EVE Search - The battlecruisers and the cost.

All Channels

Ships and Modules

The battlecruisers and the cost.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Hank Showbo	Posted - 2007.01.18 18:07:00 - [1] Ok, the new battlecruisers are fun I guess, but does anyone actually fly them t2 fitted? Even semi-t2 fitted? It now costs over 50M to fit out the hurricane (35M for guns/6M for nos/5M for MWD etc), it all adds up so much it just isnt practical to do it anymore. People tell me, the new battlecruisers are t1 therefore cheap, and I say, so what, a decent fitting isnt. Should it really cost less for me to fit out a battleship than to fit out a battlecruiser?
Borasao	Posted - 2007.01.18 18:11:00 - [2] Yes, partially Tech2 fitted. Basically everything in mids/lows is Tech2 when I fly mine. My highs are named tech1.
Mentat Canis Dreamscape Serenity Fallen	Posted - 2007.01.18 19:24:00 - [3] Its again one of those things if you can't afford to lose it don't fly it. I fly my cane just about fully tech two with the exception of the MWD and the Hardeners and the only reason for the hardeners is skills. Its total cost is about 85mil and you can insure I think it is 35 mil and you can make 50mil in a good 2-3 hours of serious ratting in that cane.
Fey Zanis	Posted - 2007.01.18 19:27:00 - [4] "Should it really cost less for me to fit out a battleship than to fit out a battlecruiser?" well, do you want a crappy battleship or a nice battlecruiser?
Nicocat Caldari New Age Solutions	Posted - 2007.01.18 19:36:00 - [5] I don't T2 fit mine because I can't fit T2 guns. =P ---------------------------- Originally by: Splagada SEED ME DADDY WTB: Friggin' portrait
Laythun Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2007.01.18 19:39:00 - [6] All T2. But then im amarr and im not on the minnieZOOMZOOM bandwagon. CEI's own Undercover Brother [MIA] It's great being Amarr, aint it?Ö
Forum Troll	Posted - 2007.01.18 19:42:00 - [7] What, do you want them to triple the cost to make all ships or something? Just because modules have a higher demand than ships does not make the items not worth fitting. I will have tech two items in every slot as my skill progression allows on my Hurricane.
Haniblecter Teg F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control	Posted - 2007.01.18 19:54:00 - [8] Hell yea! I've got my mrymidon fully t2 fitted. Its a very effective fighter and tanker if you have up to snuff skills. I think the Tier2 BC's are excellent soloers. With the insurance costing 10mill (that right?), then my t2 drones, med reppers, ab and all the EW adds up to around 20million or so. That's 30million that goes poof every time its popped. Not bad for a ship that does 350+ DPS against a stock raven + can tank 100 raw dps. Worth it? Sure, for me at least, since Im sportin 1bill + in isk and assets. Its either that, or I start solo'ing in HACs. Even if I ignore my 250mill vagabond and go for my munnins, Ill still be losing 130mill+ per destroyed munin. That means Im sticking to fleet operations with my hacs. ---------------------------------------- Friends Forever
MrTripps Gallente	Posted - 2007.01.18 20:22:00 - [9] Originally by: Haniblecter Teg I've got my mrymidon fully t2 fitted. Its a very effective fighter and tanker if you have up to snuff skills. It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up. /Ferris Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so. - Bertrand Russell
LUKEC Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.01.18 21:09:00 - [10] I just slap t2 dual heavy pulses on geddon and few iStabs and 5x t2 heavy drones and heavy nosf and i pretend it's tier2 bc, it's cheaper indeed. -------- Do you have Amarr Encryption lvl5 trained? Contact me.
Montero Kemono.	Posted - 2007.01.18 21:12:00 - [11] Fully t2 here. It costs but if you look after it it's a lasting investment. --------- Scrapheap Challenge
Shadarle	Posted - 2007.01.18 21:20:00 - [12] I don't buy that a BC is more expensive to fit than a BS first of all. Second, if you can't afford to properly fit a ship and thus may lose it, don't fly it. Third, the tier 1 BC's are cheaper to buy.. but their modules cost nearly as much as tier 2 BC's so percentage wise the mods are even a larger part of the total price for the initial BC's. Fourth, if you use only t1 mods you had better not have the skills to use the t2 versions or the money... because you're losing out on MASSIVE amounts of dps/tanking when you do so. Tanking Setups Compared Stacking Penalty / Resists Explained
Tuschii Pirates of Destruction Union	Posted - 2007.01.18 23:12:00 - [13] I try to T2 it as much as possible starting with T2 high slots at top priority.
Riho Red Wrath Exquisite Malevolence	Posted - 2007.01.19 00:55:00 - [14] allmost evrything is t2 :/ makes a lil bit of a diffrence in PvP... it might give u an advantage over a t1 fitted ship but it makes ur vallet cry more when u loose it.
Nyxus GALAXIAN Rule of Three	Posted - 2007.01.19 03:54:00 - [15] Edited by: Nyxus on 19/01/2007 03:50:44 Originally by: Laythun All T2. But then im amarr and im not on the minnieZOOMZOOM bandwagon. QFT. I can't help it. T2 is just SO much better I can't help but fit it, bugger the cost. Nyxus The Gallente ideals of Freedom, Liberty and Equality will be met by the Amarr realities of Lasers, Armor and Battleships. - Golan Trevize
Xendie Forsaken Empire The Forsaken Empire	Posted - 2007.01.19 06:27:00 - [16] Originally by: Hank Showbo Should it really cost less for me to fit out a battleship than to fit out a battlecruiser? you obviously havent flown fully tech2 kitted battleships. Quote: Nertzius > having fun being incompetitent? Quote: jake sisko > its f-e's bob dev alt making lag
Militis Kolosok Caldari Praetorian Black Guard	Posted - 2007.01.19 07:29:00 - [17] Edited by: Militis Kolosok on 19/01/2007 07:26:13 I fly mine about half t2 fitted, the other half I can't afford (like t2 invul and t2 bcus) or don't have the skills for (launchers) EDIT: Zomg, they finally put my portrait in :D -KolosoK-
Alistair Theisman Caldari No Quarter. C0VEN	Posted - 2007.01.19 07:35:00 - [18] If you think the hurricane is bad to fit T2, dont even try fitting a Drake. Freaking Heavy Missile Launcher II's
FreeHansjeToo	Posted - 2007.01.19 08:01:00 - [19] Why fly a BC if you can fly a BS?
Deathbarrage	Posted - 2007.01.19 08:08:00 - [20] what's t2 on my hurricane: 6x 425mm II 2x LSE II 3x gyro II rest is named
Alliaanna Dalaii Gallente Does Not Compute	Posted - 2007.01.19 08:27:00 - [21] My Tech II Fitted BC = 150mill /40mill Insurance. My Tech II Battleships AMMO = 80mill !!! Never mind the bloody ship and fittings Alliaanna [FOR SALE]25Mill Sp Amarr Char + Hauler Alt
Dita Jin	Posted - 2007.01.19 08:44:00 - [22] Originally by: FreeHansjeToo Why fly a BC if you can fly a BS? Why fly a BS when you can fly a carrier? etc. etc. posting something like that is just ignorant and stupid and does not provide anything to the topic at all. Many people prefer BC because of the fact that they can move around compared to the blobs that battleships are. Also there is the gang assist modules that everyone forgets about all the time...
Kagura Nikon Minmatar MASS HOMICIDE FREGE Alliance	Posted - 2007.01.19 09:21:00 - [23] tech 2 weapon costs will drop as soon as people realize that invention is pretty good for modules. I still can'tdo it. But as soon as i can I will go all out making 220mm vulcan T2. If brute force doesn't solve your problem.. then you are not using enough!!
Zekk Pacus Caldari StateCorp	Posted - 2007.01.19 09:33:00 - [24] My Drake, my Harb, my Ferox and my Prophecy are all t2-fitted wherever skills allow. Even where a t2 mod costs 16mill (Invul Field II, anyone?) I'll still buy it over the t1 version if I can because it's a better module. Fact. The Drake's by far the most expensive one to fit out of them all because BCU IIs and Invul Field IIs are so, so expensive. Damn mission runners.
Hank Showbo	Posted - 2007.01.19 09:46:00 - [25] Originally by: Xendie Originally by: Hank Showbo Should it really cost less for me to fit out a battleship than to fit out a battlecruiser? you obviously havent flown fully tech2 kitted battleships. I have, I use t2 fitted tempests, and tbh, in size comparison I find them cheap. Certainly more damaging and tankable than the hurricane. I just like hurricanes better, I like the look, the speed, the agility and most of all I prefer medium sized weapons. The fact is, there are a lot of medium class ships out there (Cruisers/Battlecruisers/Command Ships/Recons/Logistics/Heavy Assault Ships), I beleive there needs to be more t2 BPOs out for medium sized modules.
Greyshadow Guardians of Hell's Gate Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2007.01.19 09:57:00 - [26] Got a fully fitted T2 Drake, totals 300mil ship & fittings ...damn I love it ------ The Grim Reaper is out of the office at the moment leave a message and Greyshadow will get back to you!
Venkhar Krard	Posted - 2007.01.19 11:42:00 - [27] Edited by: Venkhar Krard on 19/01/2007 11:41:23 The prices of medium t2 weapons are insane now because of resellers. Its cheaper to fit a typhoon than a hurricane. Large named nos - 1,5 mil medium named nos - 6 mil large ACs t2 - 1,2mil medium ACs t2 - 6 mil I hope this will change with time ;]
Miklas Laces A.N.A.R.C.H.I.C.A	Posted - 2007.01.19 11:50:00 - [28] T2 guns and ammo on mine, the rest t1/named/whatever.
FreeHansjeToo	Posted - 2007.01.19 12:19:00 - [29] Quote: Why fly a BS when you can fly a carrier? etc. etc. posting something like that is just ignorant and stupid and does not provide anything to the topic at all. If you don't like the question, don't answer. If you don't know the answer, don't asnwer. It does not cost so much more to train for BS. It's not a steppingstone to BS. You CHOOSE to train for BC, there is no NEED in order to fly for instance a BS. Now let's try again: why would you want to fly a BC instead of a BS? Speed? There is not much difference there. There is a LOT of difference elsewhere: CAP, Poweroutput and Armor/Shield.
Malthros Zenobia Caldari Independent Navy Reserve	Posted - 2007.01.19 12:31:00 - [30] Originally by: Shadarle I don't buy that a BC is more expensive to fit than a BS first of all. Compare a HML drake setup to a Torp Raven setup, the Drake setup costs more. Originally by: kieron The Carrier was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.
Greyshadow Guardians of Hell's Gate Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2007.01.19 12:41:00 - [31] Originally by: FreeHansjeToo Now let's try again: why would you want to fly a BC instead of a BS? Speed? There is not much difference there. There is a LOT of difference elsewhere: CAP, Poweroutput and Armor/Shield. I personally can fly BS's but the BC proved a good all around damage platform. You can supply gank and tank and you have a wider range of targets due to the weapons fitted. I'm talking about Drake to Raven/Scorp/Rokh, but the same can still apply to others, by all means though I'm not saying some BS's can't do the same but the BC is designed better for that kind of combat. Oh and you say speed isn't a lot different between BC & BS, well bang a 10mn MWD on and your get a good speed and good acceleration as well. Where as a BS will need some time to get that top end unless you've had to use other slots which then gimps your setup. Oh its so not as clear cut as you make out, so many good reasons to fly a BC. ------ The Grim Reaper is out of the office at the moment leave a message and Greyshadow will get back to you!
Venkhar Krard	Posted - 2007.01.19 12:49:00 - [32] Originally by: FreeHansjeToo Now let's try again: why would you want to fly a BC instead of a BS? Speed? There is not much difference there. There is a LOT of difference elsewhere: CAP, Poweroutput and Armor/Shield. Large weapon sig resoltuion - 400 Medium weapon sig resolution - 125 and better tracking Thats why i prefer my BC. Its better for killing everything but bs.
Spaced Skunk Buffed Rumpuss Zit Dids	Posted - 2007.01.19 15:00:00 - [33] Edited by: Spaced Skunk on 19/01/2007 14:57:44 I am one of those pilots that prefer medium sized weapons, despite my character being well trained to use a Tempest/Typhoon/Mealstrom. I again do beleive the prices are rediculous, t2 does require more to build yes, but not so much more. Again, its not a case of demand with the modules, it is a case of resellers. As noted, a lot of the prices went down when CCP reseeded the BPOs, a week later back to thier normal prices with medium weapons being effected by heavy inflation. Its definatly resellers. I would personally like to build all my setups myself, adding that more challenging yet rewarding aspect to EvE. However because of the tech2 BPOs being rewarded from a lottery and invention being crappy the t2 prices never settle down. I dont think CCP will make it so invention gives you a chance of producing a BPO. Which obviously would get a lot of newbie industrial corporations a bigger chance at making isk, and give people the chance to be completely self reliant.
Christopher Dalran	Posted - 2007.01.19 15:16:00 - [34] Edited by: Christopher Dalran on 19/01/2007 15:14:41 T2 modules cost so much perhaps for a simple reason. No t2 item is seeded on the market, as far as i'm aware they can only be bought from another player. Knowing that we need to look at where most people chose to spend their time doing research (from an agent), coincidentally that just happens to be overwhelmingly in favor or T2 ships. Since most people are using all their agents for ships research would it not stand to assume less T2 module bpo's are being won? Less people making them = higher cost because of less competition. The best example i can find are T2 Cap rechargers, they cost about 25mill each. Now use t1 and named times that you find and your module cost plummets well below the cost of the ship. If you want to deck out your t1 ship with t2 modules its probably going to cost more for the modules than for the ship. As a general rules for PvE fly the best ship you can, for PvP fly what you can afford to lose and replace immediatly without worrying about isk.
Sol Star	Posted - 2007.01.19 19:33:00 - [35] Originally by: Christopher Dalran The best example i can find are T2 Cap rechargers, they cost about 25mill each. You haven't checked latest market prices on these lately have you?
Arion Daishi	Posted - 2007.01.19 19:37:00 - [36] Dont forget the cost of rigs. Rigs will add another 50-100m to the cost of the ship. I am currently running with t2BCUs, t2 hardeners and extenders. The missile launchers, pdus and invuln fields are t1. I cant bring myself to pay 20m for a t2 invuln field. The gain over named t1 isnt all that big. My Drake is currently running at nearly 200m with 2 rigs, 7 arby launchers, and the rest (please dont bring my inability to find low prices into this). Take a look at the missile launchers. t1 arby heavy launchers are running at about 12m a pop. The same siege launchers is half that price. There are simply more people making BS sized weaponry, lowing its cost. Daishi
Ghostshadow Caldari Templars of Space	Posted - 2007.01.19 19:51:00 - [37] You don't make arbys.... Try compairing Siege I/II to Heavy I/II (might be the same issue... But at least those modules can be player built) _________________________________ He who laughs last Thinks slowest
madaluap Gallente Mercenary Forces Exquisite Malevolence	Posted - 2007.01.19 20:04:00 - [38] Originally by: Christopher Dalran Edited by: Christopher Dalran on 19/01/2007 15:14:41 T2 modules cost so much perhaps for a simple reason. No t2 item is seeded on the market, as far as i'm aware they can only be bought from another player. Knowing that we need to look at where most people chose to spend their time doing research (from an agent), coincidentally that just happens to be overwhelmingly in favor or T2 ships. Since most people are using all their agents for ships research would it not stand to assume less T2 module bpo's are being won? Less people making them = higher cost because of less competition. The best example i can find are T2 Cap rechargers, they cost about 25mill each. Now use t1 and named times that you find and your module cost plummets well below the cost of the ship. If you want to deck out your t1 ship with t2 modules its probably going to cost more for the modules than for the ship. As a general rules for PvE fly the best ship you can, for PvP fly what you can afford to lose and replace immediatly without worrying about isk. Because im such a good guy im willing to sell you 20 caprechargers 2 for 18 mil each... _________________________________________________ Breetime
Berrik Radhok GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.01.19 20:16:00 - [39] It's cheaper than an HAC. Originally by: Khavi Vetali Oh don't worry, the goons are just as suicidal with their battleships as they are with their frigates.
Majin82 Caldari g guild	Posted - 2007.01.19 20:43:00 - [40] For as long as I have had the ISK and Skills to do it, I only use T2 items. I donÆt even bother with low level named or T1 unless itÆs a throw away ship (Ferox during war time). My Drakes are all fully T2 fitted except for my rigs, IÆll fix that as soon as they are listed on the market. I donÆt insure my ships anymore cause the fittings IÆll lose are often 2 to 3 times the cost of the ship. Just to give you an Idea, my level 4 mission Drake using faction gear costs around 500mil in total and itÆs worth every ISK I spent on it. ------------------------------------- The difference between a Pirate and an Anti-Pirate is that an Anti-Pirate fights ships fitted with guns! Passive Drake For The Win
OrangeAfroMan Minmatar Suffoco Noctis Ethereal Dawn	Posted - 2007.01.20 00:54:00 - [41] Hell I faction fit my main ships to get an advantage over the T2ers. The cost is worth it - but also don't fly it if you can't afford to lose it, simple. Nos - Time for a Change
OrangeAfroMan Minmatar Suffoco Noctis Ethereal Dawn	Posted - 2007.01.20 00:55:00 - [42] Originally by: FreeHansjeToo Now let's try again: why would you want to fly a BC instead of a BS? Speed? There is not much difference there. There is a LOT of difference elsewhere: CAP, Poweroutput and Armor/Shield. If you can't see the reason to, then just keep flying in battleships. Nos - Time for a Change
Ice Conch	Posted - 2007.01.20 01:03:00 - [43] t2 highs and lows are necessary
Lumberjackhammer Caldari Dodge this inc Vanu Space Command	Posted - 2007.01.20 13:29:00 - [44] drake - T2 modules all the way (almost, not shield pwer relays) its costs me about...7x12mill (launchers) 2x12(bcs) 45 for the ship,,,,another 150 mill for shield recharge rigs,,,and 2 extenders, 2 rechargers, 2 invulvs,,,,,yep it costs ALOT (altho, I bought alot of the stuff some time ago, when rigs still sold for 50-55 mill, and launcher were down on 8 mill)
FreeHansjeToo	Posted - 2007.01.20 20:21:00 - [45] Quote: If you can't see the reason to, then just keep flying in battleships Weak, very weak.
Kuno Hida	Posted - 2007.01.20 21:21:00 - [46] My rigs are t1.... Drake, T2 across the board. Its lovely. I'll cry when it gets blown up, and go dust off a Ferox for a while. Either of my BS cost more than this drake...but my guns are t1 mostly. Suck it up and go rat some more. Its worth it.
Majin82 Caldari g guild	Posted - 2007.01.20 21:28:00 - [47] Originally by: FreeHansjeToo Quote: If you can't see the reason to, then just keep flying in battleships Weak, very weak. FreeHansjeToo, You have been coming across as a Troll, while I am hoping that is not your intention, you have contributed very little to explain your point. Why do you think a BC isn't a good as a BS? Here are my reasons I think a BC, the Drake in this case, is better then a BS, Raven in this case. - Cost, right off the bat a Raven will cost you more ISK to buy over a Drake. - Time, the skills needed to get into a Raven take longer then getting into a Drake. - Fittings, Raven H:8 (6 Launchers), M:6, L:5 Drake H:8 (7 Launchers) M:6, L:4. Minus 1 low, the Drake has the exact same number of fitting slots. It has 8 highs, just like the Raven, The biggest difference is what you can fit on a Raven (Heavy gear). But The Drake gives you amazing selection of options on how to fit it, filling many different roles. Take, Anti-Frigate using assault launchers, Anti-Cruiser using heavy launchers, Anti-HAC using heavy assault launchers, for example. - Bonuses, The Drake has tank bonuses, where the Raven has gank bonuses. In REV tank has shown to be king, if you can out tank your target, you will win. In PVE, Tank is god, if you can shrug off the damage you take, the missions will be a lot easier. - Passive tank-ability, Thanks to the fact the Drake has the amazing Bonuses to it's tank, having BC 4-5 allows you to devote some mids to LSEIIs and shield rechargers, while still having great base Resists. Coupled with Purger rigs I have been able to create Fully passive tanks on the Drake that have more HP regen a second then you could get with a Gist X-Type XLarge booster with a 30% amp. Nos immune anyone? -Gang Assist Modules, Fitting warfare links allows you to contribute more to the fleet then just more firepower. With the right skills, the bonuses you can give to the fleet can give you a huge advantage. -Speed, ItÆs base speed may only be 30m/s faster then the Raven, but fit a AB or MWD and you can go 1200+ m/s with the right skills and gear. - Versatility, A Drake can run level 1Æs û 4Æs very fast and effectively, act as support to a fleet (warfare links), solo PVP, act as a tackler, Transport Cargoà While the Raven can do a all the same things, the Drake does most of them faster and cheaper. I could keep going but I think you get the general Idea. So please build an argument to counter my points if you would like to continue stating that a BS is better why bother with a BC. I am not flaming you in any way, I would just like to see your reasons. So please don't bring a jerry can to your next post. ------------------------------------- The difference between a Pirate and an Anti-Pirate is that an Anti-Pirate fights ships fitted with guns! Passive Drake For The Win
AKULA UrQuan Caldari STK Scientific	Posted - 2007.01.20 21:41:00 - [48] My mission running drake is a mix of T2 and quality named gear. The PvP snipeing Ferox I have is pure T2 except for the drones.
FreeHansjeToo	Posted - 2007.01.21 18:13:00 - [49] Majin82, If you counter questions and remarks with an answer as you gave, you will get remarks like my last 1, trollish or nor. I do not think I need to 'explain' anything, since I was asking a question. However, since your attitude irks me, here we go: First of all, as the original OP the question was stated in general, not for specific ships. You, sir, take 2 ships and start comparing, I wonder why. I compared too, Myrmadon vs Dominix, and I find the Myrm lacking in this comparison. I think this invalidates a lot of your points, bet let's get over some. Cost: difference in price between Myrm and Domi is 15-20 mil. Negligible, in my eyes, I hope I don't need to explain that. Time: as I stated in a previous post in this thread, learning BC is a CHOICE. You don't NEED to learn BC before entering another ship class. BC is only for BC, and maybe muchmuchmuch later Command ships. Fittings: BS usually has more fittings than BC. Maybe there are exceptions, they are just that. Again, you compare specific ships. Bonuses: again, ship specific. If I compare Myrm against Domi, the Myrm fails for me, very much so. Your next remarks are all for the specific ships you mentioned, I'll not go into that. Exception: speed. You maybe right about that, but slap on an AB and the rest on a BS and see the speed difference there... My remarks in previous posting you have not countered. More armor, more CAP, which enables you to fit LAR's instead of MAR's. In a damage-rich environment a BC has to leave very fast, I noticed, despite the repair bonus usually on a BC. Since I use suckers many times a BC just does not cut it. In this thread I read 1 advantage a BC has over BS: signature. That's the only thing sofar, wth versatility, where BC beats BS. Not enough for me.
Linavin Mercurialis Inc. Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.01.21 18:37:00 - [50] Personally, all the sky high module prices makes me wanting to fly HAC's again. The price difference between a tech II BC and an HAC is smaller than ever before ---
Sgt Blade Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2007.01.21 19:02:00 - [51] fully t2 fitted for me, got faction stuffs on my bc's somwhere.... Hypnotic Pelvic Thrusting Level 5
JoeT Amarr Short Attention Span	Posted - 2007.01.21 19:43:00 - [52] everything i can get thats t2 :) guns, ammo, AB, tank. --- If i'm posting on the forums, it's mostly cause i'm at work :D
Kashele	Posted - 2007.01.22 10:23:00 - [53] Originally by: FreeHansjeToo Time: as I stated in a previous post in this thread, learning BC is a CHOICE. You don't NEED to learn BC before entering another ship class. BC is only for BC, and maybe muchmuchmuch later Command ships. But BC gets you EVERY race's BC, as long as you have the cruiser prerequisites (which you'd need anyway for the race-specific battleship). So training battlecruiser isn't that valuable for the very race-specific character. However, it very much becomes a stepping stone for the character moving on to another race's ships. With a mediocum of training, you can make yourself quite happy in another race's BC while waiting for the cruiser and battleship skills you consider essential to catch up. The time difference becomes even more evident if you add training large weapon specialization into the mix.
Kagura Nikon Minmatar MASS HOMICIDE FREGE Alliance	Posted - 2007.01.22 11:10:00 - [54] In group combat, battleships are usually the scrambled and primary called ones. That is enough reson for me to use a BC. :) But i do have my tempest to snipe a few things where my cane can't reach If brute force doesn't solve your problem.. then you are not using enough!!
Kay Rissa The Priory Shroud Of Darkness	Posted - 2007.01.22 11:24:00 - [55] i have 2 characters: 1 caldary, 2nd Ammar/gallente.... U know what, i stoped flying caldary, because prices of t2 modules r insane. To fit drake with all t2 modules would cost more then 150 mils... To fit brutix/mirmidom cost 30-40 mils... EOS/astarte cost 98/120 mils or so, fitting also around 30-40 mils...nighhawk - 180-200 mils + 150mils for fitting... insane Proud member of the Priory ps: i dont like to kill innocent ppl, so if i killed u, u rnt innocent
Felinuszzz Caldari TunDraGon	Posted - 2007.01.22 11:24:00 - [56] Edited by: Felinuszzz on 22/01/2007 11:23:57 What's the whine about. Tech 2 is, in my opinion, the barebones lowest quality of fitting you should be using on any ship that you are planning on fighting others in. Yes, a Hurricane costs 50M, fittings cost another 40M-60M (at least the way I fit mine anyways). What's the problem. Unless you're dying daily and not getting any kills in the process, this should be affordeable and sustaineable from kill loot. If you cannot afford to go PvPing in a full t2/best named battlecruiser, you should do it in a cruiser instead. Look at it this way; the additional 15M for a 90% webber can (and will) save your life. The named MWD can (and will) save your life. Same with every high-priced fitting. They all make your ship more surviveable and harder to lose. The way I do it, I just spend all my ISK on a big stockpile of fittings. I keep my wallet thin, and my hanger crowded with best named/tech 2 stuff that I use. I'm starting to buy faction fittings now, and really, 40M-150M a piece, it is still affordeable if you are careful with your money and loot. ---------
Sherpondeldey Minmatar SolaR KillerS	Posted - 2007.01.22 11:45:00 - [57] i've got a new 'cane, had a couple of kills and it and then switched to autopest with t1 'scout' autocannons slots layout is almost the same but 6x220 t2 are like 70 times more expensive then 6xdual 425 'scout'. Heavy dim nosferatu is at least twice cheeper than medium dim nos. Large repairers t2 are more expensive then medium but who cares?! i had saved 40mil in my high slots
FreeHansjeToo	Posted - 2007.01.22 12:15:00 - [58] Quote: But BC gets you EVERY race's BC, Good point, can't argue that. Quote: If brute force doesn't solve your problem.. then you are not using enough!! With such a slogan, why consider a BC...
The Hanz Caldari Ordo Rosa Crux Templaris	Posted - 2007.01.23 00:32:00 - [59] BC's are made of "win."
FreeHansjeToo	Posted - 2007.01.23 06:39:00 - [60] Quote: BC's are made of "win." ??? Care to explain?
Alpine 69 Slacker Industries Exuro Mortis	Posted - 2007.01.23 07:34:00 - [61] my drake is full t2, just feel more secure in it then with **** t1/named mods (also a matter of ego to fit t2) Drake = 50m Heavy missile launcher II = 16m x 7 = 112m invul II = 19m x2 = 38m medium nosferatu II = 4m x 2 = 8m bcu II = 10m x 2 = 20m large shield extender II = 7m large shield booster II = 1m pdu II = 5m x2 = 10m ------------------------------------------------ + total of ship + t2 mods = 246m -notice this doesnt include insurance cost and payout. -notice this doesnt include wtfexpensive rigs & "required" implants etc. -notice im not saying every medslot item as i usually dont fit those t2 for example) see, drakes are pain for wallet to fit. now stop crying about the hurricane being expensive. now lets see if my raven is any cheaper; Raven = 110m Cruise missile launcher II = 13m x 6 = 78m 100mn ab II = 4m Xlarge shield booster II = 2m bcu II = 10m x3 = 30m pdu II = 5m x2 = 10m em hardener II = 5m ---------------------------------------------- + that totals for 239m -notice raven pays out more insurance however although the insurance cost is noticably heavier. -notice i didnt say the 2 diminishing nosses i tend to use that are 7m each. eeeeeeek my sig got nerfed again :(
Haniblecter Teg F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control	Posted - 2007.01.23 08:46:00 - [62] Edited by: Haniblecter Teg on 23/01/2007 08:49:19 Who cares about whatt the most popluar race's ship of the month costs. Go for the other tier 2 bc's and you'll see very nice performance for a fraction the cost. Frickin bandwagoneers. ---------------------------------------- Friends Forever

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.