Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Djangus Khant
FARMHOUSE GIRLS The Worst Team Ever
0
|
Posted - 2016.05.23 01:03:20 -
[91] - Quote
How is EVE taking more isk a good thing? |
Lugh Crow-Slave
2609
|
Posted - 2016.05.23 05:11:20 -
[92] - Quote
Jitaprice071 wrote:i completly agree with removing this new tax system,maybe making a new one, why not.
because nothing happened like ccp planned.
Jita is the Heart of Eve, it's also a 13 years-old reflex.
Market is now up and down, even some people seems to be not aware of the new huge tax applied and loose a lot of money -and make others loose a lot of money too-,producers placing sell orders look like livestock smelling apocalypse.
My job, hub traders, will disappears. Until now, we offered logistic comfort. removing it could seriously affect all players' intention to go on.
it has help with production i can now make more if i build from scratch rather than just working with the most valuable link in the chain.
But seriously CCP not only can i not Tax compression but so long as i have a refinery i can't block ppl from using it? if they can dock it can be used. This is just dumb and i really wish i could here the argument to why i can't tax a service in my citadel.
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Syss7
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
19
|
Posted - 2016.05.31 17:55:41 -
[93] - Quote
This seems the appropriate forum for this question.
It doesn't appear the the Citadel is taking the RX-804 implant into processing consideration. Is anyone else seeing this issue? Maybe I'm missing something. |
Baumarkt
Sozialamt
1
|
Posted - 2016.06.01 14:33:14 -
[94] - Quote
Is it possibile to show more Details in the Wallet-log from wich citdell the reprocessing/Market Tax is comming, ist really confusing if you own more than one to know wich is really profitable..... |
Rek Seven
Art Of Explosions 404 Hole Not Found
2235
|
Posted - 2016.06.01 15:56:47 -
[95] - Quote
Remove tax from wormhole and null sec citadels!
The wishlist is pretty much complete...
|
Baumarkt
Sozialamt
1
|
Posted - 2016.06.01 16:12:12 -
[96] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Remove tax from wormhole and null sec citadels!
Why they should? Talkt to the owners its their decision... The Citadells have to get payed, the purchase and online costs.... |
Rek Seven
Art Of Explosions 404 Hole Not Found
2236
|
Posted - 2016.06.02 06:04:39 -
[97] - Quote
Baumarkt wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Remove tax from wormhole and null sec citadels! Why they should? Talkt to the owners its their decision... The Citadells have to get payed, the purchase and online costs....
I'm talking about the mandatory transaction tax, not the brokers fee.
The wishlist is pretty much complete...
|
Kuekuatsheu
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2016.06.05 11:45:10 -
[98] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The currently planned market tax values are: 3% BrokerGÇÖs Fee- Reduced to 2.5% with skills and 2% with both skills and max NPC standings
- Is sunk from the game in NPC stations, is paid to owners in outposts, is customizable and paid to owners in Citadels
- Skills and standings donGÇÖt apply in player structures
BrokerGÇÖs fee formula: 3% brokers fee - ([Broker Relation skill level]0.1 + [Faction Standing level]0.03 + [Corp Standing level]*0.02) 2 % Transaction Tax- Reduced to 1 % with max skills
- Is sunk from the game in all locations and is not customizable
We intend to tweak these taxes further at a later point after contracts have been added to citadels. The exact values of that next round of tweaks would depend on the metrics after this first release. Thanks for the change, love you Fozzie! |
Pelea Ming
Space Dandies
340
|
Posted - 2016.06.28 06:41:40 -
[99] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Drago Shouna wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:It's a buff to lowsec, but still a long term death knell to Highsec. You can't remove citadels to avoid a wardec, they cost the same no matter the area of space, they should give the same reward for use in any area of space since they require the same investment. Otherwise it gives an unbeatable materials advantage to Null/WH's. Which is terrible for the game. I had this discussion with Fozzie at fanfest, I even pointed out that it could very well be a game breaker for some small miners and industrialists. His reply was a bit shocking really, well more than a bit. he said " I don't care if 1000 players quit over it, we'll just recruit a thousand more" With him in charge of team five o I dread to think of what other ways he has up his sleeve to shaft HS in the future. I absolutely did not say that, although I can understand if you misheard me or misunderstood. I said that we need to make the changes that are best for the game as a whole; and that although almost all change will cause at least some people to leave the game, good changes will result in more players overall. And like I told you at the party, if you do decide to quit over this I wish you the very best in the future and want you to know that you're always welcome back if you choose. I realize that I personally don't know you, Fozzie, but in my in game career here with Eve, I've seen you apparently get 'misquoted' like this quite regularly.
Don't get me wrong, I feel it's a healthy attitude for a business to realize that while no matter what you do, some customers will go, only to be replaced by others....
It just seems to me that quite often, you personally apparently get misquoted to extremes about such things fairly often. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |