|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 13 post(s) |
TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
1084
   |
Posted - 2015.05.01 21:17:17 -
[1] - Quote
I can appreciate CCP's game vision and that Quafe skins for example don't fit on an Amarr ship from a lore perspective. On the other hand, some of these 'mis-matched' skins look amazing on certain ships and it would really be a shame to not have them just because of lore. Because let's face it, no-body cares about lore, certainly not when it comes to SKINs.
A golden Stratios just looks badass, as does a black one. Please don't keep these awesome combinations from us just for lore!
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
1084
|
Posted - 2015.05.01 23:16:52 -
[2] - Quote
See? How f*cking badass is that?!
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
1084
|
Posted - 2015.05.02 23:34:17 -
[3] - Quote
Just in case lore is seriously going to be a reason not to allow mix and match SKINs as it were, the lore would actually support it 100%.
1. It's been established that the Empires are losing their grasp on Capsuleers for a while now. We've been merrily doing our own thing, ignoring whatever the Empires want and certainly not abiding by their historic values. We have Gallente pilots flying Amarr ships and Caldari pilots shooting Caldari Navy ships. They don't control us or the ships we fly.
2. The camouflage technology that made SKINs possible in the lore is readily available to everyone and it stands to reason that Capsuleers, stubborn as we are, would tinker with it to get any desired effect. Capsuleers wouldn't give a rats *ss about what an Empire's ship is supposed to look like. We're Capsuleers, we create our own empires and we'll certainly decide for ourselves how we make our ships look.
So please, CCP, give us the freedom to apply any SKIN on as many ships as possible. This thread is a testament to some of the amazingly awesome looking ships it could create and how badly people want to have them. Don't ignore that, you're smarter than that!
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
1088
|
Posted - 2015.05.09 14:04:59 -
[4] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:CCP Darwin wrote:V5++ is coming! Keep your eyes open for more news soon. Eagerly awaiting it. Was there any further consideration towards having the age of a ship show more with weathering/dirt etc? Considering all of the complaints about dirty looking skins, I think they'd better consider making the "worn and weathered" look optional.
They should just make every line of code in the game optional so we'll never have this 'can it be optional!' whining again.
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
1088
|
Posted - 2015.05.10 01:01:26 -
[5] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5542008#post5542008
more proof that CCP doesn't understand how/why players grow attached to space things.
bad: nonconsensual ship grunge
good: customizable coating materials (not just colors)
corp and alliance color schemes
I mean, if we're going to spend time doing stuff for the sake of visuals. Grunge is an idea that should have been shot down wayy early on. How that idea could have been green-lit alongside making ships look prettier and customizable is beyond me.
"Nonconsensual ship grunge"...
Ah the entitlement is big in this one.
New structure: Space car wash. Charge people to wash their ships and charge extra for wax.
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
|
|
| |
|