EVE Search - Moon landing conspiracy theories

All Channels

Out of Pod Experience

Moon landing conspiracy theories

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
baltec1 248	Posted - 2011.12.18 06:54:00 - [1] - Quote Because the soviets would have just gone along with a fake moon landing by their enemy
baltec1 248	Posted - 2011.12.18 07:20:00 - [2] - Quote Atticus Fynch wrote: baltec1 wrote: Because the soviets would have just gone along with a fake moon landing by their enemy Keep in mind it is current techology that is slowly exposing this via the internet. The desktop PC you use now has more power in it than NASA's mainframes inthe 1960s. Tracking spacecraft was also very difficult back then. Why would the Soviets have be any the wiser? According to the world the US went to the moon...right? Why would anyone doubt such a thing? But many bits and pieces when put together show something strange about the whole Apollo program. Not long after the moon landings we sent several probes to the outer planets, before the moon landings soviets were sending probes to venus. If they can track much smaller targets all the way to venus then they can track a larget object a meer 250 miles to the moon. They also intcepted the transmissions from the moon by the landers and orbiters. Then there is jodrell bank telescope in the UK which not only tracked apollo but also confirmed sputnik and just about ever other American and Soviet probe for decades. A dish so powerfull it is still in use today.
baltec1 248	Posted - 2011.12.18 07:32:00 - [3] - Quote Yea ah dun goofed dat wun
baltec1 248	Posted - 2011.12.19 09:58:00 - [4] - Quote Atticus Fynch wrote: VKhaun Vex wrote: This thread stinks of SO MUCH STUPID I can hardly stand it. The only "stupid" I see in this thread are people saying "you're stupid for not believing it" but I have yet to hear any arguments on specifics. -How were the astronauts shielded from radiation? -Why are there inconsistenies in the photographs? -Why oh why for such a huge event in all of humanity could things like blueprints and orignal footage disappear? Hell the US still has the original Declaration of Independance and Constitution from the 1700s, but it cant keep the stuff from man's first steps on the moon from the 60s and 70s? 1. They wern't 2. What inconsistenies? 3. Many of the plans for the D-Day landings, the battle of the somme and most of the Paris sewer system have also been lost/destroyed
baltec1 250	Posted - 2011.12.20 17:50:00 - [5] - Quote Akita T wrote: Atticus Fynch wrote: Sidus Isaacs wrote: I never understood why people want to belive it was fake. It is kind of like a religion I guess. It's not that people want ot believe it's fake. It's just that a lot of little things abut the whole Apollo program dont add up. Have you tried using all the little things as opposed to some cherry-picked ones only ? And have you tried using the plus sign for a change ? A plus is simply two negetives stuck together. Or four depending on the size.
baltec1 250	Posted - 2011.12.23 18:29:00 - [6] - Quote Astrid Stjerna wrote: FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: "There are millions of micro-meteors traveling at speeds up to 6000 MPH, which would tear the ship to pieces." Because all those deep space probes we've sent out for YEARS have been torn to pieces. NEXT! I also want to point out that 'micro' in astronomical terms is a grand of sand. The distance between any of our inner-system planets planets is several million miles. Put a million grains of sand in a million-mile-long olympic swimming pool and see how likely it is that a swimmer will run into a particular grain. They also ignore the fact that we have has space stations in orbit for close to 50 years and never had an inpact Oh and all of the deep space probes that went through the asteroid belt. If anything was going to get hit it would be then!
baltec1 250	Posted - 2011.12.24 09:38:00 - [7] - Quote Alara IonStorm wrote: VKhaun Vex wrote: Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote: Alara IonStorm wrote: There was another Superpower that was highly invested in proving this was a hoax. They had the equipment and intelligence network to do it too if it was. Must've been Haiti, that's why we made that earthquake there.... to shut them up No it was North Korea, that's why Obama killed Kim. You morons... I was of course speaking to the Space Race between the United States and the Mole People who live in the Under City. You Guys are detached from reality. Clearly this is crab people at work.
baltec1 251	Posted - 2011.12.24 10:24:00 - [8] - Quote And here I was trying to think of a creative way to inject a pony into this thread
baltec1 251	Posted - 2011.12.24 10:45:00 - [9] - Quote I wanted a nice moon related pic so I put luna's name into google. OH God.
baltec1 261	Posted - 2011.12.27 09:12:00 - [10] - Quote Alara IonStorm wrote: VKhaun Vex wrote: dan drorgar wrote: Moon rocks for example can be found on earth. Don't be so mean. Everyone knows that you can find Moon Rocks on Earth. Astronauts brought a whole bunch of them from the Moon... When they went there. =/ I think hement rocks that landed here all by themselves. The irony is we have brought back more moon rocks than have landed here naturally and been found.
baltec1 261	Posted - 2011.12.28 09:29:00 - [11] - Quote NaturalBeast wrote: Yeah they went. Realized no oil, no McDonalds, no XXX websites and went home miserable. Actually I think they saw something that freaked them out. Something that changed the course of history forever. They found this?
baltec1 273	Posted - 2011.12.28 21:03:00 - [12] - Quote dan drorgar wrote: VKhaun Vex wrote: dan drorgar wrote: CNN Do you think a rock from an asteroid impact that has fallen through our atmosphere and sat in a desert for hundreds of thousands of years is indistinguishable from samples collected and brought back Probbably not, but I'd doubt that the general public knows how, can verify the samples (those known to be from the moon directly) ... Indeed, apparently NASA sometimes gets away with handing out petrified wood and calling it "moon rocks". ;-) I think I could pick one out.
baltec1 312	Posted - 2011.12.30 15:26:00 - [13] - Quote Atticus Fynch wrote: A transmission from high earth orbit is indistinguishable from a transmission from the moon. The argument here is not -have we been inspace-. that is a given. The question is, have we been to the moon. The sad part of all of this is you have no idea just how stupid that comment was.
baltec1 316	Posted - 2011.12.30 21:08:00 - [14] - Quote Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote: Alara IonStorm wrote: Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote: That's a good thing, if the soviets got Luna we'd all be living in the everfree forest Not the first time the Soviets have tried to use Pony Tech against the Free World. It's ok... as long as we still have the party cannon they can't do much. Everyone knows the soviets hate parties Lets not forget the orbital friendship cannon.

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,05s, ref 20250928/0528
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.