EVE Search - MC vs TDG SNIGG VETO?

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

MC vs TDG SNIGG VETO?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
toots galore	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:18:00 - [1] Reading the thread on the best pirate corps VETO, TDG and SNIGG came out easily voted the best pirate corps. Just for fun Can those master tacticians amongst theorise who would come out on top if VETO, TUNDRAGON and SNIGG united to face the might of the Mercernary Coalition the best Pirate PvP corps against the best Merc alliance I dont know enough about any of them to make a theory but would be interestyed in others thoughts
Marcus TheMartin Gallente Tuxedo.	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:26:00 - [2] I'm the best pirate corp why am I not included Best Dressed Corp of 2006! -Marcus TheMartin
toots galore	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:28:00 - [3] Originally by: Marcus TheMartin I'm the best pirate corp why am I not included Originally by: toots galore Reading the thread on the best pirate corps VETO, TDG and SNIGG came out easily voted the best pirate corps. It seems most who replied in the thread rated VETO, TDG and SNIGG above you whoever you are
Samirol Turbulent	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:29:00 - [4] Edited by: Samirol on 31/12/2006 21:30:04 MC are shock troops and what qualifies a win? total and complete destruction of the corp? destruction of POSes? and VETO are mercs now IIRC... Great being a gallente blasterthron pilot, aint it? Join channel 'Turby' ingame.
PCaBoo Newbies On Xstacy	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:31:00 - [5] Merc doesn't mean anti-pirate. If they did fight, i'm sure things would be interesting, but I doubt there'd be a true victor. ________________________________ Caldari's are the Chosen people!
toots galore	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:34:00 - [6] Edited by: toots galore on 31/12/2006 21:36:29 Ok to make it clearer, Hypothosise.. an area of low Sec (0.4-01)space where only the corps/allainces named have access Involved parties side one mercernary Coalition side two VETO SNIGG Tundgragon No POS's Objectives 1. to deny the opponents freedom of movement through the sector 2. To attack and destroy enemy vessels Defination of victory greatest loss of ships remember this is all hypothetical, it means determining wether the small gang tactics of pirates will hold up against the mass tactics of MC or any other tactics you can think of..
Samirol Turbulent	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:39:00 - [7] Edited by: Samirol on 31/12/2006 21:40:38 MC probably has more capitals, and since you are going by greatest NUMBER of ships lost, not isk, then it would just be capital fleet blobbing with fighters assigned everywhere. "Merc doesn't mean anti-pirate" no, but full time mercenaries arent pirates either. unless i was wrong, and they are like snigg, and pirate regularly when not on contract. Great being a gallente blasterthron pilot, aint it? Join channel 'Turby' ingame.
toots galore	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:40:00 - [8] ps.. I know this is all unlikely, esp as SNIGG and VETO and MC have each other as +10. however as I am studying military history and am dabbling in the "What If's" as part of this it seemed it might appeal as a discussion to those who like to theorise on military outcomes, esp seeing as it is an Eve enviroment
Superbus Maximus Gallente Sniggerdly	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:48:00 - [9] Originally by: toots galore ps.. I know this is all unlikely, esp as SNIGG and VETO and MC have each other as +10. however as I am studying military history and am dabbling in the "What If's" as part of this it seemed it might appeal as a discussion to those who like to theorise on military outcomes, esp seeing as it is an Eve enviroment We are -10 to MC. Ha you think thats big wait till you see the next
toots galore	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:53:00 - [10] apologies I thought that you all worked together on merc contracts still its slightly immaterial to the question posed
Superbus Maximus Gallente Sniggerdly	Posted - 2006.12.31 21:59:00 - [11] Well you cant really get an answer to this question unless the fight were to happen I guess. Between SNIGG, VETO, and TGD I think we have a fair ammount of capital ship pilots, dont think we have near as many MC, or the expierence in fighting in large battles with them, but when it comes to guerilla tactics I think we got them beat hands down. Ha you think thats big wait till you see the next
kubtest	Posted - 2006.12.31 22:21:00 - [12] Would be more interesting to theorise who'd win a tourney style thing, if you bring every pilot, from every corporation into the play in their biggest ship...MC would most likely have more members and more carriers (and a carrier blob is lol in low sec battles ;)) Also, MC is 4 corporations, not one ;) Personally though, as a totally unbiased person who has nothing to do with any of these corps (no no, really I swear) i'd clearly haveto say TDG > MC
kublai Short Attention Span	Posted - 2006.12.31 22:21:00 - [13] Originally by: kubtest Would be more interesting to theorise who'd win a tourney style thing, if you bring every pilot, from every corporation into the play in their biggest ship...MC would most likely have more members and more carriers (and a carrier blob is lol in low sec battles ;)) Also, MC is 4 corporations, not one ;) Personally though, as a totally unbiased person who has nothing to do with any of these corps (no no, really I swear) i'd clearly haveto say TDG > MC Stupid default alt, that's it, you're getting deleted kubtest!
hUssmann Caldari Veto.	Posted - 2006.12.31 22:57:00 - [14] We're mercs, pirates at heart though. <3 Phoenix Lonestar > Server lag was non-existant pre-Dragon
Dr Slice MAFIA Pirate Coalition	Posted - 2006.12.31 23:15:00 - [15] The original post is bias in my mind, since he is 24 days old and corped with School of Applied Knowledge (aka ALT). I'd rather hear objective opinion on this matter.
toots galore	Posted - 2006.12.31 23:36:00 - [16] Edited by: toots galore on 31/12/2006 23:42:01 Edited by: toots galore on 31/12/2006 23:39:15 Quote: The original post is bias in my mind, since he is 24 days old and corped with School of Applied Knowledge (aka ALT). I dont see any Bias whatsoever I sked a hypothetical question. I made no attempt to resolve the question I have taken no side so where is this bias? What does the age of my character or wether it is an alt or not have to do with encouraging a "what If" hypothetical discussion.. If I was slagging off one the named participants in this scenerio then my age/Alt status would be relevant, but I am not Some people like discussing the Hypothetical results of conflicts, studying the attributes of the participants and making an informed judgement on the outcome I stated quite clearly, in this case I dont know the named participants in this scenerio enough to make that judgement and asked if anyone felt they could discuss it and make a call on who would win Jeez.. anyone got a tin foil hat I can borrow
Dr Slice MAFIA Pirate Coalition	Posted - 2006.12.31 23:43:00 - [17] Originally by: toots galore Edited by: toots galore on 31/12/2006 23:42:01 Edited by: toots galore on 31/12/2006 23:39:15 Quote: The original post is bias in my mind, since he is 24 days old and corped with School of Applied Knowledge (aka ALT). I dont see any Bias whatsoever I sked a hypothetical question. I made no attempt to resolve the question I have taken no side so where is this bias? What does the age of my character or wether it is an alt or not have to do with encouraging a "what If" hypothetical discussion.. If I was slagging off one the named participants in this scenerio then my age/Alt status would be relevant, but I am not Some people like discussing the Hypothetical results of conflicts, studying the attributes of the participants and making an informed judgement on the outcome I stated quite clearly, in this case I dont know the named participants in this scenerio enough to make that judgement and asked if anyone felt they could discuss it and make a call on who would win Jeez.. anyone got a tin foil hat I can borrow Just seems suspicious that you post this type of topic on your alt, regardless of your intentions. I'm sure you mean well, just appears that you're hiding for some reason.
kublai Short Attention Span	Posted - 2006.12.31 23:50:00 - [18] Originally by: Dr Slice Originally by: toots galore Edited by: toots galore on 31/12/2006 23:42:01 Edited by: toots galore on 31/12/2006 23:39:15 Quote: The original post is bias in my mind, since he is 24 days old and corped with School of Applied Knowledge (aka ALT). I dont see any Bias whatsoever I sked a hypothetical question. I made no attempt to resolve the question I have taken no side so where is this bias? What does the age of my character or wether it is an alt or not have to do with encouraging a "what If" hypothetical discussion.. If I was slagging off one the named participants in this scenerio then my age/Alt status would be relevant, but I am not Some people like discussing the Hypothetical results of conflicts, studying the attributes of the participants and making an informed judgement on the outcome I stated quite clearly, in this case I dont know the named participants in this scenerio enough to make that judgement and asked if anyone felt they could discuss it and make a call on who would win Jeez.. anyone got a tin foil hat I can borrow Just seems suspicious that you post this type of topic on your alt, regardless of your intentions. I'm sure you mean well, just appears that you're hiding for some reason. Pretty sure a member of any above corp's would have the balls to post this with his real tag slice :P
toots galore	Posted - 2006.12.31 23:57:00 - [19] As I said I am studying military history. I particularly like taking part in dscussions on "What Ifs" (What If the Japanese Fleet had been spotted the day before Pearl harbour, what if D-Day had failed etc) This topic is an attempt to open that type of discussion here on Eve just for fun, I dont have the knowledge to make a judgement myself but am able to enjoy a discussion /arguement made by people with the required knowledge. However if people think there is some dark alterior motive going on here then just let it drop and Im sorry I tried to start it up
kublai Short Attention Span	Posted - 2007.01.01 00:32:00 - [20] Originally by: toots galore As I said I am studying military history. I particularly like taking part in dscussions on "What Ifs" (What If the Japanese Fleet had been spotted the day before Pearl harbour, what if D-Day had failed etc) This topic is an attempt to open that type of discussion here on Eve just for fun, I dont have the knowledge to make a judgement myself but am able to enjoy a discussion /arguement made by people with the required knowledge. However if people think there is some dark alterior motive going on here then just let it drop and Im sorry I tried to start it up His just a little ***y you didn't mention MAFIA ;) As someone with no ties to any of above corps cough hack cough arf* ahm, yeah no I like your post hides various other characters under a pillow
Dr Slice MAFIA Pirate Coalition	Posted - 2007.01.01 00:36:00 - [21] Edited by: Dr Slice on 01/01/2007 00:36:26 Originally by: kublai Originally by: toots galore As I said I am studying military history. I particularly like taking part in dscussions on "What Ifs" (What If the Japanese Fleet had been spotted the day before Pearl harbour, what if D-Day had failed etc) This topic is an attempt to open that type of discussion here on Eve just for fun, I dont have the knowledge to make a judgement myself but am able to enjoy a discussion /arguement made by people with the required knowledge. However if people think there is some dark alterior motive going on here then just let it drop and Im sorry I tried to start it up His just a little ***y you didn't mention MAFIA ;) As someone with no ties to any of above corps cough hack cough arf* ahm, yeah no I like your post hides various other characters under a pillow Meh, I'm not offended my Corp wasn't mentioned. Just thought it strange that half the Corps he listed tho aren't Pirate Corps. And he insists on staying hidden via posting with an Alt lol.
Verus Potestas Caldari Perkone	Posted - 2007.01.01 00:40:00 - [22] I'd guess MC, simply due to more experience fighting with those numbers. Not that I consider them better PvPers, just that the situation you suggest plays into MC's hands. --- In third-party forums we trust Did i ask for anyone to copy this into their sig? No, ****heads, its my text, not yours.
ParMizaN Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.01.01 01:21:00 - [23] ijn s astratight outn fight we would win but thats not where wee would nbe fighting them.. hyatrd to say and yeah ism wastedm:P)) happy new >hesr :)
slapp Caldari BoNe CoLLeCTorS	Posted - 2007.01.01 01:50:00 - [24] Haven't fought alongside or against Veto, Snigg or MC. I say all of them have amazing commanders and tactics and pure luck would define the winner. -GIMME BLOOD & BOOBIES-
zeroh Caldari V I R I I Center for Disease Creation	Posted - 2007.01.01 02:18:00 - [25] Id go with TDG Snig and Veto Cause i use to be in TDG and SNIGG yay go guys go
FooB2 Caldari Pre-nerfed Tactics	Posted - 2007.01.01 02:59:00 - [26] Originally by: toots galore As I said I am studying military history. I particularly like taking part in dscussions on "What Ifs" (What If the Japanese Fleet had been spotted the day before Pearl harbour, what if D-Day had failed etc) This topic is an attempt to open that type of discussion here on Eve just for fun, I dont have the knowledge to make a judgement myself but am able to enjoy a discussion /arguement made by people with the required knowledge. However if people think there is some dark alterior motive going on here then just let it drop and Im sorry I tried to start it up what if you never said anything? hmm.... TEAM LULZ FOR HIRE
Altai Saker Omniscient Order The Sani Sabik	Posted - 2007.01.01 03:47:00 - [27] ... You're asking how an alliance will do against a coalition of three fiercely independent corps of what 20 active players each? Obviously anyone of the three small corps will pick apart the alliance easily and come up with a superior kill / death ratio. http://www.omniscient-order.com/
Shamis Orzoz Sniggerdly	Posted - 2007.01.01 06:35:00 - [28] We obviously wouldn't be able to stand toe to toe against the entire MC. They have many more capital ship pilots and cap ships. But I'm sure we could make their lives difficult in a guerilla war. Unless of course they take it to high sec...
Tomas Ysidro Caldari Contraband Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.01.01 07:23:00 - [29] Regardless of who would win this hypothetical battle royale, I'm sure we'd all have fun.
jerrard iceni Minmatar Knights of Chaos	Posted - 2007.01.01 13:30:00 - [30] Originally by: toots galore Reading the thread on the best pirate corps VETO, TDG and SNIGG came out easily voted the best pirate corps. errr.... no. dont get me wrong VETO,TDG and SNIGG are good at what they do, but there are plenty of other pirate corps out there who are just as good if not better, like Armee der finsternis for example. All that vote proved was that those 3 corps are the best known.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.