Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

GenesisMike
The Roaches UNI0N.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 05:16:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:GenesisMike wrote: Go 3 Trimarks in the rigs, for the lows i would take off the Adaptive Nano Plating and put a second heat sink. You should have ample tank without the ANP and since you will not be solo in a BS your role is to burn the target. Since you will most likely have someone else in a tackling ship a point is not necessary in the mids so I don't see a problem with them really.
The entire point is that you save 40mil on those Trimarks, Dmg Rigs cost 2mil each. You also save 14 mil using Duel Pulse instead of Megapulse as well. You must of missed the part where I stated the Cookie Cutter Fit. Quote:Not great compared to the 150mil Megapulse Trimark type but after insurance your cost is about the same as a Drake or a Cane. This is not about Cookie Cutter it is about cost. For slightly above the base cost of a Battlecruiser this is an effective Battleship Fit.
No I did not miss what you were saying about cost. I was referencing the effectiveness of the fit itself. Why save some money when what you are flying isn't effective. Sure its cheaper, the reason those rigs are cheap are because there is a low demand for them since most PVP pilots recognize the importance of survivability over a few extra DPS. Situational fittings may use those rigs but for what the Geddon is primarily used for tank balances the DPS aspect well. This concept of saving money on fits and coming up with a fit that isn't effective to save cash is counter productive. I think of it like skill points to fly a ship, if you do not have the necessary SP's to properly fly the ship don't get into it yet. Same goes for fitting one, if you cannot afford the correct mods/rigs then just wait a bit longer until you can. Cookie cutter fits are categorized as such for the simple reason that they work well and a majority of ppl use them.
Also I never even commented on using mega pulses on the Geddon, i use duels myself since they have good dps and I have two large neuts on my Geddons. Before you try and correct people be sure to check what they actually said.
To OP, if you still need some fits EVE mail me in game and I can send you some of the fits I use that have proven worthwhile. |

Alara IonStorm
659
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 05:32:00 -
[32] - Quote
GenesisMike wrote: No I did not miss what you were saying about cost. I was referencing the effectiveness of the fit itself. Why save some money when what you are flying isn't effective.
It is effective. It has good DPS, a strong tank and great range. Your confusing effective with optimal.
GenesisMike wrote: Sure its cheaper, the reason those rigs are cheap are because there is a low demand for them since most PVP pilots recognize the importance of survivability over a few extra DPS. Situational fittings may use those rigs but for what the Geddon is primarily used for tank balances the DPS aspect well. This concept of saving money on fits and coming up with a fit that isn't effective to save cash is counter productive.
Your talking about 28k EHP like it makes a world of difference. The 110k EHP is just fine as is it's DPS and Range. In fact they are exceptional for the cost, The Geddon gets more DPS, Range and Tank then an average Tier 2 Battlecruiser which is this fits primary target. It does its job well. Effectively you might say and it does it on the cheap.
GenesisMike wrote: I think of it like skill points to fly a ship, if you do not have the necessary SP's to properly fly the ship don't get into it yet. Same goes for fitting one, if you cannot afford the correct mods/rigs then just wait a bit longer until you can. Cookie cutter fits are categorized as such for the simple reason that they work well and a majority of ppl use them.
You think wrong then. I am willing to loose 15% performance at 50% the cost of your fit. I will fly it. If I feel that I am in a situation where a bulkier fit is required I will make that fit and be able to afford it just fine. But my Battlcruiser Cost Fit that Pwns Battlecruisers works fine.
If I want a Battleship that works and I decide I don't want to spend as much to make it I will. The numbers are good on this ship.
GenesisMike wrote: Also I never even commented on using mega pulses on the Geddon, i use duels myself since they have good dps and I have two large neuts on my Geddons. Before you try and correct people be sure to check what they actually said.
I said Megapulse because they are optimal not because you said it. Megapulse Geddon is the Optimal or Cookie Cutter Fit for fleet fights. Whilst Duel Pulse is often used when Heavy Neuts are needed.
|

GenesisMike
The Roaches UNI0N.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 06:07:00 -
[33] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:GenesisMike wrote: No I did not miss what you were saying about cost. I was referencing the effectiveness of the fit itself. Why save some money when what you are flying isn't effective.
It is effective. It has good DPS, a strong tank and great range. Your confusing effective with optimal. GenesisMike wrote: Sure its cheaper, the reason those rigs are cheap are because there is a low demand for them since most PVP pilots recognize the importance of survivability over a few extra DPS. Situational fittings may use those rigs but for what the Geddon is primarily used for tank balances the DPS aspect well. This concept of saving money on fits and coming up with a fit that isn't effective to save cash is counter productive.
Your talking about 28k EHP like it makes a world of difference.  The 110k EHP is just fine as is it's DPS and Range. In fact they are exceptional for the cost, The Geddon gets more DPS, Range and Tank then an average Tier 2 Battlecruiser which is this fits primary target. It does its job well. Effectively you might say and it does it on the cheap. GenesisMike wrote: I think of it like skill points to fly a ship, if you do not have the necessary SP's to properly fly the ship don't get into it yet. Same goes for fitting one, if you cannot afford the correct mods/rigs then just wait a bit longer until you can. Cookie cutter fits are categorized as such for the simple reason that they work well and a majority of ppl use them.
You think wrong then. I am willing to loose 15% performance at 50% the cost of your fit. I will fly it. If I feel that I am in a situation where a bulkier fit is required I will make that fit and be able to afford it just fine. But my Battlcruiser Cost Fit that Pwns Battlecruisers works fine. If I want a Battleship that works and I decide I don't want to spend as much to make it I will. The numbers are good on this ship. GenesisMike wrote: Also I never even commented on using mega pulses on the Geddon, i use duels myself since they have good dps and I have two large neuts on my Geddons. Before you try and correct people be sure to check what they actually said.
I said Megapulse because they are optimal not because you said it. Megapulse Geddon is the Optimal or Cookie Cutter Fit for fleet fights. Whilst Duel Pulse is often used when Heavy Neuts are needed.
lol Way to backpedal. I would love to find you floating around in one of your cost effective ships. Would be a laughable KM. You enjoy pulling quotes more than reviewing your text and replies it seems. The bottom line is those rigs on a Geddon are not optimal nor are they favorable, and 28k EHP does make a world of difference when you are trying to survive long enough to kill a target. What good is a little more dps if you are not around to project it onto target? When you start flying ships larger than a cruiser and actually fit that Geddon up you will see what im talking about. If i am wrong and you have KM's to prove you have flown that fit effectively please post, otherwise stick to what you actually know, not what you can EFT/assume would be good. My original replies were not directed as a negative rather a suggestion but you have turned this into a back and forth which unfortunately has pulled away from the OP. |

Alara IonStorm
659
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 06:22:00 -
[34] - Quote
GenesisMike wrote: lol Way to backpedal. I would love to find you floating around in one of your cost effective ships. Would be a laughable KM. You enjoy pulling quotes more than reviewing your text and replies it seems.
Sure bring a Cane or Drake against one.
GenesisMike wrote: The bottom line is those rigs on a Geddon are not optimal nor are they favorable, and 28k EHP does make a world of difference when you are trying to survive long enough to kill a target. What good is a little more dps if you are not around to project it onto target?
So every ship that has less then 140k EHP is useless in EVE. 110k EHP is a good amount of tank. That is 3 Nano Canes right there for the cost of one or 2 Armor Canes.
GenesisMike wrote: When you start flying ships larger than a cruiser and actually fit that Geddon up you will see what im talking about. If i am wrong and you have KM's to prove you have flown that fit effectively please post, otherwise stick to what you actually know, not what you can EFT/assume would be good. My original replies were not directed as a negative rather a suggestion but you have turned this into a back and forth which unfortunately has pulled away from the OP.
I stated I have yet to fly it and set out my schedule to fly it. Feel free to kill it if you wish.
It gets 110k EHP has good DPS and good range for an 80mil Price Tag. If anything besides that matters to you (What type or class of ship / what other people think of the lossmail) then too bad.
Because I really don't care what others think of my Geddon that costs as much as a Harbinger with more EHP / DPS / Range. My Super Harbinger if you will.
This guy in another thread said it best.
GenesisMike wrote: Then again I always say fly whatever you want and have fun. Amen Brother. o7 |

GenesisMike
The Roaches UNI0N.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 07:08:00 -
[35] - Quote
lol. You entertain me Alara. |

Dibblerette
The Phantom Regiment Stillness of Chaos
9
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 18:21:00 -
[36] - Quote
Anyways, thanks everyone for your opinions, I will be training BC 5 soon, then working on more armor and missile support skills to make all my BCs more effective. In the mean time, I'll probably mess around with the Harpy 
|

Gorefacer
STRAG3S NEM3SIS.
3
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 01:42:00 -
[37] - Quote
GenesisMike wrote:
Someone above posted about a Rattlesnake or Scorpion, one thing that I love to see is a BS trying to solo roam, 3 BC's show up with some neuting power and very quickly most BS's will fall. In PVP i've learned a few things: where theres 1 target there are bound to be more waiting, expect neuts to be used against you, and never solo in a BS!!
Mainly true. I only threw it in their since BS fits were being thrown around and I had heard awhile ago that people have had some sort of solo success with a scorp.
Unless you are flying a ship that is almost impossible to catch (and even then you'll only be killing idiots and frigs at best) solo work is a roll of the dice. You finally find a favorable 1on1 or 1on2 only to have, as you said, a falcon show up or local blow up.
However sometimes there just isn't anyone on and you don't give a **** and go out solo anyway and it can be fun even if it's not the smartest thing to do. |

Khrage
4
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 01:59:00 -
[38] - Quote
GenesisMike wrote:
Someone above posted about a Rattlesnake or Scorpion, one thing that I love to see is a BS trying to solo roam, 3 BC's show up with some neuting power and very quickly most BS's will fall. In PVP i've learned a few things: where theres 1 target there are bound to be more waiting, expect neuts to be used against you, and never solo in a BS!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X4rMSL5A6M
never ever.  |

Alara IonStorm
672
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 02:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
FC: Megathron on the gate. Everyone fight it at Zero!
Peon: Sir we have 3 Drakes and a Harbinger.
FC: At ******* Zero!
Idiots. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army
201
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 02:09:00 -
[40] - Quote
Gorefacer wrote:GenesisMike wrote:
Someone above posted about a Rattlesnake or Scorpion, one thing that I love to see is a BS trying to solo roam, 3 BC's show up with some neuting power and very quickly most BS's will fall. In PVP i've learned a few things: where theres 1 target there are bound to be more waiting, expect neuts to be used against you, and never solo in a BS!!
Mainly true. I only threw it in their since BS fits were being thrown around and I had heard awhile ago that people have had some sort of solo success with a scorp. Unless you are flying a ship that is almost impossible to catch (and even then you'll only be killing idiots and frigs at best) solo work is a roll of the dice. You finally find a favorable 1on1 or 1on2 only to have, as you said, a falcon show up or local blow up. However sometimes there just isn't anyone on and you don't give a **** and go out solo anyway and it can be fun even if it's not the smartest thing to do.
I solo in a Raven (no gang bonuses, etc) sometimes - especially if I can find a bunch of BCs camping a high sec entrance. They generally are not prepared for 1400 DPS and full tackle coming down on them. The Navy Scorp can do the same thing but has a way bigger tank. I've lost a few that way, but I can normally take on camps of 3-5 people by myself as long as they don't come out with logis or a Falcon.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Gorefacer
STRAG3S NEM3SIS.
3
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 02:15:00 -
[41] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Gorefacer wrote:GenesisMike wrote:
Someone above posted about a Rattlesnake or Scorpion, one thing that I love to see is a BS trying to solo roam, 3 BC's show up with some neuting power and very quickly most BS's will fall. In PVP i've learned a few things: where theres 1 target there are bound to be more waiting, expect neuts to be used against you, and never solo in a BS!!
Mainly true. I only threw it in their since BS fits were being thrown around and I had heard awhile ago that people have had some sort of solo success with a scorp. Unless you are flying a ship that is almost impossible to catch (and even then you'll only be killing idiots and frigs at best) solo work is a roll of the dice. You finally find a favorable 1on1 or 1on2 only to have, as you said, a falcon show up or local blow up. However sometimes there just isn't anyone on and you don't give a **** and go out solo anyway and it can be fun even if it's not the smartest thing to do. I solo in a Raven (no gang bonuses, etc) sometimes - especially if I can find a bunch of BCs camping a high sec entrance. They generally are not prepared for 1400 DPS and full tackle coming down on them. The Navy Scorp can do the same thing but has a way bigger tank. I've lost a few that way, but I can normally take on camps of 3-5 people by myself as long as they don't come out with logis or a Falcon. -Liang
Thats awesome. I'd love to do that but in a new area and not sure how solo friendly it is. I'll probably rock the drake solo a bit to test it out. Last area we were in was surprisingly generous on that front. I'd blind roam in circles 30+ jumps and usually come back safe (though this was late at night when not many people were on).
Mind giving me your solo raven fit? I have perfect torp skills that's been going to waste for a long time. My issue when trying to fit one though is getting decent tackle on it with DPS/tank TP and all the rest. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army
201
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 02:24:00 -
[42] - Quote
Gorefacer wrote: Thats awesome. I'd love to do that but in a new area and not sure how solo friendly it is. I'll probably rock the drake solo a bit to test it out. Last area we were in was surprisingly generous on that front. I'd blind roam in circles 30+ jumps and usually come back safe (though this was late at night when not many people were on).
Mind giving me your solo raven fit? I have perfect torp skills that's been going to waste for a long time. My issue when trying to fit one though is getting decent tackle on it with DPS/tank TP and all the rest.
Sure - this is the one I like to use. Which of the tackle mods are T2 varies by what I have on hand, but the same principle applies. The biggest danger you're likely to face is armor cruisers and armor BCs - but nobody really flies them armor fit anymore. Seriously - I blew through 3 shield canes (simultaneously) almost unscathed but ended up losing to a (slaved?) armor cane solo. -_-
[Raven, PVP Raven] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II
Quad LiF Fueled Booster Rockets Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II Target Painter II Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I Stasis Webifier II
Siege Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Torpedo Siege Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Torpedo Siege Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Torpedo Siege Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Torpedo Siege Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Torpedo Siege Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Torpedo Medium Energy Neutralizer II Medium Energy Neutralizer II
Large Core Defence Field Extender I Large Core Defence Field Extender I Large Core Defence Field Extender I
Ogre II x2 Hammerhead II x2 Hobgoblin II x1
-Liang
Ed: Drones to suit BTW. I normally run with Hammers and ECM since I know the fight is gonna be close range. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Gorefacer
STRAG3S NEM3SIS.
3
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 03:48:00 -
[43] - Quote
Sweet thanks. I was usually trying to fit an LSE and a heavy neut to my fits since thats what worked in small gangs for me but now that I think about it if you're in scram range to tackle anyway 2x med neuts is way better for fitting. I also do remember 3 or 4 volleying hurricanes back in the day with torp ravens. They'd die so quickly sometimes I would ignore primary and just pick them off as fast as I could. |

Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 03:53:00 -
[44] - Quote
Drone boats are particularly well suited for solo work, I'd say. A lone vexor will get plenty of shiny frigates willing to engage, and can wtfpwn just about all of them. A <10m ship eating a 60m one is about as efficient as it gets.
The Myrm and Domi are also very effective, due to the large number of useful ways they can be fit. Tri rep myrm with a bunch of vamps plus a neut or two quite fun, and can engage anything smaller than a battleship. |

Suleiman Shouaa
The Tuskers
35
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 10:57:00 -
[45] - Quote
Ghetto-Geddon (no trimarks, gun rigs) is really cost effective compared to trimarking it - most of the time you'll die is due to ECM or Logi where the extra EHP pays no difference.
A nano Drake is also quite nice, easily the best nano Battlecruiser due to how versatile it is - you can take on a gang of 10-15 and walk away with kill or two. Artillery Hurricane or Shield Harbinger is generally better at killing tacklers, but the Drake is much better if you need to tailor due to the situation at had.
P.S. I am laughing at the guy who fits two Heavy Neuts on his Geddon. Have a look at his fit and guess if you can figure out his playstyle.. |

Takeshi Yamato
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
48
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 11:17:00 -
[46] - Quote
Suleiman Shouaa wrote:P.S. I am laughing at the guy who fits two Heavy Neuts on his Geddon. Have a look at his fit and guess if you can figure out his playstyle..
Killing mission runners? Can't think of any other reason to go for two heavy neuts. Geddon is bad choice for that though. |

Dibblerette
The Phantom Regiment Stillness of Chaos
9
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 23:00:00 -
[47] - Quote
Fitted up a Brutix today, and jumped on a Drake in a belt. I was able to burn him down despite the Tornado, Hurricane and Rifter that all came to his aid, and laughed my pod all the way to safety. Great first fight with the face-melter type of ship. |

GenesisMike
The Roaches UNI0N.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 18:09:00 -
[48] - Quote
Suleiman Shouaa wrote:Ghetto-Geddon (no trimarks, gun rigs) is really cost effective compared to trimarking it - most of the time you'll die is due to ECM or Logi where the extra EHP pays no difference. A nano Drake is also quite nice, easily the best nano Battlecruiser due to how versatile it is - you can take on a gang of 10-15 and walk away with kill or two. Artillery Hurricane or Shield Harbinger is generally better at killing tacklers, but the Drake is much better if you need to tailor due to the situation at had. P.S. I am laughing at the guy who fits two Heavy Neuts on his Geddon. Have a look at his fit and guess if you can figure out his playstyle..
Laugh all you want but against an Active tanked ship it does very well. I brought that out since the BC's in the system that were trying to kill the to BS's in the mail needed a way to dial down the guns on the Mega and break his tank. Was working wonders till the Phoon showed up, that and the Mega was slaved lol.
As for my playstyle... high sec war deck corps like mine are going after mission runners. So if you understand how that works kiddo you would understand the fit. Neutralize the active tank/hardeners and win the fight. Plus any ship using cap for weapons drops fast when two large neuts are on em. After that its a quick kill for me. Even outside of high sec normal PvP neuts are very effective. Look at my entire killboard, yes I have lost some ships but I have also had more success then failure. So knock my style all you want but its working for me.
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14245502
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14415836
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14344419
|

Suleiman Shouaa
The Tuskers
37
|
Posted - 2011.12.27 14:33:00 -
[49] - Quote
GenesisMike wrote:Suleiman Shouaa wrote:Ghetto-Geddon (no trimarks, gun rigs) is really cost effective compared to trimarking it - most of the time you'll die is due to ECM or Logi where the extra EHP pays no difference. A nano Drake is also quite nice, easily the best nano Battlecruiser due to how versatile it is - you can take on a gang of 10-15 and walk away with kill or two. Artillery Hurricane or Shield Harbinger is generally better at killing tacklers, but the Drake is much better if you need to tailor due to the situation at had. P.S. I am laughing at the guy who fits two Heavy Neuts on his Geddon. Have a look at his fit and guess if you can figure out his playstyle.. Laugh all you want but against an Active tanked ship it does very well. I brought that out since the BC's in the system that were trying to kill the to BS's in the mail needed a way to dial down the guns on the Mega and break his tank. Was working wonders till the Phoon showed up, that and the Mega was slaved lol. As for my playstyle... high sec war deck corps like mine are going after mission runners. So if you understand how that works kiddo you would understand the fit. Neutralize the active tank/hardeners and win the fight. Plus any ship using cap for weapons drops fast when two large neuts are on em. After that its a quick kill for me. Even outside of high sec normal PvP neuts are very effective. Look at my entire killboard, yes I have lost some ships but I have also had more success then failure. So knock my style all you want but its working for me. http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14245502http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14415836http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14344419
Use a Typhoon - you don't sacrifice DPS for the neuts. Also, in most situations by simply picking the correct damage type to deal, you can break through their tank with little to no trouble. Just a tip junior.
As for dealing with active tanked ships in general, when you're in a gang vs a single target, they work well (obviously). But the OP is not talking about gang vs solo, he's talking about solo vs gang. There is a pretty huge difference between the two so until you experience it, you won't know what I'm talking about. |

MinorFreak
Militaris Industries Cascade Imminent
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.27 15:46:00 -
[50] - Quote
[Harbinger, StormCrow] 7x Focused Medium Pulse Laser II (Imperial Navy Multifrequency M) Medium Energy Neutralizer II
10MN Afterburner II Stasis Webifier II Warp Scrambler II Medium Capacitor Booster II (Cap Booster 800)
Damage Control II Medium Armor Repairer II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 2x Heat Sink II
3x Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
5x Hornet EC-300 5x Warrior II
[Implants - stormcrow] Slot 6: Hardwiring - Inherent Implants 'Squire' PG4 Slot 7: Hardwiring - Inherent Implants 'Lancer' G1-Beta Slot 8: Hardwiring - Inherent Implants 'Lancer' G2-Gamma Slot 9: Hardwiring - Inherent Implants 'Lancer' G1-Delta Slot 10: Hardwiring - Zainou 'Gnome' KZA1000 ===========================
Definitely a close in combatant with a weakness for anything medium ranged that can point it. Great armor tank plus 500+ DPS. Although i'm not sure if the ecm drones for a "get out of jail free card" would work on anything - if not i'd just go with more warriors. *shrug* I tend not to lose harbingers in pvp engagements (only one in my losses history with a fit almost exact as above) and prefer this ship to anything else in the game...I lack finesse and enjoy the blunt instrument that is the harby. |

To mare
Advanced Technology
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 04:05:00 -
[51] - Quote
if you want a ship that's cost efficent for pvp you need a ship that will be able to gtfo when the enemy blob you or he's just winning |

GenesisMike
The Roaches UNI0N.
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 04:29:00 -
[52] - Quote
Suleiman Shouaa wrote:GenesisMike wrote:Suleiman Shouaa wrote:Ghetto-Geddon (no trimarks, gun rigs) is really cost effective compared to trimarking it - most of the time you'll die is due to ECM or Logi where the extra EHP pays no difference. A nano Drake is also quite nice, easily the best nano Battlecruiser due to how versatile it is - you can take on a gang of 10-15 and walk away with kill or two. Artillery Hurricane or Shield Harbinger is generally better at killing tacklers, but the Drake is much better if you need to tailor due to the situation at had. P.S. I am laughing at the guy who fits two Heavy Neuts on his Geddon. Have a look at his fit and guess if you can figure out his playstyle.. Laugh all you want but against an Active tanked ship it does very well. I brought that out since the BC's in the system that were trying to kill the to BS's in the mail needed a way to dial down the guns on the Mega and break his tank. Was working wonders till the Phoon showed up, that and the Mega was slaved lol. As for my playstyle... high sec war deck corps like mine are going after mission runners. So if you understand how that works kiddo you would understand the fit. Neutralize the active tank/hardeners and win the fight. Plus any ship using cap for weapons drops fast when two large neuts are on em. After that its a quick kill for me. Even outside of high sec normal PvP neuts are very effective. Look at my entire killboard, yes I have lost some ships but I have also had more success then failure. So knock my style all you want but its working for me. http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14245502http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14415836http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14344419 Use a Typhoon - you don't sacrifice DPS for the neuts. Also, in most situations by simply picking the correct damage type to deal, you can break through their tank with little to no trouble. As for dealing with active tanked ships in general, when you're in a gang vs a single target, they work well (obviously). But the OP is not talking about gang vs solo, he's talking about solo vs gang. There is a pretty huge difference between the two so until you experience it, you won't know what I'm talking about.
You could use a Typhoon, but we were talking about a Geddon, so dmg type is limited to the Crystals. Solo the Neuts work well with a Geddon since if you can silence their active tank or their weapons you can win. I actually do a lot of solo work which is where the neuts can really factor in at times. When I do I fly neut boats for this very reason. Also gives me a chance to escape since even boosting pilots arent going to be able to tank, point, attack and web/MWD while being neuted. Why dont you come find me around in my Neut Geddon and see how you stand up to it? |

Suleiman Shouaa
The Tuskers
38
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 13:32:00 -
[53] - Quote
You live in high sec correct? |

Twisted Girl
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 16:48:00 -
[54] - Quote
it all comes down to pilots and individual skills to be honest. I personally prefer ships that have a higher chance of living to see another day. Used to fly a pimp navy mega in 07 ect tho in this days I just think you will be blobbed to health and you prob are bether off in something that can run away if needed.
Machariels/cynabals/vagabonds and "nano" ishtars are prob my favourite small gang ships, tho I accually never used the machariel much.
my personally choice would be a nyx:P specially effective pvp ship before the supercarrier nerf:P
tho its still p effektive, you just need to be slightly more picky with targets.
Even tho its p expensive nothing else I have flyed have ever done so much cost to build vs isk damage inflickted. according to eve kill its done about 1600 billion damage for the cost of about 50b (with my fit and implants) and its still not dead.(even if its been in trouble a few times)
https://www.pandemic-legion.com/killboard/view_pilotstats.php?id=Twisted Girl&type=tsf&stype=Nyx (just copy the entire link manually)
passed 1000 kills a few mothns back. of those been : Carrier 182 dread 27, supercarrier 17 titan: 8. tho most of the super kills are credited PL fcs(just fced/setuped like 3 myself)
prob 75% of carrier/dread kills are "small gang"/fishing super kills(typically 3-4 supers working together). you need a cyno but after that its compliterly able to "solo" due to officer web and points ect |

GenesisMike
The Roaches UNI0N.
2
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 06:38:00 -
[55] - Quote
Suleiman Shouaa wrote:You live in high sec correct?
I go all over, but yes I am based in high for the time being. I can roll wherever you can hide your friends to gank me :) |

Suleiman Shouaa
The Tuskers
41
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 12:36:00 -
[56] - Quote
Come to Hevrice. |

Baneken
Hyvat Pahat ja Eric The Polaris Syndicate
33
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 13:56:00 -
[57] - Quote
Also speaking of drone boats an Ishkur and 5x ECM drones is a beast, more so now with slightly easier fittings.  |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp V.A.S.T.
235
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 20:44:00 -
[58] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote: [Armageddon, Cheap]
I know you're going to crucify me, but a shield gank nano Armageddon actually works way better than you might think. I've got a friend that flies them and while I may not agree with the fit its undeniably very effective. I've seen him engage (and win) at 3v20 odds including them having caps on the field. I'm not sure if this has more to do with him being ******* ballsy as hell or the ffitting being really good. -Liang
As a Geddon flyer I'd love to see his fit. I have to confess I'm intrigued. I wonder how much of his success stems from the fact that his fit goes counter to traditional Geddon doctrine. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |