| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17840
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 13:53:12 -
[1] - Quote
Maekchu wrote:Sandy Point wrote:I just do not recall the extent of hostility I see present toward anyone who wishes not to engage in PVP. Oh my sweet summer child. If you think "Uninstall" or "GTFO" is toxic, then you haven't experienced the toxicity coming from carebears that gets caught in PvP. I will use the term "carebear", since not all PvE'ers are carebears. While it is true, that the usual attitude originating from PvP'ers is "Get gud or GTFO". I hardly see this as toxic behavior, or at least not even close to the level of toxicity I have experienced from carebears. Let me just give a few examples from one of my recent wardecs. These are some of the terms used in mails on convoes by the enemy corp, when we used game mechanics to blow up their stuff or disrupt activity. - Piece of **** - ******* which is only doing **** - Should I invite you to dinner so you can become my little *****? - Human waste The funny thing is, these are not even that bad. Do you know how many times I've been told to die of cancer, go **** myself or jump off a bridge? Yes, the EvE community can be toxic. But from my experience, it rarely comes from PvP'ers, since most PvP'ers are not attached to their space assets and usually understands that one day ships will die. The vast majority of the toxicity comes from carebears, that suddenly finds themselves on the receiving end of a conflict.
When we used to gank miners we set up a complaints form and I wish we had kept them around somewhere because the bitterness and hate would have made even the dark side step back. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17840
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 14:15:37 -
[2] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Dracvlad wrote:And just why did you set up a complaints form, to rub it in that you had blown them up so you could get to them personally and make yourself feel superior. There you go... Probably for the admins records etc
Deflection.
Give them a form and they bug the corp members less, worked wonders as they bitched at an automated response rather than threaten to kill the families of our members and **** our pets. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17841
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 14:43:57 -
[3] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote: The loot scoping mechanic needs to be adjusted, the gankers avoid consequences by the use of a alt in a noob ship scooping to a DST and then the freighter pilot scooping into his hold from the DST.
You keep on saying this but have yet to explain how you squeeze a 1 million m3 package of freight containers through a 60k m3 hold. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17841
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 15:15:50 -
[4] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:baltec1 wrote:Dracvlad wrote: The loot scoping mechanic needs to be adjusted, the gankers avoid consequences by the use of a alt in a noob ship scooping to a DST and then the freighter pilot scooping into his hold from the DST.
You keep on saying this but have yet to explain how you squeeze a 1 million m3 package of freight containers through a 60k m3 hold. 62.5k hold at level 5. You are diverting attention from the basic mechanic issue.
I'm pointing out that glaring hole in your argument. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17842
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 15:26:14 -
[5] - Quote
Glamor Boy Fergison wrote:I've honestly tried to put up with the anti-social game design and players who insist on anti-social behavior. I've put up with senseless gankings, been scammed a few times, sat docked while war decs ticked down, stayed logged off for weeks while war dec corps insisted on prolonging war decs even when they didn't get any kills and have done my best to fit in with the game due to my love for the game potential.
In the process I've paid subscriptions on three accounts until I have accumulated a total of nearly 100m of skill points on my three alts. I've also tried to enjoy the aspects of the game that work for me while ignoring the scamming, ganking and general anti social behavior.
But the time has come for me to give up. The potential of enjoyment has finally dried up to the point where I simply don't log in any longer. All but one of my accounts have expired and been left that way. This last account was paid up until November, but I shan't be logging into it. Frankly I've not played on this account since last December.
I've tried in the past to make suggestions that would allow me to continue. I've tried to find ways to co-exist with the average Eve players. But all said and done, I've given up and will not be adding funds to the CCP coffers in the future. Instead I've switched over to another game and have made substantial investments (time and money) into that game over the last few months.
And you know what the odd things is to me? If CCP had done like so many other games have done and created a PvE server to allow members the choice of game style, I (and dozens of other ex players I've met) would continue enjoying the game far into the future. But they have refused to do so and the result is a gradually diminishing player community.
Who knows? Perhaps CCP will give it a try some day and perhaps I'll return if the option of PvE gameplay is enabled. But until then, I've given up.
Forced PvP is not the way I choose to play Eve so I will no longer try to play Eve.
Remove the pvp and the economy crashes, leaving the pve players with nothing but grinding missions and gathering worthless loot in their officer fitted ships. They would quit for the next 3 month wonder that caters to their needs before abandoning that too. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17842
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 15:27:32 -
[6] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:baltec1 wrote:Dracvlad wrote:baltec1 wrote:Dracvlad wrote: The loot scoping mechanic needs to be adjusted, the gankers avoid consequences by the use of a alt in a noob ship scooping to a DST and then the freighter pilot scooping into his hold from the DST.
You keep on saying this but have yet to explain how you squeeze a 1 million m3 package of freight containers through a 60k m3 hold. 62.5k hold at level 5. You are diverting attention from the basic mechanic issue. I'm pointing out that glaring hole in your argument. Simply because most people don't use them...
That's their choice. Tools are already there. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17843
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 16:31:04 -
[7] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote: There are certain reasons around the algorithm that decides what drops, meaning that it is often better for the ganker in terms of expensive items dropping if you use cans.
Its more likely they will earn isk if you have a 50% drop rate on 100 items than just one. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17843
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 16:34:38 -
[8] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote: That's because it does not fit into a single DST, its fairly simple, alt scoops to DST, freighter pilots scoops out of DST, rinse and repeat.
1 million still does not go into 60k. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17843
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 16:38:06 -
[9] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote: And I repeat most people do not use them.
Then thats their fault. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17843
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 16:54:21 -
[10] - Quote
Pandora Carrollon wrote:Yay! I'm finally with Jenn again! Agree with it entirely. You go girl!
I also want to fully support the idea that lobbying CCP to change minor play points is problematic for the game.
Miners and haulers have the capacity to defend themselves right now, avail yourself of those options and stop trying to maximize your ISK haul at the expense of the game itself. It's counter productive.
HiSec is not intended to make ISK at the rate you can in Lo or Null.
Put up with the occasional gank or fly with escort. Suck it up and play EVE.
I'm with Ralph KG as well, they need to bring back some semblance of the watchlist to make Merc play style valid and do away with the mass War Decs.
Ironically, ice miners had their best level of income back when ganking was a much bigger thing. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17867
|
Posted - 2016.08.15 20:54:50 -
[11] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote: Free intel, you went and asked someone for it and paid a little bit of ISK, nothing that the other person can do to prevent this, there is no counter, sorry it is free intel.
Info that is out of date 1 minute after getting it. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17870
|
Posted - 2016.08.15 21:02:54 -
[12] - Quote
Morgan Agrivar wrote: The one thing I never found out is the information you get back...when that info comes back, is it fresh intel or from when you initiated the search a few minutes earlier?
Fresh, however it matters little when the target is in a speed fitted blockade runner 23 jumps away. By the time you get there the target will be halfway across the galaxy.
The big problem is that you no longer have any idea if the person is logged on or not so you could be spending hours hunting down someone not even logged in. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17870
|
Posted - 2016.08.15 21:08:39 -
[13] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote: Narrows down the search a bit, but where is the counter?
Doesn't need a counter, its balanced by the fact that by the time you act on the info its out of date. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17871
|
Posted - 2016.08.15 21:39:25 -
[14] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:baltec1 wrote:Dracvlad wrote: Narrows down the search a bit, but where is the counter?
Doesn't need a counter, its balanced by the fact that by the time you act on the info its out of date. Typical bull, if yu had done your homework before hand you would know where he was likely to be and would use your locator alt to narrow down his exact location, in other words you would be poised to go after him. This is easy stuff for anyone with a brain.
Ok, come find me. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17873
|
Posted - 2016.08.15 21:52:00 -
[15] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote: Well the question is more like would a war dec entity have bothered to have gone after someone like you before the watch list change, the answer would be no. Try harder please...
They did.
Now, how about you backing up your BS for once? Come find me. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17894
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 11:51:21 -
[16] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:baltec1 wrote:Dracvlad wrote: Well the question is more like would a war dec entity have bothered to have gone after someone like you before the watch list change, the answer would be no. Try harder please...
They did. Now, how about you backing up your BS for once? Come find me. OK now that is because of what, your ganking activities so someone paid them to war dec you and they of course had little hope of getting you. The trick in this game is to know what you can and cannot do and not try something that is impossible. The person who may have paid for a war dec against you would have been silly in my book. I for one know it would be very unlikely to have any impact on you whatsoever. I would not war dec PL to go after you period. Now if you were operating nearly all the time near me then that would be different. I did at one time do a locator agent on you to find you location for interest and you were in Deklin at that point.. I know that you are not the alt of Warr Akkini or Endie, but have not managed to get more than that. You are as far as I am concerned are fairly untouchable. Which is why you comment is silly.
If you can't get better info on me of all people than how do you expect to track down people nobody knows? Especially given that they have no way of telling if they are online or not. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17896
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 13:38:46 -
[17] - Quote
Faylee Freir wrote: You are actually very correct in this. I would counter argue that AG banding together and effectively fighting would generally help every haulers profits.
Only thing that would increase profits for haulers is increased risk and loss. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17896
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 14:26:05 -
[18] - Quote
Faylee Freir wrote: Haulers can bring increased risk and loss to directly increase profits but if AG start impacting gankers ability to gank it will allow more freighters to pass through and deliver cargo.
Can't get much lower than it already is. Using the best data we have the chance of getting ganked in your freighter stands at less than 0.01%. There is only 2 organisations left doing this and one of them is funded by charity.
Chances of being ganked are so low you might as well say its as safe as you can get without outright banning pvp from highsec. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17896
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 14:34:28 -
[19] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:
That is only Red Frog data and as someone quite rightly pointed out on another thread their max collateral is 1bn, changes the dynamics a lot and makes them not representative of hisec hauling as a whole.
Its data from several million gate jumps and they use the exact same rules, mechanics and tools available to everyone.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17898
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 15:36:50 -
[20] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote: The value of the cargo is set to be unprofitable to gank, so therefore they are not representative of freighter ganking in hisec.
What mechanic stops everyone else from not stuffing more than a billion into their holds? |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17901
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 18:21:12 -
[21] - Quote
Faylee Freir wrote:More freighters, jump freighters, and orcas die everday to pvp in low, null, and wspace than they do to hisec ganks.
Always have. |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
17902
|
Posted - 2016.08.16 18:34:47 -
[22] - Quote
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:baltec1 wrote:Faylee Freir wrote:More freighters, jump freighters, and orcas die everday to pvp in low, null, and wspace than they do to hisec ganks. Always have. While (probably) true of Orcas and Jump Freighters...even a casual glance at the killboards for regular freighters would seem to indicate that that is a blatant lie... A higher percentage of them may die there, because there are so many fewer out there...but the clear majority have been killed in high sec for regular freighters.
Most that die in highsec are killed in wars oddly enough
|
| |
|