you, not overestimate. That way they will be more willing to engage you solo and less likely to blob you.
Adventures
New player with questions? Join my public channel in game: House Forelli
Titan's Lament
|

Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
251
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 14:34:55 -
[35] - Quote
Syrilian wrote:One other question: I have exclusively used blasters in PVP but I have noticed that most Ishkur's are fit with rails. Is it a bad idea to use blasters on a Ishkur? I have no idea how this applies to PvP but there are some basics in the stats that may shed light on this.
As a general rule rails use more cpu and pg and produce less damage and will not track as well as blasters, but counter that with significantly longer range engagement capabilities.
As a general rule blasters use less cpu and pg and have higher damage potential and track better but the trade off is significantly short range.
This is purely a guess on my part but it would seem given these basic characteristics of the two that players are opting for rails as a way of allowing them to better control, or to use range as a part of their tactics. And it might help them stay our of range of nos, neuts and other forms of ewar they do not want to deal with. Again I must repeat myself these are my guesses based on the stats of the various modules etc, hopefully a skilled PvP player will come along and provide some more insight into this. |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
3813
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 16:15:17 -
[36] - Quote
Syrilian wrote:One other question: I have exclusively used blasters in PVP but I have noticed that most Ishkur's are fit with rails. Is it a bad idea to use blasters on a Ishkur? Small rails are usually used to scram kite.
Scram kiting means trying to stay at the edge of scram range (9 km). Usually you try to stay about 7-8 km from your opponent, while holding him down with a scram. Effective against short-range weapons (blasters or autocannons) since at that range they can't hit you.
However, due to poor rail tracking, to apply more damage it's best not to orbit, but try to keep range instead, minimizing angular velocity.
To successfully scram kite you usually need an afterburner, a web and a scram, and preferably a fast ship. That way you can be faster than your opponent, allowing you to maintain the 7-8 km range and minimize angular velocity. Otherwise, he will be able to either close range and hit you or pull range and escape from your scram.
Rails can also be used to kite at point range (around 24 km), but at the moment lasers (both pulse and beam) do better damage than rails at that range.
Another advantage of rails is that you can usually hit someone who is kiting you (at 24 km).
Finally, rails benefit from ships with tracking bonuses (such as the comet) - the ishkur doesn't have them.
Blasters are effective at short range, obviously. Tracking is great, damage is higher than rails, only issue is you have to be within a few km (though the Ishkur's optimal range bonus can help in hitting farther off, especialy if you use null ammo).
I have limited experience PVP-ing in ishkurs, but personally I'd fit them with blasters and try to avoid ships that can easily kite me (though my drones would still hit). Blasters also require less CPU, which is kinda tight on the ishkur (as on most AFs).
TL;DR blasters are fine imho, actually I'd personally have some doubts on fitting rails on an Ishkur
Make space glamorous!
Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!
|

Syrilian
Ascending Angels
71
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 16:38:17 -
[37] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:Syrilian wrote:One other question: I have exclusively used blasters in PVP but I have noticed that most Ishkur's are fit with rails. Is it a bad idea to use blasters on a Ishkur? Small rails are usually used to scram kite. Scram kiting means trying to stay at the edge of scram range (9 km). Usually you try to stay about 7-8 km from your opponent, while holding him down with a scram. Effective against short-range weapons (blasters or autocannons) since at that range they can't hit you. However, due to poor rail tracking, to apply more damage it's best not to orbit, but try to keep range instead, minimizing angular velocity. To successfully scram kite you usually need an afterburner, a web and a scram, and preferably a fast ship. That way you can be faster than your opponent, allowing you to maintain the 7-8 km range and minimize angular velocity. Otherwise, he will be able to either close range and hit you or pull range and escape from your scram. Rails can also be used to kite at point range (around 24 km), but at the moment lasers (both pulse and beam) do better damage than rails at that range. Another advantage of rails is that you can usually hit someone who is kiting you (at 24 km). Finally, rails benefit from ships with tracking bonuses (such as the comet) - the ishkur doesn't have them. Blasters are effective at short range, obviously. Tracking is great, damage is higher than rails, only issue is you have to be within a few km (though the Ishkur's optimal range bonus can help in hitting farther off, especialy if you use null ammo). I have limited experience PVP-ing in ishkurs, but personally I'd fit them with blasters and try to avoid ships that can easily kite me (though my drones would still hit). Blasters also require less CPU, which is kinda tight on the ishkur (as on most AFs). TL;DR blasters are fine imho, actually I'd personally have some doubts on fitting rails on an Ishkur
Thank you for the advice. I thought blasters would work, but almost every single fit I've seen online had rails which made me think I was missing something.
|

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
1657
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 18:14:04 -
[38] - Quote
Honestly the tristan does rail fits better than the ishkur does. I used to fly a rail ishkur quite a bit until I realized that its too slow for the fit. This isn't to say it can't be done, but it won't be able to kite against most frigates. Instead fit it with ions and try to use your mid slots to control range instead of the ship's base speed.
New Player Placement Specialist and Scope Project FC.
Contact me for a free consultation.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!
|

Solecist Project
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
22395
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 18:44:15 -
[39] - Quote
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Honestly the tristan does rail fits better than the ishkur does. I used to fly a rail ishkur quite a bit until I realized that its too slow for the fit. This isn't to say it can't be done, but it won't be able to kite against most frigates. Instead fit it with ions and try to use your mid slots to control range instead of the ship's base speed. We live in weird times where Tristans are used for kiting ...
Back in my days we put a big fat plate onto the tristan ... ... blasters, drones and it just owned.
Well back in my days I also put smartbombs and a 10mn AB on the tristan ... ... but I tried putting one on every frigate the game offered, so .......... *cough*
I wish you a slow, agonising death with screams and tears of pain and horror.
Have everything you posess taken away from you.
Most importantly ... yourself.
Corpses4Drifters
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
9533
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 19:19:16 -
[40] - Quote
Syrilian wrote: Thank you for the advice. I thought blasters would work, but almost every single fit I've seen online had rails which made me think I was missing something.
t Just the meta showing, you have enough room for a flight of goblins and warriors which means you can project a portion of dps out quite far.
When something kites you , set the warriors on them and they're likely going to be forced off (iv fought off a garmurs like this) they are also the drones you want for killing other drones,
so empress forbid you find yourself ontop of something like a myrm , you set those bad boys to work killing his drones asap switch to Fed navy antimatter primary them one at a time and pray he doesn't notice quickly enough . yes there's many more drones but a blaster ishkur is fully capable of killing them as quickly as they're launched at you.
Then when you have eaten them all and want full dps, switch to void and hobs melt face and laugh maniacally.
here's a fit For you,
[Ishkur, Ralph King-Griffin's Ishkur] Adaptive Nano Plating II Damage Control II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Small Armor Repairer II
1MN Afterburner II Warp Scrambler II Small Capacitor Booster II,Navy Cap Booster 150
Small Unstable Power Fluctuator I Light Neutron Blaster II,Void S Light Neutron Blaster II,Void S Light Neutron Blaster II,Void S
Small Ancillary Current Router II Small Anti-Explosive Pump II
Warrior II Hobgoblin II
Lords.Of.Midnight now recruiting
Steamy hot small gang action is waiting for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |