Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14694
|
Posted - 2015.10.10 23:35:31 -
[121] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Seriously, we need to see if we can't make sure that stupid **** Mike Azariah isn't on the CSM next year. His hand has been on all of this year's nerfs. Done. I am not planning on running next year. See, it is easy to get what you want. Ya just ask. m
Probably the only post of yours I've ever liked. Honestly, I think you're a sleaze who talks out both sides of his mouth.
XeX Znndstrup wrote:We clearly disagree with this post. Very easy to **** from a computer, don't you ? And absolutely unfair. Try to learn respect.
You know that noise people make when they're about to hock a loogie? That's pretty much all I imagined your character doing when reading this post.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Kandu Harr
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 00:45:49 -
[122] - Quote
Well it seems my efforts may not have been for naught after all
This would be a proper change in mechanics. I'll wait until it's implemented before I celebrate. |
Bellatrix Invicta
New Order Logistics CODE.
632
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 01:43:11 -
[123] - Quote
Kandu Harr wrote:Well it seems my efforts may not have been for naught after all This would be a proper change in mechanics. I'll wait until it's implemented before I celebrate.
Yeah. It was all you, bro.
If you think you've won, think again.
The CODE always wins.
|
Kandu Harr
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 01:59:02 -
[124] - Quote
Bellatrix Invicta wrote:Kandu Harr wrote:Well it seems my efforts may not have been for naught after all This would be a proper change in mechanics. I'll wait until it's implemented before I celebrate. Yeah. It was all you, bro.
I never thought of that. Thanks. |
412nv Yaken
The Conference Elite CODE.
324
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 02:12:50 -
[125] - Quote
What I learnt from this thread.
Hyper dunking is a solo activity, despite known hyper Dunkers team up with 2 or 3 ppl Freighter gankers r bad Any type of conflict in Highsec is bad Code is still hated. I'm wrong because I'm in code
Flying in a group of frigates is elite pvp Solo frigate pvp is elite pvp Basically anyone that's "regularly" in a security status less than .5 is elite Pvp despite their kill boards not checking out.
I shall now go biomass I have been doing it all wrong.
A True Champion of High Security Space
|
Faylee Freir
The Conference Elite CODE.
179
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 02:13:32 -
[126] - Quote
Today I came across 8b in capital BPOs that some Orca jettisoned for my Machariel pilot... Strange.
HTFU
|
Otto Bismarck
Reikoku Pandemic Legion
23
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 02:13:46 -
[127] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Seriously, we need to see if we can't make sure that stupid **** Mike Azariah isn't on the CSM next year. His hand has been on all of this year's nerfs.
Holy Amarrian Empire, are you insane? Mike is one of the hardest working CSMs, which is indeed a challenge because they are all really hard working. If you also think about how just downright wrong your statement about Nerfs is. The CSM are behind 0 nerfs. They might suggest things to CCP that might be wrong/underpower/overpowered and CCP are the ones who have the final say on all of the changes in Eve Online. Thanks your proving your an idiot, and insulting a hard working member of the community.
GG Well Played
Mike Azariah wrote: Done. I am not planning on running next year.
See, it is easy to get what you want.
Ya just ask.
m
Can I put your name on the ballot against your will? |
Leto Thule
Lazerhawks
3795
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 02:18:51 -
[128] - Quote
412nv Yaken wrote:What I learnt from this thread.
Hyper dunking is a solo activity, despite known hyper Dunkers team up with 2 or 3 ppl Freighter gankers r bad Any type of conflict in Highsec is bad Code is still hated. I'm wrong because I'm in code
Flying in a group of frigates is elite pvp Solo frigate pvp is elite pvp Basically anyone that's "regularly" in a security status less than .5 is elite Pvp despite their kill boards not checking out.
I shall now go biomass I have been doing it all wrong.
You. *******. Bastard.
Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
|
Leto Thule
Lazerhawks
3795
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 02:20:12 -
[129] - Quote
Kandu Harr wrote:Well it seems my efforts may not have been for naught after all This would be a proper change in mechanics. I'll wait until it's implemented before I celebrate.
Me: "So, do you guys remember that forum alt that changed EVERYTHING?"
Everyone else: "No, not really"
Me: "Me either. Oh well."
Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
|
Kandu Harr
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 02:29:16 -
[130] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:Kandu Harr wrote:Well it seems my efforts may not have been for naught after all This would be a proper change in mechanics. I'll wait until it's implemented before I celebrate. Me: "So, do you guys remember that forum alt that changed EVERYTHING?" Everyone else: "No, not really" Me: "Me either. Oh well."
Nobody knew who the Tank Man was either.
Doesn't really matter in this case. I'll just disappear into the masses and be forgotten. Mission successful. |
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
25264
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 08:45:25 -
[131] - Quote
Kandu Harr wrote:Well it seems my efforts may not have been for naught after all This would be a proper change in mechanics. I'll wait until it's implemented before I celebrate. Veers is that you?
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
XeX Znndstrup
74
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 08:53:06 -
[132] - Quote
Aoife Fraoch wrote:Bellatrix Invicta wrote:XeX Znndstrup wrote: We clearly disagree with this post. Very easy to **** from a computer, don't you ? And absolutely unfair. Try to learn respect. As well...
Who the **** is "we"? Is this the Royal 'we' or is there some group of people out there who may or not exist? Let you see our official thread in this forum. We don't want to start another exchange in this thread to respect the original subject.
Judge of The Law Organization and President of Stellar Order.
"Long is the way, and hard, that out of hell leads up to light". John Milton, Lost Paradise.
@ /// f
|
Hiasa Kite
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
245
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 08:55:39 -
[133] - Quote
Kandu Harr wrote:Well it seems my efforts may not have been for naught after all This would be a proper change in mechanics. I'll wait until it's implemented before I celebrate. Can you explain why the mechanical removal of an underpowered tactic is a good thing? I'm honestly struggling to figure that one out.
People to vote for CSM X(in order): Sabriz Adoudel, Cagali Cagali, Steve Ronuken, Manfred Sideous, Mike Azariah, Gorski Car
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
2819
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 09:34:54 -
[134] - Quote
Nighthawk The Assassin wrote:No Link alt's and there are REAL PvP pilots there? Ohh I love realll F1 monkeys, challenge accepted.
DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !
|
Nighthawk The Assassin
Divine Intervention of The Dark Angels Parental Supervision.
10
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 09:44:35 -
[135] - Quote
412nv Yaken wrote:MMORPG...... what does it stand for? Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game. Yet solo freighter pilots can cry enough on the forums, reddit, petitions and get a play style banned. If they had 1 friend who brought reps, hyper dunking would not work.
LOGIC
Except this is bullshit. You play a play style that in ANY other game would be constituted as "Griefing" i.e deliberately upsetting other players in attempt to get "your rocks off". In ANY other game you would have warnings, temps bangs and then perma bans.
Yet in this cess pit CCP is now starting to realise that allowing this type of game play is in fact killing the game. In the last two years we have lost close to 22 THOUSAND players who have quit in disgust. So yet, with the base fact evidence that we are not retaining new players, you continue this play style with one goal in mind. To take down EvE and say "yeh we did that".
Which shows a disgusting mindset. No, all of you, griefers, need to be stopped so eve can grow. So eve can retain new players who can look after children and afk mine to make ISK, who can log in in super shiny ships they earned and feel safe flying about in empire space.
If you want loot so badly, go low/null/wh's and fight for it, but you don't, you spout "risk vs reward" like it's a shield, yet when a player i.e me suggested link alt's become *suspect* as soon as they enter the field, what did u all do? You war decked the **** out of the corp i was in and forced it to disband as we had 2k+ players on us in a 15 man corps.
Why should we Risk our stuff to get rewards when you risk NOTHING to get yours, ganking is NOT RISK VS REWARD, death is a certainty when ganking i.e so it is not BY LOGIC Risk vs reward. The shield you hide behind is complete and utter rubbish, you use a motto of the game to do one thing.
Grief other players in an attempt to **** as many people off as possible and call is "risk vs reward" when you infact risk nothing as u know you will loose your ship so by definition of "risk". No, there is no risk, its a certainty you will loose your ship so BY EXTENSION OF YOUR LOGIC it is pre planned assault on another player.
So stop spouting your crap like it means anything. Griefers are the biggest cowards in the game and always will be.
You dont dare head to real pvp areas because you would get slapped sideways so much by real players, you'd realise what you call pvp is infact ganking and griefing and NOT pvp.
GTFO |
Kandu Harr
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 09:54:07 -
[136] - Quote
Hiasa Kite wrote:Kandu Harr wrote:Well it seems my efforts may not have been for naught after all This would be a proper change in mechanics. I'll wait until it's implemented before I celebrate. Can you explain why the mechanical removal of an underpowered tactic is a good thing? I'm honestly struggling to figure that one out.
Boarding a ship in hisec while under a criminal timer is ****. That is the only proper change required.
Ganking and bumping will continue unaffected by this change. As it should. |
Kandu Harr
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 10:05:19 -
[137] - Quote
Nighthawk The Assassin wrote: drivel
I'd gank you too if I found you afk mining. And pay Tora to wardec your corp.
Welcome to Eve. |
Hiasa Kite
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
246
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 10:07:53 -
[138] - Quote
Nighthawk The Assassin wrote:You play a play style that in ANY other game would be constituted as "Griefing" i.e deliberately upsetting other players in attempt to get "your rocks off". In ANY other game you would have warnings, temps bangs and then perma bans. Killing other people is not griefing. It's PvP, pure and simple. EVE is one of the few games that boast asymmetric PvP. I, for one, love that; both as a ganker and a victim.
Quote:Yet in this cess pit CCP is now starting to realise that allowing this type of game play is in fact killing the game. Debunked months ago by CCP. Try again.
http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/03/ccp-proves-new-order-was-right-about.html
Quote:Which shows a disgusting mindset. No, all of you, griefers, need to be stopped so eve can grow. So eve can retain new players who can look after children and afk mine to make ISK, who can log in in super shiny ships they earned and feel safe flying about in empire space. You're trolling. You must be. Right?
Quote:If you want loot so badly, go low/null/wh's and fight for it This is a stupid suggestion. HiSec is a target rich environment full of AFK loot pi+Ķatas. If you want piracy HiSec is a great place to start and stay, in fact.
Quote:You war decked the **** out of the corp i was in and forced it to disband as we had 2k+ players on us in a 15 man corps. Why is your failure their fault? If you're seriously out-gunned, switch tactics. Guerilla warfare for the win!
I'm all but certain this is a troll, but meh, it's Sunday.
People to vote for CSM X(in order): Sabriz Adoudel, Cagali Cagali, Steve Ronuken, Manfred Sideous, Mike Azariah, Gorski Car
|
Hiasa Kite
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
246
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 10:13:20 -
[139] - Quote
Kandu Harr wrote:Hiasa Kite wrote:Can you explain why the mechanical removal of an underpowered tactic is a good thing? I'm honestly struggling to figure that one out. Boarding a ship in hisec while under a criminal timer is ****.. This doesn't answer the question. How does the game benefit from such a change? "I don't like it" isn't a valid answer.
People to vote for CSM X(in order): Sabriz Adoudel, Cagali Cagali, Steve Ronuken, Manfred Sideous, Mike Azariah, Gorski Car
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
25264
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 10:19:30 -
[140] - Quote
Nighthawk The Assassin wrote:Except this is bullshit. You play a play style that in ANY other game would be constituted as "Griefing" i.e deliberately upsetting other players in attempt to get "your rocks off". In ANY other game you would have warnings, temps bangs and then perma bans. Your point being? That playstyle is explicitly allowed here, therefore how other games view it is completely irrelevant.
Quote:Yet in this cess pit CCP is now starting to realise that allowing this type of game play is in fact killing the game. In the last two years we have lost close to 22 THOUSAND players who have quit in disgust. So yet, with the base fact evidence that we are not retaining new players, you continue this play style with one goal in mind. To take down EvE and say "yeh we did that". Citation needed on the 22,000 players that have supposedly quit in disgust, especially when you take into account that multiple character training is now a thing, that the changes to the EULA with regards to input broadcasting made a lot of multiboxing accounts untenable to maintain etc, etc. As for newbie retention, that has always been an issue for CCP; furthermore CCP looked into claims about ganking etc driving away newbies and found them to be questionable at best.
Quote:Which shows a disgusting mindset. No, all of you, griefers, need to be stopped so eve can grow. So eve can retain new players who can look after children and afk mine to make ISK, who can log in in super shiny ships they earned and feel safe flying about in empire space.
If you want loot so badly, go low/null/wh's and fight for it, but you don't, you spout "risk vs reward" like it's a shield, yet when a player i.e me suggested link alt's become *suspect* as soon as they enter the field, what did u all do? You war decked the **** out of the corp i was in and forced it to disband as we had 2k+ players on us in a 15 man corps. They're not meant to feel safe, ask CCP Falcon. Afking anything in a game that is PvP in nature is a bad idea, and Eve is definitely PvP in nature.
All the really shiny loot is in hisec, some people stuff their freighters full of it and afk it across the universe while they're busy not playing the game, some mission runners fit all sorts of unnecessary bling and are dumb enough to get tricked into fights or afk their ship between destinations etc. CCP can't fix the stupid people by nerfing the not stupid people.
Quote:Why should we Risk our stuff to get rewards when you risk NOTHING to get yours, ganking is NOT RISK VS REWARD, death is a certainty when ganking i.e so it is not BY LOGIC Risk vs reward. The shield you hide behind is complete and utter rubbish, you use a motto of the game to do one thing.
Grief other players in an attempt to **** as many people off as possible and call is "risk vs reward" when you infact risk nothing as u know you will loose your ship so by definition of "risk". No, there is no risk, its a certainty you will loose your ship so BY EXTENSION OF YOUR LOGIC it is pre planned assault on another player. You're wrong, ganking does carry risks; that those risks are mostly in the hands of other players who can't be bothered to use the mechanics available to them to provide that risk is irrelevant.
Quote:So stop spouting your crap like it means anything. Griefers are the biggest cowards in the game and always will be.
You dont dare head to real pvp areas because you would get slapped sideways so much by real players, you'd realise what you call pvp is infact ganking and griefing and NOT pvp.
GTFO Their killboard would like to disagree with you
Ganking is indeed PvP, unless of course all of the people that gankers kill are actually bots or NPCs?
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
|
Siegfried Cohenberg
Schlomos Incorporated Shut It Down
114
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 11:05:21 -
[141] - Quote
Nighthawk The Assassin wrote:412nv Yaken wrote:MMORPG...... what does it stand for? Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game. Yet solo freighter pilots can cry enough on the forums, reddit, petitions and get a play style banned. If they had 1 friend who brought reps, hyper dunking would not work.
LOGIC Except this is bullshit. You play a play style that in ANY other game would be constituted as "Griefing" i.e deliberately upsetting other players in attempt to get "your rocks off". In ANY other game you would have warnings, temps bangs and then perma bans. Yet in this cess pit CCP is now starting to realise that allowing this type of game play is in fact killing the game. In the last two years we have lost close to 22 THOUSAND players who have quit in disgust. So yet, with the base fact evidence that we are not retaining new players, you continue this play style with one goal in mind. To take down EvE and say "yeh we did that". Which shows a disgusting mindset. No, all of you, griefers, need to be stopped so eve can grow. So eve can retain new players who can look after children and afk mine to make ISK, who can log in in super shiny ships they earned and feel safe flying about in empire space. If you want loot so badly, go low/null/wh's and fight for it, but you don't, you spout "risk vs reward" like it's a shield, yet when a player i.e me suggested link alt's become *suspect* as soon as they enter the field, what did u all do? You war decked the **** out of the corp i was in and forced it to disband as we had 2k+ players on us in a 15 man corps. Why should we Risk our stuff to get rewards when you risk NOTHING to get yours, ganking is NOT RISK VS REWARD, death is a certainty when ganking i.e so it is not BY LOGIC Risk vs reward. The shield you hide behind is complete and utter rubbish, you use a motto of the game to do one thing. Grief other players in an attempt to **** as many people off as possible and call is "risk vs reward" when you infact risk nothing as u know you will loose your ship so by definition of "risk". No, there is no risk, its a certainty you will loose your ship so BY EXTENSION OF YOUR LOGIC it is pre planned assault on another player. So stop spouting your crap like it means anything. Griefers are the biggest cowards in the game and always will be. You dont dare head to real pvp areas because you would get slapped sideways so much by real players, you'd realise what you call pvp is infact ganking and griefing and NOT pvp. GTFO
My friend, we are not griefers. We are simply fellow capsuleers who just LOVE to pvp.
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I Ineluctable.
1637
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 11:06:59 -
[142] - Quote
Then what you doing in highsec ganking freighters and miners trololol
Recruiting V I R I I Small Gang Nullsec PVP
Drinking rum before 10am makes you a pirate, not an alcoholic
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
25265
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 11:14:45 -
[143] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Then what you doing in highsec ganking freighters and miners trololol Following his profession as a freelance trader who specialises in acquiring goods from traveling merchants and resource gatherers at gunpoint as the opportunity arises.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Hiasa Kite
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
247
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 11:16:34 -
[144] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Then what you doing in highsec ganking freighters and miners trololol PvPing, of course!
<^.^> I'm a cat lol
|
Faylee Freir
The Conference Elite CODE.
179
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 14:26:39 -
[145] - Quote
Last night there was an Orca sitting on a gate while AFK for many minutes. I normally don't scan orcas but I'm glad I did this time... He had 8b in capital ship and capital ship component BPOs. I started bumping him and a few minutes later he "woke up" and started insulting me. Dunking ensued, followed by him jettisoning his cargo container named "capital bpos". I quickly scooped them and thanked him for the isk.
I never wished him any harm nor was my intent to "grief" him. Yet if you ask him (if he ever logs back on again) he will probably call me a griefer. I'm glad he did what he did because it's isk in my pocket and made for some humorous entertainment. I think it's insane that players such as the one I described would have any kind of voice that pertains to the direction or changes in mechanics in this game. These people only exist in eve to acquire wealth and then have it taken from them.
HTFU
|
Faylee Freir
The Conference Elite CODE.
179
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 14:36:01 -
[146] - Quote
Nighthawk The Assassin wrote:412nv Yaken wrote:MMORPG...... what does it stand for? Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game. Yet solo freighter pilots can cry enough on the forums, reddit, petitions and get a play style banned. If they had 1 friend who brought reps, hyper dunking would not work.
LOGIC Except this is bullshit. You play a play style that in ANY other game would be constituted as "Griefing" i.e deliberately upsetting other players in attempt to get "your rocks off". In ANY other game you would have warnings, temps bangs and then perma bans. Yet in this cess pit CCP is now starting to realise that allowing this type of game play is in fact killing the game. In the last two years we have lost close to 22 THOUSAND players who have quit in disgust. So yet, with the base fact evidence that we are not retaining new players, you continue this play style with one goal in mind. To take down EvE and say "yeh we did that". Which shows a disgusting mindset. No, all of you, griefers, need to be stopped so eve can grow. So eve can retain new players who can look after children and afk mine to make ISK, who can log in in super shiny ships they earned and feel safe flying about in empire space. If you want loot so badly, go low/null/wh's and fight for it, but you don't, you spout "risk vs reward" like it's a shield, yet when a player i.e me suggested link alt's become *suspect* as soon as they enter the field, what did u all do? You war decked the **** out of the corp i was in and forced it to disband as we had 2k+ players on us in a 15 man corps. Why should we Risk our stuff to get rewards when you risk NOTHING to get yours, ganking is NOT RISK VS REWARD, death is a certainty when ganking i.e so it is not BY LOGIC Risk vs reward. The shield you hide behind is complete and utter rubbish, you use a motto of the game to do one thing. Grief other players in an attempt to **** as many people off as possible and call is "risk vs reward" when you infact risk nothing as u know you will loose your ship so by definition of "risk". No, there is no risk, its a certainty you will loose your ship so BY EXTENSION OF YOUR LOGIC it is pre planned assault on another player. So stop spouting your crap like it means anything. Griefers are the biggest cowards in the game and always will be. You dont dare head to real pvp areas because you would get slapped sideways so much by real players, you'd realise what you call pvp is infact ganking and griefing and NOT pvp. GTFO This thread is about hyperdunking.
I, like many others gank for profit. I'm confused on what you qualify as risk. I think I take on great amounts of risk when I spend anywhere around 500m on bombers to kill a Freighter.
- Hyperdunking is very easy to stop - The Freighter might not drop enough to even cover bomber costs - The wreck might get popped - The loot might get stolen
So put 500m on the table and any of those scenarios are very likely to happen... Cool, glad to know there's no risk.
HTFU
|
Saskia Laru
the 57th Overlanders Brigade Cede Nullis
47
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 15:25:10 -
[147] - Quote
Nighthawk The Assassin wrote:412nv Yaken wrote:MMORPG...... what does it stand for? Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game. Yet solo freighter pilots can cry enough on the forums, reddit, petitions and get a play style banned. If they had 1 friend who brought reps, hyper dunking would not work.
LOGIC Except this is bullshit. You play a play style that in ANY other game would be constituted as "Griefing" i.e deliberately upsetting other players in attempt to get "your rocks off". In ANY other game you would have warnings, temps bangs and then perma bans. Yet in this cess pit CCP is now starting to realise that allowing this type of game play is in fact killing the game. In the last two years we have lost close to 22 THOUSAND players who have quit in disgust. So yet, with the base fact evidence that we are not retaining new players, you continue this play style with one goal in mind. To take down EvE and say "yeh we did that". Which shows a disgusting mindset. No, all of you, griefers, need to be stopped so eve can grow. So eve can retain new players who can look after children and afk mine to make ISK, who can log in in super shiny ships they earned and feel safe flying about in empire space. If you want loot so badly, go low/null/wh's and fight for it, but you don't, you spout "risk vs reward" like it's a shield, yet when a player i.e me suggested link alt's become *suspect* as soon as they enter the field, what did u all do? You war decked the **** out of the corp i was in and forced it to disband as we had 2k+ players on us in a 15 man corps. Why should we Risk our stuff to get rewards when you risk NOTHING to get yours, ganking is NOT RISK VS REWARD, death is a certainty when ganking i.e so it is not BY LOGIC Risk vs reward. The shield you hide behind is complete and utter rubbish, you use a motto of the game to do one thing. Grief other players in an attempt to **** as many people off as possible and call is "risk vs reward" when you infact risk nothing as u know you will loose your ship so by definition of "risk". No, there is no risk, its a certainty you will loose your ship so BY EXTENSION OF YOUR LOGIC it is pre planned assault on another player. So stop spouting your crap like it means anything. Griefers are the biggest cowards in the game and always will be. You dont dare head to real pvp areas because you would get slapped sideways so much by real players, you'd realise what you call pvp is infact ganking and griefing and NOT pvp. GTFO
Well not to split hairs but CCP did a study that showed the opposite of what you are claiming about so called 'griefers" making people quit.
I think those that left are do to carebear boredom, expelled bots, and alt accounts closed down. I have personally closed down 4 of my 5 accounts because I don't care for indy anymore.
And if you just want to make afk ISK in EVE then I would say your the problem, not the people that actively play. So how bout we put on our big girl panties and HTFU. Or you could go try WoW, or Space WoW, or any other of the many games out there that cater to non interactive, I'm afraid of people, don't get out of the house much, don't want to try or learn how to play type of play style.
I play EVE because it is dangerous. Lose is real, and people can %^*&* you over if your not paying attention. Remember... and these words are straight from CCP. High Sec is NOT 100% safe. Not sure what your confused about with this.
OK...bit of a rant. Apologies.
Now for the OP. I have no thoughts or cares on hyperdunking... seems a minor niche that's easily countered. Don't see what the fuss is about. The tears from the AG crowd are enjoyable though.
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I Ineluctable.
1640
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 15:30:21 -
[148] - Quote
Personally i dont get this whole afk thing, why even bother having a game if your just going to afk, i like ganking because we dont really need this whole afk gameplay and if you remove that risk then the problem will just escalate
Recruiting V I R I I Small Gang Nullsec PVP
Drinking rum before 10am makes you a pirate, not an alcoholic
|
Leto Thule
Lazerhawks
3800
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 16:15:05 -
[149] - Quote
Shitehawk the Assgoblin wrote:
You dont dare head to real pvp areas because you would get slapped sideways so much by real players, you'd realise what you call pvp is infact ganking and griefing and NOT pvp.
By definition, there are no areas of EVE that are not PVP zones.
Your tears on here are great, and we have all enjoyed them. I love it when guys like yourself attempt to throw the old "Hurr hurr pvp is just in nullsec hurr hurr" line out there. You do realize that MANY of the pilots you will encounter in highsec are alts of null sec alliance members, right?
And you do realize they would treat an industrial ship the very same way, anywhere in EVE, right?
"But Leto", you ask, "Doesnt the fact that I pvp in null make me a badass?"
No, it does not. The guns dont fire hotter, the blobs are real, and the only difference is capitol drops and bubbles.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I Ineluctable.
1641
|
Posted - 2015.10.11 16:48:29 -
[150] - Quote
Bubbles are nullsecs answer to non-consensual pvp
Recruiting V I R I I Small Gang Nullsec PVP
Drinking rum before 10am makes you a pirate, not an alcoholic
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |