Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Rhett Cutler
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2016.04.28 03:42:06 -
[61] - Quote
This is my first post ever.
I have five accounts
Citadel expansion.......yeah, right.
As a minor note on the release blog it buries something about taxes and broker fees changing with a reason........that CCP wants to see how the market will react to a "small" change. Small change, yeah right. To me it's a huge change.
I have been playing over two years as a solo trader. My goal is to amass a net worth of a trillion isk. That's fun for me. So far I'm 12% of the way there. I buy and sell. I buy and sell lots. I live and trade in High Sec.
And then today. after grinding out ten thousandths of a broker fee point (off the trillions that go thru my trading hub .......and it is trillions) I discover in the fine print that CCP has changed the broker fees by a factor of eight to ten for me "to see how the market will react" It is buried in the overwhelming coverage of new new new null sec stuff. Not much mention of why economically massive tax and fee changes were required.
To trade my way to a trillion takes a lot of building and reinvestment. A ten thousanth of a pecentage point adds up. Now it appears my low broker/tax total has gone from just over 1% to almost triple that. Now while that may sound small....I buy my ore (one station broker fee) and then sell my product (another broker fee in my production) My net profits are under ten percent...... when they sell. Ya think CCP just broke my game?
I'm frustrated....and today for the first time.....I quit early. Not sure what I'll do in the future. Don't need your sympathy nor ISK. I just want my gaming style respected and if changes must be made maybe a little more info and debate on why. Paying customers are not mere guinea pigs for testing and monitoring theories.
Rhett & company |
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1332
|
Posted - 2016.04.28 04:24:35 -
[62] - Quote
Rhett Cutler wrote:As a minor note on the release blog it buries something about taxes and broker fees changing with a reason........that CCP wants to see how the market will react to a "small" change. Small change, yeah right. To me it's a huge change.
I have been playing over two years as a solo trader. My goal is to amass a net worth of a trillion isk. That's fun for me. So far I'm 12% of the way there. I buy and sell. I buy and sell lots. I live and trade in High Sec.
And then today. after grinding out ten thousandths of a broker fee point (off the trillions that go thru my trading hub .......and it is trillions) I discover in the fine print that CCP has changed the broker fees by a factor of eight to ten for me "to see how the market will react" It is buried in the overwhelming coverage of new new new null sec stuff. Not much mention of why economically massive tax and fee changes were required.
To trade my way to a trillion takes a lot of building and reinvestment. A ten thousanth of a pecentage point adds up. Now it appears my low broker/tax total has gone from just over 1% to almost triple that. Now while that may sound small....I buy my ore (one station broker fee) and then sell my product (another broker fee in my production) My net profits are under ten percent...... when they sell. Ya think CCP just broke my game?
I'm frustrated....and today for the first time.....I quit early. Not sure what I'll do in the future. Don't need your sympathy nor ISK. I just want my gaming style respected and if changes must be made maybe a little more info and debate on why. Paying customers are not mere guinea pigs for testing and monitoring theories.
Rhett & company I feel your pain.
There was another thread in this forum section covering it, but as you would expect this forum section isn't very visible and isn't read by most. The thread also attracted a lot of questions for which few answers were given. I'm still waiting for them to tell us what the roll out plan and finer details of this specific change are, a day after it has been released. I think it's safe to say communication has been poor. |
CaesarGREG
CBC Interstellar Fidelas Constans
1
|
Posted - 2016.04.28 11:05:35 -
[63] - Quote
Now minimum Tax is shown 1% but its taken 0.75%
Display Base broker fee Fluctuates somtimes shows 225.00% , 231.00% , 234.00%
but deduct 2% Broker fee for order.
So u dont rise Sales Tax still 0.75 maybe u shouldnt rise Broker Fee? or maybe not so much 10 times? 0.18% > 2% . Its to much!
Beter solution is Rise Tax than broker fee, to big difrence betwen them. Markets will die less orders hanging and waiting for customers. 10 times higher risk specially for not popular items, wich not always sell quick and u have to re set order and pay again broker fee. |
Jerppu3
Solar Vista. The Anubis Accord
9
|
Posted - 2016.04.28 12:49:13 -
[64] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Jerppu3 wrote:Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Can we please tax compression?
Right now there is very little reason to refine in a citadel that isn't closer to a trade hub and even beyond that there will be plenty of public ones with 0 tax. If ppl can just compress in mine for free why would they ever refine there. A DST can move over 1M of ore after compression.
Beyond that why can't I charge for a service I'm paying to provide Exactly what he said. We have been asking this for quite a while now. Hell I would settle for a good explenation as to why ccp has decided against this
HELLO CCP, ANYBODY THERE?
HELLO CCP, hver ++arna? Vinsamlegast! :D
|
Darkwing Fiftytwo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2016.04.28 13:19:25 -
[65] - Quote
Agreed the new broker fee is crazy high. Also why force guys to grind standings with their trading alts. I am going to pay for the sub regardless of that grind.
Or can you allow us to buy standings the way we can buy sec status? Bribes are a real thing :)
Total transaction tax is now anywhere between 3-4%! |
CaesarGREG
CBC Interstellar Fidelas Constans
1
|
Posted - 2016.04.28 15:46:20 -
[66] - Quote
What is market? what is it? I mean not thenically? Answer:
1. Producers / miners / ratters. 2. Buyers. 3. Market traders.
With all 3 things everything works fine.
But 3. Point to exist fine need Higher Sales Tax than Broker Fee, becaues Producer usualy sell Goods to Market Trader on "buy Order" to avoid and dont pay Sales Tax, usualy dont want wait so long as trader. Now When Seles Tax is around 20% costs ( 2x broker + Tax) most producers will decide sell themselves, what in my opinion will disfunction markets. Stiupid things will happend more often like difrence beetween buy and sell will be lower than transaction costs.
If CCP want 2% broker fees ok just fine , but God Sake pls set up Sales Tax around 4% minimum.
Pls consider to hold healthe balance beetween broker Fee and Tax (Old balance was around 1:3 ratio > 0.75% to 0.18%) we dont care how much % u will set up but hold balance like it was Ratio with higher Sales Tax!!!! |
Redneck Herman
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2016.04.28 19:01:48 -
[67] - Quote
This is also the thing that pisses me off. I learned of this on the patch day, they tried to hide it.
Rhett Cutler wrote:This is my first post ever.
I have five accounts
Citadel expansion.......yeah, right.
As a minor note on the release blog it buries something about taxes and broker fees changing with a reason........that CCP wants to see how the market will react to a "small" change. Small change, yeah right. To me it's a huge change.
I have been playing over two years as a solo trader. My goal is to amass a net worth of a trillion isk. That's fun for me. So far I'm 12% of the way there. I buy and sell. I buy and sell lots. I live and trade in High Sec.
And then today. after grinding out ten thousandths of a broker fee point (off the trillions that go thru my trading hub .......and it is trillions) I discover in the fine print that CCP has changed the broker fees by a factor of eight to ten for me "to see how the market will react" It is buried in the overwhelming coverage of new new new null sec stuff. Not much mention of why economically massive tax and fee changes were required.
To trade my way to a trillion takes a lot of building and reinvestment. A ten thousanth of a pecentage point adds up. Now it appears my low broker/tax total has gone from just over 1% to almost triple that. Now while that may sound small....I buy my ore (one station broker fee) and then sell my product (another broker fee in my production) My net profits are under ten percent...... when they sell. Ya think CCP just broke my game?
I'm frustrated....and today for the first time.....I quit early. Not sure what I'll do in the future. Don't need your sympathy nor ISK. I just want my gaming style respected and if changes must be made maybe a little more info and debate on why. Paying customers are not mere guinea pigs for testing and monitoring theories.
Rhett & company
|
Indahmawar Fazmarai
5137
|
Posted - 2016.04.28 22:12:59 -
[68] - Quote
Redneck Herman wrote:This is also the thing that pisses me off. I learned of this on the patch day, they tried to hide it. Rhett Cutler wrote:This is my first post ever.
I have five accounts
Citadel expansion.......yeah, right.
As a minor note on the release blog it buries something about taxes and broker fees changing with a reason........that CCP wants to see how the market will react to a "small" change. Small change, yeah right. To me it's a huge change.
I have been playing over two years as a solo trader. My goal is to amass a net worth of a trillion isk. That's fun for me. So far I'm 12% of the way there. I buy and sell. I buy and sell lots. I live and trade in High Sec.
And then today. after grinding out ten thousandths of a broker fee point (off the trillions that go thru my trading hub .......and it is trillions) I discover in the fine print that CCP has changed the broker fees by a factor of eight to ten for me "to see how the market will react" It is buried in the overwhelming coverage of new new new null sec stuff. Not much mention of why economically massive tax and fee changes were required.
To trade my way to a trillion takes a lot of building and reinvestment. A ten thousanth of a pecentage point adds up. Now it appears my low broker/tax total has gone from just over 1% to almost triple that. Now while that may sound small....I buy my ore (one station broker fee) and then sell my product (another broker fee in my production) My net profits are under ten percent...... when they sell. Ya think CCP just broke my game?
I'm frustrated....and today for the first time.....I quit early. Not sure what I'll do in the future. Don't need your sympathy nor ISK. I just want my gaming style respected and if changes must be made maybe a little more info and debate on why. Paying customers are not mere guinea pigs for testing and monitoring theories.
Rhett & company
It was discussed lengthily and properly at the appropiate forum section, so people had every chance to speak ther mind before CCP did what they wanted to do for their design goals. |
Farmer Johnson's Daughter
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 00:31:42 -
[69] - Quote
Now not only do you screw us around on tax and brokers, but you take isk to refine as well?.
For a player that does it all, mine,refine,manufacture you have effectively killed any chance of trading for profit with these new taxes.
I'm stunned by CCP's shortsightedness.
|
Darkwing Fiftytwo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 13:00:45 -
[70] - Quote
Farmer Johnson's Daughter wrote:Now not only do you screw us around on tax and brokers, but you take isk to refine as well?. For a player that does it all, mine,refine,manufacture you have effectively killed any chance of trading for profit with these new taxes. I'm stunned by CCP's shortsightedness.
I've already posted 2x about the new broker fees, after doing some more trading etc. I feel even more strongly that they are WAY too high. Putting up an offer to sell some PI materials lets say worth $1B, im looking at 25mm to post it, and 15mm in taxes thats nuts!
Especially since we dont have healthcare!? LOL.
These new broker fees will hurt the market liquidity a lot. |
|
Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2792
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 18:33:31 -
[71] - Quote
Redneck Herman wrote:This is also the thing that pisses me off. I learned of this on the patch day, they tried to hide it.
They tried to hide it by doing the initial announcement about the feature changing at the beginning of march?
If I want to hide stuff, I personally don't start talking about it close to 2 month in advance... |
Lugh Crow-Slave
2355
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 19:06:03 -
[72] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Redneck Herman wrote:This is also the thing that pisses me off. I learned of this on the patch day, they tried to hide it.
They tried to hide it by doing the initial announcement about the feature changing at the beginning of march? If I want to hide stuff, I personally don't start talking about it close to 2 month in advance...
yeah in places that few players actually look rather than in a dev blog.
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Khan Wrenth
Ore Oppression Prevention and Salvation
587
|
Posted - 2016.04.30 01:09:43 -
[73] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:[yeah in places that few players actually look rather than in a dev blog. Well, to be fair, the devs here aren't spectacular in getting all announcements in one place. Most things are announced in the "upcoming stuff" forum, but not all. Reddit seems to get news before us sometimes, and other sections of the forums wholly unrelated to "upcoming stuff" sometimes get announcements. Like, the the Marauder/bastion mode "slap on the wrist" (as you put it) I don't recall seeing in a Dev blog or in the "upcoming stuff" forum at all. So, for a player to stay appraised of what's coming up, there's the "upcoming stuff" forum, Reddit, Dev blogs, and sometimes the Test Server forum. Probably others too.
I think we can forgive players for missing some information, sometimes.
Let's discuss overhauling the way we get intel in EvE.
|
E'lanna Firestorm
Liquid Risk
0
|
Posted - 2016.04.30 01:34:52 -
[74] - Quote
I don't get CCP compulsion to drive people out of hi sec.
I don't get a lot of time to play games. I spend a significant amount of time earning isk to buy assets. I don't what to spend weeks saving for something to lose it to some player that gets joy by making others miserable. I don't want to have to keep rebuilding. I don't have the time for that. CCP's game tweaks seem aimed to make people reliant on POS that can be destroyed at any moment along with everyone's assets.
Why does CCP feel the need to nerf hi-sec in order to justify POS? They say so that station owners can make a profit. That is ridiculous. The reward of POS is to project power and reap the benefits of that power. The POS should cost money, not make money.
The militaries of the world don't spend money building bases and ships to make profit, it is to project power. Power is the end goal. Leave us hi sec players out of it. |
Khan Wrenth
Ore Oppression Prevention and Salvation
587
|
Posted - 2016.04.30 01:41:47 -
[75] - Quote
E'lanna Firestorm wrote:I don't get CCP compulsion to drive people out of hi sec. Because the more a player is exposed to more parts of the game, the more likely they will stay subscribed. There's a lot of fun to be had in all sectors of space, and if a player is familiar enough and comfortable enough to visit all sectors of space, they are more likely to find content to entertain themselves rather than growing bored and unsubbing.
Think of it as a gentle "push" out of the nest. Not only will you learn you can fly, you'll find it quite exciting too. At least in theory.
Let's discuss overhauling the way we get intel in EvE.
|
E'lanna Firestorm
Liquid Risk
0
|
Posted - 2016.04.30 02:09:12 -
[76] - Quote
E'lanna Firestorm wrote:I don't get CCP compulsion to drive people out of hi sec.
I don't get a lot of time to play games. I spend a significant amount of time earning isk to buy assets. I don't what to spend weeks saving for something to lose it to some player that gets joy by making others miserable. I don't want to have to keep rebuilding. I don't have the time for that.
Khan Wrenth wrote:E'lanna Firestorm wrote:I don't get CCP compulsion to drive people out of hi sec. Because the more a player is exposed to more parts of the game, the more likely they will stay subscribed. There's a lot of fun to be had in all sectors of space, and if a player is familiar enough and comfortable enough to visit all sectors of space, they are more likely to find content to entertain themselves rather than growing bored and unsubbing. Think of it as a gentle "push" out of the nest. Not only will you learn you can fly, you'll find it quite exciting too. At least in theory.
so hi sec is one of those areas. why mess with it and destroying the profitability of trading and manufacturing is one way to get ride of all those players. |
Lugh Crow-Slave
2357
|
Posted - 2016.04.30 02:16:29 -
[77] - Quote
lol they couldn't even manage to get all the patch notes right
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Ace Aideron
Red Falcon Group Intrepid Crossing
7
|
Posted - 2016.04.30 11:59:10 -
[78] - Quote
I, too, am curious about the motivation for increasing taxes. The old levels were already too high, IMO, and the new ones are that much worse.
The way taxes and broker fees are implemented in Eve makes me wonder if they reflect a RL worldview of how taxation should work.
Is the goal is to sink more isk out of the economy? If so, there are more creative ways.
Or perhaps the goal is to slow down the economy and to make it less economical to do station trading? If so, they might be effective -- but annoying to the other 99% of us.
As much as I appreciate the trading system, I, for one, would like to suggest a complete overhaul -- there's a lot of room for improvement in everything from fees, to terminology, to the way orders are created, changed, and interact with one another.
|
Regnar Avastum
267
|
Posted - 2016.05.02 05:00:11 -
[79] - Quote
So how is this refining tax actually implemented? I can't seem to get the formula down.
Providing Trade/Manufacture/Research Spreadsheets, 3rd Party Services and operating the EVE FORUM RESELLER
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
355
|
Posted - 2016.05.02 06:52:01 -
[80] - Quote
Regnar Avastum wrote:So how is this refining tax actually implemented? I can't seem to get the formula down.
NVM the formula, I don't get how this is working at all right now...
Yesterday I spent a few hours mining ore with 3 accounts, I took it all to the pos and refined/compressed it all.
Then last night I took 2 accounts to grab some Ice for pos fuel, this all got dumped in the corp ore hangar in our home station. But.
When I went to refine it, it was odd. On one account there was no isk charge, but on the other there was an isk charge, but the Ice was mined by both accounts, so the ownership of it is shared.
How come one owner of the Ice has to pay an isk charge in a NPC station but the other doesn't?
I can't get my head around it, it's just weird.
edit..It's the same in a station for ore which was mined on both accounts. |
|
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3238
|
Posted - 2016.05.02 11:44:59 -
[81] - Quote
Drago Shouna wrote:
NVM the formula, I don't get how this is working at all right now...
Yesterday I spent a few hours mining ore with 3 accounts, I took it all to the pos and refined/compressed it all.
Then last night I took 2 accounts to grab some Ice for pos fuel, this all got dumped in the corp ore hangar in our home station. But.
When I went to refine it, it was odd. On one account there was no isk charge, but on the other there was an isk charge, but the Ice was mined by both accounts, so the ownership of it is shared.
How come one owner of the Ice has to pay an isk charge in a NPC station but the other doesn't?
I can't get my head around it, it's just weird.
edit..It's the same in a station for ore which was mined on both accounts.
Faction standings. It's an identical tax on refining to the old refining tax, just instead of losing a percent of materials, you are charged the identical percent of isk on it's estimated market value. The Citadels are meant to skim their tax from the increased refining that they offer, so NPC stations can still be 0 tax if you have the standings without making citadels worthless on that front. |
Regnar Avastum
267
|
Posted - 2016.05.02 11:48:11 -
[82] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Drago Shouna wrote:
NVM the formula, I don't get how this is working at all right now...
Yesterday I spent a few hours mining ore with 3 accounts, I took it all to the pos and refined/compressed it all.
Then last night I took 2 accounts to grab some Ice for pos fuel, this all got dumped in the corp ore hangar in our home station. But.
When I went to refine it, it was odd. On one account there was no isk charge, but on the other there was an isk charge, but the Ice was mined by both accounts, so the ownership of it is shared.
How come one owner of the Ice has to pay an isk charge in a NPC station but the other doesn't?
I can't get my head around it, it's just weird.
edit..It's the same in a station for ore which was mined on both accounts.
Faction standings. It's an identical tax on refining to the old refining tax, just instead of losing a percent of materials, you are charged the identical percent of isk on it's estimated market value. The Citadels are meant to skim their tax from the increased refining that they offer, so NPC stations can still be 0 tax if you have the standings without making citadels worthless on that front.
In theory yes in practice no. Please provide the exact % tax from estimated value. I have done multiple tests with various ore types and couldn't figure it out.
Providing Trade/Manufacture/Research Spreadsheets, 3rd Party Services and operating the EVE FORUM RESELLER
|
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3239
|
Posted - 2016.05.02 11:56:14 -
[83] - Quote
Regnar Avastum wrote:
In theory yes in practice no. Please provide the exact % tax from estimated value. I have done multiple tests with various ore types and couldn't figure it out.
Get standing greater than 6.7 with the corp that owns the station, pay 0 tax. Not sure anyone ever bothered actually establishing the exact formula for calculating the tax when what really mattered was the point it reached zero. If it was listed it was probably of evelopedia and now gone. It started at 5% with 0 standings though. |
Regnar Avastum
267
|
Posted - 2016.05.02 13:03:40 -
[84] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Regnar Avastum wrote:
In theory yes in practice no. Please provide the exact % tax from estimated value. I have done multiple tests with various ore types and couldn't figure it out.
Get standing greater than 6.7 with the corp that owns the station, pay 0 tax. Not sure anyone ever bothered actually establishing the exact formula for calculating the tax when what really mattered was the point it reached zero. If it was listed it was probably of evelopedia and now gone. It started at 5% with 0 standings though.
The old formula for reprocessing: http://eve-industry.org/export/IndustryFormulas.pdf
Example of the current reprocessing: http://postimg.org/image/k51opu029/
The old 5% tax applied as ISK tax with comparison to the real cost: http://postimg.org/image/4klkr6s41/
Providing Trade/Manufacture/Research Spreadsheets, 3rd Party Services and operating the EVE FORUM RESELLER
|
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3239
|
Posted - 2016.05.02 13:20:55 -
[85] - Quote
Now try hovering over that 63 isk and seeing what it tells you the breakdown is? It's certainly in the vicinity of things anyway. |
Resgo
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
60
|
Posted - 2016.05.02 18:16:51 -
[86] - Quote
Fozzie, I understand increasing taxes as an ISK sink for the game. Increasing the broker's fee doesn't make a lot of sense to me. That discourages people from putting items on the market in bulk and ties up their funds as well as their items. Also a lot of what occurs on the market involves the .000000001 isk game. Why not consider performing the following changes:
Decrease the up front broker tax to a much lower amount. Maybe .25 percent.
Apply a similar charge for changing the price of listed items or for canceling the market listing ahead of schedule. This both discourages constant 1 isk battles and also puts a real cost for doing it.
Significantly increase the sales tax for once an item that is sold. Perhaps start it at 5 percent before skills/standings.
You want to encourage people to list items and greater quantity makes things more about supply and demand rather than .0000001 isk differences. |
Darkwing Fiftytwo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2016.05.03 13:06:25 -
[87] - Quote
Someone commented on a complete overhaul, while not the worst idea its not necessarily required.
There are however some mechanics that they can correct using the stock market as a basis and example.
For example: If the best bid on a stock is $100. And I put in a sell order for $1.00, the trade does not go thru at $1.00, it hits the best bid of $100 and a trade occurs.
Also the minimum unit should be removed or adjusted so that you cant make your minimum quantity equal to some absurb amount of isk. Removes market fraud.
EDIT: I also agree with the guy above me. You can set the minimum tick quantities so that everything is 0.00001 isk.
For stuff priced 0-100 isk use 0.01, 100-1000, use 0.10, for 1000-10,000 use 1 isk, etc etc
for 1B items you should have 1mm increments to post orders. |
KEYSTYLES
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
0
|
Posted - 2016.05.08 02:04:25 -
[88] - Quote
With EVE being so heavily based on the market, what is the thought behind actively trying to decrease market efficiency? The centralized hub(s) is the reason the market works and is the fundamental back bone of why the game is fun to play for the masses. Think for just a second what this game would look like without Jita (and amarr, rens,etc)... no one wants to spend that much time trying to find all the parts to a ship that is going to get blown up in a mater of hours. I'm just getting back into this game again, ccplease don't break it |
Lugh Crow-Slave
2474
|
Posted - 2016.05.08 18:09:22 -
[89] - Quote
doesn't help that it looks like L citadels are going to settle around 18 bill not the 7b ccp talked about. so there is not going to be as many player markets.
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Jitaprice071
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2016.05.12 19:07:40 -
[90] - Quote
i completly agree with removing this new tax system,maybe making a new one, why not.
because nothing happened like ccp planned.
Jita is the Heart of Eve, it's also a 13 years-old reflex.
Market is now up and down, even some people seems to be not aware of the new huge tax applied and loose a lot of money -and make others loose a lot of money too-,producers placing sell orders look like livestock smelling apocalypse.
My job, hub traders, will disappears. Until now, we offered logistic comfort. removing it could seriously affect all players' intention to go on. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |