Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sarf
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 16:26:00 -
[1]
Quote: # The bonus on expanded cargo holds have been rounded.
Ok cargo expander 2 had there expandieness reduced from 29 to 27.5 they are no different than alocal now, just allows 1% faster speed, and 1% more structure....
I think everyone who uses transports and industrials will agree.
THERE CARGO HOLDS ARE TO SMALL!
|
Bartholomeus Crane
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 16:54:00 -
[2]
No different from a local and yet, they allow 1% faster speed and 1% more structure ...
Hmmm, are you redefining what 'no different' means, or are you just ... -- Drone users unite! Support drone whinage |
Malthros Zenobia
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 16:57:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Sarf
Quote: # The bonus on expanded cargo holds have been rounded.
Ok cargo expander 2 had there expandieness reduced from 29 to 27.5 they are no different than alocal now, just allows 1% faster speed, and 1% more structure....
I think everyone who uses transports and industrials will agree.
THERE CARGO HOLDS ARE TO SMALL!
T2 being almost identical to best named?
You act like that's something new.
Originally by: kieron The Carrier was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.
|
Alex Bester
Gallente Aeon Foundation - Science and Research Division
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 17:00:00 -
[4]
Well, think about this:
Mk5 6000m¦ + 25%(skill) x 1,295^5(5x T2 EC) = 27315,56 m¦ Add just one rig for another 10% and you have more space then in a jet can. Once the ship blows you have the same problem as the freighters. And T2 mods are im most cases on par with the best named mods (sometimes they require more grid/cpu).
So i guess they got balanced.
I must go into space again, to the lonely stars and the endless sky, and all I ask for is a fast ship and a star to steer her by... |
James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 17:01:00 -
[5]
So, T2 is a bit better than T1, top named.
Not seeing the problem...
|
Jurushy
SteelVipers YouWhat
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 17:05:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Jurushy on 26/11/2006 17:07:00 he only whine becouse he need to sell his cargo expander on the level like named may below so he cannot dictate price to "pirating" the customer whit that
in my opinion all t2 should be have same stats like best named (or a little worse in fitting like now) items which drop from npc so we would get realistik prices and non of the "elite" t2 owner will farm isk
the t2 item market is broken becouse no risk vs really high reward by some items (PDU2 CR2 and ohter wantet items)
i would kill this BPO system and create a bpc system some copys u can get from agents some from npc¦s and some can be inproved from normal tech1
everyone would be able to get them and no ultra rich player will be able to contiue deal like a DON ------
TUX PROMISE
i will always remember him till it will come to TQ |
Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 21:58:00 -
[7]
As says everyone, T2 is in almost every case (T2 guns with T2 ammo being the exception) about the same as best named, but more difficult to fit. 'Tis the way of EVE. -----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |