| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Ares Splinter
Bank Of Zion The Volition Cult
1
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 09:15:03 -
[1] - Quote
CCP now must listen the new with rorq on the grid so destroys in it for miners and forcing them to lose their BOOST and being dependent on other player to sit there with them and people have said stop in our corp way introduce this, we lose our mines not only that cheated as do my 80 hours with boost just to get to their gametime so kill them now total .. our mines have announced they stop eve if in carrying this out and then follow our pvp members and pve with we had a corp meeting about it and said we find a different game all together and play if not in coming up with a better solution for those the miners to mine 100 hours instead of the 70-80 hours they do now .. with boost we do not know what your plan is, but it sucks to all others who do not have a rorq. |

Lan Wang
C.Q.B Snuffed Out
3481
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 09:37:34 -
[2] - Quote
you should run this post by someone in your corp who can translate it because it makes no sense
is it tears that you have to have boosts on grid now or something else, im not sure
Loyalist to Angel Cartel
Your killboard reads like a "how to get farmed 101" - Noah Reese
|

Anthar Thebess
1640
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 09:39:49 -
[3] - Quote
Maybe instead of mining for 80 hours to get gametime they start to do something else ? This is not rant against mining but if someone goal is to get isk for game time then they need to do around 40milion daily. 40milion is a payout for completing a single heaven. T1 battleship need 30minutes to complete a haven, this give us 15hours of ratting. If you upgrade yourself to Faction battleship you reduce this time even more. Going into bigger hulls reduce this time even more.
Assuming that someone is afraid of nullsec (we don't have rorquals in higsec so i guess this is not the issue). Classical running of LVL 4 missions in higsec give you 50-60 million per hour. Proper running burner missions put you at 120mi /h + Lets not forget about incursions - where you can go up to 240mil /h
Please forward this information to your members.
Stop discrimination, help in a fight against terrorists
Show your support to The Cause!
|

Lan Wang
C.Q.B Snuffed Out
3481
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 09:48:12 -
[4] - Quote
i also wonder what sort of isk/hr you guys are making mining, 80 hours at 12mil/hr is near a bil isk, your miners only make 12mil an hour?
Loyalist to Angel Cartel
Your killboard reads like a "how to get farmed 101" - Noah Reese
|

Toobo
Project Fruit House Solyaris Chtonium
172
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 09:50:46 -
[5] - Quote
You should consider that if mass of people stopped mining because of this, mineral prices will eventually go up enough that you can earn reasonable ISK in comparatively similar hours spent on mining.
Also, if lots of people decide not to risk Rorq on belt and go on mining without the boosts, if you dare to mine with Rorq and have organisational skill and resources to secure the boost for your miners, you will have incredible advantage over people mining without boosts.
The changes kill easy/safe boost for miners, but any significant decrease in supply will be compensated for the miners when the market price adjusts. And for those who cna secure the on grid boost will reap great rewards and make more from mining than they do now.
I won't get into the issue of what Rorq should be or not as a ship balance issue, but from market perspective the changes will reward you greatly if you can adapt to it.
Toobo is a lucky talisman - use Toobo's referral for IWI and you too can be lucky. ;)
Programers/Designers Wanted
|

Lady Ayeipsia
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1200
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 09:55:56 -
[6] - Quote
Since no one else says it.... Can I have all your members stuff? I mean you are threatening to quit a game over a much needed booster change, one that should make your PvP group much happier. |

Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
2760
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 10:04:13 -
[7] - Quote
Toobo wrote:You should consider that if mass of people stopped mining because of this, mineral prices will eventually go up enough that you can earn reasonable ISK in comparatively similar hours spent on mining.
Also, if lots of people decide not to risk Rorq on belt and go on mining without the boosts, if you dare to mine with Rorq and have organisational skill and resources to secure the boost for your miners, you will have incredible advantage over people mining without boosts.
The changes kill easy/safe boost for miners, but any significant decrease in supply will be compensated for the miners when the market price adjusts. And for those who cna secure the on grid boost will reap great rewards and make more from mining than they do now.
I won't get into the issue of what Rorq should be or not as a ship balance issue, but from market perspective the changes will reward you greatly if you can adapt to it.
Seriously. This is only good news for competent miners as they will see an increase in the value of their ore. It is bad news for lazy, risk-averse miners however, but that is how a properly designed game should work.
Besides, you can use the Rorqual to boost without activating the Industrial Core to provide the best boosts in the game. If you do take the risk to activate the Core, you are locked in place but significant increase your yield even beyond that. You now have to decide how much you are willing to risk and how well you can support your choices instead of it just being mandatory for everyone to have a 100%-safe boosting Rorqual in a POS.
Risk vs. reward is back and mining now requires players to make a decision. Make your choice wisely and you will profit more than your competitors. Make it poorly, and you will become content. In either case, the game wins.
The 8 Golden Rules of Eve
Why Do They Gank?
|

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1041
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 10:14:14 -
[8] - Quote
Comments from Reddit today that pretty much sum it up:
Generally speaking people are just whining that they're going to be forced to risk their couple billion ISK ship, when the only way the same people who are complaining would actually 'risk' it is if you let it deploy a permanent and invulnerable POS-shield that never comes down and can't be reinforced.
and
Theyre carebear miners - they won't be happy until just owning a rorqual makes their mining barges invulnerable, and they can use it to boost from a station.
Carebears being carebears.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|

Ginger Naari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
66
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 10:26:52 -
[9] - Quote
If someone is mining for 80 hours to just pay for a months sub it just makes me glad that I pay cash.
No worries, no stress, no time frame in which I HAVE to mine or whatever.
Just chill and enjoy whatever I decide to do, it's much more civilised. 
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
2848
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 10:41:29 -
[10] - Quote
Hello OP
Can I have the stuff of all your corp members if you quit? You don't need it anymore if you change to that other game.
EDIT: eww too late, someone already asked.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1678
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 10:51:05 -
[11] - Quote
Every time someone creates a new thread to whine about the Rorqual on grid boosts and how much it sucks I check the dev blogs page to make absolutely sure I haven't missed a dev blog somewhere. Just did it again and guess what, no Rorqual dev blog.
You and anyone else whining about this have absolutely NO clue what is going to happen with the Rorqual. You have NO clue what CCP intends with them, you have NO clue if sieging them will even be a thing and if so, what the drawbacks will be.
So how about you save the whining for when actual information has been released instead of just assuming that the only change they're making is having to be on grid.
Gah.
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|

Nana Skalski
Poseidaon
16211
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 11:30:23 -
[12] - Quote
The prices will be readjusted to new levels and everyone will be happy again.
Every part of a game helps to tell a story. =ƒôò
Where is Angry CONCORD guy when you need him.
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ
|

Jenn aSide
Shinigami Miners Test Alliance Please Ignore
14728
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 12:22:51 -
[13] - Quote
People who complain abotu the Rorq never seem to mention the new miner boosting BC that will be an alternative.
As for boosts, I'll say it again to CCP: these whines are what happens when you put unbalanced stuff in the game and people get used to them as an entitlement. At this point they feel like you OWE them easy to protect, hyper effective off grid boosts....because that's what you gave them for years.
|

Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
1870
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 12:45:56 -
[14] - Quote
*blinks*
But they'll be able to play for free soon.
What's the deal?

*whistles innocently and cloaks out*
Everything in EVE is a trap.
And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.
Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
|

Arianne Kass
Garoun Long-Term Capital Management
5
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 13:16:04 -
[15] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:i also wonder what sort of isk/hr you guys are making mining, 80 hours at 12mil/hr is near a bil isk, your miners only make 12mil an hour?
One Mackinaw orehold of Spod is worth at least 8m, so as usual a lot of hyperbole. Baseless whining does not make for a convincing case, especially not if it is outside the official(tm) feedback thread. |

Skyler Mind
Klungels second hand spaceshipparts Kids With Guns Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 13:52:59 -
[16] - Quote
In real life when the game of business changes corporation adapt to the new changes, those that don't get hurn in ther financial ventures. Blockbuster had tears of the streaming business and refuse to adapt on time, and what happened they are out of the game. New corporation with less winning will adapt and make isk, markets will adjust. |

March rabbit
Mosquito Squadron The-Culture
1901
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 15:58:03 -
[17] - Quote
I've heard that fully trained and boosted hulk mining in 0.0 gives above 250mil/hour  My alt has little above 23 seconds of cycle time on ICE mining (Covetor + T2 equipment + rorq bonuses). Harvesting Krystallos (1.25mil pu in Jita) it gives 3600/23*1.25=195mil/hour And i'm not talking about 'all V' skills and T2 barge here.....
So yes, guy talking about 80 hours of mining WITH rorq to pay for PLEX ...... 
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

Decaneos
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
145
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 16:23:22 -
[18] - Quote
Lady Ayeipsia wrote:Since no one else says it.... Can I have all your members stuff? I mean you are threatening to quit a game over a much needed booster change, one that should make your PvP group much happier.
If i remember right, it was actually kiting pvp gangs that where the first to complain about the changes to boosts |

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
2850
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 16:29:01 -
[19] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:I've heard that fully trained and boosted hulk mining in 0.0 gives above 250mil/hour  My alt has little above 23 seconds of cycle time on ICE mining (Covetor + T2 equipment + rorq bonuses). Harvesting Krystallos (1.25mil pu in Jita) it gives 3600/23*1.25=195mil/hour  And i'm not talking about 'all V' skills and T2 barge here..... So yes, guy talking about 80 hours of mining WITH rorq to pay for PLEX ......  Maybe hes real issue is his corps ore buyback program 
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

Serene Repose
3024
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 16:43:31 -
[20] - Quote
Benedick:
Well, every one can master a grief but he that has it.
William Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing Act 3, Scene 2
We must accommodate the idiocracy.
|

Lan Wang
C.Q.B Snuffed Out
3485
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 16:45:26 -
[21] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:March rabbit wrote:I've heard that fully trained and boosted hulk mining in 0.0 gives above 250mil/hour  My alt has little above 23 seconds of cycle time on ICE mining (Covetor + T2 equipment + rorq bonuses). Harvesting Krystallos (1.25mil pu in Jita) it gives 3600/23*1.25=195mil/hour  And i'm not talking about 'all V' skills and T2 barge here..... So yes, guy talking about 80 hours of mining WITH rorq to pay for PLEX ......  Maybe hes real issue is his corps ore buyback program 
maybe he just complaining because the upcoming alpha clones wont really work too well when mining with venture alts
Loyalist to Angel Cartel
Your killboard reads like a "how to get farmed 101" - Noah Reese
|

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2551
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 16:46:14 -
[22] - Quote
I once again have to ask if I can call my activities to collect space resources from asteroids something other than mining because the OP is embarrassing everyone who thinks themselves a miner. So let me see, your Roq is no longer a totally safe thing to make you "boosted". OK, so. Everyone mining today without a Roq raise your hand. Bonus if you are doing it without any "boost". How oh how are so many of us surviving this clearly unfair disadvantage? Seriously, if this is going to drive you all out of Eve, awesome, be gone you lazy whiner miners!
I am going to try again to explain why Eve is special. It is complicated and mostly free form. Instead of the traditional machine based NPC AI driving it all, Eve makes you "compete" with other humans, which sometimes are clever and driven. They will learn to adapt and optimize no matter what changes may be thrown into the sandbox. If you don't like that then Eve is not for you. There is no "easy" setting in Eve. That is why it continues to keep people engaged.
So I might not always like changes in some mechanics but I adapt and realize that is why I like the challenge. To be honest its when I see changes that maybe put us closer to that "easy" setting that I worry. Not that I don't think there should be some places in Eve that can almost be "easy". That should be high sec, not null. Null should be insanely lucrative and very dangerous. So long as risk is partnered with reward and vis versa all is right in the 'verse".
The Roq should not be some sort of "win" gizmo for lazy miners. |

Federigo Mondial
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 17:06:09 -
[23] - Quote
Well you can use a Command ship :)
|

Blade Darth
Room for Improvement Limited Expectations
66
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 17:33:30 -
[24] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:miner boosting BC But why. There's the orca, which is worth something like 3 skiffs... Make the orca cheaper so it can be used in throwaway t1 mining fleets (300m) and use rorq for 10-20 ship strong t2 fleets....
As for OP... idk how many alts or dual character training your corp fuels, apparently a lot. It doesn't take 80 hours for 1 account to get a plex. Including a 2-3b ship (that's gonna multiply fleet value by 3), how often do you lose the whole mining fleet? Once every few months? |

Ocean Ormand
Bagel and Lox
30
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 17:41:41 -
[25] - Quote
Ares Splinter wrote:CCP now must listen the new with rorq on the grid so destroys in it for miners and forcing them to lose their BOOST and being dependent on other player to sit there with them and people have said stop in our corp way introduce this, we lose our mines not only that cheated as do my 80 hours with boost just to get to their gametime so kill them now total .. our mines have announced they stop eve if in carrying this out and then follow our pvp members and pve with we had a corp meeting about it and said we find a different game all together and play if not in coming up with a better solution for those the miners to mine 150 hours instead of the 70-80 hours they do now .. with boost we do not know what your plan is, but it sucks to all others who do not have a rorq.
I simply dont understand folk complaining about orca and rorq boosting. Assuming that folk decide that it is too risky to use their boosting ships in belts - that means that (1) those ships will be parked; (2) less ore/ice will be mined; (3) the price of ore/ice will go up. Hence, the relative position of miners is going to be the same - you will mine less but being paid more for it. Of course you may have to compete with folk who do decide to take the risk by boosting from a belt - but those people are seeking greater profit from greater risk. Having miner's have to make choices about how much they are willing to risk to profit is not bad for the game.
Ofc the ones who truly suffer in all of this is ccp. Boosting is usually done from an alt account - frequently an afk alt account. People may very well decide that they dont want to risk their ships or have to actively focus on boosting - as a result they may very well simply close the subscriptions on this accounts. Miners are going to mine regardless of boosting but if enough people decide to close their specialized boosting accounts then ccp is going to take both a financial hit. Most significantly, it will potentially be a drag on online concurrent users. If People see that the ocu numbers are going to down even further - there is the potential it becomes a bitter cycle with folk thinking that the game is dying and therefore not logging in and causing a further spiraling of player loss. IMO ccp should not be introducing mechanisms that make it harder for people to box accounts since that just leads to a loss of the specialized alt accounts and pressure on ocu numbers. But what do i Know? I just play the game.
|

Piugattuk
Lima beans Corp
477
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 17:49:18 -
[26] - Quote
You can use a drake in place of a Roc, to me it's for years people have said risk vs rewards well guess CCP has taken that advice and have added more risk for the more juicier rewards of fancy roids.
But they were also benevolent in that instead of only orcas and roc's you could use a battle cruiser, so thank CCP for being nice. |

Pandora Carrollon
Dawn of a New Horizon The Republic.
666
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 17:51:10 -
[27] - Quote
If you're in Sov Null... not sure what the issue is, you should have defenses on site to handle the Rorq being on grid. It's more of a planning and organizational problem now.
If you're in LoSec, it's almost like Sov Null but you have different organizational needs to protect the hardware you have deployed.
HiSec, not much change, it's just Orca mining and the issues that came with that.
So, if this is a big problem, yes, it will bleed miners and I agree with Pedro here, it's not necessarily a bad thing for the game. I think the Alpha clones will more than make up for any losses players.
So, while I don't mind the loss of the infinite boost, I'm still not sure the Rorq was buffed correctly, so jury still out there.
8 Golden Rules of EVE GÇó EVE is entirely PvP
|

Arronicus
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Badfellas Inc.
1510
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 20:39:08 -
[28] - Quote
Ares Splinter wrote:CCP now must listen
no.
It changes the dynamic so that boosts are no longer a given, they are a risk-reward factor. Current mining boost gameplay is unexciting, and has no element of risk/reward, it's simply a must. If you want to make decent money, you must pay for an afk toon to sit afk all day in a safe location giving boosts.
Coming november, there is significant direct incentives for having your boosting pilot in the belt with the miners, and slightly more significant incentives for having a rorq drop into siege there to give out boosts, but also accompanying risks. Orcas and Rorqs WILL be in asteroid belts, (I'm not going to mention the porpoise, nullsec miners considering the porpoise are likely mining out of ventures) so if you want boosts
1) Put your own boosting toon in the belt, and enjoy the extra isk you pull in for the risk it entails 2) Make friends/join corps with other people bringing their boosters. And if you aren't a complete ****/goon, tip them. 3) Cry on the forums until nothing changes. Because nothing will change, CCP is committed to this, and enough miners will embrace it that the world will keep spinning.
The more of your friends who quit mining, the more people that will take their place as prices go up, and the ore market restabilizes. Many people will even continue to mine without good boosts. |

Toobo
Project Fruit House Solyaris Chtonium
178
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 22:19:56 -
[29] - Quote
I think Rorq bait will be a thing. Rorq gets tackled, cyno open, defence fleet jumps in, the attacker opens his own cyno, things can escalate quickly and it will be great. There are many cases where pvp fleet sits idle in a POS with titan ready to bridge while hunters are looking for good hot drop opportunities. Then someone will scream in the comms, "Yes! we got our Rorqual tackled! Enemy cyno open and caps dropping in! jump jump jump!!!"
Then there will be such a joy and people will cyno to Rorqual to get the contents they have been waiting for hours. Everyone will be happy :D think positive, this could be a fun change.
Toobo is a lucky talisman - use Toobo's referral for IWI and you too can be lucky. ;)
Programers/Designers Wanted
|

Onictus
The Scope Gallente Federation
948
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 05:44:13 -
[30] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:People who complain abotu the Rorq never seem to mention the new miner boosting BC that will be an alternative.
As for boosts, I'll say it again to CCP: these whines are what happens when you put unbalanced stuff in the game and people get used to them as an entitlement. At this point they feel like you OWE them easy to protect, hyper effective off grid boosts....because that's what you gave them for years.
I still think that its hilarious with all the whining after OGBs have been the boogie man forever.
Reap what you sow bitches.
|

Serene Repose
3025
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 07:31:19 -
[31] - Quote
Toobo wrote:I think Rorq bait will be a thing. Rorq gets tackled, cyno open, defence fleet jumps in, the attacker opens his own cyno, things can escalate quickly and it will be great. There are many cases where pvp fleet sits idle in a POS with titan ready to bridge while hunters are looking for good hot drop opportunities. Then someone will scream in the comms, "Yes! we got our Rorqual tackled! Enemy cyno open and caps dropping in! jump jump jump!!!"
Then there will be such a joy and people will cyno to Rorqual to get the contents they have been waiting for hours. Everyone will be happy :D think positive, this could be a fun change. You can't be serious! Actually play EVE! Where ever did you get such an idea?!
We must accommodate the idiocracy.
|

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
3942
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 15:38:15 -
[32] - Quote
I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.
CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic.
Know a Frozen fan? Check this out
Frozen fanfiction
|

Zanar Skwigelf
Boa Innovations Brothers of Tangra
43
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 15:51:28 -
[33] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.
CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic.
Who said the rorq won't be actively mining? |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
3942
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 16:06:07 -
[34] - Quote
Zanar Skwigelf wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.
CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic. Who said the rorq won't be actively mining? CCP?
Know a Frozen fan? Check this out
Frozen fanfiction
|

Zanar Skwigelf
Boa Innovations Brothers of Tangra
43
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 17:25:08 -
[35] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Zanar Skwigelf wrote:
Who said the rorq won't be actively mining?
CCP?
Where did they say that? I'm curious why they put capital mining drones on SISI if the rorq is only boosting. Also, is there something in the description that says miner iis can't be fit on the rorq? |

baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
18155
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 17:28:35 -
[36] - Quote
Piugattuk wrote:You can use a drake in place of a Roc, to me it's for years people have said risk vs rewards well guess CCP has taken that advice and have added more risk for the more juicier rewards of fancy roids.
But they were also benevolent in that instead of only orcas and roc's you could use a battle cruiser, so thank CCP for being nice.
FC can I bring a drake? |

Arronicus
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Badfellas Inc.
1514
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 17:29:14 -
[37] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Zanar Skwigelf wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.
CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic. Who said the rorq won't be actively mining? CCP?
There's been data on new capital sized mining drones in the client info lately. I think many of us are very much under the impression you'll be able to use them to mine with your roq. |

Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
449
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 18:12:51 -
[38] - Quote
Arronicus wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:Zanar Skwigelf wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.
CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic. Who said the rorq won't be actively mining? CCP? There's been data on new capital sized mining drones in the client info lately. I think many of us are very much under the impression you'll be able to use them to mine with your roq.
those drones will not have a yield that would outperform.. say.. a Capital Mining laser.. which shows just how detached and stupid, yes i said stupid ccp is for not giving the rorqual pilot a chance to finally mine...
its a capital industrial ship and look what they come up with it!!!!!... they have no idea what this ship should do.. they dont know!, all cause they've seen a few battle rorqs in the field.. thats why there's so much lacking in content for the rorqual now.
the rorqual should be the most powerful mining ship in the game.. not some lame booster only asset with funky little drones that are ripoffs from transformers that wont provide enough protection at all for her.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
18075
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 19:06:05 -
[39] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I once again have to ask if I can call my activities to collect space resources from asteroids something other than mining because the OP is embarrassing everyone who thinks themselves a miner. So let me see, your Roq is no longer a totally safe thing to make you "boosted". OK, so. Everyone mining today without a Roq raise your hand. Bonus if you are doing it without any "boost". How oh how are so many of us surviving this clearly unfair disadvantage? Seriously, if this is going to drive you all out of Eve, awesome, be gone you lazy whiner miners!
I am going to try again to explain why Eve is special. It is complicated and mostly free form. Instead of the traditional machine based NPC AI driving it all, Eve makes you "compete" with other humans, which sometimes are clever and driven. They will learn to adapt and optimize no matter what changes may be thrown into the sandbox. If you don't like that then Eve is not for you. There is no "easy" setting in Eve. That is why it continues to keep people engaged.
So I might not always like changes in some mechanics but I adapt and realize that is why I like the challenge. To be honest its when I see changes that maybe put us closer to that "easy" setting that I worry. Not that I don't think there should be some places in Eve that can almost be "easy". That should be high sec, not null. Null should be insanely lucrative and very dangerous. So long as risk is partnered with reward and vis versa all is right in the 'verse".
The Roq should not be some sort of "win" gizmo for lazy miners.
Well well, look who's back!
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!"
|

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
3942
|
Posted - 2016.09.22 22:30:36 -
[40] - Quote
Arronicus wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:Zanar Skwigelf wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.
CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic. Who said the rorq won't be actively mining? CCP? There's been data on new capital sized mining drones in the client info lately. I think many of us are very much under the impression you'll be able to use them to mine with your roq. At one time, a few months before Incarna, there was data for "establishments" in the client. Until its actually announced by CCP and scheduled for deployment, we cannot be sure. Unless they are very high yield drones, a Rorq will still be a poor miner, and not worth the effort. Adding strips, and still being an effective boost ship in a belt, will need more highs for strips. It would be nice if a Rorq was at least as effective a miner as a Hulk, and provided boosts on top of that.
Know a Frozen fan? Check this out
Frozen fanfiction
|

Hengle Teron
Order In Disorder Curatores Veritatis Alliance
60981
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 11:53:24 -
[41] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:People who complain abotu the Rorq never seem to mention the new miner boosting BC that will be an alternative.
As for boosts, I'll say it again to CCP: these whines are what happens when you put unbalanced stuff in the game and people get used to them as an entitlement. At this point they feel like you OWE them easy to protect, hyper effective off grid boosts....because that's what you gave them for years.
Tbh, even a command dessie / t1 BC can be alternative |

Toobo
Project Fruit House Solyaris Chtonium
189
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 14:37:57 -
[42] - Quote
Actually, I read the OP again I feel a bit sorry for him that he got shafted with the changes.
And I had some nice wins with gambling today, so I thought I would give him a small gift to make him feel better.
I have set up a free contract of 100 Carbons for the OP.
You can use Industrial Core on your Rorqual to compress them, and it will turn into a single unit of Diamond.
I wish you all the best.
love, Toobo.
Toobo is a lucky talisman - use Toobo's referral for IWI and you too can be lucky. ;)
Programers/Designers Wanted
|

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2555
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 15:07:08 -
[43] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:I once again have to ask if I can call my activities to collect space resources from asteroids something other than mining because the OP is embarrassing everyone who thinks themselves a miner. So let me see, your Roq is no longer a totally safe thing to make you "boosted". OK, so. Everyone mining today without a Roq raise your hand. Bonus if you are doing it without any "boost". How oh how are so many of us surviving this clearly unfair disadvantage? Seriously, if this is going to drive you all out of Eve, awesome, be gone you lazy whiner miners!
I am going to try again to explain why Eve is special. It is complicated and mostly free form. Instead of the traditional machine based NPC AI driving it all, Eve makes you "compete" with other humans, which sometimes are clever and driven. They will learn to adapt and optimize no matter what changes may be thrown into the sandbox. If you don't like that then Eve is not for you. There is no "easy" setting in Eve. That is why it continues to keep people engaged.
So I might not always like changes in some mechanics but I adapt and realize that is why I like the challenge. To be honest its when I see changes that maybe put us closer to that "easy" setting that I worry. Not that I don't think there should be some places in Eve that can almost be "easy". That should be high sec, not null. Null should be insanely lucrative and very dangerous. So long as risk is partnered with reward and vis versa all is right in the 'verse".
The Roq should not be some sort of "win" gizmo for lazy miners. Well well, look who's back!
Never left, just been quietly enjoying the wonders of the "verse". :-) |

Zenboca
State War Academy Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2016.09.27 18:37:42 -
[44] - Quote
Ares Splinter wrote:CCP now must listen the new with rorq on the grid so destroys in it for miners and forcing them to lose their BOOST and being dependent on other player to sit there with them and people have said stop in our corp way introduce this, we lose our mines not only that cheated as do my 80 hours with boost just to get to their gametime so kill them now total .. our mines have announced they stop eve if in carrying this out and then follow our pvp members and pve with we had a corp meeting about it and said we find a different game all together and play if not in coming up with a better solution for those the miners to mine 150 hours instead of the 70-80 hours they do now .. with boost we do not know what your plan is, but it sucks to all others who do not have a rorq. This is a MULTIPLAYER GAME... |

Elenahina
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
1254
|
Posted - 2016.09.27 19:02:09 -
[45] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Piugattuk wrote:You can use a drake in place of a Roc, to me it's for years people have said risk vs rewards well guess CCP has taken that advice and have added more risk for the more juicier rewards of fancy roids.
But they were also benevolent in that instead of only orcas and roc's you could use a battle cruiser, so thank CCP for being nice. FC can I bring a drake?
FC what do?!
Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you.
Also, iderno
|

PopeUrban
El Expedicion Flames of Exile
100
|
Posted - 2016.09.28 02:24:51 -
[46] - Quote
Off grid ship boosting is cancer, because ships can log out, making a boost rorq nearly impossible to lose ever. Its the same problem other forms of boosting had/have. It puts a player in a ship in the position of doing nothing interesting.
If you want off grid boosts, they should be coming from structures. Structures are a good balance between risk and reliability because they can be destroyed, but they can't be ganked. I'd be very surprised if the new industrial structures don't have mining efficiency fittings to create more long term risk and investment to encourage industrial entities to take ownership of and responsibility for the space they inhabit without constantly having to field a blingy gank target.
Heck, I wouldn't be suprised if they have "command burst" fittings that simply required the miners to check in at the structure every once in a while to get their buff restored. You could even monetize it as a station service. Set up a buff station near a popular ice belt, charge a fee for anyone not in your corp to get boosted. You make passive ISK, but on the flip side you pay in fuel and have to keep it defended through diplomacy or arms.
All the "alt-tab" fits will eventually be moved to one structure or another for good reasons. having someone switch on a module and then just sit there is not gameplay. I wouldn't be suprised if mining itself was given some kind of minigame eventually to make it a more active, engaging, and lucrative activity for people who want to actively mine versus click on lasers and go make a sandwich. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |