EVE Search - Revelations 1.4 Deployment on Tues, 20 March from 1100 to 1700 GMT

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Revelations 1.4 Deployment on Tues, 20 March from 1100 to 1700 GMT

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial We Are Nice Guys	Posted - 2007.03.16 22:37:00 - [61] Originally by: Arushia Originally by: hotgirl933 Originally by: Hangman69 "The limit of data cores you can buy each day has been raised to 4000. " This can lead to a lot of people fully cashing out their research points if the T2 lottery is done giving out bpos. This will drive invention costs down. Are all lottery BPOs going to be handed out prior to patch deployment? lottery BPOs are being convered to 10000 run BPCs all t2 BPOs wil be removed so its a mute point Source? Also, Hulks are inventable, what about drones? And ammo... Seriously. I pay too much for scorch and conflag as it is. ---------------------------------------- Thou Shalt "Pew Pew"

CCP Oneiromancer	Posted - 2007.03.16 22:39:00 - [62] Originally by: Imechal Ravpeim "Wrecks that contain loot can now be salvaged without having to remove the loot first." This one kinda bugs me. Will it cause an act of aggression to salvage someone else's wreck? Does it already? Because I could see a lot of greifing destroyers warping around and salvaging people's wrecks while destroying their loot... Salvaging a wreck that belongs to another player does not lead to criminal flagging.

Jarjar Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency	Posted - 2007.03.16 22:39:00 - [63] Edited by: Jarjar on 16/03/2007 22:35:58 Originally by: Imechal Ravpeim "Wrecks that contain loot can now be salvaged without having to remove the loot first." This one kinda bugs me. Will it cause an act of aggression to salvage someone else's wreck? Does it already? Because I could see a lot of greifing destroyers warping around and salvaging people's wrecks while destroying their loot... The loot drops in a new can. Edit: Also... Best patch notes. EVER. "In Communist China ISK buys YOU!!" - random bio
Cerwyn Taraman Minmatar Phoenix Tech Industries Apoapsis Multiversal Consortium	Posted - 2007.03.16 22:44:00 - [64] Hooray for bug fixes and tweaking instead of new content...seriously :-) I think EVE has needed some TLC to some of the existing systems more than new content for a while now. Great job CCP!
Ephemeral Waves The Nine Gates Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2007.03.16 22:49:00 - [65] Edited by: Ephemeral Waves on 16/03/2007 22:46:38 This is great patch! I especially love the wreaking hits on the logoffski and the nano-ship. However....camera reset on session change? Illegible fonts? Eph. Now Recruiting
AS Patriot Caldari StarHunt Fallout Project	Posted - 2007.03.16 22:50:00 - [66] Will the old T2 BPO's then just die out as people loose them, just like the harvester drones maybe __________________________________________________ Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Sahwoolo Etoophie ([email protected])
Djerin Obsidian Exploration Services	Posted - 2007.03.16 22:56:00 - [67] Edited by: Djerin on 16/03/2007 22:53:29 Quote: Logging off inside a warp disrupt bubble (mobile warp disrupt or interdictor bubble) no longer triggers an emergency warp. Geez i hope you tripple-checked this on supercapitals. Otherwise if there was some unintented behavior there this could end up in having to actually reimburse such ships. ;) edit: oh and nice stuff to read in there. Now i can think of a new sig. Originally by: Cipher7 Its like if the Imperial Star Destroyers flew past the X-Wing fighters and started flying circles around them, it would turn Star Wars into a slapstick comedy a-la Benny Hill instead
Kumu Honua	Posted - 2007.03.16 23:03:00 - [68] Quote: Corporate standing takes low standing members into account. Doesn't it already do so? What exactly is this changing?
Pottsey Gallente Enheduanni Foundation	Posted - 2007.03.16 23:19:00 - [69] ôThe description for the Auto Targeting System II module now displays the proper number of maximum locked targets (+3).ö I thought that module was impossible to get. No T2 blueprints where giving out in the lottery as far I a know and invention does ton work as there are no T1 blueprints. Been trying to get the T2 module for a while now. Passive shield tanking guide click here
Joerd Toastius Octavian Vanguard	Posted - 2007.03.16 23:20:00 - [70] Originally by: Hoshi Quote: # Control towers anchored at a moon are now moved into the center of the grid, up to 100km+ from the warp-in point. This has been done to resolve various grid issues with control towers. As a covert ops pilot this one scares me a lot. This means that if I warp at 100km to a hostile pos I might land inside it and be decloaked and killed and there is no way what so ever for me to find out in advance... That's exactly what I thought when I read that. Colour me concerned.


CCP Oneiromancer	Posted - 2007.03.16 23:30:00 - [71] Originally by: Joerd Toastius Originally by: Hoshi Quote: # Control towers anchored at a moon are now moved into the center of the grid, up to 100km+ from the warp-in point. This has been done to resolve various grid issues with control towers. As a covert ops pilot this one scares me a lot. This means that if I warp at 100km to a hostile pos I might land inside it and be decloaked and killed and there is no way what so ever for me to find out in advance... That's exactly what I thought when I read that. Colour me concerned. This is happening when you anchor a new POS. Existing POS'es are not being moved.

Bruno Bonner Gallente Lutin Group	Posted - 2007.03.16 23:30:00 - [72] Good patch notes, the real question now is how many stealth updates are you guys doing? ------ aka BinderAJ
Darius Shakor Minmatar Freelance Unincorporated Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2007.03.16 23:40:00 - [73] Originally by: CCP Oneiromancer Originally by: Joerd Toastius Originally by: Hoshi Quote: # Control towers anchored at a moon are now moved into the center of the grid, up to 100km+ from the warp-in point. This has been done to resolve various grid issues with control towers. As a covert ops pilot this one scares me a lot. This means that if I warp at 100km to a hostile pos I might land inside it and be decloaked and killed and there is no way what so ever for me to find out in advance... That's exactly what I thought when I read that. Colour me concerned. This is happening when you anchor a new POS. Existing POS'es are not being moved. I think the point is that all new POS are possibly going to be at locations you would warp to when scouting for POS and hence you lose your covert and an expensive cloak when you get bounced out of the shield. I don't really like this change myself eaither as it makes putting up a POS in 0.0 while in hostile situations very scetchy. You have a slow hauler or carrier anchoring the POS... now place your bets where the POS will be when it is finished and how far away you have to fly to get to it as hostiles are on their way to shoot it. Is there a reason this was done this way instead of making it so that the centre of a grid which contains a moon is moved to the warp in point? This seems like a backwards way of tackling it and makes life a heck of a lot more difficult for players. I don't want to be anchoring a POS then find out I have to fly maybe 90 odd km away to fuel and online it when it is done. Or be required to make a bookmark to the tower, warp out to the planet then back in again to the bookmark... it should not have to be this way guys. ------ Shakor Clan Information Portal
NightmareX Caldari Infinitus Odium	Posted - 2007.03.16 23:52:00 - [74] I see the 4 new eve songs that are on sisi atm isn't writed in the Patch Note. But looks like a nice patch Infinitus Odium - We Are The Bringers Of Hatred
CyberChick The Ghost Riders Hydra Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.17 00:03:00 - [75] For capital pilots like myself, can we petition rigs that now are described as not working with capital modules? I already have a Aux Nano pump on my Archon, and it has made no difference...
Matalino Gallente	Posted - 2007.03.17 00:15:00 - [76] Quote: Corporate standing takes low standing members into account. Is there a bug out there where members with standings of approx 0.1 are not include in the average, or is this a nerf against empire POS and Jump Clone services by including members with no standings?
Roughriver The Plexus Research Institute The Order of New Eden	Posted - 2007.03.17 00:20:00 - [77] Originally by: Matalino Quote: Corporate standing takes low standing members into account. Is there a bug out there where members with standings of approx 0.1 are not include in the average, or is this a nerf against empire POS and Jump Clone services by including members with no standings? yes, I am curious about this.. what dose 'low standing members' means? Members with no standing at all or members with - or 0.X standing?
Baleorg Gallente Guys of Sarcasm	Posted - 2007.03.17 00:56:00 - [78] Originally by: Bruno Bonner Good patch notes, the real question now is how many stealth updates are you guys doing? if they tell, it wont be stealth ... :) a stealth upgrade i saw on sisi is the new sorting thigny.. when you redocked and have liek 890 item sin your personal hangar, you haev a dropdown menu above it to filter for things.. ammo, modules. bla.. yada BTW: A GOOD Cache-Cleaner
Brolly Caldari The Department of Justice	Posted - 2007.03.17 01:08:00 - [79] Some nice little changes there....if they work Kinda looking forward to invention stuff but I'm not going to get my hopes up. No salvage less wrecks is cool. I wonder how much encryption skills are gonna drop and how well the books are gonna be seeded...only time will tell. Good luck with patch day I stink yo feer
buyuksun	Posted - 2007.03.17 01:12:00 - [80] Will the Current auctions to corps stay like it was till they are done?

Mysticaa Gallente Fringe Roamers of Goa	Posted - 2007.03.17 01:24:00 - [81] Quote: Ice belts have been removed from all systems with 0.8+ security standing. Let me guess this is to help eliminate macrominers? cough BS! cough Oh wait its to improve system performance! cough BS!! cough ----------------------------------------------- Why do I post here? Originally by: Tao Han "TANK CEO!!!" Quick Wrangler, to the Banmobile!!! Sig snatched by Xorus
Wrayeth Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2007.03.17 01:45:00 - [82] Edited by: Wrayeth on 17/03/2007 01:47:48 Well, according to Tuxford nano-ships will still be viable and will still ****any turret ship out there. He might as well not have nerfed nanos at all, FFS. http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=491976&page=1#30 CCP, I don't know why I keep letting you get my hopes up. I'd hoped that my playstyle (the straight-up fight, solo and small gang PvP) would become viable again when you announced that nanos would, in fact, be nerfed, but I now see that my hopes were in vain. It looks like my 3-billion ISK faction-fitted machariel will continue doing what it's been doing since Revelations was released: sitting in dock. Thanks muchly, CCP. And yes, that last line was sarcasm. -Wrayeth "Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing* to this thread!" Might As well Train Another Race
Mack Dorgeans Camelot Innovations	Posted - 2007.03.17 02:38:00 - [83] Sadly, none of my accounts are enabled on Singularity. Can anyone tell me if overdrives will still have a cargo penalty?
Slate Fistcrunch Direct Intent The Makhai	Posted - 2007.03.17 03:09:00 - [84] With changes to wrecks and salvaging, has can pvp flagging been fixed yet?
Arushia Nova Labs	Posted - 2007.03.17 04:59:00 - [85] Quote: Systems in Jovian space have been changed to true 0.0 security status to avoid standing loss issues in future tournaments. What were they before? Nova Labs
Ben Derindar KelBen Productions	Posted - 2007.03.17 05:46:00 - [86] Originally by: Patch notes - Logging off inside a warp disrupt bubble (mobile warp disrupt or interdictor bubble) no longer triggers an emergency warp. - Ice belts have been removed from all systems with 0.8+ security standing. These changes alone make this patch worthwhile. \o/ /Ben How to fix Eve
Bienurdau Hywoaf Minmatar Matari Holo News Network	Posted - 2007.03.17 07:49:00 - [87] Originally by: Hangman69 "The limit of data cores you can buy each day has been raised to 4000. " This can lead to a lot of people fully cashing out their research points if the T2 lottery is done giving out bpos. This will drive invention costs down. Are all lottery BPOs going to be handed out prior to patch deployment? That's the point :), to make invention cheaper and a viable alternative. I'm sure this is a step towards ending the lottery :) Idea: Treaties Idea: Jump Rigs
Superbus Maximus Gallente Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.03.17 07:49:00 - [88] Edited by: Superbus Maximus on 17/03/2007 07:46:46 Nice to see logging in bubbles was finally fixxed should have been done year ago, but the other changes look great. Nice to see some of the major problems fixxed this time around. Please do not edit moderator sig comments. -Conuion Meow ([email protected])
Bienurdau Hywoaf Minmatar Matari Holo News Network	Posted - 2007.03.17 07:56:00 - [89] Originally by: Mysticaa Quote: Ice belts have been removed from all systems with 0.8+ security standing. Let me guess this is to help eliminate macrominers? cough BS! cough Oh wait its to improve system performance! cough BS!! cough Yep I see a continuing problem with the removal of all the belts since the start of Kali, seems a really lame attempt to force folks into low sec or empire, yet at the same time making it harder for them to get there. Idea: Treaties Idea: Jump Rigs
Tripoli Tiffany Minmatar Bionic Travellers Bionic Dawn	Posted - 2007.03.17 07:58:00 - [90] Quote: An issue where you couldn't destroy rigs without repackaging your ship has been resolved. On the fitting screen, right click the module and select destroy. Damn, only a few hours ago I repackaged my insured Maelstrom to get rid of the only rig that was on it so I could replace it with 3 better rigs, and I had to pay 43.5m to re-insure it.



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.