EVE Search - Sticky:[Focus Group] Capital Ships

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Focus Group] Capital Ships

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Scott Ormands The Desolate Order Brave Collective 62	Posted - 2015.11.14 20:02:44 - [61] - Quote I'm also curious where I come in.
Faren Shalni Future Corps Sleeper Social Club 155	Posted - 2015.11.14 20:42:50 - [62] - Quote I must admit this thread is entertaining So Much Space
Elise Randolph Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 1452	Posted - 2015.11.14 22:16:36 - [63] - Quote I'm good, right guy who has been in Darkness for 3 weeks? ~
Sgt Ocker Kenshin. DARKNESS. 774	Posted - 2015.11.14 22:50:23 - [64] - Quote Elise Randolph wrote: I'm good, right guy who has been in Darkness for 3 weeks? I presume your meaningless comment is directed at me? Little hint - I don't post with my main Fun question - 1. Do you know me (not my forum alt), 2. or anything about me? Answer to part 1, yes you do. Part 2, not much obviously. My opinions are mine. If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
Sgt Ocker Kenshin. DARKNESS. 774	Posted - 2015.11.14 22:52:05 - [65] - Quote Scott Ormands wrote: I'm also curious where I come in. Funny. I would have thought, if you have to ask the answer would be obvious. My opinions are mine. If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
Scott Ormands The Desolate Order Brave Collective 62	Posted - 2015.11.15 03:26:33 - [66] - Quote Sgt Ocker wrote: Scott Ormands wrote: I'm also curious where I come in. Funny. I would have thought, if you have to ask the answer would be obvious. (does anyone have a link to the slack logs.. are they available yet?) Well obviously I'm unknown, but the question remains as to whether I'm also incompetent or corrupt, maybe both. Since you seem to be so great at passing judgement on people you don't actually know I figured i just must know what you think of me. It's just oh so important. P.S. Selling out my adgenda for 10B isk and a vouch to PL.
Sgt Ocker Kenshin. DARKNESS. 774	Posted - 2015.11.15 04:19:25 - [67] - Quote Scott Ormands wrote: Sgt Ocker wrote: Scott Ormands wrote: I'm also curious where I come in. Funny. I would have thought, if you have to ask the answer would be obvious. (does anyone have a link to the slack logs.. are they available yet?) Well obviously I'm unknown, but the question remains as to whether I'm also incompetent or corrupt, maybe both. Since you seem to be so great at passing judgement on people you don't actually know I figured i just must know what you think of me. It's just oh so important. P.S. Selling out my adgenda for 10B isk and a vouch to PL. Actually I haven't passed judgement on anyone I don't either know (as in have spoken to on more than one occasion, been in fleet with many times, etc) or have had other 1st hand experience in game with. You on the other hand are making unfounded false accusations - I'd now put you in the incompetent and corrupt groups. Narrow minded (unable to separate truth from fiction), unknown and therefore untrustworthy, come to mind too but I didn't make the list of who's who, so didn't get to pick the categories (that was actually someone else). Logs aren't edited enough for public viewing yet? My opinions are mine. If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
Elise Randolph Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 1452	Posted - 2015.11.15 05:53:36 - [68] - Quote Sgt Ocker wrote: Elise Randolph wrote: I'm good, right guy who has been in Darkness for 3 weeks? I presume your meaningless comment is directed at me? Little hint - I don't post with my main Fun question - 1. Do you know me (not my forum alt), 2. or anything about me? Answer to part 1, yes you do. Part 2, not much obviously. Woah you need to relax and be more like the man Bob Ross believes you can be. ~
Orca Platypus Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 84	Posted - 2015.11.15 07:06:53 - [69] - Quote RoCkEt X wrote: What group do i come under? LOL Your allegiance clearly places you within Corrupt. Your wall of text was nothing but meaningless bunch of crap until chapter 3, which revealed it all to be nothing more than crying to nerf already minimal and borderline pointless fatigue to a completely meaningless token mechanic state. This is also in line with your allegiance agenda, which confirms your placement as Corrupt. I have no evidence that you belong in any other group more than to the current. Scott Ormands wrote: I'm also curious where I come in. Fake curiosity reeks, you know.
5pitf1re agony unleashed Agony Empire 85	Posted - 2015.11.15 09:38:32 - [70] - Quote Sgt Ocker wrote: Logs aren't edited enough for public viewing yet? You need to take your tinfoil off man. The group hasn't even begun with official feedback yet.

RoCkEt X Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 171	Posted - 2015.11.15 09:57:34 - [71] - Quote Orca Platypus wrote: RoCkEt X wrote: What group do i come under? LOL Your allegiance clearly places you within Corrupt. Your wall of text was nothing but meaningless bunch of crap until chapter 3, which revealed it all to be nothing more than crying to nerf already minimal and borderline pointless fatigue to a completely meaningless token mechanic state. This is also in line with your allegiance agenda, which confirms your placement as Corrupt. I have no evidence that you belong in any other group more than to the current. Scott Ormands wrote: I'm also curious where I come in. Fake curiosity reeks, you know. You're an idiot... LOL
Ellendras Silver CrashCat Corporation 218	Posted - 2015.11.15 13:30:40 - [72] - Quote xttz wrote: Orca Platypus wrote: Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions... Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies. As it happens, some points I personally plan to advocate in the focus group are: 1) Increase jump range and nerf watchlist to bring back hotdrop/counter-drop play, but keep a version of the current system to prevent people to cross the map super-fast. 2) Carrier ratting is dumb as hell and needs to die in a fire. 3) See above 4) Supercaps should be an inspirational part of the game that drives people to both field them and kill them, without returning to being an N+1 apex ship. The logs will all be public too. tell me and please use arguments, why carrier ratting is dumb and should die? [u]Carpe noctem[/u]
5pitf1re Agony Unleashed Agony Empire 86	Posted - 2015.11.15 16:04:05 - [73] - Quote Ellendras Silver wrote: xttz wrote: Orca Platypus wrote: Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions... Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies. As it happens, some points I personally plan to advocate in the focus group are: 1) Increase jump range and nerf watchlist to bring back hotdrop/counter-drop play, but keep a version of the current system to prevent people to cross the map super-fast. 2) Carrier ratting is dumb as hell and needs to die in a fire. 3) See above 4) Supercaps should be an inspirational part of the game that drives people to both field them and kill them, without returning to being an N+1 apex ship. The logs will all be public too. tell me and please use arguments, why carrier ratting is dumb and should die? I'm fairly sure he means AFK carrier ratting and I agree with it. AFK farming activities should die in a fire.
Orca Platypus Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 84	Posted - 2015.11.15 16:24:27 - [74] - Quote RoCkEt X wrote: You're an idiot... LOL Dear CCP, please note the level of argumentation presented by the one you chose as focus group participant. If anyone asks, I'm for booting.
Scatim Helicon GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3369	Posted - 2015.11.15 17:34:30 - [75] - Quote 5pitf1re wrote: I'm fairly sure he means AFK carrier ratting and I agree with it. AFK farming activities should die in a fire. Good job that from what we've seen of the new fighter squadrons they look to be dependant on the player actively controlling them. Post on the Eve-o forums with a Goonswarm Federation character that drinking bleach is bad for you, and 20 forum warriors will hospitalise themselves trying to prove you wrong.
5pitf1re Agony Unleashed Agony Empire 86	Posted - 2015.11.15 18:59:33 - [76] - Quote Orca Platypus wrote: 5pitf1re wrote: I'm fairly sure he means AFK carrier ratting and I agree with it. AFK farming activities should die in a fire. So when do moons depart from eve, again? I'm not going to defend the afk activities, but dishing out on all of them indiscriminately will give you a bad dialectic stance. Of course there is no way to get rid of all the AFK farming options. Mining being one of them. It would involve profound mechanical changes which also means human resources. I also like the discussions around NPCs becoming smarter, possibly using the burner mission AI everywhere in EVE, that would be really cool.
Frostys Virpio KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation 2396	Posted - 2015.11.15 19:44:42 - [77] - Quote Scatim Helicon wrote: 5pitf1re wrote: I'm fairly sure he means AFK carrier ratting and I agree with it. AFK farming activities should die in a fire. Good job that from what we've seen of the new fighter squadrons they look to be dependant on the player actively controlling them. They could of just removed the "feature" that drone auto attack enemies and be done with this stupidity tho.
Orca Platypus Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 84	Posted - 2015.11.15 20:56:43 - [78] - Quote 5pitf1re wrote: Orca Platypus wrote: 5pitf1re wrote: I'm fairly sure he means AFK carrier ratting and I agree with it. AFK farming activities should die in a fire. So when do moons depart from eve, again? I'm not going to defend the afk activities, but dishing out on all of them indiscriminately will give you a bad dialectic stance. Of course there is no way to get rid of all the AFK farming options. Mining being one of them. It would involve profound mechanical changes which also means human resources. I also like the discussions around NPCs becoming smarter, possibly using the burner mission AI everywhere in EVE, that would be really cool. Mining in a fleet is by no way an afk activity. Rocks pop, cargohold overflows every 2.5 minutes, and somebody has to haul. If you only know how to mine solo and presumably afk - your problem, don't ruin it for people who know how interaction intensive a real mining is. Afkarrier and afktar are indeed afk though. Feel free to wreck. Frostys Virpio wrote: They could of just removed the "feature" that drone auto attack enemies and be done with this stupidity tho. ECM really needs buffs that badly?
Ellendras Silver CrashCat Corporation 218	Posted - 2015.11.15 21:01:32 - [79] - Quote 5pitf1re wrote: Ellendras Silver wrote: xttz wrote: Orca Platypus wrote: Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions... Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies. As it happens, some points I personally plan to advocate in the focus group are: 1) Increase jump range and nerf watchlist to bring back hotdrop/counter-drop play, but keep a version of the current system to prevent people to cross the map super-fast. 2) Carrier ratting is dumb as hell and needs to die in a fire. 3) See above 4) Supercaps should be an inspirational part of the game that drives people to both field them and kill them, without returning to being an N+1 apex ship. The logs will all be public too. tell me and please use arguments, why carrier ratting is dumb and should die? I'm fairly sure he means AFK carrier ratting and I agree with it. AFK farming activities should die in a fire. you may be fairly sure, i am not. i hate assumptions so i try never to make them (don't claim i always succeed at it) [u]Carpe noctem[/u]
Kenneth Feld Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 320	Posted - 2015.11.15 21:03:14 - [80] - Quote Orca Platypus wrote: RoCkEt X wrote: You're an idiot... LOL Dear CCP, please note the level of argumentation presented by the one you chose as focus group participant. If anyone asks, I'm for booting. 5pitf1re wrote: I'm fairly sure he means AFK carrier ratting and I agree with it. AFK farming activities should die in a fire. So when do moons depart from eve, again? I'm not going to defend the afk activities, but dishing out on all of them indiscriminately will give you a bad dialectic stance. Moons will depart when drilling platforms are released

Sgt Ocker Kenshin. DARKNESS. 774	Posted - 2015.11.15 21:17:21 - [81] - Quote 5pitf1re wrote: Sgt Ocker wrote: Logs aren't edited enough for public viewing yet? You need to take your tinfoil off man. The group hasn't even begun with official feedback yet. So when is what has been discussed going to be available. No tinfoil needed you just confirmed, what you responded to as correct. I'm pretty sure when someone says ALL LOGS, it should mean all logs. Only "official" feedback will be available to players - Stinks of - Get your deals in before the logs are "official feedback", that way you can be seen to be seeking some sort of balance officially while having already got what you want privately. That is what you just said above - Isn't it? Talk about reducing your credibility. This is eve where telling lies, backstabbing and self serving interest groups, are part of daily game play. Maybe I've spent too much time dealing with self serving political groups and individuals (in and out of Eve) to be open minded about a group who could potentially further reduce (remove) my ability to play the way I choose - IE; not in blobs. My opinions are mine. If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
MrQuisno Steelmaze 6	Posted - 2015.11.15 21:50:22 - [82] - Quote Hello, I would like to join the focus group for capital ships. As over the last few years I been pushing many ideas on the forums for how it would be awesome to change up some of the capitals and fighters. I have push ideas like fittings to fighters or even different type of classes. Glad to see some of the ideas got used. Nerfing the capital ships HP to make them the players pick a path to all dps or tank. I still think we are still missing a capital ship here. Why can't we get a super class for force Auxiliary with special abilities. You would use these type of ships which give special abilities out side the scope of command ships. Giving you extra fitting slot high med or low maybe even rigs. Instead of stacking penalties of using more then one type of module. In other words say you wanted to fit 4 cargo slots in the low. With this ship you would get same bounes for 4 fitted but would be able to free up one extra slot to fit what ever you liked.
Lazarus Telraven Amok. Goonswarm Federation 96	Posted - 2015.11.15 22:22:12 - [83] - Quote Sgt Ocker wrote: 5pitf1re wrote: Sgt Ocker wrote: Logs aren't edited enough for public viewing yet? You need to take your tinfoil off man. The group hasn't even begun with official feedback yet. So when is what has been discussed going to be available. No tinfoil needed you just confirmed, what you responded to as correct. I'm pretty sure when someone says ALL LOGS, it should mean all logs. Only "official" feedback will be available to players - Stinks of - Get your deals in before the logs are "official feedback", that way you can be seen to be seeking some sort of balance officially while having already got what you want privately. That is what you just said above - Isn't it? Talk about reducing your credibility. This is eve where telling lies, backstabbing and self serving interest groups, are part of daily game play. Maybe I've spent too much time dealing with self serving political groups and individuals (in and out of Eve) to be open minded about a group who could potentially further reduce (remove) my ability to play the way I choose - IE; not in blobs. To get you to stop crying I have posted the logs to pastebin for your viewing pleasure. http://pastebin.com/A0XBxnFA
Sgt Ocker Kenshin. DARKNESS. 774	Posted - 2015.11.16 06:10:05 - [84] - Quote Lazarus Telraven wrote: To get you to stop crying I have posted the logs to pastebin for your viewing pleasure. http://pastebin.com/A0XBxnFA Quote: http://pastebin.com/A0XBxnFA Equals Quote: The logs show nothing. Well that was about as informative as I thought it would be - Easy and fast to read to.. Empty paste bins usually are. My opinions are mine. If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
Alundil Isogen 5 1060	Posted - 2015.11.16 15:32:22 - [85] - Quote Orca Platypus wrote: Lazarus Telraven wrote: I know I'm not very well known, but to put me in the unknown list hurts my feelings :\ You are not known at all, but your affiliation has clearly placed you within a group, intentions of which are definitely not unknown. MFW "....Laz is unknown" You should stop posting immediately. I'm right behind you
Capqu Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 1186	Posted - 2015.11.16 16:18:56 - [86] - Quote "lordsservant: tracking titans were super cool and imo relatively healthy for the game" jaysus some of these people https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 16944	Posted - 2015.11.16 16:25:57 - [87] - Quote Orca Platypus wrote: RoCkEt X wrote: You're an idiot... LOL Dear CCP, please note the level of argumentation presented by the one you chose as focus group participant. If anyone asks, I'm for booting. You want him booted for telling the truth? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
ISD Decoy ISD Community Communications Liaisons 1379	Posted - 2015.11.16 18:06:39 - [88] - Quote I have removed a personal attack and those quoting it. Quote: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited. Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not conductive to the community spirit that CCP promotes. As such, this kind of behavior will not be tolerated. ISD Decoy Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department
Frostys Virpio KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation 2396	Posted - 2015.11.16 18:13:16 - [89] - Quote Capqu wrote: "lordsservant: tracking titans were super cool and imo relatively healthy for the game" jaysus some of these people Malcanis wrote: Olga Romanov wrote: Please CCP for the love of ******* god just ban Lord's Servant from it before it starts For their own protection, never mind ours. Someone had called it I guess...
Olga Romanov Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 3	Posted - 2015.11.17 08:29:57 - [90] - Quote I tried to warn you all!



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,06s, ref 20250708/1627
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.