| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

X Nibiru
State Protectorate Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2015.08.07 21:11:59 -
[1] - Quote
Hi, I am here to figure something out. At the moment there is a Gallente FW pilot just chillin' at Jita. How is he able to sit in space without getting attacked by the Navy?
A couple screenshots: http://imgur.com/i7xCEB4
http://imgur.com/6o45h7l |

Yang Aurilen
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
754
|
Posted - 2015.08.07 22:41:31 -
[2] - Quote
Don't know about faction navy mechanics eh?
Post with your NPC alt main and not your main main alt!
|

Moxide Reddredi
Operation Meatshield
65
|
Posted - 2015.08.07 23:14:29 -
[3] - Quote
Because he is pro at elite solo pvp |

X Nibiru
State Protectorate Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 00:01:17 -
[4] - Quote
Yang Aurilen wrote:Don't know about faction navy mechanics eh? Enlighten me? |

Starbuck05
Zeura Brotherhood
274
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 00:02:54 -
[5] - Quote
navy police can be tanked in a proper ship
there's also away to avoid them but can't remember 100% how .. .prolly much like concord .. ge them to spawn somewhere else in same system then warp back ... rinse and repeat .. again not 100% sure as i've never done the elite high sec hub camping .. thing..
-á- I am the commanding officer , u should adress me as sir !
-á- But if i call u sir , what would i call your wife then ??
|

X Nibiru
State Protectorate Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 00:05:26 -
[6] - Quote
Starbuck05 wrote:navy police can be tanked in a proper ship
there's also away to avoid them but can't remember 100% how .. .prolly much like concord .. ge them to spawn somewhere else in same system then warp back ... rinse and repeat .. again not 100% sure as i've never done the elite high sec hub camping .. thing..
He wasn't being attacked. Another guy showed up as well shortly after. Just two Gallente FW pilots hanging out in Jita. I really would like an explanation. My understanding was, if you're in enemy territory their navy will shoot you. |

T Broz
MATAFS The Bloc
1
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 11:33:31 -
[7] - Quote
To avoid the somehow high dps and being jammed I think they tank the navy with a drone being repped or like I saw in Hek with an alt in a very tanky ship to take aggro. Dunno. |

George Gouillot
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
77
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 14:59:39 -
[8] - Quote
T Broz wrote:To avoid the somehow high dps and being jammed I think they tank the navy with a drone being repped or like I saw in Hek with an alt in a very tanky ship to take aggro. Dunno.
No, it is much easier. Every ship that has at least 5 faction mods of the friendly faction fitted and 50 tags of the highest rank of the enemy faction in cargohold is considered a collaborator and will never be shot by faction navy.
I have been told tags can be replaced by PLEX at 1:50 ratio but never tried by myself. |

Hamtai
The Forge Of Maak
0
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 11:39:09 -
[9] - Quote
1 they use a rattlesnake with a single drone somewhere in space. Most of the time at dock range of an other station or inside a pos force field while drones are outside.
2 the rattlesnake pilot uses his drone to attack the navy spaw, that spawn start shooting the drone.
3 Some neutral bs then start remote rep, shield, structure the drone and NOT the rattlesnake ... worst ... they are not flagged. The drone has heavy tank because of rattlesnake bonus
4 the single drone can tank the faction police.
5 others gallente militia come near the rattlesnake with their own faction spawn.
6 faction spawn switch target to the rattlesnake, if needed the ratllesnake pilot engage each spawn to gain full aggro.
7 others militia pilots are no immune to faction spaw and can now shot every one at undock, they even can afford to use a frigate which one would be insta poped without that exploit
8 you can add more gallente pilots as long as you add neutral bs to increase the amount of dmg taken by the sentry drone
http://i.imgur.com/kvW8Gki.png
you can see the imperial navy curator taking damage / Faceless Parmala is the rattlesnake pilot / all others bs pilots are neutral
Reported to ccp from months, seems they don't care or should be considered as a valid tactic Still waiting an official answer !!! |

George Gouillot
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
80
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:03:31 -
[10] - Quote
Hamtai wrote:1 they use a rattlesnake with a single drone somewhere in space. Most of the time at dock range of an other station or inside a pos force field while drones are outside. 2 the rattlesnake pilot uses his drone to attack the navy spaw, that spawn start shooting the drone. 3 Some neutral bs then start remote rep, shield, structure the drone and NOT the rattlesnake ... worst ... they are not flagged. The drone has heavy tank because of rattlesnake bonus 4 the single drone can tank the faction police. 5 others gallente militia come near the rattlesnake with their own faction spawn. 6 faction spawn switch target to the rattlesnake, if needed the ratllesnake pilot engage each spawn to gain full aggro. 7 others militia pilots are no immune to faction spaw and can now shot every one at undock, they even can afford to use a frigate which one would be insta poped without that exploit 8 you can add more gallente pilots as long as you add neutral bs to increase the amount of dmg taken by the sentry drone http://i.imgur.com/kvW8Gki.png
you can see the imperial navy curator taking damage / Faceless Parmala is the rattlesnake pilot / all others bs pilots are neutral Reported to ccp from months, seems they don't care or should be considered as a valid tactic Still waiting an official answer !!!
Yes, it works exactly like this - now try in Dodixie! |

Lexiana Del'Amore
Nouvelle Rouvenor
173
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:50:11 -
[11] - Quote
get a alt in a super cheap but super fast frig... enter enemy system with alt... warp 100 to random planet and start burning... enemy NPC's will try (and fail to catch up) with your fast alt.. Now your main does not need to worry about NPC's as they are all busy trying to catch the first fast frig.. |

Legatus1982
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
13
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:23:32 -
[12] - Quote
This is clearly an exploit, is obviously stupid and needs to be fixed.
Why would you even have faction police in the game if they aren't going to do anything? Just delete them if that is the case, they are cluttering up my screen with their false presence. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1504
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 15:56:41 -
[13] - Quote
Legatus1982 wrote:This is clearly an exploit, is obviously stupid and needs to be fixed.
Why would you even have faction police in the game if they aren't going to do anything? Just delete them if that is the case, they are cluttering up my screen with their false presence.
Wrong definition again, exploit only applies when mechanics are abused in a way that CCP has deemed unacceptable.
I believe this has been used for many years. CCP is aware of it and has never declared it an exploit. Therefor the term you were looking for is just abnormal use, or 'abuse' of normal mechanics.
Lexiana Del'Amore wrote:get a alt in a super cheap but super fast frig... enter enemy system with alt... warp 100 to random planet and start burning... enemy NPC's will try (and fail to catch up) with your fast alt.. Now your main does not need to worry about NPC's as they are all busy trying to catch the first fast frig..
I believe they will eventually get a magical web on you, that that might just have been the police in my case. Also, there are up to 15 separate spawns in 1.0 afaik so the trick is passing off all the spawns to the tank. otherwise there would be 14 other groups of navy ready to go.
When we used to camp as a fleet in 0.5 highsec. We would jump 10 BS in (which was the number of spawns in 0.5), then bring in the logi and fast tackle. As long as non of the BS dc'd or left system the navy would stick to them. |

Legatus1982
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
13
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 16:55:49 -
[14] - Quote
Ah Crosi. Always assuming that ccp wrote the dictionary. I'm going to miss watching you flop around on the forums spewing misinformation when I finally quit eve someday.
The current implementation of faction police are easily bypassed without any other enemy faction in system. A couple days ago I passed by a gallente gatecamp in litiura. I waved at them as I passed by but noticed the five or so navy ships on the gate were not shooting them at all and there were no other gallente in system at the time, so this was not a case of some gallente rattlesnake or frigate tanking the navy, they were simply not being aggressed. It's not the first time this happened and the exploit is wide spread at this point that you should know what they are doing (I don't, because I actually fly in the war zone, not shooting random people in high sec). |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1504
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 22:58:43 -
[15] - Quote
Sorry for using CCP's own terminology in their own game lol.
As for your scenario, i have camped lituria long ago, coincidentally, with the same person that the OP is complaining about in Jita
You are mistaken if you think the rats are not attacking him there. All you need to do is tank the ~200 or so dps and kill the ewar rats if you see something coming you want to kill.
It is possible that you saw the rats spawning but passed by in the 20 or so seconds it takes for the rats to start shooting.
Again, just to be clear, exploit is an action that CCP is aware of and has banned. An abuse of game mechanics may or may not eventually be deemed an exploit but in this case CCP has not done so. If anyone finds an abnormal use of mechanics and fails to make CCP aware of it so that CCP can judge on the activity, then that person can be subject to a ban.
This is basically the EULA on the subject, so instead of telling me how wrong i am, perhaps send an email to CCP about how stupid they are? |

Legatus1982
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
13
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 12:20:01 -
[16] - Quote
As if we can't tell the difference between aggression and harmlessly floating around that gate, FFS Crosi you are the most unreasonable person I've ever seen on these forums. These cruisers were sitting right on the gate they didn't warp in and I held my cloak for nearly the full duration while I watched them float around unharmed. If you don't know what's going on then don't comment about it honestly.
And newsflash, ccp didn't invent the word exploit. Lol. What are you like 13 years old? Just because ccp doesn't declare something an exploit in their game rules doesn't mean the normal usage of the word exploit doesn't apply.
Honestly you have some serious growing up to do, you are like a two year old child trying to always get his way. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1504
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 13:04:56 -
[17] - Quote
Excuse me if i dont believe you are competent enough to recognise what was going on. Specially with how wrong and ill informed you have been over a multitude of eve related subjects. And then how you glossed over every single example as though you knew it all along lol.
While i dont scorn you for this, eve is a complex game after all, but the sheer bold faced ignorance you display does get tiring.
I have camped the same gate, with the same people and find it highly unlikely that they are abusing some unknown mechanic because its simply easy enough to do it without.
Until CCP rules on an abuse of mechanics it is not an exploit. If any abuse of mechanics is kept secret from CCP that is banable. I believe CCP is already aware of all abuse of NPC mechanics and everything is currently ok to use as they have not declared them an exploit.
Feel free to go on about what exploit means in different contexts, im not sure how productive that will be since we are talking about EVE and CCP are perfectly clear on how they use the word. |

Masaaq
PYRO MANIACS A Band Apart.
23
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 13:42:41 -
[18] - Quote
Legatus1982 wrote:As if we can't tell the difference between aggression and harmlessly floating around that gate, FFS Crosi you are the most unreasonable person I've ever seen on these forums. These cruisers were sitting right on the gate they didn't warp in and I held my cloak for nearly the full duration while I watched them float around unharmed. If you don't know what's going on then don't comment about it honestly.
And newsflash, ccp didn't invent the word exploit. Lol. What are you like 13 years old? Just because ccp doesn't declare something an exploit in their game rules doesn't mean the normal usage of the word exploit doesn't apply.
Honestly you have some serious growing up to do, you are like a two year old child trying to always get his way.
Extreme levels of butthurt detected. |

Legatus1982
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
13
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 16:17:50 -
[19] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Excuse me if i dont believe you are competent enough to recognise what was going on. Specially with how wrong and ill informed you have been over a multitude of eve related subjects. And then how you glossed over every single example as though you knew it all along lol.
While i dont scorn you for this, eve is a complex game after all, but the sheer bold faced ignorance you display does get tiring.
I have camped the same gate, with the same people and find it highly unlikely that they are abusing some unknown mechanic because its simply easy enough to do it without.
Until CCP rules on an abuse of mechanics it is not an exploit. If any abuse of mechanics is kept secret from CCP that is banable. I believe CCP is already aware of all abuse of NPC mechanics and everything is currently ok to use as they have not declared them an exploit.
Feel free to go on about what exploit means in different contexts, im not sure how productive that will be since we are talking about EVE and CCP are perfectly clear on how they use the word.
Oh yes, because your own knowledge and skills have demonstrated your intellectual abilities. Quality posts from you such as "you can't build a titan out of incursion loot" and "I'm going to have my dog pilot my links".
The only ability I've seen from you so far is your ability to pay ccp more money for in game advantages.
The word exploit means what it means. CCP decides what you get banned for in eve online, not the definition of the word exploit. This is a stupid deflection on the issue. |

Phyrr
The Gosimer and Scarab
2
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 21:52:50 -
[20] - Quote
Legatus1982 wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Excuse me if i dont believe you are competent enough to recognise what was going on. Specially with how wrong and ill informed you have been over a multitude of eve related subjects. And then how you glossed over every single example as though you knew it all along lol.
While i dont scorn you for this, eve is a complex game after all, but the sheer bold faced ignorance you display does get tiring.
I have camped the same gate, with the same people and find it highly unlikely that they are abusing some unknown mechanic because its simply easy enough to do it without.
Until CCP rules on an abuse of mechanics it is not an exploit. If any abuse of mechanics is kept secret from CCP that is banable. I believe CCP is already aware of all abuse of NPC mechanics and everything is currently ok to use as they have not declared them an exploit.
Feel free to go on about what exploit means in different contexts, im not sure how productive that will be since we are talking about EVE and CCP are perfectly clear on how they use the word. Oh yes, because your own knowledge and skills have demonstrated your intellectual abilities and how superior they are to my own. Quality posts from you such as "you can't build a titan out of incursion loot" and "I'm going to have my dog pilot my links". The only ability I've seen from you so far is your ability to pay ccp more money for in game advantages. The word exploit means what it means. CCP decides what you get banned for in eve online, not the definition of the word exploit. This is a stupid deflection on the issue. My suggestion to you is to refrain from the smart ass comments while posting stuff like this. But you're free to make yourself look however you want.
I can demonstrate superior knowledge than your own if you wish.
A long long time ago in a faction warfare that was but weeks old....you could still fly into high sec hostile space and gank players. I myself dual accounted a destroyer and frigate to Amarr Prime and killed a few pilots, they were quite surprised. The navies chased you around constantly so you had to kill something in a few seconds and warp.
The important part of this story is that back in those days, this was ONLY possible with frigs and destroyers, because each person that entered hostile space spawned an NPC Navy fleet for EACH player. I told a Minnie FC of my antics in high sec and (for science) we took a 70 man fleet of various ships into amarr high sec to begin an assault. Every single one of our ships died, a Navy was spawned for EACH person in the fleet. Much amusement was had at our massacre.
Sometime after this CCP changed the mechanics, so that players could indeed enter hostile high sec space, but at great risk to themselves, but there wouldn't be a navy spawning for each player. The current mechanics are intended and rewards those players that can tank and/or distract the now limited naval fleets of npc hostile space. Not only has this made FW more fun, it's more realistic than seeing several hundred NPC's spawn to deal with a fleet.
I haven't been in FW for sometime, but it sounds like those changes are still current and they are intended. This isn't an exploit, you just clearly aren't old enough to remember when and why these changes were introduced.
So do us a favour eh? Stop assuming and making an ass out of u and not me. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1504
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 23:23:07 -
[21] - Quote
Legatus1982 wrote:My suggestion to you is to refrain from the smart ass comments while posting stuff like this. But you're free to make yourself look however you want.
As i have already said, your use of the word exploit was misplaced since the activities listed are not considered exploiting by CCP. If CCP declared these actions exploitation, using them would be banable.
In all these cases you argue with me as a proxy for CCP. Im just telling you how it is, if you have a problem with that you had best speak with CCP themselves.
I know you are fighting hard to remain ignorant. Im just trying to help you adhere to correct terminology so you dont get confused and can better articulate your constant whining. |

Legatus1982
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
13
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 11:28:03 -
[22] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Legatus1982 wrote:My suggestion to you is to refrain from the smart ass comments while posting stuff like this. But you're free to make yourself look however you want. As i have already said, your use of the word exploit was misplaced since the activities listed are not considered exploiting by CCP. If CCP declared these actions exploitation, using them would be banable. In all these cases you argue with me as a proxy for CCP. Im just telling you how it is, if you have a problem with that you had best speak with CCP themselves. I know you are fighting hard to remain ignorant. Im just trying to help you adhere to correct terminology so you dont get confused and can better articulate your constant whining.
http://i.word.com/idictionary/exploit
Learn something for once in your life |

Legatus1982
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
13
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 11:29:50 -
[23] - Quote
Phyrr wrote:Legatus1982 wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Excuse me if i dont believe you are competent enough to recognise what was going on. Specially with how wrong and ill informed you have been over a multitude of eve related subjects. And then how you glossed over every single example as though you knew it all along lol.
While i dont scorn you for this, eve is a complex game after all, but the sheer bold faced ignorance you display does get tiring.
I have camped the same gate, with the same people and find it highly unlikely that they are abusing some unknown mechanic because its simply easy enough to do it without.
Until CCP rules on an abuse of mechanics it is not an exploit. If any abuse of mechanics is kept secret from CCP that is banable. I believe CCP is already aware of all abuse of NPC mechanics and everything is currently ok to use as they have not declared them an exploit.
Feel free to go on about what exploit means in different contexts, im not sure how productive that will be since we are talking about EVE and CCP are perfectly clear on how they use the word. Oh yes, because your own knowledge and skills have demonstrated your intellectual abilities and how superior they are to my own. Quality posts from you such as "you can't build a titan out of incursion loot" and "I'm going to have my dog pilot my links". The only ability I've seen from you so far is your ability to pay ccp more money for in game advantages. The word exploit means what it means. CCP decides what you get banned for in eve online, not the definition of the word exploit. This is a stupid deflection on the issue. My suggestion to you is to refrain from the smart ass comments while posting stuff like this. But you're free to make yourself look however you want. I can demonstrate superior knowledge than your own if you wish. A long long time ago in a faction warfare that was but weeks old....you could still fly into high sec hostile space and gank players. I myself dual accounted a destroyer and frigate to Amarr Prime and killed a few pilots, they were quite surprised. The navies chased you around constantly so you had to kill something in a few seconds and warp. The important part of this story is that back in those days, this was ONLY possible with frigs and destroyers, because each person that entered hostile space spawned an NPC Navy fleet for EACH player. I told a Minnie FC of my antics in high sec and (for science) we took a 70 man fleet of various ships into amarr high sec to begin an assault. Every single one of our ships died, a Navy was spawned for EACH person in the fleet. Much amusement was had at our massacre. Sometime after this CCP changed the mechanics, so that players could indeed enter hostile high sec space, but at great risk to themselves, but there wouldn't be a navy spawning for each player. The current mechanics are intended and rewards those players that can tank and/or distract the now limited naval fleets of npc hostile space. Not only has this made FW more fun, it's more realistic than seeing several hundred NPC's spawn to deal with a fleet. I haven't been in FW for sometime, but it sounds like those changes are still current and they are intended. This isn't an exploit, you just clearly aren't old enough to remember when and why these changes were introduced. I don't know if they made changes to this again in that time, but from what I have read in the thread they still seem to be in force. So do us a favour eh? Stop assuming and making an ass out of u and not me.
So your plan to demonstrate your superior knowledge was to post a stupid pointless 4-6 paragraph story about eve online years ago? While not making any useful contribution at all to the actual discussion? I can see how anyone would take you seriously, rofl
Tell us more about how your dog is piloting your links |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1504
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 13:09:11 -
[24] - Quote
So he made a well informed comment on why the mechanics are like they are, and your contribution to the topic was to call something an exploit that by CCPs own definition is not an exploit.
As for the definition itself. Its often useful to recognise the context in which words are used. For example, the word 'theory' has a much different meaning in day to day vernacular than it does in a scientific context. By the same token, the implications of calling something an exploit in EVE as apposed to its dictionary definition of ' to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage' have different connotations.
In eve, an exploit will get you banned, but ' to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage' is the name of the game.
I know eve is a hard game to walk into, but your attitude of not wanting to learn or improve your understanding will get you nowhere. If you want everything to be fair and rainbow coloured, theres other games out there for you. |

Estella Osoka
Perkone Caldari State
686
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 14:00:41 -
[25] - Quote
I have never seen a squid whine so much, or be so ill informed.
As far as CCP is concerned, not an exploit. Working as intended. Don't think so? File a petition and stop whining on the forums. |

Legatus1982
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
13
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 14:48:52 -
[26] - Quote
Oh look another links alt owner is in here defending his buddy imagine my surprise. Your credibility was never higher. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1504
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 15:02:05 -
[27] - Quote
Just because you changed subject, doesnt make you any less wrong lol. |

Legatus1982
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
13
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 15:07:07 -
[28] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:So his contribution was a well informed comment on why the mechanics are like they are, and your contribution to the topic was to call something an exploit that by CCPs own definition is not an exploit.
As for the definition itself. Its often useful to recognise the context in which words are used. For example, the word 'theory' has a much different meaning in day to day vernacular than it does in a scientific context. By the same token, the implications of calling something an exploit in EVE as apposed to its dictionary definition of ' to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage' have different connotations.
In eve, an exploit will get you banned, but ' to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage' is the name of the game. So as you can see, the straight-up dictionary definition is less than useless here.
I know eve is a hard game to walk into, but your attitude of not wanting to learn or improve your understanding will get you nowhere. If you want everything to be fair and rainbow coloured, theres other games out there for you.
So basically this entire time you are deflecting the real issue with the definition of the word exploit, which whether you like the context or not, is a perfectly valid usage of the word in the context of the post. Your own irrelevant opinion does not change that fact and neither does ccp ruling one way or the other.
Furthermore, not all exploits that even by your pointlessly limited definition of the word are named exploits by ccp are known to the company yet. Your limitation on the word serves NO PURPOSE to anyone at all, and having your links butt buddy come in here saying stupid things changes nothing about that fact.
Finally, the real issue which you are still avoiding is that people are not being aggressed by hostile navy in high sec which is a fact you are going to have to accept, and the only reason we don't have conclusive proof already is because people are doing this in jita where local had a thousand players on the list. Several people have already reported seeing this, I've seen it, you know about, most of gallente knows about it, croak roach and spar multendor and their gang knows about it, apparently you and your friend are the only people in all of eve who don't know about this issue, and I find that very suspect given the fact that you lie on these forums constantly. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
1504
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 15:15:59 -
[29] - Quote
Im not deflecting anything. Im deferring judgement to CCP, who have been aware of this behavior for many years and have not called it an exploit.
As for my opinion on the behavior itself, i dont really care either way. |

Legatus1982
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
13
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 15:42:58 -
[30] - Quote
We've already been through the usage of the word exploit, you're definitely completely wrong, the second highlighted portion of your quote is clearly sarcasm and needs no explanation other than yet another attempt from you to dishonestly claim ignorance, and the fact that jita has too big of a local list is in fact the reason this guy's picture doesn't definitively prove the case being made whether you like that fact or not.
It's only a matter of time before ccp catches this because the use is so wide spread and I am fully certain you already know of said exploit due to the fact that you are again probably the most dishonest person on these forums. And that's saying alot given the nature of these forums.
I'm not going to waste more time on the issue, you are as usual perpetually a child and the exploit will eventually be caught whether you lie all day on the forums or not. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |