| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
84
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
I had an interesting discussion with a friend of mine yesterday about the prevalence of botting and why it is not combated more actively. I am now aware that some alliances have "don't report bots" policies for a multitude of reasons, including avoiding drama (due to trigger-happy white knight types who report everything in sight, or due to actual abuse), padding alliance wallet, and "because it's not our fault CCP can't enforce its EULA".
This has left me rather disappointed, but I'm curious: how widespread is this practice? With all the bot hate everywhere, I would think there exist alliances with "zero tolerance" bot policies -- towards their own members, allies, and enemies. Do they exist or am I just living in cuckoo-land?
(No I am not looking for recruitment; I am simply asking a question) |

Topaz Sky
3
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP devs are apparently in the goons and goons have an open goon-botting tolerance policy, so clearly not. |

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
198
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Officially most alliances are probably anti-bot, kind of social suicide otherwise, so any answer you get here on an open forum will be irrelevant, tainted, flawed, outright lies.
CCP is getting better at it but they need to accept their limitations and involve the employers (corps/alliances) in the equation: Make employers partially accountable for employee behaviour and introduce some helpful tools (such as activity monitors) for corp/alliance admins to use to ferret out the culprits. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
84
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Topaz Sky wrote:CCP devs are apparently in the goons and goons have an open goon-botting tolerance policy, so clearly not. Nice tinfoil hat. Goonswarm was one of the unnamed alliances I mentioned, which I believe (according to my sources) has a "don't report bots" policy. It's not "bots are okay" but it's effectively that anyway. The reason that is put in place is because of idiots who would go through friendly systems reporting every single ratter for botting, which causes unnecessary drama and headaches for everyone. Even worse if those friendly systems are in an ally's space, not the own alliance's space.
I mean, it's understandable, but sort of sad. And that doesn't answer my question either way. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
84
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:Officially most alliances are probably anti-bot, kind of social suicide otherwise, so any answer you get here on an open forum will be irrelevant, tainted, flawed, outright lies.
CCP is getting better at it but they need to accept their limitations and involve the employers (corps/alliances) in the equation: Make employers partially accountable for employee behaviour and introduce some helpful tools (such as activity monitors) for corp/alliance admins to use to ferret out the culprits.
I'm not expecting any straightforward and true answers. Everything on these forums is to be taken with a sea-ful of salt. "Anti-bot" has multiple meanings though. In some alliances, you will be derided, fined, or booted if you're found botting, but you'll never be reported. Most alliances probably don't want you to report blue bots. Some may even encourage reporting all red ratters you find as bots.
I'm wondering if there's any alliance that actually has a policy to report any and all bots.
There are some people who wouldn't turn their brother or best friend in for a crime, but would gladly turn in a stranger. Then there's some people who would. |

Goose99
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
367
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Topaz Sky wrote:CCP devs are apparently in the goons and goons have an open goon-botting tolerance policy, so clearly not. Nice tinfoil hat. Goonswarm was one of the unnamed alliances I mentioned, which I believe (according to my sources) has a "don't report bots" policy. It's not "bots are okay" but it's effectively that anyway. The reason that is put in place is because of idiots who would go through friendly systems reporting every single ratter for botting, which causes unnecessary drama and headaches for everyone. Even worse if those friendly systems are in an ally's space, not the own alliance's space. I mean, it's understandable, but sort of sad. And that doesn't answer my question either way.
Don't ask, don't tell. It causes trouble.
Yes, it's a widespread practice. There's zero incentive for Alliances to report their bots, when they earn them isk. There's an obvious conflict of interest there. You may as well expect bots to report themselves. Only uninvolved party will be willing to report, that means publicize corp finances so 3rd party can see bounty ticks, or opening up blue space to camera drones so bots can be observed. Good luck with that. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
152
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:Officially most alliances are probably anti-bot, kind of social suicide otherwise, so any answer you get here on an open forum will be irrelevant, tainted, flawed, outright lies.
CCP is getting better at it but they need to accept their limitations and involve the employers (corps/alliances) in the equation: Make employers partially accountable for employee behaviour and introduce some helpful tools (such as activity monitors) for corp/alliance admins to use to ferret out the culprits.
I am anti-bot but pro RMT.  |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
140
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:41:00 -
[8] - Quote
no -á"Nerf it cause I can't fly it". I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Cass Lie
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Might be PL would kick any botting char that got caught and blown. Not because it is ~immoral~, but because he is stupid enough to do it on a main and not on an alt in a renter alliance in some god-forgotten null system.
And on a more serious note, the answer is yes, at least one such alliance exists. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
84
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 16:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Cass Lie wrote:Might be PL would kick any botting char that got caught and blown. Not because it is ~immoral~, but because he is stupid enough to do it on a main and not on an alt in a renter alliance in some god-forgotten null system.
And on a more serious note, the answer is yes, at least one such alliance exists.
Report him too?
If PL does this, they may have regained the respect I lost for them when they hotdropped my Slicer with an Aeon and a Nyx. |

Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
245
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
the Ruskies/Germans dont give a damn. their alliances bot all the time. |

Prince Kobol
106
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
I have spoke about this before.
CCP will always be in a no win situation in regards to the topic of null sec alliances botting and involved in RMT.
Since there is no way we as players can gain information on who has been banned because of Botting or RMT and CCP will never release this kind of information there will always be speculation.
On top of that we have the situation where there are members of CCP who used to be part of the Goons and other Null Sec alliances, add to that CSM members, both past and present, who are close friends to many CCP staff and you have a melting pot of rumours and innuendo.
Of course every alliance is going to claim that they are anti-bot and anti RMT, but since it is impossible to prove either way you the player will have to take their word.
The Goons will always be the number one target of speculation regarding this subject simply because of their close to ties to CCP Staff, The Mittani being the CSM Chair and their reputation and persona which they have created themselves of being lairs and cheats, not to mention their goal of destroying Eve for everybody else.
You also have the situation that if somebody creates a throw away alt on a throw away account to purchase isk, transfers said isk by purchasing goods at a vastly increased price from their alliance, if CCP catches this alt, the isk which is now in the alliance hands will not be removed.
After all, it is impossible to prove that this alt is in anyway connected to the alliance.
Scams happen everyday in Eve.
There are far too many ways for people to Bot / RMT on throw away accounts and transferring isk to their respective alliances with zero risk.
How can you change this.. I have no idea.
|

Prince Kobol
106
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:22:00 -
[13] - Quote
I have spoke about this before.
CCP will always be in a no win situation in regards to the topic of null sec alliances botting and involved in RMT.
Since there is no way we as players can gain information on who has been banned because of Botting or RMT and CCP will never release this kind of information there will always be speculation.
On top of that we have the situation where there are members of CCP who used to be part of the Goons and other Null Sec alliances, add to that CSM members, both past and present, who are close friends to many CCP staff and you have a melting pot of rumours and innuendo.
Of course every alliance is going to claim that they are anti-bot and anti RMT, but since it is impossible to prove either way you the player will have to take their word.
The Goons will always be the number one target of speculation regarding this subject simply because of their close to ties to CCP Staff, The Mittani being the CSM Chair and their reputation and persona which they have created themselves of being lairs and cheats, not to mention their goal of destroying Eve for everybody else.
Also the Russians are always being labelled as Botters / RMT merchants yet unless you can provide 100% proof that the Alliance as a whole are in involved and not just a few rogue players then what can you do?
Its hard enough to prove 1 person is botting let alone a group of 50+
1 person is very good at keeping quiet, the more people involved the greater the risk of somebody getting pissed off and spilling the beans.
You also have the situation that if somebody creates a throw away alt on a throw away account to purchase isk, transfers said isk by purchasing goods at a vastly increased price from their alliance, if CCP catches this alt, the isk which is now in the alliance hands will not be removed.
After all, it is impossible to prove that this alt is in anyway connected to the alliance.
Scams happen everyday in Eve.
There are far too many ways for people to Bot / RMT on throw away accounts and transferring isk to their respective alliances with zero risk.
How can you change this.. I have no idea.
Damn forum  |

Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
294
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:27:00 -
[14] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:If PL does this, they may have regained the respect I lost for them when they hotdropped my Slicer with an Aeon and a Nyx.
How in the great blue **** did your slicer get tackled by 2 supers?
Lady Spank for C&P Moderator.
|

J Kunjeh
101
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
It's pretty simple: any Alliance that takes a strong stand against botting will lose the 0.0 game as a result and no longer be a viable Alliance in Eve. It's counterproductive for them to report on their own ISK making activities, so why would they? No, it's CCP that needs to step up their efforts against bots...but wait, then they'll lose real life sub dollars, so why would they do that?? A never ending problem...too many people are on the take. "The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
84
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:30:00 -
[16] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:If PL does this, they may have regained the respect I lost for them when they hotdropped my Slicer with an Aeon and a Nyx. How in the great blue **** did your slicer get tackled by 2 supers?
Didn't get tackled. I got out, of course. Still, it was one of the dumbest things I have ever seen.
My Rifter did get pointed and killed by a Thanatos once, but that's because I was basically asking for it. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
84
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:34:00 -
[17] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:It's pretty simple: any Alliance that takes a strong stand against botting will lose the 0.0 game as a result and no longer be a viable Alliance in Eve. It's counterproductive for them to report on their own ISK making activities, so why would they? No, it's CCP that needs to step up their efforts against bots...but wait, then they'll lose real life sub dollars, so why would they do that?? A never ending problem...too many people are on the take.
CCP had a massive bot-banning effort in the past, in which they presumedly lost a ton of paying subscribers. I'm not too concerned about it being a conflict of interest for them.
It shouldn't be a conflict of interest for 0.0 alliances, though. I don't know how CCP can solve that. |

Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
294
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:There are far too many ways for people to Bot / RMT on throw away accounts and transferring isk to their respective alliances with zero risk.
Funny how entire alliances are to blame for RMTing when they could careless about the trivial amounts of ISK to be made in that manner, when a single tech moon produces about 115-130M ISK/Hour (at hurry up and sell prices at that); so why would GoonSwarm RMT when they have enough ISK (as well as the rest of their coalition) to just replace any ship lost in any attempt to ****, murder, purge or kill something?
Besides- if you were the leader or synomous overlord of a nullsec alliance roughly the size of the top 4 alliances (~4600 members on average) where would you find time to monitor the activities of every active member in your alliance? You cannot possibly pin that kind of responsibility on a handful of people, regardless as to what alliance they belong to.
And the 'No Bot Reporting' rule originated in TEST when a bunch of mouthbreathers were mad about the sanctum nerf and couldn't find an empty one to harvest interstellar ***-gold from. So they started reporting people who were honestly just ratting to get them a temp ban until an investigation was completed.
Given the amount of null sec being invaded right now, I would imagine botting out in Null has dropped off signifigantly, and since the Goon Ice Interdiction is over, I don't think anyone would be hard pressed to figure out where they went...
Lady Spank for C&P Moderator.
|

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
52
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:39:00 -
[19] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:Officially most alliances are probably anti-bot, kind of social suicide otherwise, so any answer you get here on an open forum will be irrelevant, tainted, flawed, outright lies.
CCP is getting better at it but they need to accept their limitations and involve the employers (corps/alliances) in the equation: Make employers partially accountable for employee behaviour and introduce some helpful tools (such as activity monitors) for corp/alliance admins to use to ferret out the culprits. Absolutely not.
I do not bot and nor do I condone it. But making subscribers police other subscribers for game mechanic failure exploits or suffer consequences is the most twisted form of anti-botting measure around. Good luck keeping the honest, non-RMT'ing people as subscribers if such a measure were put into place.
CCP owns this game and the servers on which it is run. This is their property to manage for better or worse. 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
84
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:47:00 -
[20] - Quote
Xolve wrote: And the 'No Bot Reporting' rule originated in TEST when a bunch of mouthbreathers were mad about the sanctum nerf and couldn't find an empty one to harvest interstellar ***-gold from. So they started reporting people who were honestly just ratting to get them a temp ban until an investigation was completed.
This is why we can't have nice things.
I hate people. |

Prince Kobol
107
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 17:57:00 -
[21] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:There are far too many ways for people to Bot / RMT on throw away accounts and transferring isk to their respective alliances with zero risk. Funny how entire alliances are to blame for RMTing when they could careless about the trivial amounts of ISK to be made in that manner, when a single tech moon produces about 115-130M ISK/Hour (at hurry up and sell prices at that); so why would GoonSwarm RMT when they have enough ISK (as well as the rest of their coalition) to just replace any ship lost in any attempt to ****, murder, purge or kill something? Besides- if you were the leader or synomous overlord of a nullsec alliance roughly the size of the top 4 alliances (~4600 members on average) where would you find time to monitor the activities of every active member in your alliance? You cannot possibly pin that kind of responsibility on a handful of people, regardless as to what alliance they belong to. And the 'No Bot Reporting' rule originated in TEST when a bunch of mouthbreathers were mad about the sanctum nerf and couldn't find an empty one to harvest interstellar ***-gold from. So they started reporting people who were honestly just ratting to get them a temp ban until an investigation was completed. Given the amount of null sec being invaded right now, I would imagine botting out in Null has dropped off signifigantly, and since the Goon Ice Interdiction is over, I don't think anyone would be hard pressed to figure out where they went...
I am not saying Alliance have organised botting or that they are in involved in RMT.. i.e selling all those billions of isk they make via Tech Moons to illegal isk selling sites for RL money.
All I am saying is that it appears that many people do believe that these alliances are involved in these kinds of activities and that CCP are aware of it but turn a blind eye because they are either scared to lose subs or because they are close personal friends of people in these alliances.
Either way, there never has been, nor will there ever be unless somebody like a CEO of one of these alliances comes forward with proof, that any of this takes place.
Its all about perception and currently judging by the forums posts over the last 6 months, many people do believe these kind of things take place.
The question is can CCP do anything to change this perception which lets be honest, is not good. |

Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
294
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 18:15:00 -
[22] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Stuff.
You realize most of the alliances that are the constant target for finger pointers, all have open financials posted either on their super serious 'spreadsheets online' forums, or in game right?
Lady Spank for C&P Moderator.
|

Zagam
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
308
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 18:47:00 -
[23] - Quote
There are several that I know of that are pretty anti-bot in the CFC. I know for sure that Fatal Ascension is definitely anti-bot, and most of the other CFC alliances are also.
PS> Reading comprehension of this post is improved when tin foil hats are removed prior to reading. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. The Lostboys
183
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 18:54:00 -
[24] - Quote
Xolve wrote:
Funny how entire alliances are to blame for RMTing when they could careless about the trivial amounts of ISK to be made in that manner, when a single tech moon produces about 115-130M ISK/Hour (at hurry up and sell prices at that); so why would GoonSwarm RMT when they have enough ISK (as well as the rest of their coalition) to just replace any ship lost in any attempt to ****, murder, purge or kill something?
.....
The claim is they SELL the ISK they make form those moons to get personally rich with real money.
Edit: Zero tolerance Alliance: Ivy League. But they hold no sov. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. Subscribers can never answer a question posed to CCP. Only CCP can. |

Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
295
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 19:04:00 -
[25] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote: The claim is they SELL the ISK they make form those moons to get personally rich with real money.
Edit: Zero tolerance Alliance: Ivy League. But they hold no sov.
We're talking about entities in this game that live outside of (get ready for it) Hi-Sec *GASP*, that are somehow making money hand over fist, and we the butthurt players of New Eden are all simulatenously donning our 1600mm Tin Foil Hats. 
Welcome to the conversation though. Lady Spank for C&P Moderator.
|

Palovana
Inner Fire Inc.
46
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 19:10:00 -
[26] - Quote
Maybe if CCP instituted actual rewards (for example, 0.5% of botted isk goes to the whistle blower) on bots reported via their "Report Bot" menu option, more people would be willing to break the "don't ask, don't tell" bot-agreement?
Or everyone would go all ++ber-snitch hoping to score free isk, and there would be more than 9000 reports per hour.
Please support: export of settings in editable format
Your stuff goes here. |

J Kunjeh
102
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 19:13:00 -
[27] - Quote
Palovana wrote:Maybe if CCP instituted actual rewards (for example, 0.5% of botted isk goes to the whistle blower) on bots reported via their "Report Bot" menu option, more people would be willing to break the "don't ask, don't tell" bot-agreement?
Or everyone would go all ++ber-snitch hoping to score free isk, and there would be more than 9000 reports per hour.
Winner, winner TV dinner! I think what you described here should be the basis for a new (and worthwhile) bounty system in Eve. Bounty Hunter's on the lookout for bots and getting paid phat ISK to do so.
"The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |

Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
295
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 19:15:00 -
[28] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:I think what you described here should be the basis for a new (and worthwhile) bounty system in Eve. Bounty Hunter's on the lookout for bots and getting paid phat ISK to do so.
I think you should never post again. Lady Spank for C&P Moderator.
|

J Kunjeh
102
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 19:18:00 -
[29] - Quote
Xolve wrote:J Kunjeh wrote:I think what you described here should be the basis for a new (and worthwhile) bounty system in Eve. Bounty Hunter's on the lookout for bots and getting paid phat ISK to do so. I think you should never post again.
You must admit though, that would be infinitely better than the lame bounty system in place today.
"The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |

Prince Kobol
107
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 19:25:00 -
[30] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Stuff. You realize most of the alliances that are the constant target for finger pointers, all have open financials posted either on their super serious 'spreadsheets online' forums, or in game right?
lol.. you see any anybody who believes that this kind of thing goes on is not going to believe a spreadsheet which any alliance in question creates.
Spreadsheets that I will admit I have never seen or even heard off.
What I find interesting is that you are trying to claim that only people who live in high sec are making these kind of claims and also you seem very agitated.
The plain fact of the matter is that many people, regardless of their play style or location within Eve do believe that these alliances are involved in RMT in some form.
Whether this is right or wrong is irreverent, what matter is that the perception is here and its exists.
Its is a perception which is consistently brought up and discussed time and again and is damaging for CCP from a PR stand point.
As a developer you do not want to be associated with any rumour that involves you conspiring / being associated / or turing a blind eye to / with players who are actively involved in RMT.
Spend a few minutes on dotlan and you will find many systems in null where you will have only a small amount of jumps in the last 24 hrs but a very high number of NPC's kills.
For example found a system Pure Blind where it is only showing 9 jump but 696 NPC's kills in the last 24 hours.
Now does this mean people of botting, of course it doesn't, but would such kinds of number warrant a Dev or GM to spend a few minutes to investigate.. perhaps.
Its numbers like this which make people question whether CCP are indeed serious in clamping down / stopping RMT and Botting.
However as I have said before, because CCP do not release any meaning information about their work on botting / RMT, and many would say for good reason, the suspicion will always be there.
I just want to point out that I did not choose Pure Blind on purpose, its just that I recently been talking about that system to somebody and it stuck in my head is all 
So my apologies if me using Pure Blind as an example upsets anybody, it was not my intention.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |