Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Juana Cavin-Guang
Zelotic Economics Karezza Lost Cause Syndicate
6
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 01:59:56 -
[1] - Quote
Here's an idea, instead of giving assault frigs a "bandaid" to better fit into the svipul shaped peg in the meta with the intended fleet role of the ship class, we change up the ship class to fill a niche that won't be better fit and outclassed in almost every way by a tech 3 destroyer.
Rename the Assault Frigate ship class to Reconnaissance Frigate and give them all d-scan immunity. It would give the ship class something unique, and it should provide a neat little niche for the ship class to excel in. The mind games in FW will move to a whole new level, at the very least. |
Iyokus Patrouette
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
619
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 02:51:59 -
[2] - Quote
Juana Cavin-Guang wrote: The mind games in FW will move to a whole new level, at the very least.
not really because a T3D will still beat an assault frig.
---- Advocate for the initiation of purple coloured wormholes----
|
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
3925
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 05:48:38 -
[3] - Quote
I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships.
Oh god.
|
ChromeStriker
Out of Focus Odin's Call
983
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 08:48:33 -
[4] - Quote
\o/ buff everything else.... dont fix the problem... powercreeps a lie.... double the damage on all other frig size ships and give other destroyers 10x the ehp... that'll fix the problem... right? .... right??
(for those who dont understand, that was sarcasm...)
No Worries
|
Omar Alharazaad
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2665
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 09:51:39 -
[5] - Quote
If I could have a buff to assault frigates of my choice it would be skill dependent resistance to energy neutralizers. Mebbe a tiny boost to their base speed too? I mean if we're talking about the brass ring here and stuff.
Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.
|
Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
13464
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 10:38:25 -
[6] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships. this made me giggle
i think an ab bonus wouldn't go amiss. not as sever as the sansa line obviously but enough to allow them to run down the slow-medium slow cruisers
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
771
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 12:25:28 -
[7] - Quote
At the risk of sounding like a complete idiot, I still have to wonder what the hell T3D's were meant for if not to completely obsolete every AF in the game. Did CCP really just say, "**** it," and just decide to toss them in for ***** and giggles, or was there some dev blog explaining their actual intended role that I missed? It's all I tend to hear now is that AF's and many other frigs are dead and T3D's killed them, especially in FW Low.
At the same time, I also have to wonder why simply bringing some of your own T3D's along with to counter there own brethren doesn't work just as well. I can't imagine I'm not the first to suggest that, can I? Maybe it's just me; I have very little PvP from long ago, but nothing recent, so that's very possible.
"Tomahawks?"
"----in' A, right?"
"Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each."
"----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."
|
Leila Meurtrier
Why Am I Not Surprised
72
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 13:04:40 -
[8] - Quote
There are two things which should be buffed for Assault Frigates. And it would be adequate even without t3ds being here. 1)Increase the base speeds to either match t1 counterparts or get them in -5/+5 range. 2)Give them about 15 extra CPU and 5 PWG in general.
That way they'll become the same thing to t1 frigs as HAC to t1 cruiser. Why speed buffs? Because HACs don't have speed penalties like AFs do. Why fitting buffs? Because, you know, these ships are MEANT to carry MORE plates/shield extenders AND use mwd to their heart's contest. In the current state, it's not a thing. You barely may fit t2 pulses with damage mods, damage control and MWD on Retribution. You may need overclocking rig just for that. You don't have powergrid for 400mm plate (You probably should), you'll have problem with fitting long point and you can't even touch any weapon system rig.
Then, we may actually consider serious comparison of t3ds and assault frigates. Although, I think they really always meant to have bonus strength and range/overheat damage reduction for warp scramblers, given the "Heavy second tackle" role CCP were mumbling about. |
Garrett Osinov
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
24
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 17:17:33 -
[9] - Quote
Svipul fitted 100 mils, Af 35-40 mils. Obviously 100 mils ship will be better then 35-40 mils ship. |
Leila Meurtrier
Why Am I Not Surprised
76
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 17:27:51 -
[10] - Quote
Garrett Osinov wrote:Svipul fitted 100 mils, Af 35-40 mils. Obviously 100 mils ship will be better then 35-40 mils ship. Taking price into account in universe being ruled by 8-12 y.o. veterans is just plain silly. Not to mention that 100 mil is a bull. Taking similar grade of blinging, we talk about just 20-25 mil difference. |
|
Arla Sarain
726
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 18:19:07 -
[11] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships. This and an agility buff would be sweet. |
Ong
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
129
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 19:30:45 -
[12] - Quote
T3D's might be the straw that broke the camels back, but AF's have been obsolete since the t1/faction frigate buffs. There was absolutely no reason to fly them already.
But yeah w/e hurf derf T3D's took ma job!! |
Ong
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
129
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 19:37:55 -
[13] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships.
Because that wouldn't be power creep at all, there is already very little reasons to fly larger ships as it is!!
|
Rawketsled
Generic Corp Name
360
|
Posted - 2016.01.07 23:04:51 -
[14] - Quote
Give them a +200% bonus to the effectiveness of;
- TCs and TEs (and the missile ones),
- SeBos and SigAmps,
- ECCM and Backup Sensors,
- Cap Batteries.
This means AFs can be fit to be mega resistant to ewar, but have little extra bite unless they specifcally fit for it. This is a new niche that doesn't exist in the game yet. |
Valkin Mordirc
1801
|
Posted - 2016.01.08 00:56:19 -
[15] - Quote
Garrett Osinov wrote:Svipul fitted 100 mils, Af 35-40 mils. Obviously 100 mils ship will be better then 35-40 mils ship.
I'll just take out my officer fit Ibis and go wreck if price is obviously a balance factor
#DeleteTheWeak
|
Kamahl Daikun
Back To Basics. Tactical Supremacy
65
|
Posted - 2016.01.08 03:58:25 -
[16] - Quote
Valkin Mordirc wrote:Garrett Osinov wrote:Svipul fitted 100 mils, Af 35-40 mils. Obviously 100 mils ship will be better then 35-40 mils ship. I'll just take out my officer fit Ibis and go wreck if price is obviously a balance factor
I'm betting isk that my Deadspace Luxury Yacht will destroy your Ibis. |
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
3926
|
Posted - 2016.01.08 05:27:15 -
[17] - Quote
Ong wrote:Riot Girl wrote:I wanna give them heavy neuts so they can threaten larger ships. Because that wouldn't be power creep at all, there is already very little reasons to fly larger ships as it is!! Because there's totally a reason to fly AFs, but yeah, it's not really a legit suggestion. They need something though, preferably something that can be carried up to HACs too.
Oh god.
|
Omar Alharazaad
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2680
|
Posted - 2016.01.08 08:00:10 -
[18] - Quote
I don't know about them being completely obsolete so much as having much more niche applications than they used to. For my high sex nogoodery I still use the Ishkur as my go-to ship due to it having two separate weapons platforms that can work well together or independently.
It doesn't output damage like a T3D, certainly, nor is it as fast, but in the case where I'm having a nice close slow dance with a much larger vessel it's very handy to have the drones that I can divert in case a white knight arrives intent on saving the princess. I've sent a handful of catalysts and coercers scurrying off in flames this way in the past, so the versatility aspect has much appeal to me.
Would I put my trusty AF up against a T3D with reasonable expectation of victory? Of course not. Barring the pilot being far worse at EVE than me, I'm gonna lose. They are possessed of a different form of versatility, and have strengths of their own that are quite potent.
I do think the AF does need a bit of love in comparison, because as folks have stated it's now competing with a class of ship that does pretty much everything it used to do but only better.
Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.
|
Hochopepa
POS Consultants Group LLC
32
|
Posted - 2016.01.08 19:36:24 -
[19] - Quote
Juana Cavin-Guang wrote:Here's an idea, instead of giving assault frigs a "bandaid" to better fit into the svipul shaped peg in the meta with the intended fleet role of the ship class, we change up the ship class to fill a niche that won't be better fit and outclassed in almost every way by a tech 3 destroyer.
Rename the Assault Frigate ship class to Reconnaissance Frigate and give them all d-scan immunity. It would give the ship class something unique, and it should provide a neat little niche for the ship class to excel in. The mind games in FW will move to a whole new level, at the very least.
These are called covert ops frigates.
|
Alaric Faelen
Sabotage Incorporated Executive Outcomes
350
|
Posted - 2016.01.11 02:04:45 -
[20] - Quote
It's the same problem with their larger cousins, but in reverse.
The HACs are so much better than the next larger class of ships- the battlecruiser- that BC fleets have become rare animals. This was called Ishtars Online for awhile, not Oracles Online. AFs suffer from being inferior to the next larger class of ships, Destroyers. Especially now with T3 and Command variants in the meta.
CCP could boost the mobility of the AF to make the frigate hull more nimble than a larger destroyer- but given the extreme focus on mobility blessed upon the T3 destroyers, this begins to make an AF look like a 'Heavy Ceptor' in application- a role I don't think is really compelling.
I think the immunity to D-Scan idea has merit. The AF could become like a 'combat' recon, reduced cloak targeting penalty, D-Scan immune, but unable to warp cloaked.
Or just troll everyone and make Bastion Module AF's. |
|
ValentinaDLM
Khushakor Clan Of Questionable Repute
838
|
Posted - 2016.01.11 03:14:34 -
[21] - Quote
I think the jag needs a major buff in it having an optimal bonus suggesting artillery yet, being unable to meaningfully fullfill that role at all and being too slow to be heavy tackle. The retribution could use a very small like +5pg bonus so that it can still fit a plate with pulse lasers and an MWD without too many fitting mods and a proper glass cannon beam fit.
Outside of those I feel that the lineup really isn't that bad. Harpies are bordering on OP, Hawks are super strong in small gangs, vengeances too, the wolf is pretty decent in dps for a minmatar ship and fits a solid tank, or can kite okay for a ship so slow. The enyo is very strong as a glass cannon and the ishkur has solid versatility.
We have had lots of sweeping changes to the meta when I think only minor changes should be done or we will just see power creep in response to the new ships. |
Justin Cody
Hard Knocks Inc. Hard Knocks Citizens
342
|
Posted - 2016.01.11 09:15:05 -
[22] - Quote
Sobaan Tali wrote:At the risk of sounding like a complete idiot, I still have to wonder what the hell T3D's were meant for if not to completely obsolete every AF in the game. Did CCP really just say, "**** it," and just decide to toss them in for ***** and giggles, or was there some dev blog explaining their actual intended role that I missed? It's all I tend to hear now is that AF's and many other frigs are dead and T3D's killed them, especially in FW Low.
At the same time, I also have to wonder why simply bringing some of your own T3D's along with to counter there own brethren doesn't work just as well. I can't imagine I'm not the first to suggest that, can I? Maybe it's just me; I have very little PvP from long ago, but nothing recent, so that's very possible.
You make a relevent observation that T3D's appear to be meant to obsolete (in a rock-paper-scissors sense) the Assault Frigate Class. Tech 3 Cruisers largely (though not absolutely) obsolete HAC's and Recons while adding superior probing abilities. People still use HAC's because they are cheaper and they are still effective because they still have potent bonuses. Assault Frigates were meant to counter the cruiser meta at their initial release and later the BC meta when they got their sig bonus reduction.
With the T3D's they are fairly expensive compared to their t1 counterparts and ought to be looked at in that regard. Assault Frigates are fairly slow and cumbersome - but we can't keep buffing everything otherwise we run into the same issue elsewhere.
What else can be done to change/shift the meta? Iterate on under used mechanics. Ex:
Drugs - Assault Frigate Role Bonus - 25% reduction in drug penalty severity and 25% increase to drug beneficial effect Addition: Assault Frigates get 3m3 drug bay that is non-scannable by high sec police forces.
Other ideas: Reduce AF Base Signature so that it is VERY tiny - like 20 meters or less. Making them harder to lock (or insta-lock) as well as harder to track - and reduce further incoming missile damage from the rapid light class of launchers and nearly immune to anything larger.
Ideally pirate ships get the drug bay imo and AF's get the signature reduction - yes I know it steps on the interceptors a bit but interceptors get to fly through bubbles and generally be much faster plus tackle specialty. |
Justin Cody
Hard Knocks Inc. Hard Knocks Citizens
342
|
Posted - 2016.01.11 09:15:56 -
[23] - Quote
That said most cruisers in a 1v1 or even 1v2 situaltion will utterly step all over a t3d if you have a decent fit and good skills. |
ChromeStriker
Out of Focus Odin's Call
989
|
Posted - 2016.01.11 09:33:00 -
[24] - Quote
Justin Cody wrote:That said most cruisers in a 1v1 or even 1v2 situaltion will utterly step all over a t3d if you have a decent fit and good skills.
If you specifically fit the cruiser to fight TD3's yeah... ish... some just dont have a chance whatever you do, and most of the time the destroyer can just bug out... and if you fit to foght the T3D's you gimp yourself to everything else...
No Worries
|
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
779
|
Posted - 2016.01.11 12:17:56 -
[25] - Quote
ChromeStriker wrote:Justin Cody wrote:That said most cruisers in a 1v1 or even 1v2 situaltion will utterly step all over a t3d if you have a decent fit and good skills. If you specifically fit the cruiser to fight TD3's yeah... ish... some just dont have a chance whatever you do, and most of the time the destroyer can just bug out... and if you fit to foght the T3D's you gimp yourself to everything else...
Sounds awfully familiar actually...remember when the Dramial was OP'd and CCP had to lasso that one in? People use to state that even a cruiser could be easily bested by a Dram if flown right, and that dessies and frigs were having an even harder time with it. I remember people in T1 cruisers would say to watch for Dramiels, they are a pain to deal with.
Funny thing is when I ask someone who had flown the Dram for a long time before the nerf how it was afterwards, they said, "Well, it's not as good as it was and harder to get a strong fit squeezed in and some fits don't work like they use to, but it's still strong. It just doesn't feel like cheating anymore is all, which is nice."
"Tomahawks?"
"----in' A, right?"
"Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each."
"----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."
|
Hochopepa
POS Consultants Group LLC
32
|
Posted - 2016.01.11 19:05:13 -
[26] - Quote
Youtube is littered with videos of T3Ds curb-stomping cruisers, frigate and really anything under BC solo. In a small gang (2-3), BC and BS don't stand a chance either. |
Stitch Kaneland
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
725
|
Posted - 2016.01.11 22:05:29 -
[27] - Quote
Hochopepa wrote:Youtube is littered with videos of T3Ds curb-stomping cruisers, frigate and really anything under BC solo. In a small gang (2-3), BC and BS don't stand a chance either.
I regularly stomp t3ds and even frig gangs in my BC's. But thats because i fit for max application against smaller ships. Because you know... i might only run into 1 BS during a roam, but run across 30 frigs/t3ds. So im willing to gimp just to put t3ds and command dessies in their place when they try to pounce my drake.
Give Battlecruisers range to fullfil their Anti-Cruiser role - OP SUCCESS
|
Stitch Kaneland
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
725
|
Posted - 2016.01.11 22:11:38 -
[28] - Quote
ValentinaDLM wrote:I think the jag needs a major buff in it having an optimal bonus suggesting artillery yet, being unable to meaningfully fullfill that role at all and being too slow to be heavy tackle. The retribution could use a very small like +5pg bonus so that it can still fit a plate with pulse lasers and an MWD without too many fitting mods and a proper glass cannon beam fit.
Outside of those I feel that the lineup really isn't that bad. Harpies are bordering on OP, Hawks are super strong in small gangs, vengeances too, the wolf is pretty decent in dps for a minmatar ship and fits a solid tank, or can kite okay for a ship so slow. The enyo is very strong as a glass cannon and the ishkur has solid versatility.
We have had lots of sweeping changes to the meta when I think only minor changes should be done or we will just see power creep in response to the new ships.
Yay! Someone who has ideas to fix AF without resorting to stupid gimmicks.
This. This is all that is needed to fix AF.
Up their grids so they can actually be heavy tackle, or actually do the role theyre intended to do. Also cap buffs for most of them. Since running a point and mwd seems like an impossible task half the time.
Some AF need some tweaking like the jag. Just roll both damage bonuses into 1 trait and give it a shield boost bonus. Same as the wolf, but maybe give it another falloff bonus or sig bonus. I will say the jag amd wolf are pretty fast. My jag with one nano is around 2900m/s cold and close to 4k hot. Pretty good imo.
Remove hawk's shield boost bonus and give it an application bonus. Up its grid so i can fit LML and give a moderate buff to shield HP. This makes it into a frigate sized corax.
Give ishkur full drone bay from the get go, give it an armor rep bonus.
Just a few ideas off the top of my head... im actually roaming in AF now, and they still shame most frigs and t2 dessies.
Give Battlecruisers range to fullfil their Anti-Cruiser role - OP SUCCESS
|
Hochopepa
POS Consultants Group LLC
32
|
Posted - 2016.01.12 15:07:34 -
[29] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:Hochopepa wrote:Youtube is littered with videos of T3Ds curb-stomping cruisers, frigate and really anything under BC solo. In a small gang (2-3), BC and BS don't stand a chance either. I regularly stomp t3ds and even frig gangs in my BC's. But thats because i fit for max application against smaller ships. Because you know... i might only run into 1 BS during a roam, but run across 30 frigs/t3ds. So im willing to gimp just to put t3ds and command dessies in their place when they try to pounce my drake.
Certainly, when you're specially fit to deal with them, then you can do just that. Not everyone flies around specially fit to deal with them though. And that, really, proves the point. If you have to do special fits just do deal with a specific ship class, it may be time to do a balance pass.
|
ValentinaDLM
Khushakor Clan Of Questionable Repute
839
|
Posted - 2016.01.12 16:25:44 -
[30] - Quote
Hochopepa wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote:Hochopepa wrote:Youtube is littered with videos of T3Ds curb-stomping cruisers, frigate and really anything under BC solo. In a small gang (2-3), BC and BS don't stand a chance either. I regularly stomp t3ds and even frig gangs in my BC's. But thats because i fit for max application against smaller ships. Because you know... i might only run into 1 BS during a roam, but run across 30 frigs/t3ds. So im willing to gimp just to put t3ds and command dessies in their place when they try to pounce my drake. Certainly, when you're specially fit to deal with them, then you can do just that. Not everyone flies around specially fit to deal with them though. And that, really, proves the point. If you have to do special fits just do deal with a specific ship class, it may be time to do a balance pass. Eve is a very complex version of rock, paper scissors with piloting skill/FC skill thrown in; it isn't meant that ships are a strictly meant to destroy all ships smaller than them with any fit. Just like 1400mm pests aren't th best fit to use against ahacs, HML drakes aren't the best to use against t3ds, if you didn't have to fit your ship towards fighting down then that would absolutely be OP. T3Ds probably ought to get a minor look at, but mostly from a mobility aspect as they are in quite a few cases faster than frigates. I personally think just taking off a few ms from t3ds and probably adding a few to t1 Dessies would do a fair bit to making things more competitive, but we absolutely shouldn't make them easier to hit by larger guns than they are now. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |