| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 08:15:52 -
[1] - Quote
As the title states this is a suggestion for the removal of high sec ganking specifically looking at the current absurd situation that allows freighters to be ganked in high sec without the ability to defend yourself.
You are safer taking a freighter through null sec than high sec because you have the ability to control the travel route and kill any hostiles before they can attack your freighter.
Everyone would think you were crazy if you took your freighter through high sec with a war dec active but, once again, it is safer than without one because you can spot and kill any hostiles before they attack your freighter.
Even if you do everything right (do not auto pilot and triple web your freighter) you can still die without having the ability to defend yourself.
Just ask Grath The Meta Show @ 25:20.
Preemptive counter arguments:
Concord is a deterrent only they are not there to protect you from people A: Things change. Geddons used to be able to fit 8 heat sinks, Domis used to have 15 heavy drones, Concord used to be a deterrent, See how easy it is to change things.
People will just move stuff in NPC corps and won't be vulnerable at all A: I have a few ideas on how to fix this but am open to suggestions.
Dude, don't auto pilot your freighter and you won't get ganked! A: Manually piloting and triple webbing your freighter won't always save you, see above link
I have never lost a freighter in x number of years hauling stuff in empire, you people are just doing it wrong A: You're just lucky, it will happen to you at some point
LOLOLOL You just got ganked in high sec, How much did you lose??? A: I can't fly freighters on any of my characters
And so you understand the situation, Enjoy the ganks
Let the freighter flames begin. |

Seliah
Repo.
209
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 08:50:01 -
[2] - Quote
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're not actually suggesting anything, are you ? |

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
12149
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 08:56:19 -
[3] - Quote
Nope, just whinging and moaning.
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|

Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
1694
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:03:58 -
[4] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote:As the title states this is a suggestion for the removal of high sec ganking specifically looking at the current absurd situation that allows freighters to be ganked in high sec without the ability to defend yourself. I am confused; when did CCP take away the ability for you to defend yourself?
If you want to protect your assets, you are suppose to provide for your own defense: that is a core tenet of this game. The developers of this game have made this crystal clear.
Freighters are giant loot pinatas that are very good at carrying a large amount of cargo, and quite poor at defending themselves. If you insist on using them, you probably should bring a defense fleet to protect them. If you don't want (or can't) defend them, maybe you should consider using an alternative hauler to carry your goods, one that is more adept at defending itself.
So, -1. |

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:24:15 -
[5] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Christopher Multsanti wrote:As the title states this is a suggestion for the removal of high sec ganking specifically looking at the current absurd situation that allows freighters to be ganked in high sec without the ability to defend yourself. I am confused; when did CCP take away the ability for you to defend yourself? If you want to protect your assets, you are suppose to provide for your own defense: that is a core tenet of this game. The developers of this game have made this crystal clear. Freighters are giant loot pinatas that are very good at carrying a large amount of cargo, and quite poor at defending themselves. If you insist on using them, you probably should bring a defense fleet to protect them. If you don't want (or can't) defend them, maybe you should consider using an alternative hauler to carry your goods, one that is more adept at defending itself. So, -1.
It seems both you and falcon are confused. Concord is not a deterrent in the same way the police are in real life. Because if you carjack someone in real life you got jail for many months of your life. In Eve you are wanted for 5 minutes then the police just let get back to your criminal. So bad analogies are bad.
The only form of defence you have is if you web your freighter into warp before you get bumped and ganked. If you believe there is any other form of defence then you are mistaken. |

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2052
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:27:04 -
[6] - Quote
You can kill the bumper.
Whilst I do think the mechanics are pants on head stupid, it's very necessary for the ecosystem. |

Celthric Kanerian
Ascendance Of New Eden Workers Trade Federation
486
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:27:15 -
[7] - Quote
You whine and rant throughout the post, and then you post this out of nowhere without any connection to that before.
Christopher Multsanti [b wrote:Concord is a deterrent only they are not there to protect you from people[/b] A: Things change. Geddons used to be able to fit 8 heat sinks, Domis used to have 15 heavy drones, Concord used to be a deterrent, See how easy it is to change things.
|

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:29:46 -
[8] - Quote
Seliah wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're not actually suggesting anything, are you ?
I am suggesting the removal of high sec ganking. There are a few ways it can be done but I don't work for CCP I don't presume to have all the answers. I am just pointing out something that, to me, looks broken in terms of game mechanics.
|

Mag's
the united
20310
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:36:34 -
[9] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote:As the title states this is a suggestion for the removal of high sec ganking specifically looking at the current absurd situation that allows freighters to be ganked in high sec without the ability to defend yourself. You idea is built upon a false premiss.
The fact that some choose not to defend themselves, doesn't preclude the ability to do so.
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|

Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
1697
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:41:51 -
[10] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote: It seems both you and falcon are confused. Concord is not a deterrent in the same way the police are in real life. Because if you carjack someone in real life you got jail for many months of your life. In Eve you are wanted for 5 minutes then the police just let get back to your criminal. So bad analogies are bad.
The only form of defence you have is if you web your freighter into warp before you get bumped and ganked. If you believe there is any other form of defence then you are mistaken.
And what exactly do mean by if I insist on using them?? You mean a ship designed by CCP for carrying massive amounts of cargo? That kind of insist?
Of course there are other forms of defense. Bumpers can be ganked. Freighters can be remote repaired. Gank ships can be ECMed or shot with lasers. CCP Falcon confirmed that you are suppose to bring said defenses.
Eve is a game about tradeoffs. No ship or fit is good at everything. Freighters are very good at hauling, but the cost of that is your are vulnerable to gankers and bumpers. You are asking CCP to change the game to make freighters not only the best ship for cargo capacity, but now the only ship in the game immune to attack in highsec. Why would anyone fly anything else?
If you want the benefits of being able to carry a lot, they you have to accept and mitigate the risk someone will gank you. That is the tradeoff for using freighters in the game. There are haulers, like the DSTs, that are immune to bumping and highly resistant to ganking. The tradeoff for that? Reduced cargo capacity.
Choose the tool that is best for your hauling needs. Do not come here and beg CCP to make your ship do everything so you get the best of both worlds all the time. You know, actually play the game?
|

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:43:44 -
[11] - Quote
afkalt wrote:You can kill the bumper.
Whilst I do think the mechanics are pants on head stupid, it's very necessary for the ecosystem.
You're right, the mechanics are crazy and you're right you can kill the bumper, but for that argument to be valid it means that every freighter needs to be escorted by a support fleet in high sec, which in itself is kinda pants on the head stupid.
I am not going to search for dev blogs or anything so I may be incorrect when i say what i'm about to say but i'm pretty sure when CCP released Freighters they didn't come with an exception that they would need to escorted everywhere in high sec (low and null sec is a different matter).
There are also plenty of examples of CCP letting player actions influence game play against intended design, (jet can mining for one) But freighter ganking has gone way past the line imo.
I have no problem with freighters being killed, I love it. But freighters should be able to get their corp or alliance to escort and pro actively protect them. You can make market hubs only accessible through low secs or make everyone be war decable, there are plenty of other ways to make freighters valid targets than the way it currently happening. |

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:52:13 -
[12] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Of course there are other forms of defense. Bumpers can be ganked. Freighters can be remote repaired. Gank ships can be ECMed or shot with lasers. CCP Falcon confirmed that you are suppose to bring said defenses.
Eve is a game about tradeoffs. No ship or fit is good at everything. Freighters are very good at hauling, but the cost of that is your are vulnerable to gankers and bumpers. You are asking CCP to change the game to make freighters not only the best ship for cargo capacity, but now the only ship in the game immune to attack in highsec. Why would anyone fly anything else?
If you want the benefits of being able to carry a lot, they you have to accept and mitigate the risk someone will gank you. That is the tradeoff for using freighters in the game. There are haulers, like the DSTs, that are immune to bumping and highly resistant to ganking. The tradeoff for that? Reduced cargo capacity.
Choose the tool that is best for your hauling needs. Do not come here and beg CCP to make your ship do everything so you get the best of both worlds all the time. You know, actually play the game?
This is the part where you are not going to like my argument. I am asking for every ship to not be attackable in high sec unless you have a war. There are plenty of places in eve for non consensual pvp (wh space, null and low sec AND high sec if you have a war active). If you want to kill people in high sec declare war.
I'm just using freighters as an extreme example. |

Mag's
the united
20312
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:56:24 -
[13] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote:This is the part where you are not going to like my argument. I am asking for every ship to not be attackable in high sec unless you have a war. There are plenty of places in eve for non consensual pvp (wh space, null and low sec AND high sec if you have a war active). If you want to kill people in high sec declare war.
I'm just using freighters as an example. Then you'll gain no traction here.
Eve is and will always be a game, that allows none consensual PvP. Whether this be combat, Mining, Industry, Missions etc etc. It's at the core of the game.
If you're looking to play Eve without any consequences and to be Combat free in High sec, then please use the test server.
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2056
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:57:57 -
[14] - Quote
It's a capital....Go ask and non-high sec dweller the life expectancy of an unescorted capital.... |

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 09:58:21 -
[15] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote: Bumpers can be ganked. Freighters can be remote repaired. Gank ships can be ECMed or shot with lasers.
The video i posted shows 40 catalysts killing a freighter in less than 30 seconds. None of things you posted will be able to stop that from happening in that time frame.
|

Mag's
the united
20314
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:00:34 -
[16] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote:Black Pedro wrote: Bumpers can be ganked. Freighters can be remote repaired. Gank ships can be ECMed or shot with lasers.
The video i posted shows 40 catalysts killing a freighter in less than 30 seconds. None of things you posted will be able to stop that from happening in that time frame. You mean people have gathered together, in an MMO, their numbers have overwhelmed a solo pilot and you're surprised about this?
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2056
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:00:52 -
[17] - Quote
Seriously man, yes the mechanics may be stupid and completely unintuitive but what ELSE is there to stop people (like me, because why not) running about in multibillion officer fit ships in 100% safety raking isk in hand over fist whilst being untouchable?
They are very necessary. Could they stand to be improved? 100% yes, but I sincerely doubt that would go the way you want. |

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:01:10 -
[18] - Quote
afkalt wrote:It's a capital....Go ask and non-high sec dweller the life expectancy of an unescorted capital....
You really should learn to read before you post things that make you look like a total idiot....
Christopher Multasnti wrote:Freighters didn't come with an exception that they would need to escorted everywhere in high sec (low and null sec is a different matter). |

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:02:33 -
[19] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Christopher Multsanti wrote:Black Pedro wrote: Bumpers can be ganked. Freighters can be remote repaired. Gank ships can be ECMed or shot with lasers.
The video i posted shows 40 catalysts killing a freighter in less than 30 seconds. None of things you posted will be able to stop that from happening in that time frame. You mean people have gathered together, in an MMO, their numbers have overwhelmed a solo pilot and you're surprised about this?
Not in the slightest. I'm pretty sure I never said player behaviour is the problem
|

Mag's
the united
20314
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:02:42 -
[20] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote:You really should learn to read before you post things that make you look like a total idiot. You were going for irony with this? Am I right?
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|

Mag's
the united
20315
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:03:33 -
[21] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote:Mag's wrote:You mean people have gathered together, in an MMO, their numbers have overwhelmed a solo pilot and you're surprised about this? Not in the slightest. I'm pretty sure I never said player behaviour is the problem So far, you've failed to show any problem.
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|

afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2056
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:05:03 -
[22] - Quote
To be fair he's demonstrated a number of problems, just none related to the topic at hand  |

Mag's
the united
20315
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:05:47 -
[23] - Quote
afkalt wrote:To be fair he's demonstrated a number of problems, just none related to the topic at hand  Damn it, I had a mouth full of coffee. 
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|

Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
1698
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:06:12 -
[24] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote: This is the part where you are not going to like my argument. I am asking for every ship to not be attackable in high sec unless you have a war. There are plenty of places in eve for non consensual pvp (wh space, null and low sec AND high sec if you have a war active). If you want to kill people in high sec declare war.
I'm just using freighters as an extreme example.
Well, the thing is, that is not going to happen. That is not consistent with the core design of the game. Ships are suppose to die. You are not entitled to 100% safety or have the right to fly wherever you choose. If there are too many gankers for you to defend yourself from, it is best that you choose to avoid them, just like everyone else in this game does when they are faced with a overwhelmingly superior force.
Let's all take some time to bask some more in the thoughts of CCP Falcon:
CCP Falcon wrote:I love EVE and the core of what the game stands for. That's why I've been dedicated to it and its community for over 11 years now.
Risk vs Reward is a huge part of that.
Honestly, if that changed, and the game started to soften out and cater to those who want to have their hand held all the way through their gameplay experience, I'd rather not be working on the project regardless of how many subscribers we had, than sell out the core principles that New Eden was built on.
That's a sentiment that I hear a lot around the office, because we are all invested in what makes New Eden so compelling - The dark, gritty, hard reality beneath the pretty ships and nebulas.
EVE is built on the core principle that you are never 100% safe, no matter where you go or what you do. When you interact with another player, you roll the dice on whether they're going to screw you over or not. That's a massive part of the social engineering behind the very basic underpinnings of the EVE Universe.
Sorry, but your scaremongering counter argument makes no sense to me and carries no weight :)
|

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:17:28 -
[25] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Christopher Multsanti wrote:Mag's wrote:You mean people have gathered together, in an MMO, their numbers have overwhelmed a solo pilot and you're surprised about this? Not in the slightest. I'm pretty sure I never said player behaviour is the problem So far, you've failed to show any problem.
I have put forth an argument in which no one can defend themselves against a bumper and 40 catalysts. An argument which you cannot counter and now you claim there is no problem. GG you!
|

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:22:11 -
[26] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Wall of text
Killing in high sec might be a point i'll concede won't ever stop happening. You know what, keep it in there if you feel the sandbox might be diluted beyond the point of no return without it.
But the point still stands, your suggestions of defence against ganks are no defence at all.
|

Mag's
the united
20315
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:28:08 -
[27] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote:Mag's wrote:Christopher Multsanti wrote:Mag's wrote:You mean people have gathered together, in an MMO, their numbers have overwhelmed a solo pilot and you're surprised about this? Not in the slightest. I'm pretty sure I never said player behaviour is the problem So far, you've failed to show any problem. I have put forth an argument in which no one can defend themselves against a bumper and 40 catalysts. An argument which you cannot counter and now you claim there is no problem. GG you! No you put forward a premiss, that was false. Due in no small part, to you not including all the relevant information. You can avoid facts as much as you like. But no one has ever lost the ability to defend themselves.
If you want to make assumptions and jump to conclusions, then be my guest. But it will carry no weight here.
I have to ask, when did you buy that character?
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|

Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:34:38 -
[28] - Quote
Mag's wrote:I have to ask, when did you buy that character?
Mag's my friend I created this char 3 months before you did and almost a full year before you joined MASS. And probably like you, I have done it all. High sec ganked, been ganked, scammed (never been scammed), Pirated, killed BOB haulers in delve, FC'ed. I have done the lot.
So please tell me how you would defend your freighter against a bumping mach and 40 catalysts? Cos If I am missing some fundamental I would like to know. |

Lan Wang
V I R I I Ineluctable.
1584
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:41:18 -
[29] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote:Mag's wrote:Christopher Multsanti wrote:Mag's wrote:You mean people have gathered together, in an MMO, their numbers have overwhelmed a solo pilot and you're surprised about this? Not in the slightest. I'm pretty sure I never said player behaviour is the problem So far, you've failed to show any problem. I have put forth an argument in which no one can defend themselves against a bumper and 40 catalysts. An argument which you cannot counter and now you claim there is no problem. GG you!
so whats your solution to this are you saying that people cant bring the right amount of ships to kill something within a given time? is efficiency actually a problem? how do you fix being efficient?
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|

Mag's
the united
20315
|
Posted - 2015.10.01 10:41:42 -
[30] - Quote
Christopher Multsanti wrote:Mag's wrote:I have to ask, when did you buy that character? Mag's my friend I created this char 3 months before you did and almost a full year before you joined MASS. And probably like you, I have done it all. High sec ganked, been ganked, scammed (never been scammed), Pirated, killed BOB haulers in delve, FC'ed. I have done the lot. So please tell me how you would defend your freighter against a bumping mach and 40 catalysts? Cos If I am missing some fundamental I would like to know. So you you bought it back, after selling it in 2006 to Shooq?
You have a friend that scouts and webs you. A big part of defence, is never allowing the enemy a chance. Then if you happen to be very very unlucky and do it wrong, you can use your friend as a warp point when being bumped. You can also bring more friends along and have them rep your ass, or ECM shoot the -10 ganker when they show up. Either way, that's called defending yourself. But as with everything in Eve, nothing is guaranteed.
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |