|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 02:03:00 -
[1]
deaderated 1 deaderated 2
now PLEASE.. stop talking to yourselves in our local and just LEAVE!
and thats for scanning down my mega the other day and popping it while i fumbled. my hands were full with food and crap and i don't think i'll ever get all that crap out of my keyboard.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 02:22:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Pepperami
Originally by: Empyre Edited by: Empyre on 17/02/2007 02:07:32 deaderated 1 deaderated 2
now PLEASE.. stop talking to yourselves in our local and just LEAVE!
and thats for scanning down my mega the other day and popping it while i fumbled. my hands were full with food and crap and i don't think i'll ever get all that crap out of my keyboard.
lol, 2 empty high slots ftw
/shrug.. it was all i could throw together in a few minutes. i was in a pod until after work and they camped our station when i got home.. had to put it together super quick and sneak out of station when they weren't watching.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 02:26:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Abn Matar IAC has not been chestbeating, I've personally read 95% of the posts and we dont endorse nor respect such behaviour. You may want to state this issue in another thread.
not so much on the forums, i can attest to.. i've been glued here for a week.. but i could show you some local chat logs that are quite the polar opposite.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 02:55:00 -
[4]
let's not even forget that we tried twice! he popped a dictor because he warped in at the wrong distance.. the Nyx stayed there while the dictor pilot went and got another and while we set up again.
he was stupid enough to stay there even after 1 attempt.. we made SURE we got it right the second time. he attacked both times..
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 03:09:00 -
[5]
how about this? we sell you the salvage.. albeit with a certain markup.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 03:20:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Hellaciouss I'm pretty sure drones automatically move on to the next target when they pop something
but they should also STOP attacking (drones) or stop/disappear/'warp away' (fighters).
these were attacking til the bitter end. lets also not forget he was*****y enough to stay there after we tried twice. theres not much to support his claim of warping away, save for the fraps we've yet to see.. even that doesn't prove anything over what CCP has in their logs.
there was a lot of us waiting a long time for that very moment. you can bet your arse we all had a fixed gaze on the entire fight. dictor bubbles, bumpers, vamps, dps.. we did everything just like it should have.
i'll be utterly shocked if CCPs logs show any differently.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 03:38:00 -
[7]
Originally by: TheDevilsJury
Originally by: Jake Noble Am I being stupid but doesnt that image you posted show that you got killed?
http://www.gerontiq.co.uk/images/2007.02.17.03.11.01
Look at the time. It was taken 8 minutes ago.
explain this then..
different times on either shot. the one he posted shows 03:10, this one shows 01:47.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 04:05:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Gouglash I don't deny it was a smart tactic. Cunning. Well thought out.
However, it was also a complete molestation of the intended use of the aggro timer.
I know your corp, or at least just you, I don't care enough to really look, are huge BoB fanboys, but you have to agree on two very obvious and unavoidable facts here.
1) The aggro timer is meant to stop people from logging to avoid fights after they've been aggroed or aggroed someone else.
2) BoB clandestinely used the aggro timer in a secretive way, without the Titan pilot's knowledge, in order to kill it.
Again, I don't deny it was an intelligent plan. I just say it was an abuse of a flawed aggro system. Ethically, it is absolutely no different than distributing aggro by shooting a wreck.
i don't condone spy-like activity, but when 'the coalition' can openly admit to infiltrating voice comms to gain the advantage and a load of bandwagoneers will praise its utilization as 'proof' LV were trying to lag out the node, when 'the coalition' fit the shoe more with the mass of n00b-ships and t1 frigates....
*gasp* .. *huff* *huff*
then i'm not going to feel any sympathy for the violins when they start playing and the tables are turned.
(is that a world record run-on?)
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 04:11:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Gouglash You're just ******* retarded. OK, I leave thread now.
c'mon now man.. if you want to have a mature discussion then discuss the points. if you're just going to resort to smackish insulting then it just shows you weren't/aren't prepared to do it maturely, so i doubt the integrity of the points you are trying to make.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 04:30:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Liquid Vision More dev haxsploits!!
Yawn. Glad to see IAC will be getting their mom back. I didn't bother to read the thread but I'm sure Empyre bled his BS all over it.
forgot to train your trolling skill, but i'm flattered you feel the need to single me out.
*snip*
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
|
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 04:43:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Edde Bebbi Perhaps the nyx pilot was a spy?
don't out our secrets on public forums!!
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 05:31:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Edde Bebbi Apologies Gerontiq, this is mainly aimed at the mindless conspiricy theorists, you seem to have taken the loss with dignity.
only after all other possible claims otherwise were debunked.. start reading at page one.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 06:00:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Liquid Vision You're like the obnoxious drunk at the nice restaurant. Everyone can't help but point you out because you're such an ass.
Nice job mangling those BOB kill numbers from the thread a few days ago. Whenever you get caught in a bold faced lie because your bull****tery skills aren't up to par you just ignore it when people call you out. Nice tactic!
lmao. point out where i was caught in a lie. anyone with the ability to click a mouse button could go read the thread you're talking about and see otherwise.
cute, though.. you jump into a discussion with a smackfest and try to make up material to defend yourself when everyone corners you and calls you out on your crap.
oh, and nice claim above about your business. that customer in your thread must be a reaaaaallly good one. so much business you gotta bump your own thread, eh?
now turn off the monitor and go to sleep.. maybe in the morning the shame will hit. and don't worry, i at least don't harbor any hard feelings, so don't let pride dig you any deeper.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 06:06:00 -
[14]
Originally by: xh'duality Yet peaople dont get the point that the MS will be back in his posation soon. Lol why bother continuing something wich soon will not be reason to talk about cause the NYX pilot will yet again be in a NYX. Kepp flamming up. The War has just begun. The end of anythign has not not started.
IAC, please keep your lapdogs at bay.. or teach them to read. It's painful to see so many conflicting claims refuted by the previous thread pages.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 08:09:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Liquid Vision Kinda like the shame of your entire alliance getting raped by IAC? Kinda like the shame of you never doing a damn thing? Kinda like the shame of there being absolutely 0 ISS members in on the Mom kill?
technically, this character wasn't in during that time and my other wasn't active so i can't speak with any authority on these incidents. doesn't this kill kind of contradict your claim that we do nothing? you're embarassing yourself now. not on the km? sure. but there are tons of screenshots of our aggression (i posted one of my damn combat log ffs!) and even a dang video.
Originally by: Liquid Vision And yes. . .you're the only idiot that thinks going from 13 kills/2 losses to 43 kills/37 losses is actually an improvement in k/d ratio.
and you're the only idiot that can't seem to comprehend what you read because my point was that the dates were going backwards as the k/d ratio got worse. my post was also an inquiry to clarify this as it was confusing in the context the poster wrote it.. i wasn't the only one in that thread to try and draw that parallel and it was later clarified, all points you conveniently leave out. who am i kidding, you didn't even get the general talking points, right.
Originally by: Liquid Vision And yes, people bump their **** in the Sell forum because of the high traffic. And no, I didn't even take that persons offer because they wanted 3.5 bill in collateral.
maybe we should just link this thread to your thread so your customers can get a nice judge of character before they start investing.. that is if they can trust someone who wants to take their BPOs and isk with no collateral paid and trust them to do the research with characters that aren't even validated in the business plan with screenshots of their skills.
Originally by: Liquid Vision Thanks tho. I don't serve ISS or BOB. So, no dice for you.
irrelevant. i didn't ask, i didn't care, nor do i care now.
done making an arsehat out of yourself or you want to keep going?
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
Empyre
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.02.17 09:51:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Liquid Vision trolling bait
if you want to have a discussion, fine.. do some research and come back. i've given you the benefit of the doubt, but now it's moot until you at least bring something factual or at least logical to the table.
People argue when their personal views are at odds, whereas a debate is a more formal method of analyzing the angles of an issue. |
|
|
|