Im going to say no.

Syria screwed themselves up.

No country next to syria which are some of the richest gobeements in the world wont accept them.

Our goverment and country is stetched to breaking point ywt we still have to take them in and give them free benifits and aid and local nhs treatment.

We also know isis black cells are mixed in with them.

No no no no no bloody no

Not to single you out or anything, but this is exactly why CCP can't involve themselves in something so politically charged, and it's why we can't have a discussion about this here. This is a gaming forum, and political debates like this just wind people up. You have very good reasons for your comments, but they will upset people who are already upset over watching that refugee crisis unfold.

International powers that be (Western particularly) stuck their neck out on intervention in Libya against Gaddafi, as far as they could (and exclusive to air/navy support, no boots on the ground.)

View the abstaining votes and speeches of certain Security Council states in the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, for more elucidation as to why the international community was politically unable to further involve itself in the Syrian issue in support of the revolt vs the al-Assad autocracy (before ISIS altogether).

The Arab Spring managed to sweep the north african coast of autocratic rulers that had ruled for generations, but Syria came too late in the chain, and the West could not interfere in the Syrian Revolt, though the rebels dearly needed it and hoped for it.

The West failed them in their attempt for freedom. And hence the situation is worse than ever, al-Assad still rules, and ISIS is now at the borders of a fractured nation.

You are categorically wrong.

View the abstaining votes and speeches of certain Security Council states in the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, which was put forward so as to save civilian lives from imminent and anticipated genocide by Gaddafi.

Much the same as Bashar al-Assad has also committed genocide on his own population, in the absence of intervention.

Come back when you know which members of the UN intervened in Libya, and which abstained from the decision altogether, and why.

Well I clearly remember a time when all the world LOVED obama, wanted him elected, and right afterwords he did his world tour apologizing for America. All I can say is: I told you so.
meh he's out soon.

Read the Resolution.

You are completely and utterly misinformed to the level of tinfoil hattery.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1973

The action in Libya was ENTIRELY and STRICTLY under UN "blessing".

Then watch the speeches of the Security Council members in explanation of their vote.

Now ask yourself what else you might be wrong about in your resolute obstinacy.

Contemplate on that for awhile, do some research and re-evaluate your positions.