| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
2645
   |
Posted - 2016.07.15 22:07:13 -
[31] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:If he is who he claims to be, a guy who got his kicks trolling/messing with people IRL instead of keeping it in game and got banned for it.
Maybe you should really read up on the stuff you are commenting about. Not sure why you think this had something to do with RL. He got one of those famous blank reason bans which you get if some dude at CCP has a personal problem with you or if they just want you gone and there is no real reason like an actual TOS/EULA violation (which they would obviously cite instead of just not telling you why you got banned).
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|
March rabbit
Mosquito squadron
The-Culture
1827
|
Posted - 2016.07.15 22:20:13 -
[32] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Sonya Corvinus wrote:If he is who he claims to be, a guy who got his kicks trolling/messing with people IRL instead of keeping it in game and got banned for it. Maybe you should really read up on the stuff you are commenting about. Not sure why you think this had something to do with RL.
You wouldn't believe but every character in this game is controlled by real person.
Scary i know 
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
Sonya Corvinus
Static-Noise
Upholders
361
|
Posted - 2016.07.15 22:31:20 -
[33] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Maybe you should really read up on the stuff you are commenting about. Not sure why you think this had something to do with RL. He got one of those famous blank reason bans which you get if some dude at CCP has a personal problem with you or if they just want you gone and there is no real reason like an actual TOS/EULA violation (which they would obviously cite instead of just not telling you why you got banned).
Appreciate the salt, code salt is best salt.
Anything in comms that has nothing to do with the game (ie, any bonus room, really) is just children acting like 12 year olds. Keep it in game please. That being said, I'm proud of you for writing something new instead of copy/pasting the same four messages you post here. Way to go!
Plz though, I do love the salt. Keep it coming. |
Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
263
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 00:35:08 -
[34] - Quote
Origami.
Little spaceship origami. |
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
1052
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 00:45:00 -
[35] - Quote
No matter what's going on here, I love this thread.
Nice post OP!
As for content ideas... pudding? Can we do pudding?
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Empire Raider
Spicy Onion Rings
0
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 01:30:47 -
[36] - Quote
Paranoid Loyd wrote:You signed your post Ero? So you have been evading your ban with this character the whole time? Or are you some douche impersonating Ero?
Right? And the funny part is that he is either getting banned for evading his ban or for impersonating another player.
RIP another troll who didn't read the EULA |
Caco De'mon
New Order Logistics
CODE.
0
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 01:43:55 -
[37] - Quote
Held der Finsternis wrote:What would you like to see to save Eve from itself and the carebears?
A 5th empire...Hub, enforced borders,citizenship, etc... |
Sustrai Aditua
Intandofisa
391
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 10:26:30 -
[38] - Quote
content creation...hooboy, youkillme...players playing a game "creating content". The "playing devs". Oh my. Youkillme.
If we get chased by zombies, I'm tripping you.
|
Hengle Teron
Order In Disorder
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
60009
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 17:55:23 -
[39] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Sonya Corvinus wrote:If he is who he claims to be, a guy who got his kicks trolling/messing with people IRL instead of keeping it in game and got banned for it. Maybe you should really read up on the stuff you are commenting about. Not sure why you think this had something to do with RL. He got one of those famous blank reason bans which you get if some dude at CCP has a personal problem with you or if they just want you gone and there is no real reason like an actual TOS/EULA violation (which they would obviously cite instead of just not telling you why you got banned).
Yep, looking to break a guy mentally into quitting your "minigame" after you scammed all his ingame assets is obviously still part of the "ingame". |
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
2647
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 21:15:59 -
[40] - Quote
Hengle Teron wrote:Yep, looking to break a guy mentally into quitting your "minigame" after you scammed all his ingame assets is obviously still part of the "ingame".
Sounds pretty ingame to me, since they scammed him for ingame assets and they made a great effort to keep everything ingame. Not sure what you mean by "break a guy", they simply requested that he sings songs to get his stuff back. Does not sound too serious if you ask me.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|
|
|
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
12587
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 21:26:12 -
[41] - Quote
Eli Stan wrote:I want to be able to fight in highsec without CONCORD interfering. I want all ships fitted with offensive modules or drones to be exempt from CONCORD or other NPC protection, including mine. I want to take a fleet into a citadel-bashing fleet and wreck them, or be wrecked by them, without bothering with war decs or anybody going criminal. Otherwise defenseless mining, industrial and transport ships, as well as defenseless combat ships, are the only ones that should ever get CONCORD spawns when shot. Ganking ships, Incursion ships, and security mission ships all should only have themselves and other players as protection. In other words, for combat ships highsec should be like NPC null except without bubbles or cynos.
In lore terms, CONCORD and NPCs tell us players they're busy dealing with drifters and we should HTFU and protect ourselves if we want to fly with weapons.
Hey...you're an NPC.
Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .
Bumble's Space Log
|
Frostys Virpio
Yet another corpdot.
2965
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 21:54:36 -
[42] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Hengle Teron wrote:Yep, looking to break a guy mentally into quitting your "minigame" after you scammed all his ingame assets is obviously still part of the "ingame". Sounds pretty ingame to me, since they scammed him for ingame assets and they made a great effort to keep everything ingame. Not sure what you mean by "break a guy", they simply requested that he sings songs to get his stuff back. Does not sound too serious if you ask me.
I will accept that this is "in game" as soon as you demonstrate in game how a character can sing. If you can't, then obviously it was out of game. |
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
CODE.
2647
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 22:25:17 -
[43] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Hengle Teron wrote:Yep, looking to break a guy mentally into quitting your "minigame" after you scammed all his ingame assets is obviously still part of the "ingame". Sounds pretty ingame to me, since they scammed him for ingame assets and they made a great effort to keep everything ingame. Not sure what you mean by "break a guy", they simply requested that he sings songs to get his stuff back. Does not sound too serious if you ask me. I will accept that this is "in game" as soon as you demonstrate in game how a character can sing. If you can't, then obviously it was out of game.
You join a channel where EVE voice is activated and start singing
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|
perpetua Isimazu
Perkone
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 22:47:16 -
[44] - Quote
Why do some folk just automatically assume that high sec dwellers want or need content creation?
Why do some folk insist that carebears 'need' to leave high sec and go to low/null/whs?
This game is supposed to be a sandbox, where folk get to choose what they'd like to try and do, not some exercise in bashing round pegs into square holes.
Bashing pegs into holes is an entirely different kind of game to Eve.... and one aimed at infants. |
Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
16878
|
Posted - 2016.07.16 22:58:58 -
[45] - Quote
perpetua Isimazu wrote:Why do some folk just automatically assume that high sec dwellers want or need content creation?
Why do some folk insist that carebears 'need' to leave high sec and go to low/null/whs?
This game is supposed to be a sandbox, where folk get to choose what they'd like to try and do, not some exercise in bashing round pegs into square holes.
Bashing pegs into holes is an entirely different kind of game to Eve.... and one aimed at infants.
its a sand box, ill bash round pegs into square holes if i damn well please
and if you have a problem with that ill hit you with my big safety mallet till you cry its op.
this being an sandbox and all its on you to stop me.
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|
Chewytowel Haklar
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
217
|
Posted - 2016.07.17 02:58:02 -
[46] - Quote
I think the game is as good as the people you meet in it. If you meet the wrong people it sucks, but when you meet the right ones the sparks begin to fly. The problem is finding those people to make content with, and most of them likely don't give a damn about these forums or even reddit. |
Remiel Pollard
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
7617
|
Posted - 2016.07.17 03:41:21 -
[47] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Hengle Teron wrote:Yep, looking to break a guy mentally into quitting your "minigame" after you scammed all his ingame assets is obviously still part of the "ingame". Sounds pretty ingame to me, since they scammed him for ingame assets and they made a great effort to keep everything ingame. Not sure what you mean by "break a guy", they simply requested that he sings songs to get his stuff back. Does not sound too serious if you ask me. I will accept that this is "in game" as soon as you demonstrate in game how a character can sing. If you can't, then obviously it was out of game.
Is this about singing ransoms again?
I don't know why I have to keep posting this.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Frostys Virpio
Yet another corpdot.
2965
|
Posted - 2016.07.17 05:09:47 -
[48] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Hengle Teron wrote:Yep, looking to break a guy mentally into quitting your "minigame" after you scammed all his ingame assets is obviously still part of the "ingame". Sounds pretty ingame to me, since they scammed him for ingame assets and they made a great effort to keep everything ingame. Not sure what you mean by "break a guy", they simply requested that he sings songs to get his stuff back. Does not sound too serious if you ask me. I will accept that this is "in game" as soon as you demonstrate in game how a character can sing. If you can't, then obviously it was out of game. Is this about singing ransoms again? I don't know why I have to keep posting this.
Your entire argument is someone didn't care about having to do something so it must always be ok. This is a flawed argument and also entirely miss the point I was making about it being out of game...
I'm sorry you had to link something irrelevant I guess... |
Remiel Pollard
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
7617
|
Posted - 2016.07.17 05:30:11 -
[49] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Hengle Teron wrote:Yep, looking to break a guy mentally into quitting your "minigame" after you scammed all his ingame assets is obviously still part of the "ingame". Sounds pretty ingame to me, since they scammed him for ingame assets and they made a great effort to keep everything ingame. Not sure what you mean by "break a guy", they simply requested that he sings songs to get his stuff back. Does not sound too serious if you ask me. I will accept that this is "in game" as soon as you demonstrate in game how a character can sing. If you can't, then obviously it was out of game. Is this about singing ransoms again? I don't know why I have to keep posting this. Your entire argument is someone didn't care about having to do something so it must always be ok. This is a flawed argument and also entirely miss the point I was making about it being out of game... I'm sorry you had to link something irrelevant I guess...
Except it's not irrelevant. It's CCP's direct endorsement of singing ransoms. Here's the thing, you get an option, no one's forcing you to do it. You don't have to get your stuff back, or save your ship, or whatever. That's entirely your choice. At the end of the day, you've already lost it anyway, and the singing ransom is merely an option you're given to get it back.
There are any number of uncomfortable situations that players can be forced into in this game by simple virtue of it being the single-shard sandbox that it is. Is discomfort, or "I'm not okay with that", a reason to make it not allowed? No, of course not, or ganking would be banned. The singing ransom is no exception, and this isn't the only example of CCP stating in no uncertain terms that singing ransoms are fine. Your personal problem with that is the only thing not relevant here.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
ISD Max Trix
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
282
|
Posted - 2016.07.17 14:26:37 -
[50] - Quote
This thread has gone crazy. There is no discussion of what is a bannable offense permitted in the forums. Thread closed.
ISD Max Trix
Lieutenant
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
I do not respond to Evemails.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |