EVE Search - Fix Stasis Web II's

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Fix Stasis Web II's

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Futher Bezluden Minmatar Red Dwarf Mining Corps 5th Column	Posted - 2007.03.17 20:07:00 - [1] 80% 10km ... Can we get 13km and 80%? Fleeting Webs are still better stat and pricewise. THUKKER -Be Paranoid
Kagura Nikon Minmatar MASS HOMICIDE	Posted - 2007.03.17 20:13:00 - [2] 13 km 80% seems adequate (maybe 13km 75% if tux feels it would be overpowering) If brute force doesn't solve your problem... you are not using enough
Phelan Lore Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.03.17 20:27:00 - [3] Leave them at 10k... Having 4k extra on a disruptor isn't necessary, having 3k exra on your web becomes essential to every ship which fits a web. Want more web range fly minnie recons. -
Sokratesz Guardians of Hell's Gate Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2007.03.17 20:48:00 - [4] 12k 90%...slightly better then best named, sounds fine to me... March 2007; the time common sense took control at CCP.
Pinky Denmark The Cursed Navy Apocalyptica.	Posted - 2007.03.17 22:40:00 - [5] Webifier is a module where T2 should NOT be better than best named at all... - I'm a nice guy!! and OMG I love Team Tuxford for the speedbalancing...
Imechal Ravpeim International Multi-Player Consortium Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.03.17 22:48:00 - [6] Originally by: Pinky Denmark Webifier is a module where T2 should NOT be better than best named at all... explain why?
Tista	Posted - 2007.03.17 22:50:00 - [7] Originally by: Pinky Denmark Webifier is a module where T2 should NOT be better than best named at all... train the skills... for t2.. get a bonus from t2...
ArtemisEntreri	Posted - 2007.03.17 23:11:00 - [8] Have you guys looked at dread guristas webs, please consider them when you're thinking of these ideas 12km 60%
Tista	Posted - 2007.03.17 23:13:00 - [9] Originally by: ArtemisEntreri Have you guys looked at dread guristas webs, please consider them when you're thinking of these ideas 12km 60% t2 needs more skills damn it, its about time not isk!
dalman Finite Horizon	Posted - 2007.03.18 00:15:00 - [10] Originally by: Tista Originally by: ArtemisEntreri Have you guys looked at dread guristas webs, please consider them when you're thinking of these ideas 12km 60% t2 needs more skills damn it, its about time not isk! You spend the time training the skills to be able to use the T2 version instead of buying a more expensive meta T1 item... How about that? And T2 webs are fixed. Now they just gotta fix all other T2 items, as no standard T2 should be better than the best T1 meta module. Then both gameplay and the market would be sooo much better. Am I forced to have any regret? I've become the lie, beautiful and free In my righteous own mind I adore and preach the insanity you gave to me
Malthros Zenobia Caldari Independent Navy Reserve	Posted - 2007.03.18 00:49:00 - [11] Originally by: dalman Originally by: Tista Originally by: ArtemisEntreri Have you guys looked at dread guristas webs, please consider them when you're thinking of these ideas 12km 60% t2 needs more skills damn it, its about time not isk! You spend the time training the skills to be able to use the T2 version instead of buying a more expensive meta T1 item... How about that? And T2 webs are fixed. Now they just gotta fix all other T2 items, as no standard T2 should be better than the best T1 meta module. Then both gameplay and the market would be sooo much better. What you're saying is basically saying is that the object which has been advanced and made better by removed the flaws, should be weaker than the flawed items. Making best named be better than T2 is just stupid. named is easier to fit, that alone is your bonus, deal with it. Originally by: kieron The Carrier was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.
smallgreenblur Minmatar Wreckless Abandon	Posted - 2007.03.18 01:00:00 - [12] Why they still haven't been fixed is anybody's guess. 10/11k 90% please ccp, chop chop. sgb
dalman Finite Horizon	Posted - 2007.03.18 01:27:00 - [13] Originally by: Malthros Zenobia What you're saying is basically saying is that the object which has been advanced and made better by removed the flaws, should be weaker than the flawed items. Just look out in the real world and you'll realize that it is you who are wrong. The first item in a line of a new generation tech is pretty much always 'worse' than the last item of the previous generation, which had beed tuned for years (your quote 'made better by removed the flaws' would IMO also actually relate to new items in the same generation!). Something that makes perfect sense. After a bit of tuning of the new generation (named T2 in EVE) they will of course outperform the old generation. Then it's also of course the case that new generation items includes new things that the previous generation did not support. Like how you can write new softwear using features that the new generation of hardware supports. And which in EVE also perfectly relates to both of 'skills only affecting T2 items' and 'T2 ammo only useable by T2 weapons'. Am I forced to have any regret? I've become the lie, beautiful and free In my righteous own mind I adore and preach the insanity you gave to me
VanNostrum Caldari	Posted - 2007.03.18 02:51:00 - [14] Not to mention the T2 warp disruptor uses more cap than the T1 Fleeting one I agree that some T2 modules need boost such as the T2 webber, T2 remote sensor dampener, T2 disruptor etc That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter. It is a combat drone used by carriers.
BABARR	Posted - 2007.03.18 04:26:00 - [15] 12km and near 70% can be very good, its sure the T2 web actually simply suck.
Toolivus	Posted - 2007.03.18 05:33:00 - [16] If it gets a range bonus, nerf it's effect to hell and back. The 10km barrier for smaller ships hurts bad enough as it is and there is really no reason that webs need a boost.
Hoshi Blackguard Brigade	Posted - 2007.03.18 11:04:00 - [17] Originally by: dalman Originally by: Tista Originally by: ArtemisEntreri Have you guys looked at dread guristas webs, please consider them when you're thinking of these ideas 12km 60% t2 needs more skills damn it, its about time not isk! You spend the time training the skills to be able to use the T2 version instead of buying a more expensive meta T1 item... How about that? And T2 webs are fixed. Now they just gotta fix all other T2 items, as no standard T2 should be better than the best T1 meta module. Then both gameplay and the market would be sooo much better. They should not be worse than best meta but not better either. The choice should be between the more expensive meta or the cheaper but harder to fit and more skill intensive T2. ---------------------------------------- A Guide to Scan Probing in Revelations

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.