| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Riedle
Paradox Collective
32
|
Posted - 2011.12.15 22:57:00 -
[91] - Quote
Valei Khurelem wrote:I know what YOUR version of being liberal is and you're wrong, the only different version of liberals that exists has been planted in your heads at a young age and you're too witless to understand that. I have only seen one proper example of a word or ideology that has been hijacked by a different ideology or political party and that is the Republican party being taken over by homophobic, god fearing, muslim hating, warmongering and adultering neo-conservative morons like some of the people posting on these boards.
If you were to do some research you would see that I am correct and maybe then you wouldn't be so angry and wouldn't need to insult your betters.
Do you think I have been brainwashed? Is that what you tell yourself when anyone disagrees with you? lol That is a sign of egotism by the way.
While we are shattering stereotypes i am a Canadian. lol The brainwashing must go across the border I suppose. lols |

Beaches
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.15 23:04:00 -
[92] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:American Liberals don't liberate and have not done so since 1776. American conservatives have yet to actually conserve anything except government. Tomorrow is Bill of Rights Day - and today they are going to sign into law (codify - they are are already doing it) the ability to use the Army in the US to detain people without charges, legal representation, or a trial, for an indefnate period. All it takes is a decree from the executive branch - no evidence required.This whole argument may well be moot. We are arguing about the political system of a dead nation.
I'm a long time believer in the fallacy of democracy. It can work in a homogeneous city-state like Athens with voter restrictions, but never in a nation of hundreds of millions of different people. Most aren't able to clump two ideas next to each other, let alone decide how a nation should be ruled. What happened in 2008 is a perfect example of how through their ignorance and inability they fail fundamentally in their task. The main thing most of them knew about Obama was that he was black, and everyone knows he couldn't have possibly won if he was the same person but white. (even over Hillary Clinton?) Just sad and pathetic, the American people disgust me, the mobs throughout the world are disgusting. F U fickle masses  |

First Lieutenant Dan
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2011.12.15 23:16:00 -
[93] - Quote
Beaches wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:American Liberals don't liberate and have not done so since 1776. American conservatives have yet to actually conserve anything except government. Tomorrow is Bill of Rights Day - and today they are going to sign into law (codify - they are are already doing it) the ability to use the Army in the US to detain people without charges, legal representation, or a trial, for an indefnate period. All it takes is a decree from the executive branch - no evidence required.This whole argument may well be moot. We are arguing about the political system of a dead nation. I'm a long time believer in the fallacy of democracy. It can work in a homogeneous city-state like Athens with voter restrictions, but never in a nation of hundreds of millions of different people. Most aren't able to clump two ideas next to each other, let alone decide how a nation should be ruled. What happened in 2008 is a perfect example of how through their ignorance and inability they fail fundamentally in their task. The main thing most of them knew about Obama was that he was black, and everyone knows he couldn't have possibly won if he was the same person but white. (even over Hillary Clinton?) Just sad and pathetic so shallow, almost racist in its reverse racism, the American people disgust me, the mobs throughout the world are disgusting. F U fickle masses 
Well mam(lol yeah right), since I am highly qualified and as a matter of fact, I have a degree in the field, I recommend you take a dose of tissue 2 times ( twice ) daily until your box is empty or otherwise directed by your doctor or pediatrician.
|

Landrae
Blood Angel Asylum
194
|
Posted - 2011.12.15 23:38:00 -
[94] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:We'd just launch a massive campaign on their asses. Bring down MSNBC! 
Call in el anonymous? Roses are red, Violets are blue, I have a gun, Get in the van. |

MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
246
|
Posted - 2011.12.16 07:14:00 -
[95] - Quote
We're still talking about politics? seriously?
fing, it's just some people talking about games they think are pretty, and you're upset eve isn't there.
well suck it up eve doesn't deserve it this year.
also it's all about this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fHfdSi-GDo |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
341

|
Posted - 2011.12.16 10:21:00 -
[96] - Quote
Moved from General Discussion. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
34
|
Posted - 2011.12.17 19:26:00 -
[97] - Quote
Came in looking for something eve related, left with a bitter tasty of human-lizardmen slavery system rant and politics ...
I bask in the Chaos of this thread! Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
566
|
Posted - 2011.12.17 21:36:00 -
[98] - Quote
"Nominations for best art direction 2011". Two problems with that.
First, art direction. EVE strives for as much realism as possible, and while they could hope to win some design awards for whatever other categories they might want to like, "art direction" is not exactly one of them. Then again, they included TES5:Skyrim in the lineup, so that might not be that much of a problem as it first looked like.
Second, for 2011. Last I checked, EVE is not a 2011 game, nor did they radically shift the "art look" in 2011. Not enough to be a contender even technically anyway.
So, bottom line, you're complaining EVE was not nominated in a category of a certain award they don't belong into in the first place ? http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Contributor_name:Akita_T#Contributions_link_collection |

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
66
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 05:44:00 -
[99] - Quote
Beaches wrote:MSNBC? Thank your lucky stars they haven't. Those conservative idiots would have this game shut down.
Fixed.
I A/F/K cloak in Jita. Does that count? |

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
66
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 05:45:00 -
[100] - Quote
Buzzmong wrote:Beaches wrote:MSNBC? Thank your lucky stars they haven't. Those liberal idiots would have this game shut down. Do you know how I know you're an American? For some reason you chaps have a very weird idea about liberal people, probably the fault of your mass media or schools, but you seem to think they're out to get you. In short, anyone who is actually properly liberal wouldn't bat an eyelid about Eve, infact they'd probably encourage it.
^^ And, this ^^
I A/F/K cloak in Jita. Does that count? |

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
66
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 05:51:00 -
[101] - Quote
Beaches wrote:
The liberals I'm talking about wouldn't like the 'harsh world' or 'player-driven economy' parts or the minmatar for that matter, never ending list.
Those aren't liberals.
Hate to break that to you, but what your owners want you to think = liberal for you to concentrate on hating (so you keep letting them **** you in the arse left, right, and centre), actually are about as far from true liberals as it can get.
I A/F/K cloak in Jita. Does that count? |

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
66
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 06:03:00 -
[102] - Quote
Beaches wrote:Also, conservatives can be libertarians or a mix. See: Ron Paul Liberals hate 'liberty' as it were and believe that liberty is a threat to government which is there to make sure people eat, speak and behave properly see: "1984" George Orwell.
Oh, for ****'s sake...
Are you just trolling, or are you really that clueless?
By your own definition, the last 40-odd years of American governments have been as "liberal" as they come, then. [/cynicism]
"Liberal: (n.) One who is open-minded, or not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional, or established ways" (Mirriam-Webster's online)
In other words, the exact opposite of what you were/are indoctrinated into believing liberals are, by implied definition.
Maybe you should stop spewing other people's overused, generic talking-points and start thinking for yourself for once?
Or just leave your pants-on-head ******** American populist **** for another forum, that would be a nice bonus... 
I A/F/K cloak in Jita. Does that count? |

VKhaun Vex
Viziam Amarr Empire
20
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 07:00:00 -
[103] - Quote
This option has been written into the constitution since day 1.
Quote:Section. 9. The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
His position is laughable. The U.S. government is not conspiring to take your rights. Please read the bill for yourselves.
The bill doesn't give anyone any new power, and does not say that the president can do this in any new circumstances. The whole thing begins with active duty military personnel who are already under this condition, and then it adds new restrictions on how they use it, with things like the classification of combatant vs civilian. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
314
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 19:32:00 -
[104] - Quote
VKhaun Vex wrote:This option has been written into the constitution since day 1. Quote:Section. 9. The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. His position is laughable. The U.S. government is not conspiring to take your rights. Please read the bill for yourselves. The bill doesn't give anyone any new power, and does not say that the president can do this in any new circumstances. T he whole thing begins with active duty military personnel who are already under this condition, and then it adds new restrictions on how they use it, with things like the classification of combatant vs civilian.
Are you aware that Lincoln invoked those powers and followup cases in the Supreme Court show down the precedents his actions set?
Can you detail rebellion or invasion going on now?
I know, people who like to slob the state knob like yourself will probably say that OWS is a rebellion.
Tell me how banksters getting away with fraud while the Federal Reserve prints money and devalues the currency to bail out the banks is not already a rebellion against the supreme laws of the land.
Tell me how and why the administration first threatened to veto the NDAA and why - do a little research first skippy or you will be called out for being wrong.
I know a lot of people who already know what Article 1, Section 8, L15 is, and ready to carry it out too.
Rebellion and invasion? That already happened. But I expect that you will think the present regime is perfectly legit because stupid people like yourself wanted it.
The Germans wanted "it" in 1933. They got it. The Russians wanted "it" in 1917. They got it.
But I don't want or deserve what you want. All i want is freedom, through respect for the laws that protect life, liberty, and property. And that's for everybody.
Now I will wait for you to pretend that nothing will be abused and that everything is fine. A lot of Jews died expecting only a group shower too. Unless you are one of the elites of their super gophers, you probably don't have the memo or the special "get out of police state free card" either. You are just as ****** as the rest of us.
|

VKhaun Vex
Viziam Amarr Empire
20
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 23:47:00 -
[105] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Are you aware that Lincoln invoked those powers and followup cases in the Supreme Court show down the precedents his actions set?
Yeah... when there was WAR on our own soil... and only against our enemies. That's a precedent for following the constitution to the letter.
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Can you detail rebellion or invasion going on now?
Can you detail a president invoking the power now?
This bill does not invoke anything, it defines what our 'enemies' are, how money is moved, how we prepare for if it were invoked, etc. Read it and calm down. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
315
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 01:27:00 -
[106] - Quote
VKhaun Vex wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Are you aware that Lincoln invoked those powers and followup cases in the Supreme Court show down the precedents his actions set?
Now I will wait for you to pretend that nothing will be abused and that everything is fine. A lot of Jews died expecting only a group shower too. Unless you are one of the elites of their super gophers, you probably don't have the memo or the special "get out of police state free card" either. You are just as ****** as the rest of us.
Yeah... it was invoked when there was TOTAL WAR on our own soil... and only against our enemies. That's a precedent for following the constitution to the letter and not abusing anything about it. That's exactly how this country is supposed to work. If you don't like it, it's not hard to leave. Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Can you detail rebellion or invasion going on now?
Can you detail a president invoking the power now? Question makes no sense. This bill does not invoke anything, it defines what our 'enemies' are, how money is moved, how we prepare for if it were invoked, etc. Read it and calm down. You do know this bill goes through ANNUALLY right? We've been passing these since before you were born, it's been available without these bills through the constitution since before your father was a hopeful sperm, and you've lived your life without seeing habeas corpus suspended on all of america and our citizens being thrown in jail for nothing by faceless soldiers or whatever undefined horror story you think looms over you today.
"our" enemies? "We've"?
Hello? Were you there?
You write like a statist too.
Here's something to help you out .
|

VKhaun Vex
Viziam Amarr Empire
20
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 01:37:00 -
[107] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:"our" enemies? "We've"? Hello? Were you there? You write like a statist too. Here's something to help you out .
You're not making sense. You posted statements about precedents, abuse, and implication, and that I have shown are WRONG. You think word games and an article about fascism make you correct now? Apply whatever labels you want. You're still wrong about the implications of this bill, and you're still unable to admit it or argue another step forward. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
315
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 01:51:00 -
[108] - Quote
VKhaun Vex wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:"our" enemies? "We've"? Hello? Were you there? You write like a statist too. Here's something to help you out . You're not making sense. You posted statements about precedents, abuse, and implication, that I have shown are WRONG. You think word games and an article about fascism make you correct now? Apply whatever labels you want. You're still wrong about the implications of this bill, and you're still unable to admit it or argue another step forward.
I don't have to convince some statist on the internet who thinks in terms of "we" and "our" when referring to the government. You can go on being a statist, and I will continue to do what I have been doing, and basically, instilling in others the same sense of history that I share here AND then teaching them how to use guns.
That's right, I train people how not to go quietly. These are lawful people who just want to be left alone and have no intention of using force on anybody to get their way.
And will do so until dead. One way or the other.
If I am wrong, no problem. I have a good time, and as long as the rule of law and human rights are respected, nobody gets hurt.
If I am right, you get to say things like "We are losing to those rebels who want liberty!!!1!". "Our drone forces aren't taking out as many families as our military said it could!" and "WE kept those FEMA camps empty so we could go on in the internet and say 'see, there's no martial law", but our plan didn't work".
I wish I was wrong. But you know, having spent a life wondering why Jews didn't get the heck out of Germany before 1938 the latest, and then seeing how blind and stupid people can be to an encroaching and violent state now, it's apparent why, and it seems like they had a lot of people like yourself around telling everybody there's nothing new, and everything's OK.
Whatever the case, no matter how much "our" and "we" you use to apologize for the government, I get my cues not from the likes of you but from people who got their opinions firsthand and wrote about it.
So let's make a deal. You keep misinforming and dissipating, and I will keep informing and training and if I am wrong and wasting my time, I will buy you a case of beer. We'll know eventually who was right.
|

VKhaun Vex
Viziam Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 02:05:00 -
[109] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:So let's make a deal. You keep misinforming and dissipating, and I will keep informing and training and if I am wrong and wasting my time, I will buy you a case of beer. We'll know eventually who was right.
Another cute rant Herzog, but misinformation has a much simpler definition than fascist or statist. All you do is drop fire and forget propaganda you can't back up for an instant, and no one is fooled by hyperbole comparisons that don't fit, when you can't argue reality. |

Sardon Darkstar
Tears of Redemption NEM3SIS.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 12:43:00 -
[110] - Quote
Lewis Black.
And that's all I have to say about that. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
316
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 15:45:00 -
[111] - Quote
VKhaun Vex wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:So let's make a deal. You keep misinforming and dissipating, and I will keep informing and training and if I am wrong and wasting my time, I will buy you a case of beer. We'll know eventually who was right. Another cute rant Herzog, but misinformation has a much simpler definition than fascist or statist. All you do is drop fire and forget propaganda you can't back up for an instant, and no one is fooled by hyperbole comparisons that don't fit, when you can't argue reality.
I am not really going to argue with you but I thank you for the opportunity to use it as a chance to inform others.
A chance to post stuff like this....
|

Nephilius
Repo.
111
|
Posted - 2011.12.31 15:07:00 -
[112] - Quote
Myrdraeus Keaunt wrote:[quote=Buzzmong]I'm an American as well, and a liberal. I fully agree with your first statement. It's not really "the media" though, it's just language abuse to make a point, and Republicans are simply better at it. Their spin machine works better for some reason and people start accepting what they're saying as truth without reviewing it. Being liberal is a good thing! It's what pulled us up from the dark ages and differentiates us from the ME, conservative systems.
The latter part though...there are some people that call themselves "liberal" that think we need to be protected from bad thinking, art, etc... There's actually more of them on the other side, but they're more concerned about what we do in the bedroom and to whom. The big, bad "violent" video games are seen by some as cultural/moral decay that causes people to go on murderous rampages or something. Some of these people call themselves "liberals", but I agree they're really not. What's funny is that there are at least as many "conservatives" concerned about this stuff but it's somehow been spun into a bad, liberal agenda.
Frankly I agree with some parts of their POV but not the cause. We are a very violent, self-centered culture but it has absolutely nothing with video games. It's probably more the news and stupid ass reality shows than anything else. But make laws to stop it? Except for the massive war machine we're all excited about...no way.
I also think there's an inherent imbalance that's completely backward when comparing violence and sex in our culture. Sex is BAD BAD BAD. Show one nip and everyone freaks out like they've never seen it before. Tear a woman in half in a video game though....that's a protected expression of art that can't even be labeled as having "graphic content" and requiring parental consent to purchase. Our laws about sex and our obsession with keeping body parts hidden is fairly disturbed in my opinion, especially when compared to what we accept as normal, acceptable violent displays. If there was a balance here then our children's cartoons would be filled with poop fetish and S&M dungeons.
If anything though, a "liberal" might want EvE regulated so that it couldn't be sold to a 5 year old without an adult present. I don't think any of them are calling for video game *banning*...just don't peddle violence like a drug to the kids. I don't agree with their goals, but I can see their point.
I can't figure out if you're serious or trolling. Seriously.
If you bring down a giant, you're a hero. If you kill something weak-even if it has to die-then you will endure contempt. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |