|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16901
|
Posted - 2015.11.10 23:33:09 -
[1] - Quote
Morrigan LeSante wrote:Mag's wrote:3. Is CCP OK with it? Now this was a definite yes, but now I'm not so sure. Why? Well take a look at the first new line in the bumping thread.CCP CiD wrote:**This forum post is now 3 year old and does not represent CCP-¦s current stance on the issue, as such it can be viewed as outdated** Well, well. Something interesting happened in this thread after all... 
They won't be changing anything, jita undock forces their hand
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16903
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 22:26:12 -
[2] - Quote
Tyranex Obsoletus wrote:
Not a bad idea actually.
Deep space transports already have them.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16911
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 01:58:09 -
[3] - Quote
BABARR wrote:The problem is not the bumping, The problem is the Hsec suicide. Why?
Because the security status mech is just a pathetic giant joke.
You are -10 in Hsec area? You just don't give a ****. You can dock and undock whith ship, battlecruiser or even battleship if you want. Concord is just too slow. Concord allow you to dock in station, concord is a joke. Local police is better than a joke, cause they usually web you before pointing, helping you to warp away.
You can buy or sell thing, you can manage a POS in pod, ect when you are -10.
And bored to be -10? just go buy some tag !
And i don't speak about KILLRIGHT systeme, who is total joke too, you see more ppl whith killright for scam than real killright.
CCP should give a REAL SENSE to the security status. Whith an avergarde security status to a whole corporation or alliance, whith docking/undocking restriction, ect.
(And also the ability to fit a damage control on freighter)
The problem is CCP poop in his pants abouts that kind of "fix" cause ccp like to say "we have evil pirate in our game" CCP : this is not pirate ! free ganking DON'T GIVE content, this is not even PVP ! cause simply you CAN'T HAVE REVENGE ! Revenge is the first motivational for ppl to go PVP !
At -10 you can freely open fire on said gankers who I might add fly ships with no tank. Go take your revenge.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16923
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 18:06:59 -
[4] - Quote
BABARR wrote:baltec1 wrote:[quote=BABARR]
At -10 you can freely open fire on said gankers who I might add fly ships with no tank. Go take your revenge. Don't come here to troll, you KNOW you are safe, juste have to use insta undock and warping from safe to safe. (and that what you do) You are a ganker and you come here to just defend your buisness. And don't say i have a revenge to take, ganker never killed me. The fact is the security status is a total joke. Ganker now just shoot empty ship for the glory of killmail, and the don't take ANY risk for that. To be organized and a lot whith alt don't give you the "right" to don't take risk.
We are as safe as you allow us to be.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16923
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 18:12:12 -
[5] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:Your team is out there actually pulling in laim and possibly game breaking concessions and you show up to take a dump on some guy trying to get tritanium to Jita. Laughable.
The last change to freighters that the bears demanded turned out to be a nerf, as we warned them.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16923
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 18:48:54 -
[6] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:baltec1 wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:Your team is out there actually pulling in laim and possibly game breaking concessions and you show up to take a dump on some guy trying to get tritanium to Jita. Laughable. The last change to freighters that the bears demanded turned out to be a nerf, as we warned them. Sometimes pointing to a fire exit is the best you can do. If they run screaming the other way.... they'll be screaming for the rest of their lives. I think CCP should just remove freighters and JF from the game for 2 months straight. Then give them back. That would probably calm a lot of this crap down a notch or 2.
Nah, just reverse the last 8 years of nerfs to ganking for a month. A few weeks of slow concord response times, fully insured BC and battleships whacking them and a return to untanked barges being profitable to kill will do the trick. For even more fun take us back to tankable concord.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16936
|
Posted - 2015.11.15 23:46:16 -
[7] - Quote
If you wont gank the mach then gank the ganking ships, they are all profitable to gank.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16940
|
Posted - 2015.11.16 13:12:32 -
[8] - Quote
Mike Voidstar wrote:baltec1 wrote:If you wont gank the mach then gank the ganking ships, they are all profitable to gank. Again, self defense should not result in Concord or sec status loss.
Its not self defence, its attacking.
Very well, if the penalties are too extreme for you to handle due to the risks involved then just bring a webbing alt with you and get that freighter into warp before the mach can even get up to half speed.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16940
|
Posted - 2015.11.16 13:21:40 -
[9] - Quote
Mike Voidstar wrote:
So... CCP agreed that the ganking of freighters was not balanced, and made changes.
CCP changed them after year of people such as yourself demanding to be able to fit them. Todays freighters are worse than what we had before as you cannot fit the same tank and cargo space we enjoyed before. On top of that you idiots go and fit expanded cargo holds on them which makes then even easier to kill than ever before.
You made freighters worse.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16943
|
Posted - 2015.11.16 15:53:45 -
[10] - Quote
Mike Voidstar wrote:If you cannot warp because someone is intentionally bumping you repeatedly so that they can form up a gank squad, then you are under attack, and arranging a counter attack against the bumping ship is self defense and should not result in penalties.
You can get a freighter to warp before a mach can even get up to speed and this tactic is also free from concord getting upset.
Mike Voidstar wrote: I never complained about freighters. However there is an obvious and legitimate complaint here. All your point about freighters being made worse by changes means is that our current devs were hired from the portion of the community that worships the more toxic gameplay and their changes were not in the best interest of the target audience. Or maybe they just messed up. Either way, they acknowledged a problem, put in changes to address that problem, and their ever so holy emergent gameplay has made the problem worse. That speaks to the need for a balance of the situation, not a need to just ignore it for the sake of a few mouth breathing baby eaters.
The ganker were very vocal in calling for the change the freighter to not happen. For years they said don't call for mods to be fitted to freighters as it would result in a nerf.
Mike Voidstar wrote: If bumping wasn't a thing the ganks would still occur. They would cost the same as they do now. The only real difference is that squad would need to be formed and readied when the ship came through, rather than being bumped for 10 minutes previous.
And you would find a new thing to whine about like you have done for over a decade. No more nerfs to ganking, its about time you used the abundant tactics and mods available to you already.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16958
|
Posted - 2015.11.17 17:09:50 -
[11] - Quote
Mike Voidstar wrote:
There is an issue with the intended style of gameplay in high sec being violated by people essentially tackling ships for extended periods of time while being protected by Concord.
There is no issue here as there are tactics and mods that will stop this from happening both before and after someone starts to bump you.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16959
|
Posted - 2015.11.17 18:15:41 -
[12] - Quote
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Yet they are still tackling, and still protected by Concord.
It works because people are being dumb. The counters to bumping are also free from concord retaliation.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16968
|
Posted - 2015.11.18 05:12:59 -
[13] - Quote
Paladin Genghis Khanid wrote:
For me I have no desire to be a pirate because it does not exist in EVE. You can never actual function as a pirate.
Hi Bat Country here.
We specialize in attacking shipping in highsec for profit. Remind us again what a pirate does.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16974
|
Posted - 2015.11.18 06:44:29 -
[14] - Quote
Mike wrote: Regardless of how minor the penalty, self defense from unprovoked aggression should not result in penalties.
You have several tactics to counter bumping that have no penalties.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16978
|
Posted - 2015.11.18 15:49:51 -
[15] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:to get it away from the gate so it cant crash it? get it out of range of sentry guns? sorta like a murderer dragging a victim up a dark alley 
A rather apt way of putting it.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16983
|
Posted - 2015.11.19 05:18:08 -
[16] - Quote
Mike Voidstar wrote:
You make it seem as if a pilot is doing something sinful if they autopilot at all.
If they are carrying a multi billion isk cargo yes, its a very silly thing to be doing.
Mike Voidstar wrote: By your logic the only way freighters should be allowed to move is if someone hooks up pedals to the PC and they have to use that to move around at all.
What is wrong with having an escort of one ship to secure your travel?
Mike Voidstar wrote: It's not like they are fast, interesting, or all that fun to fly. Moving stuff around is fun, and I can see popping them as fun... But restoring the balance on moving them around is a real concern for some.
The balance is already heavily in favour of the hauling ship.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16985
|
Posted - 2015.11.19 17:25:19 -
[17] - Quote
Donnachadh wrote: A very interesting claim. My son has been in the PvP side of this game for more than 8 years now and the groups he has flown with have never used bumping as a tactic and it has not hindered their ability to kill others. I am not saying that it is not a valid tactic to use, just questioning what the impact on PvP other than ganking would be if bumping was removed?
Hunting carriers/dreads/supers/titans.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
16989
|
Posted - 2015.11.19 21:54:31 -
[18] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:It's pretty simple. Remove the POS. (No POS = No shield) It's actually easier to target than a bumping mach  EDIT: POS removal is a valid counter to shield hugging capitals - most people are just too lazy to put in the effort. (this logic should seem familiar to several of you)
By the time you kill the tower the capital will have escaped by several days, great plan.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
17014
|
Posted - 2015.11.21 22:22:59 -
[19] - Quote
Mike Voidstar wrote:No broken record response, that's actually a coherant point.
It does not address the fact that ganks would actually be cheaper for being redirected to lo sec, residents of lo sec have begged for years for increased gameplay options to get people in their space, the fact that the gank could still happen exactly as it does in high sec by just having the ship stop, or the laughable idea that the other guys afk autopiloting their overloaded freighters will see and learn from someone else's mistake.
For the low, low price of having bumping altered to an intentional act that can generate a flag (thus affecting the status quo not at all) you get a tool that increases content for high sec ganks, lo sec gate campers, and a whole new dimension of value for the control of those gates generating conflict and giving 2 sets of PvP motivated pilots reasons to actually fight eachother for a change.
Nobody would go to low sec because nobody would use autopilot, this is yet another terrible idea.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
17021
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 02:30:13 -
[20] - Quote
Mike Voidstar wrote:Quote:More Bravo Sierra, now anyone passing buy can shoot a ship that has minimal tank and is basically fit for speed and agility. Because that's what's supposed to happen in high sec when you attack other people outside of having kill tights, wardec, or them committing a criminal act against you.
Its not a criminal act.
You have several very easy to use counters to bumping, use them.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
|
|
|
|