| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
93
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 00:48:00 -
[61] - Quote
Evei Shard wrote::please don your tin foil hats before proceeding further:
Is there any proof that "report bot" has been used by CCP as more than a "feel good feature" for legitmate players? Have there been any bots banned by CCP after having been reported using that tool?
As far as I know, CCP won't release any information along those lines. If they won't do that, then it is impossible to determine if the "report bot" feature is even valid. It may be that CCP put it there with no intention of ever using it beyond it fooling the gullible into thinking it is a legitimate way to get CCP to take action. Outside of CCP stepping in and showing proof, not just a dev post saying "yes we do", the community is left in the dark about it. As a result, speculation, accusation, and treachery will abound.
Come to think of it, how do we know the botters aren't CCP-controlled to artificially raise PLEX prices so more people will want to buy PLEX with real money so they can raise profits?
Oh god! That matches up perfectly with your hypothesis!
I'm scared. |

Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 11:21:00 -
[62] - Quote
When an alliance's subs reach critical level they're given carte blanche to do whatever they like.
Here, do this. Join a major alliance. Read their forums. Note down all the cheats they suggest you get in on and don't care who knows it. Watch how those chars aren't banned.
Finally, you too can just stop caring. Somebody will start botting incursions at some point. Then CCP really will have a dilemma on their hands. |

My Postman
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 11:41:00 -
[63] - Quote
Cass Lie wrote:Might be PL would kick any botting char that got caught and blown. Not because it is ~immoral~, but because he is stupid enough to do it on a main and not on an alt in a renter alliance in some god-forgotten null system.
And on a more serious note, the answer is yes, at least one such alliance exists.
PL 
Do you really think PL will kick a botter while allowing "monkeybusiness" - hacking the client for not appearing in local is ok? LOL |

Munio J Makeanen
United Starbase Systems
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 14:16:00 -
[64] - Quote
Zowie Powers wrote:When an alliance's subs reach critical level they're given carte blanche to do whatever they like.
Here, do this. Join a major alliance. Read their forums. Note down all the cheats they suggest you get in on and don't care who knows it. Watch how those chars aren't banned.
Finally, you too can just stop caring. Somebody will start botting incursions at some point. Then CCP really will have a dilemma on their hands.
They already do.
Just not fully still need bit of supervision but one person is enough per whole fleet and it is not common yet.
it is just pure fail imo but whatever could not care less.
|

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
24
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 16:19:00 -
[65] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Topaz Sky wrote:CCP devs are apparently in the goons and goons have an open goon-botting tolerance policy, so clearly not. Nice tinfoil hat. Goonswarm was one of the unnamed alliances I mentioned, which I believe (according to my sources) has a "don't report bots" policy. It's not "bots are okay" but it's effectively that anyway. The reason that is put in place is because of idiots who would go through friendly systems reporting every single ratter for botting, which causes unnecessary drama and headaches for everyone. Even worse if those friendly systems are in an ally's space, not the own alliance's space. I mean, it's understandable, but sort of sad. And that doesn't answer my question either way. While I in general realy hate Goons becouse of all their highsec ganking bullshit .... this argument I can understand.
Goons are 6000 people. The leaders simply can not know every member. And from history ("we just play to destroy your game and we have fun doing it") there are for sure many butheads in Goons (including some of the leaders). Hell, I can even imagin a offizial program from Goons called: "DDOS bot pettion section with mass reporting everyone" just for lulz.
But in general all 00/low ally leader know, their member can just PvP if they have some ISK. And with the general "I want PvP and hate all PvE" mentality ... they would detroy their babys (allys) if they use a 100% anti bot policy.
Some are better known for botting (Goons, NC, russen mafia). Some do it more silent (CVA *cry*). Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Prince Kobol
111
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 16:25:00 -
[66] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Topaz Sky wrote:CCP devs are apparently in the goons and goons have an open goon-botting tolerance policy, so clearly not. Nice tinfoil hat. Goonswarm was one of the unnamed alliances I mentioned, which I believe (according to my sources) has a "don't report bots" policy. It's not "bots are okay" but it's effectively that anyway. The reason that is put in place is because of idiots who would go through friendly systems reporting every single ratter for botting, which causes unnecessary drama and headaches for everyone. Even worse if those friendly systems are in an ally's space, not the own alliance's space. I mean, it's understandable, but sort of sad. And that doesn't answer my question either way. While I in general realy hate Goons becouse of all their highsec ganking bullshit .... this argument I can understand. Goons are 6000 people. The leaders simply can not know every member. And from history ("we just play to destroy your game and we have fun doing it") there are for sure many butheads in Goons (including some of the leaders). Hell, I can even imagin a offizial program from Goons called: "DDOS bot pettion section with mass reporting everyone" just for lulz. But in general all 00/low ally leader know, their member can just PvP if they have some ISK. And with the general "I want PvP and hate all PvE" mentality ... they would detroy their babys (allys) if they use a 100% anti bot policy. Some are better known for botting (Goons, NC, russen mafia). Some do it more silent (CVA *cry*).
With the null sec alliances its not so much botting as RMT that wold be the major concern.
So for example selling isk that they are making with Tech Moons / renting out systems etc etc to illegal isk selling sites for RL Money.
This would most likely done by the Alliance Leaders or somebody who is in a position of some authority I would imagine and not just some nobody
|

Ira Theos
Viziam Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 20:31:00 -
[67] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:It's pretty simple: any Alliance that takes a strong stand against botting will lose the 0.0 game as a result and no longer be a viable Alliance in Eve. It's counterproductive for them to report on their own ISK making activities, so why would they? No, it's CCP that needs to step up their efforts against bots...but wait, then they'll lose real life sub dollars, so why would they do that?? A never ending problem...too many people are on the take.
You and Prince Kobol have just explained why there is no "game" in EVE and why there is no rational reason to even attempt playing the sovereignty side of EVE. Until CCP steps up the coding in EVE, the sandbox is nothing more than a cat box filled with catpoop. If you want to play in it, you must get dirty.
This is the reason I have cancelled all accounts and just send isk for PLEX these days to watch the inevitable decline.
|

Cipher Jones
188
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 21:00:00 -
[68] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Funny you run your mouth about how I'm not on "other forums", but you can go to those other forums and read all about who bots and who doesn't, and even buy ISK.
You should be a "journalist" for Fox News. Yep I have access to forums that in turn, have access to alliance financials; I should most certainly be punished and subject to immediate scorn for aligning myself with an online organization that wants transparency with its members. I don't give a **** about botters, I don't care who RMT's... Honestly with the amount of effort you plebes put into this tin foil hattery, you could potentially realize there are better things to do then worry about what people are doing in areas of the game your afraid to step foot into. Your as bad as that old ***** down the street- who sits around all day and counts how many times everyone in the neighborhood pisses, eats and fucks.
You claim not to care about it but have several posts about it, and complain about what i have to say about it. Seriously, get the **** out.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Cipher Jones
188
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 21:02:00 -
[69] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Beaches wrote:Please lurk before posting, you are a ******* disease GTFO I have more likes than you.
yeah but for someone with 6000 allies and 1000 likes, thats terribad.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

J Kunjeh
119
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 21:07:00 -
[70] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:J Kunjeh wrote:It's pretty simple: any Alliance that takes a strong stand against botting will lose the 0.0 game as a result and no longer be a viable Alliance in Eve. It's counterproductive for them to report on their own ISK making activities, so why would they? No, it's CCP that needs to step up their efforts against bots...but wait, then they'll lose real life sub dollars, so why would they do that?? A never ending problem...too many people are on the take. You and Prince Kobol have just explained why there is no "game" in EVE and why there is no rational reason to even attempt playing the sovereignty side of EVE. Until CCP steps up the coding in EVE, the sandbox is nothing more than a cat box filled with catpoop. If you want to play in it, you must get dirty. This is the reason I have cancelled all accounts and just send isk for PLEX these days to watch the inevitable decline.
Well, yeah, but that was my smart-ass cynical view of things. I'm not sure how much I actually believe what I said.  "The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |

Cipher Jones
188
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 21:21:00 -
[71] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Topaz Sky wrote:CCP devs are apparently in the goons and goons have an open goon-botting tolerance policy, so clearly not. Nice tinfoil hat. Goonswarm was one of the unnamed alliances I mentioned, which I believe (according to my sources) has a "don't report bots" policy. It's not "bots are okay" but it's effectively that anyway. The reason that is put in place is because of idiots who would go through friendly systems reporting every single ratter for botting, which causes unnecessary drama and headaches for everyone. Even worse if those friendly systems are in an ally's space, not the own alliance's space. I mean, it's understandable, but sort of sad. And that doesn't answer my question either way. While I in general realy hate Goons becouse of all their highsec ganking bullshit .... this argument I can understand. Goons are 6000 people. The leaders simply can not know every member. And from history ("we just play to destroy your game and we have fun doing it") there are for sure many butheads in Goons (including some of the leaders). Hell, I can even imagin a offizial program from Goons called: "DDOS bot pettion section with mass reporting everyone" just for lulz. But in general all 00/low ally leader know, their member can just PvP if they have some ISK. And with the general "I want PvP and hate all PvE" mentality ... they would detroy their babys (allys) if they use a 100% anti bot policy. Some are better known for botting (Goons, NC, russen mafia). Some do it more silent (CVA *cry*).
So why would you have an alliance member who reports all your ratters in the first place? Sounds like a mole to me.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 22:31:00 -
[72] - Quote
Oh, hey Russel called and wants his Teapot back, also I think I saw an invisible pink unicorn somewhere around here.
Have fun with your arbitrary belief that all 0.0 alliances are filled with nothing but RMT'ers and bots.
for reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_Pink_Unicorn
EDIT: Dang you CCP, BBcode fail. You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
271
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 22:40:00 -
[73] - Quote
There is no way to truly know which alliances, nullsec or otherwise, actually police and kick members for botting. What we do know are which alliances bot and allow their members to do so...
*coughttestgoonswarmcough*
Sorry. I don't want to point them out. I hate finger pointing.  EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX!
Support our boobies!-á[url]https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=24221&find=unread[/url]
|

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 23:04:00 -
[74] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:There is no way to truly know which alliances, nullsec or otherwise, actually police and kick members for botting. What we do know are which alliances bot and allow their members to do so... *coughttestgoonswarmcough* Sorry. I don't want to point them out. I hate finger pointing. 
Your Fideism is an inspiration to us all. You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
96
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 23:28:00 -
[75] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:There is no way to truly know which alliances, nullsec or otherwise, actually police and kick members for botting. What we do know are which alliances bot and allow their members to do so... *coughttestgoonswarmcough* Sorry. I don't want to point them out. I hate finger pointing. 
You mean virtually all of them, by the sounds of this thread? |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
164
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 23:33:00 -
[76] - Quote
I heard that the goon fleets currently murdering white noise consist entierly of bots. |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 23:45:00 -
[77] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:There is no way to truly know which alliances, nullsec or otherwise, actually police and kick members for botting. What we do know are which alliances bot and allow their members to do so... *coughttestgoonswarmcough* Sorry. I don't want to point them out. I hate finger pointing.  You mean virtually all of them, by the sounds of this thread?
It's like they have this fideistic belief that the only people who are in 0.0 alliances are bots or RMT'ers. It is the axiom of their whole existance. Yes there are bots and RMT'ers, but not just in 0.0, and not to the degree they believe. You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1081
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 23:48:00 -
[78] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:thats terribad. Do you know any other unfunny memes? The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
331
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 23:49:00 -
[79] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:I heard that the goon fleets currently murdering white noise consist entierly of bots. I hear some of them couldn't even stop shooting rats on the gate. It's a disgrace! |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1081
|
Posted - 2011.12.23 23:49:00 -
[80] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:There is no way to truly know which alliances, nullsec or otherwise, actually police and kick members for botting. What we do know are which alliances bot and allow their members to do so... *coughttestgoonswarmcough* Sorry. I don't want to point them out. I hate finger pointing.  You don't understand how this works. Goonswarm does not condone botting we just don't believe in our members doing CCP's job for them.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Podcorn
Republic Military School
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 00:20:00 -
[81] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:There is no way to truly know which alliances, nullsec or otherwise, actually police and kick members for botting. What we do know are which alliances bot and allow their members to do so... *coughttestgoonswarmcough* Sorry. I don't want to point them out. I hate finger pointing.  You don't understand how this works. Goonswarm does not condone botting we just don't believe in our members doing CCP's job for them.
"Don't report the bots guys, make CCP do it."

|

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
332
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 00:23:00 -
[82] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:There is no way to truly know which alliances, nullsec or otherwise, actually police and kick members for botting. What we do know are which alliances bot and allow their members to do so... *coughttestgoonswarmcough* Sorry. I don't want to point them out. I hate finger pointing. 
Let me reiterate from last page:
Lord Zim wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Topaz Sky wrote:CCP devs are apparently in the goons and goons have an open goon-botting tolerance policy, so clearly not. Nice tinfoil hat. Goonswarm was one of the unnamed alliances I mentioned, which I believe (according to my sources) has a "don't report bots" policy. It's not "bots are okay" but it's effectively that anyway. The reason that is put in place is because of idiots who would go through friendly systems reporting every single ratter for botting, which causes unnecessary drama and headaches for everyone. Even worse if those friendly systems are in an ally's space, not the own alliance's space. I mean, it's understandable, but sort of sad. And that doesn't answer my question either way. Actually, the policy is don't shoot bots (because you don't actually know it is a bot, you can only assume). We don't give a flying **** if someone reports a bot. Actually, I believe there has been cases of some testie reporting every goon (or everyone non-test) flying through fountain, though, and I'm not sure if that was something he told the guys he reported about it, or if he just did it silently, but there were some drama there. Edit: Ah. Xolve wrote:And the 'No Bot Reporting' rule originated in TEST when a bunch of mouthbreathers were mad about the sanctum nerf and couldn't find an empty one to harvest interstellar ***-gold from. So they started reporting people who were honestly just ratting to get them a temp ban until an investigation was completed. So, hi. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
267
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 00:30:00 -
[83] - Quote
"Don't report bots" policies only do one thing, encourage botting. The reasons given for such policies as to prevent people from rage-reporting innocent people just doesn't hold water. Firstly, how is the alliance ever going to know who reported who unless CCP is sending that information back to the alliance. Secondly, a "Don't falsely report people as botters" policy doesn't directly encourage botting and is still just as enforceable as the policies as stated.
The fact that alliances have "Don't report bots" policies is indicative of their encouragement of such activities. Any other reason for such policies assumes the ability to enforce it. How does one enforce it when supposedly there is no way for the alliance to know who reported a potential botter??? Or do the close ties these alliances have with CCP allow such information to make its way back to the alliance???
If information pertaining to who reported potential botters is making it back to alliance from CCP then why is this even possible unless it's to protect an alliance's interests in such activities. Sorry, but tin foil hat or no, no matter how I look at it the implications are disturbing. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
57
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 00:38:00 -
[84] - Quote
Podcorn wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:There is no way to truly know which alliances, nullsec or otherwise, actually police and kick members for botting. What we do know are which alliances bot and allow their members to do so... *coughttestgoonswarmcough* Sorry. I don't want to point them out. I hate finger pointing.  You don't understand how this works. Goonswarm does not condone botting we just don't believe in our members doing CCP's job for them. "Don't report the bots guys, make CCP do it."  So, you report every J-walker, speeder, double parking, litterer, and that guy who blew through the stop sign, to the authorities? What is your phone bill like, and how do you find time for EVE and posting?
Not our job, but we can drop a dime if we want to. :effort: You've got to remember that these are just simple miners. These are people of the land. The common clay of New Eden. You know... morons. |

Podcorn
Republic Military School
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 00:46:00 -
[85] - Quote
Falin Whalen wrote:
So, you report every J-walker, speeder, double parking, litterer, and that guy who blew through the stop sign, to the authorities? What is your phone bill like, and how do you find time for EVE and posting?
Not our job, but we can drop a dime if we want to. :effort:
No I don't care about J-walking, who does? Comparing that to botting suggests you view it as a very petty infraction. I disagree with the goons in that I think botting is horrible and it destroys the game. I report botters because I like EVE, I know that the goons say that they want to destroy EVE and maybe that's why they tolerate them / turn a blind eye to their 'petty little transgressions' against it. But that's why I view goons as botters, because even if one isn't, harboring them is just as bad. |

yumike
Eve of Madness
22
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 00:53:00 -
[86] - Quote
I found a bot in my alliance (not this char if you try to look at history, IDLE EMPIRE) and ended up suicide ganking him . (highsec, mining bot)
The funny thing is, we were very strict about area of operation & comms before even logging in (Don't wanna scare the wartargets away from staging system by having too many people login) so when we came across a blue a few jumps from staging. It was an automatic red flag. He never had a ship loss from a war target so we assumed it didn't safe cause we were blue. Suicide ganked & kicked when his ceo logged in.. (We are/were small though, sub 100 people. I doubt larger alliances could afford that) |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 00:53:00 -
[87] - Quote
Pawnee wrote: One day the fair players will realise, the cheaters have such an advantage, they can never take on and will ahve never a chance to strike back and have any competition on a simular level. Agreed... This is the first MMO I ever played and had no idea of how things really work. I have too much time invested to quit but if I knew then what I know now I never would have started. |

Cipher Jones
189
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 01:25:00 -
[88] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:thats terribad. Do you know any other unfunny memes?
Just "pubbie". I tend to save clever articulations to those who can use them.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1081
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 02:39:00 -
[89] - Quote
Podcorn wrote:"Don't report the bots guys, make CCP do it."  It's CCP's rule and it's their job to enforce it. This is not a difficult concept.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1081
|
Posted - 2011.12.24 02:40:00 -
[90] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:I tend to save clever articulations to those who can use them. Along with coherent grammar?
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |