EVE Search - This is what eve si coming to: This is what CODE is: Pathetic.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

This is what eve si coming to: This is what CODE is: Pathetic.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 11223	Posted - 2015.06.03 15:40:20 - [211] - Quote Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: So, rather than be satisfied with CCP deciding to functionally ban proper awoxing, you're on here to complain that people are allowed to join your corp with any ill intent at all, and trying to get them banned. This is the kind of thing you can only post on an NPC alt. Remember the 'dont awox me brah!' switch? Well, just wait for the cry-us release where CCP introduces some great new additional features! - CEO's can turn off all external communications, to prevent spies from using eve mail to inform those outside of corp about intel - CEO's can tag all assets in corp hangars with a virus, that will cause the asset to explode (and ship with it) at the press of a button -- no more theft! - CEO's can turn on a new dont-gank-me-brah! switch, which uses whimsical new sleeper technology to prevent CODE members from opening fire on a members ship in hisec! Surely we can all look forward to more great content-creation features like these to come, with the input of all our illustrious guardians-of-the-sandbox CSM'S! HAIL BOB..er...BARNEY! F As I've been saying, the real problem is a deep seated and learned form of risk aversion that says "we must be safe from all harm, even video game harm". Risk-Aversion isn't an issue, it's a symptom. It's just what the western world is coming to. And apparently, not just the West lol.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx 1775	Posted - 2015.06.03 19:08:02 - [212] - Quote Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Josette Dugas wrote: Aww come on now, the CODE it just a wacky, devil-may-care, bunch of fun loving eggers. What I don't get is why they are so keen to get a "good fight" out of you. Let's be honest, they have their thing, they RP the hell out of it, and ... James 315 was guided by a GM who said that if he made a roleplaying reason they can't ban him for harrassment when bumping miners. So, they aren't a real roleplaying group, it is a construct, a parody and if they start believe the rubbish then they are really sinking. Actually the GM said profit motive. The roleplay is separate. Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information. BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx 1775	Posted - 2015.06.03 19:09:36 - [213] - Quote Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: So, rather than be satisfied with CCP deciding to functionally ban proper awoxing, you're on here to complain that people are allowed to join your corp with any ill intent at all, and trying to get them banned. This is the kind of thing you can only post on an NPC alt. Remember the 'dont awox me brah!' switch? Well, just wait for the cry-us release where CCP introduces some great new additional features! - CEO's can turn off all external communications, to prevent spies from using eve mail to inform those outside of corp about intel - CEO's can tag all assets in corp hangars with a virus, that will cause the asset to explode (and ship with it) at the press of a button -- no more theft! - CEO's can turn on a new dont-gank-me-brah! switch, which uses whimsical new sleeper technology to prevent CODE members from opening fire on a members ship in hisec! Surely we can all look forward to more great content-creation features like these to come, with the input of all our illustrious guardians-of-the-sandbox CSM'S! HAIL BOB..er...BARNEY! F I think the virus will actually return the ship to the CEO's personal hangar instead of destroying it. Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information. BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!
Josette Dugas The Scope Gallente Federation 2	Posted - 2015.06.03 19:31:39 - [214] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: [quote=Josette Dugas]Aww come on now, the CODE it just a wacky, devil-may-care, bunch of fun loving eggers. What I don't get is why they are so keen to get a "good fight" out of you. Let's be honest, they have their thing, they RP the hell out of it, and they make HiSec more interesting, but taking out a mining barge is nothing at all like a "fight" so it can hardly be considered good, bad or otherwise. It is a fight, a fight the miner lost the second he undocked without support, without a plan to survive, and without relevant game mechanics knowledge. Sure it's a fight, but it's not good bad or otherwise. A good fight for me is, extending your wild west metaphor, two combatentes squaring off in a battle of skill and wits. Knocking off a miner is just knocking off a miner let's not pat ourselves on the back too hard here and put ourselves on some kind of pedestal for taking out someone who just plan doesn't know any better . I mean even if they get blown up time after time for the same things all your doing it beating up a on a dumb animal. If you want to elevate that to some kind of performance art ... your call, I don't judge. But getting in a twist because you don't get a "good fight" out of someone after you greased his barge is just lame.
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 11227	Posted - 2015.06.03 19:45:45 - [215] - Quote Josette Dugas wrote: Sure it's a fight, but it's not good bad or otherwise. A good fight for me is, extending your wild west metaphor, two combatentes squaring off in a battle of skill and wits. Knocking off a miner is just knocking off a miner let's not pat ourselves on the back too hard here and put ourselves on some kind of pedestal for taking out someone who just plan doesn't know any better . EVE is not an arena game. What you are doing here is exhibiting a misplaced sense of 'fairness' where it doesn't belong. In every encounter between people in EVE, you have at least 2 people, sitting at a computer, playing a game that both of them know has un-consensual pvp. The fact that one of them ignores this reality (that pvp can happen anywhere) has zero to do with anything, he was still a guy or girl sitting in front of a computer who 'lost' an encounter with some other human being. At the end of the day, getting ganked is no different than losing a consensual 1v1 pvp fight, there is no such thing as the 'innocent miner minding his own business' because that player choose to play EVE rather than a protected themepark style game. Quote: I mean even if they get blown up time after time for the same things all your doing it beating up a on a dumb animal. If you want to elevate that to some kind of performance art ... your call, I don't judge. But getting in a twist because you don't get a "good fight" out of someone after you greased his barge is just lame. Dumb animals don't play EVE, humans (the vast majority of which are adults) do. If you get blown up over and over in the same manner and get mad about it, it is true that this person should not be gaming. But that doesn't take away from the fact that in an encounter of 2 human beings, one won and one lost. Where I'm from, a rational and mature adult congratulates the victor in a situation where they are beaten, it's called sportsmanship. If you don't want to have to do that (and I sure as hell don't) either don't compete (in this case, means don't log in) or do compete and play to win (in my case and the case of all PVErs, that means don't let them gank you). I play to win, and have done so for 8 years. TL;DR, i;ll restate: It's the inability of some to understand that "gameplay" in eve starts at the login screen that creates the conditions where groups like Code can even exist in the 1st place.
Jonah Gravenstein Machiavellian Space Bastards 23871	Posted - 2015.06.03 19:53:43 - [216] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: in my case and the case of all PVErs, that means don't let them gank you Or do, those of us PvE's who do "play to win" are quite happy to use those that don't as a meta tank of sorts. Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business. Nil mortifi sine lucre.
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 11227	Posted - 2015.06.03 19:56:33 - [217] - Quote Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: in my case and the case of all PVErs, that means don't let them gank you Or do, those of us PvE's who do bother are quite happy to use those that don't as a meta tank of sorts. New saying: if gankers are chasing us, I don't have to outrun the gankers i just have to out run YOU. Now where did i put those Ascendency implants???
Freya Sertan Provincia Septim 149	Posted - 2015.06.03 20:02:00 - [218] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: in my case and the case of all PVErs, that means don't let them gank you Or do, those of us PvE's who do bother are quite happy to use those that don't as a meta tank of sorts. New saying: if gankers are chasing us, I don't have to outrun the gankers i just have to out run YOU. Now where did i put those Ascendency implants??? Yep. As long as I'm faster than the slowest person in the fleet... fleet tank, best tank!
Jonah Gravenstein Machiavellian Space Bastards 23871	Posted - 2015.06.03 20:02:25 - [219] - Quote ^^ Who needs to outrun, the mission runner who falls for the old ninja salvager, the afk miners and, often overloaded, haulers etc aren't hard to out-think. I was considering scanning other haulers while I do my rounds and feeding details of juicy ones to some nefarious types I know for giggles. Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business. Nil mortifi sine lucre.
Unsuccessful At Everything The Troll Bridge 21663	Posted - 2015.06.03 20:08:30 - [220] - Quote Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: New saying: if gankers are chasing us, I don't have to outrun the gankers i just have to out run YOU. Now where did i put those Ascendency implants??? Who needs to outrun when you can out-think? The mission runner who falls for the old ninja salvager, the afk miners and, often overloaded, haulers etc aren't hard to out-think. On a side note I was considering scanning other haulers while I do my rounds and feeding details of any juicy ones to some nefarious types I know, for shiggles. Out run? Out think? This is entirely too much effort on ones part. All one needs to do is 'out-whine' the other party in order to win. *Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?*

CCP Falcon 11623	Posted - 2015.06.03 21:08:25 - [221] - Quote This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. CCP Falcon \|\| EVE Universe Community Manager \|\| @CCP_Falcon Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

Christopher Mabata The Interstellar Manipulation Consortium 377	Posted - 2015.06.03 21:11:28 - [222] - Quote Daww no Falcon punch GÖú Theory-Crafter GÖú Free Agent GÖú Immortal Space Pirate GÖú "Better the Devil you Know than the devil you don't" -Observing and dismantling F&I Discussion Threads since 2013Gäó
Kaarous Aldurald Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE. 13291	Posted - 2015.06.03 21:11:52 - [223] - Quote CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Quoting for later. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws." One of ours, ten of theirs. Best Meltdown Ever.
Desert Ice78 Gryphons of the Western Wind 470	Posted - 2015.06.03 21:45:27 - [224] - Quote CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Falcon, this whole thread struck me as yet another self-publicity, "oh everyone look at me, I need attention," troll thread from the self-publicity, "oh everyone look at me, I need attention" department of CODE., complete with the usual moral outrage NPC alt that they use to head it. Question is - why are you feeding the trolls? Bad Falcon. Bold I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused.
GetSirrus Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 100	Posted - 2015.06.03 21:45:48 - [225] - Quote CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Perhaps Falcon you would like to weigh on this from CODE. http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/01/theres-always-excuse.html Is this the kind of activity being going on for years before CODE existed? Pirates of High-Sec for years have been at pains to deny that their game play is not for the sadist. But I struggle to see how this type of posting (and endorsement from rank members) is anything else.
Paranoid Loyd 5565	Posted - 2015.06.03 21:51:18 - [226] - Quote GetSirrus wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Perhaps Falcon you would like to weigh on this from CODE. http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/01/theres-always-excuse.html Is this the kind of activity being going on for years before CODE existed? Pirates of High-Sec for years have been at pains to deny that their game play is not for the sadist. But I struggle to see how this type of posting (and endorsement from rank members) is anything else. What exactly is wrong with the post you linked? "Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata Fix the Prospect!!!
Sibyyl Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective 25395	Posted - 2015.06.03 21:51:34 - [227] - Quote GetSirrus wrote: Is this the kind of activity being going on for years before CODE existed? Pirates of High-Sec for years have been at pains to deny that their game play is not for the sadist. But I struggle to see how this type of posting (and endorsement from rank members) is anything else. I think Falcon's statement was quite clear. Did you want him to weigh in on every single non-EULA-breaking circumstance that personally offends you? All our times have come Here but now they're gone
Christopher Mabata The Interstellar Manipulation Consortium 377	Posted - 2015.06.03 21:58:43 - [228] - Quote GetSirrus wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Perhaps Falcon you would like to weigh on this from CODE. http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/01/theres-always-excuse.html Is this the kind of activity being going on for years before CODE existed? Pirates of High-Sec for years have been at pains to deny that their game play is not for the sadist. But I struggle to see how this type of posting (and endorsement from rank members) is anything else. There is nothing to weigh in on here, its journalism People have been writting, twisting, creating, faking, and then applying a bias to stories about Eve for a decade. There is no breach of the TOS or the EULA here, just a story to read and enjoy or in your case get upset about unnecessarily Dont like it? Petition CODE to remove the page or block the page and never read it again. Its really that simple. Also you keep comparing anyone who does anything with ganking to a sadist, but the difference is this is a video game and what a person does here doesnt mean they also do or engage in, or even resemble in reality. And im also 99.9% sure there is nothing in the TOS/EULA that says even if you were disturbed you cant play the game. GÖú Theory-Crafter GÖú Free Agent GÖú Immortal Space Pirate GÖú "Better the Devil you Know than the devil you don't" -Observing and dismantling F&I Discussion Threads since 2013Gäó
Josette Dugas The Scope Gallente Federation 2	Posted - 2015.06.03 22:04:14 - [229] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: EVE is not an arena game. What you are doing here is exhibiting a misplaced sense of 'fairness' where it doesn't belong. I'm not misplacing anything, you are ascribing motives not in evidence. People play this game for all kinds of reasons, if you get your LOLs out of taking out miners, noobs that have wandered into low sec, or whatever good for you, why should I care one way or another? By the same token if I give the same people a pass when I come across them I'm not doing it for any reason other than I get my LOL's doing other things. There is a whole world out there and maybe I feel like crashing a market or sitting in a dock day trading. My point is there is nothing noble, heroic, or applause worthy about bumping miners. There is nothing shameful about giving a noob a pass if you don't feel like wasting the ammo or you feel like playing a long game for a bigger reward. This constant drumbeat to enoble an uber-aggressive, red = dead, no quarter playstyle is every bit as tiring as the carebears who whine about the fact that there are no covert ops mining rigs. I mean if it make you feel better or like your fulfilling some kind of unspoken mandate from above please, by all means, do what you want. Like I said I don't judge. But if someone else wants to play the game of avoiding PvP conflict I can't see how that is any less worthy or misplaced. I'm out there I've taken my hits without regret or tears. That's the game. You hike your hike, I'll hike mine.
Carrie-Anne Moss Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective 185	Posted - 2015.06.03 22:27:42 - [230] - Quote CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. What do you mean "after Code dies"??? I dont understand that part
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 11233	Posted - 2015.06.03 22:28:28 - [231] - Quote Josette Dugas wrote: My point is there is nothing noble, heroic, or applause worthy about bumping miners. Then nothing is praise worthy, because again, at the end of the day this is nothing but people sitting at the computer.. What funny about people like you is that you display a judgmental attitude ("A good fight for me is, extending your wild west metaphor, two combatants squaring off in a battle of skill and wits." remember your own words?) then act all huffy as if you don't hold judgmental opinions of others or what they are doing. A good fight is a fight which occurs within the rules of the game, a successful gank is a good fight, in the same way a successful escape from (or prevention of) a gank is. I am not a ganker or scammer, that kind of gameplay does not get me off so to speak. I'm not advocating for that play style in the least (mainly because I don't give a flip about what others do). However I respect the fact that they play within the rules, and I play with them within those same rules. THEY are my content, my continued lack of losing anything of importance to them after 8 years while I 'bear' my ass off and fill my wallet right in front of them is not only a mark of pride for me as a PVEr and EVE Player, but proof that these whiney weaklings trying to metagame them away (by lobbying CCP at every turn for protection via game changes) are in fact idiots. No one is talking about anything being noble or anything, I'm explaining the reality of EVE online, a reality that's flying completely over your head (as it does people who get ganked and then complain about it) for some reason as evidenced by your rambling posts. I read what you wrote and couldn't help but think of Kaarous Aldurald's signature: "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 11233	Posted - 2015.06.03 22:31:54 - [232] - Quote GetSirrus wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Perhaps Falcon you would like to weigh on this from CODE. http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/01/theres-always-excuse.html Is this the kind of activity being going on for years before CODE existed? Pirates of High-Sec for years have been at pains to deny that their game play is not for the sadist. But I struggle to see how this type of posting (and endorsement from rank members) is anything else. That's so much butt hurt, it flew through my computer and made my arse itch. Now I need Nanite repair paste
Avaelica Kuershin Paper Cats 154	Posted - 2015.06.03 22:36:13 - [233] - Quote Carrie-Anne Moss wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. What do you mean "after Code dies"??? I dont understand that part I shouldn't be surprised. Groups come and go, form, reform, disband. But even after all that, there is another group to carry on the same activities. Possibly with many of the same members.
Kaarous Aldurald Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE. 13292	Posted - 2015.06.03 22:57:12 - [234] - Quote GetSirrus wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Perhaps Falcon you would like to weigh on this from CODE. http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/01/theres-always-excuse.html Is this the kind of activity being going on for years before CODE existed? Pirates of High-Sec for years have been at pains to deny that their game play is not for the sadist. But I struggle to see how this type of posting (and endorsement from rank members) is anything else. What are you talking about? That was hilarious. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws." One of ours, ten of theirs. Best Meltdown Ever.
Valterra Craven 562	Posted - 2015.06.03 23:15:23 - [235] - Quote Elspeth Tezzeret wrote: Code email: "I urge you to consider your nullsec options. Not only is nullsec safer than hisec, it also supports it miners and industrialists. Frankly you will have more fun in a large nullsec alliance. " The only thing I took from this was that a ganker admitted that highsec was more dangerous than null... :)
GetSirrus Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 100	Posted - 2015.06.04 00:15:04 - [236] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: GetSirrus wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Perhaps Falcon you would like to weigh on this from CODE. http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/01/theres-always-excuse.html Is this the kind of activity being going on for years before CODE existed? Pirates of High-Sec for years have been at pains to deny that their game play is not for the sadist. But I struggle to see how this type of posting (and endorsement from rank members) is anything else. What are you talking about? That was hilarious. How is a person suffering from cancer funny? And why should it ever to used for their humiliation? This is the attraction to join New Order?! It's the magnet of a sociopath?
Christopher Mabata The Interstellar Manipulation Consortium 379	Posted - 2015.06.04 00:20:35 - [237] - Quote GetSirrus wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: GetSirrus wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Perhaps Falcon you would like to weigh on this from CODE. http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/01/theres-always-excuse.html Is this the kind of activity being going on for years before CODE existed? Pirates of High-Sec for years have been at pains to deny that their game play is not for the sadist. But I struggle to see how this type of posting (and endorsement from rank members) is anything else. What are you talking about? That was hilarious. How is a person suffering from cancer funny? And why should it ever to used for their humiliation? This is the attraction to join New Order?! It's the magnet of a sociopath? 1. We have 0 proof that any of what that person said was true, they could have been outright lying trying to make the ganker "Feel Bad" so they would get their ship replaced. It literally happens all the time. 2. There was more to that article than just that if you scrolled down 3. No the attraction is content. Fleets, killmails, tears, people to interact with on comms and make friends with ( using the word "Friends" lightly ) 4. again with the comparing it to real life mental issues, without any proof of the person's condition your just engaging in virtual monkey poo slinging with no merit hoping some of it will stick like cooked pasta to a wall. See my above post for more details. GÖú Theory-Crafter GÖú Free Agent GÖú Immortal Space Pirate GÖú "Better the Devil you Know than the devil you don't" -Observing and dismantling F&I Discussion Threads since 2013Gäó
Paranoid Loyd 5571	Posted - 2015.06.04 00:20:41 - [238] - Quote GetSirrus wrote: How is a person suffering from cancer funny? And why should it ever to used for their humiliation? This is the attraction to join New Order?! It's the magnet of a sociopath? Suffering from cancer is not funny. Trying to use the fact that your character is named after someone who suffered from cancer as a reason to shame someone into giving back what you lost in a video game is. Not in a haha kind of way but in are ******* serious kind of way. "Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata Fix the Prospect!!!
Jenn aSide Smokin Aces. 11236	Posted - 2015.06.04 00:27:34 - [239] - Quote GetSirrus wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: GetSirrus wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: This kind of activity has been going on for many years before CODE existed, and will continue for as long as EVE is around after CODE dies. It's not new or innovative, and has been done quite literally thousands of times before. It's also not against the rules. Be sure to protect your corporation from sabotage attempts. Perhaps Falcon you would like to weigh on this from CODE. http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/01/theres-always-excuse.html Is this the kind of activity being going on for years before CODE existed? Pirates of High-Sec for years have been at pains to deny that their game play is not for the sadist. But I struggle to see how this type of posting (and endorsement from rank members) is anything else. What are you talking about? That was hilarious. How is a person suffering from cancer funny? And why should it ever to used for their humiliation? This is the attraction to join New Order?! It's the magnet of a sociopath? Why would anyone share that kind of information in a video game, because of a video game situation? And why are you not questioning the motivations of that player, but questioning the motivations of these other players. We know the answer, it's because you are filled with hate and prejudice towards them, all because of the way they play a video game... A video game that allows and encourages the way they play, and that YOU enable with your subscription. There is someone sick in this situation alright, but oddly enough it's not the guys you are obsessed with....
Omar Alharazaad Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance 1790	Posted - 2015.06.04 00:57:21 - [240] - Quote I read link. Left confused as to what was wrong with it. Seemed pretty civil, actually. No tear extraction or anything. I didn't bother with the comments because, well... I couldn't be troubled to do so. I'm at a loss here as to what the issue is, to be honest. I have no more reason to care about another player's RL circumstances than they do about mine. If they really want to swap woes with me they're more than welcome to at a nearby pub, but not in the game. We're playing the same game, albeit in different manners. Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.