EVE Search - DRAKE IS WICKED BUT FEROX CAN KILL tier 2 BC. LOL

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

DRAKE IS WICKED BUT FEROX CAN KILL tier 2 BC. LOL

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Twilight Moon Minmatar Malicious Intentions	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:08:00 - [61] ISD I request you send a Polaris Frigate to 9RQ and go Ferox hunting! (Empty Space - Thinking)
HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:10:00 - [62] since they refuse to close thread upon request of starter... i also request they close on blue balls or juggle them. its only fair right?
Horza Otho Minmatar Silver Star Federation Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:12:00 - [63] hells + beer + forums = sadness ;( --- Eris Discordia is miiiiiine
HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:14:00 - [64] nm horza juggles for you
HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:17:00 - [65] lock man*****
HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:18:00 - [66] lock a*****(the rooster i mean)
HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:18:00 - [67] donkey punch to the head
HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:20:00 - [68] pimp slaps
Fraile Cloudsinger	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:20:00 - [69] Originally by: HellsRazor my POINT is BC even tier 1 still are NICE.. josh come t0 9rq you fail to come your a no show thats scared.. i can rephrase aswell..please PROVE ME WRONG. Any tier II battlecruiser with the capability of fitting 3-4 Tech II Sensor Dampeners would utterly destroy your Ferox setup mentioned. You could fit sensor boosters to compensate, but that would weaken your tank. Tho, this is all theory crafting. I'd be more than happy prove(read: test) this ingame, but I can't be arsed to do 20 jumps in 0.0 just to prove you wrong. Tier 1 battlecruisers are still nice, but the new Battlecruisers are called Tier II for a reason. And btw, this is an example of how you could(read: should) discuss the strenghts and weakness of ships in EvE.
HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:21:00 - [70] Originally by: Fraile Cloudsinger Originally by: HellsRazor my POINT is BC even tier 1 still are NICE.. josh come t0 9rq you fail to come your a no show thats scared.. i can rephrase aswell..please PROVE ME WRONG. Any tier II battlecruiser with the capability of fitting 3-4 Tech II Sensor Dampeners would utterly destroy your Ferox setup mentioned. You could fit sensor boosters to compensate, but that would weaken your tank. Tho, this is all theory crafting. I'd be more than happy prove(read: test) this ingame, but I can't be arsed to do 20 jumps in 0.0 just to prove you wrong. Tier 1 battlecruisers are still nice, but the new Battlecruisers are called Tier II for a reason. And btw, this is an example of how you could(read: should) discuss the strenghts and weakness of ships in EvE. guess you missed the FOF part.. lol

HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:23:00 - [71] O YEAH isd lock thread...lol but they never follow terms unless they want too. so.. i like lamp!!!
madaluap Gallente Mercenary Forces Exquisite Malevolance	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:25:00 - [72] Im gonna close this thread by the most powerfull argument ever, the argument you cannot resist. I once soloed a ferox in my ares, he died. solo Ares > all ph34r m3 no the ferox wasnt afk, he was firing and we were fighting in a belt in a 0.4 system. _________________________________________________
HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:26:00 - [73] Originally by: madaluap Im gonna close this thread by the most powerfull argument ever, the argument you cannot resist. I once soloed a ferox in my ares, he died. solo Ares > all ph34r m3 no the ferox wasnt afk, he was firing and we were fighting in a belt in a 0.4 system. wow your uber too.. i once killed a bs in my cruise missile caracal.. im uber.. o wait i beat a bs in my cruise kessie... OMG LOCK
Siakel	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:32:00 - [74] Originally by: HellsRazor Originally by: Fraile Cloudsinger Originally by: HellsRazor my POINT is BC even tier 1 still are NICE.. josh come t0 9rq you fail to come your a no show thats scared.. i can rephrase aswell..please PROVE ME WRONG. Any tier II battlecruiser with the capability of fitting 3-4 Tech II Sensor Dampeners would utterly destroy your Ferox setup mentioned. You could fit sensor boosters to compensate, but that would weaken your tank. Tho, this is all theory crafting. I'd be more than happy prove(read: test) this ingame, but I can't be arsed to do 20 jumps in 0.0 just to prove you wrong. Tier 1 battlecruisers are still nice, but the new Battlecruisers are called Tier II for a reason. And btw, this is an example of how you could(read: should) discuss the strenghts and weakness of ships in EvE. guess you missed the FOF part.. lol Guess you missed the part where FoFs don't fly past your lockrange. Or the part where your FoFs would be too busy going after the targets drones. Or a nearby can, cloud, station, asteroid, shiny piece of spacedust, etc.
HellsRazor Caldari FACTA NON VERBA Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:34:00 - [75] Originally by: Siakel Originally by: HellsRazor Originally by: Fraile Cloudsinger Originally by: HellsRazor my POINT is BC even tier 1 still are NICE.. josh come t0 9rq you fail to come your a no show thats scared.. i can rephrase aswell..please PROVE ME WRONG. Any tier II battlecruiser with the capability of fitting 3-4 Tech II Sensor Dampeners would utterly destroy your Ferox setup mentioned. You could fit sensor boosters to compensate, but that would weaken your tank. Tho, this is all theory crafting. I'd be more than happy prove(read: test) this ingame, but I can't be arsed to do 20 jumps in 0.0 just to prove you wrong. Tier 1 battlecruisers are still nice, but the new Battlecruisers are called Tier II for a reason. And btw, this is an example of how you could(read: should) discuss the strenghts and weakness of ships in EvE. guess you missed the FOF part.. lol Guess you missed the part where FoFs don't fly past your lockrange. Or the part where your FoFs would be too busy going after the targets drones. Or a nearby can, cloud, station, asteroid, shiny piece of spacedust, etc. they go for closes aggressor even your drones in a 1 v 1 is good :) but ill show you first hand if you dare .. but i doubt you would.
Fraile Cloudsinger	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:34:00 - [76] Originally by: HellsRazor Originally by: Fraile Cloudsinger Originally by: HellsRazor my POINT is BC even tier 1 still are NICE.. josh come t0 9rq you fail to come your a no show thats scared.. i can rephrase aswell..please PROVE ME WRONG. Any tier II battlecruiser with the capability of fitting 3-4 Tech II Sensor Dampeners would utterly destroy your Ferox setup mentioned. You could fit sensor boosters to compensate, but that would weaken your tank. Tho, this is all theory crafting. I'd be more than happy prove(read: test) this ingame, but I can't be arsed to do 20 jumps in 0.0 just to prove you wrong. Tier 1 battlecruisers are still nice, but the new Battlecruisers are called Tier II for a reason. And btw, this is an example of how you could(read: should) discuss the strenghts and weakness of ships in EvE. guess you missed the FOF part.. lol Do you think FOF missiles would instantly counter a sensor damp setup? Your DPS would then be spread against the drones and the hostile ship. A myrmidon with sensor dampeners would give you some 6km lock range, well inside NOS range. Your FOF missiles would already do a lot less damage than normal missiles and they would attack drones at random. The drones can be scooped and re-launched with full shields, ready to tank an new salvo of missiles with the explosion radius of a cruiser. Oh, you missed some of the other part, for instance how you create valid arguments.. lol?
NeuSiresMOM	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:49:00 - [77] ****
Twilight Moon Minmatar Malicious Intentions	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:54:00 - [78] Edited by: Twilight Moon on 04/12/2006 15:56:03 I'd find it amusing if ISD forum-banned you and left the thread open. Why are you bumping a thread you want locked? (Empty Space - Thinking)
Cuebick Caldari The Collective Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2006.12.04 15:59:00 - [79] If only eve was all about 1v1's HellsRazor would be the king of the hill! Seriously.. this thread makes no other purpose than for us others to have a good laugh
Verus Potestas Caldari Perkone	Posted - 2006.12.04 16:17:00 - [80] Thread just goes on delivering. Between corps atm, the NPC one is strictly a temporary thing. RAWR!111 Sig Hijackz0r!!11 - Immy

Blind Man Kemono.	Posted - 2006.12.04 16:18:00 - [81] Originally by: Verus Potestas Thread just goes on delivering.
Horza Otho Minmatar Silver Star Federation Kurai Komichi	Posted - 2006.12.04 16:20:00 - [82] omg --- Eris Discordia is miiiiiine

Deckard Bishop Forum Moderator Interstellar Services Department	Posted - 2006.12.04 16:27:00 - [83] click time to lock this thread forum rules \| [email protected] \| Our Website!



Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.