Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
|
CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
7122
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:19:20 -
[1] - Quote
With the huge expansion EVE: Ascension arriving on Nov 8, we will see the introduction of the eagerly awaited new Engineering Complexes.
We will get a new set of service modules that will expand research and manufacturing support to the entire line of Upwell structures. These service modules will be fully compatible with existing Citadel structures. Simultaneously, Upwell will be releasing a new set of Engineering Complex structures which are bonused for optimal performance with these service modules.
All details are now available in the new blog Building Dreams: Introducing Engineering Complexes
CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer
|
|
Tribal Trogdor
Better Off Red
15
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:20:40 -
[2] - Quote
Can't find item Sorry, we could not find the item you were looking for.
I've been rick rolled |
Ncc 1709
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Badfellas Inc.
306
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:22:07 -
[3] - Quote
Second! |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Mercenary Coalition
3121
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:25:04 -
[4] - Quote
EASILY FIRST PAGE |
Mai Khumm
172.0.0.1
845
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:26:53 -
[5] - Quote
First page! |
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
2719
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:28:32 -
[6] - Quote
I'm so excited! And I just can't hide it!
CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.
|
Querns
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2523
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:30:18 -
[7] - Quote
I'm still reading the dev blog, but I want to offer my appreciation for the cost of the new engineering complexes compared to the list of ships that can dock at them. It is a surprisingly elegant solution; I'm very impressed.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
Kronossan
Bellum Esca
53
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:31:21 -
[8] - Quote
I was hoping to find out more about faction tower reimbursement/replacement. |
|
CCP Lebowski
C C P C C P Alliance
750
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:34:37 -
[9] - Quote
Kronossan wrote:I was hoping to find out more about faction tower reimbursement/replacement. Towers aren't going anywhere for now, as they still have functionality that new structures don't yet offer.
Rest assured that you'll be informed when we're closer to reaching feature parity!
CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0
@CCP_Lebowski
|
|
Lady Aesir
Ghost Recon Inc
22
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
How about Banning anyone on the CSM or there friends who use insider knowledge to by the market supplies as they appear to have done here unless your leaking the information to your buddies.
Marines and Janitors!!!! |
|
Lady Aesir
Ghost Recon Inc
22
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:39:46 -
[11] - Quote
BPO Costs??? |
Highfield
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
73
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:40:02 -
[12] - Quote
CCPLz can we have the tables and spreadsheets in devblog as actual tables and spreadsheets instead of JPG files? This makes industrialist life so much more convenient!
Also, damn awesome update, love it! |
Tribal Trogdor
Better Off Red
15
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:43:07 -
[13] - Quote
I dont see any rigs that seem to apply to building caps in their final form. Are they included in the capital component rig? Or just not happening? |
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate Naquatech Syndicate
1928
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:43:12 -
[14] - Quote
BPO prices ?
Quote:The exact material compositions of the new rigs and service modules are still being nailed down, will be available in an upcoming forum post. I expected those be here
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Opner Dresden
Lugus Foundry The Explicit Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:46:13 -
[15] - Quote
The docking restrictions are goofy and unintuitive to players. They should be Small, Medium, Large for consistency. I'm disappointed that CCP continues to push pilots into mega-alliance groups and encourage blue donut mentality by forcing the choice of coffining players in supers or joining those who can afford a Keepstar.
Today, you can store and build a supercapital in a 2b isk POS... now it's a 30b+ structure with no ability to store them? This is a horrible shift of power to larger groups. |
Tribal Trogdor
Better Off Red
16
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:47:21 -
[16] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:BPO prices ? Quote:The exact material compositions of the new rigs and service modules are still being nailed down, will be available in an upcoming forum post. I expected those be here
With citadels they did 10x the expected cost. So I would guess:
7B - Medium 52B - Large 300B - XL |
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1730
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:47:32 -
[17] - Quote
That picture of a Titan at the end means that super capitals in build will be visible from outside the structure, yes? That's quite a big change to not mention anywhere in the blog, just saying.
I'm assuming that the reprocessing rigs will be getting their bonussed structure with the release of Drilling Platforms, right? Or are those meant to be specific to Citadels (makes less sense if you ask me).
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
Sir SmashAlot
The League of Extraordinary Opportunists Intergalactic Conservation Movement
205
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:48:00 -
[18] - Quote
Looks like I am going to need to replace my user unfriendly POS with roughly 5 to 6 "easy to use" structures to get similar utility that I already have. |
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate Naquatech Syndicate
1928
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:51:07 -
[19] - Quote
Tribal Trogdor wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:BPO prices ? Quote:The exact material compositions of the new rigs and service modules are still being nailed down, will be available in an upcoming forum post. I expected those be here With citadels they did 10x the expected cost. So I would guess: 7B - Medium 52B - Large 300B - XL exact material compositions
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Ashterothi
Aideron Robotics
416
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:53:13 -
[20] - Quote
Opner Dresden wrote:The docking restrictions are goofy and unintuitive to players. They should be Small, Medium, Large for consistency. I'm disappointed that CCP continues to push pilots into mega-alliance groups and encourage blue donut mentality by forcing the choice of coffining players in supers or joining those who can afford a Keepstar.
Today, you can store and build a supercapital in a 2b isk POS... now it's a 30b+ structure with no ability to store them? This is a horrible shift of power to larger groups.
By that same logic you can tether a super outside a Medium for low cost and no fuel.
Listen to On Grid Podcast for all your Empyrean needs!
|
|
Winter Archipelago
Autumn Industrial Enterprises
704
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:53:32 -
[21] - Quote
Quote: The other materials that were a part of the job (including BPCs), as well as any completed but undelivered job outputs, will have a chance to drop into the structure wreck just like structure modules. A question on the part related to completed but undelivered jobs: will the manufactured item have a chance to drop, or its materials (for a very basic example, if 10 shuttles were produced but not yet delivered, would the potential loot be 10 shuttles, or the 20k tritanium)?
For the Newbies: The 8 Golden Rules - The Magic 14 Skills - Finding the Right Corp - EVE University Wiki
|
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1732
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:55:12 -
[22] - Quote
Opner Dresden wrote:The docking restrictions are goofy and unintuitive to players. They should be Small, Medium, Large for consistency. I'm disappointed that CCP continues to push pilots into mega-alliance groups and encourage blue donut mentality by forcing the choice of coffining players in supers or joining those who can afford a Keepstar.
Today, you can store and build a supercapital in a 2b isk POS... now it's a 30b+ structure with no ability to store them? This is a horrible shift of power to larger groups.
Requiring a 30b+ structure to even build these ships, with huge vulnerability on top, hopefully means that super caps will become a bit more rare again over time. The ease with which you can build them today is kind of silly really. It should be the larger groups who have the power to build and wield these ships. That's the payoff for their investment into owning sov.
No longer can you throw down 20 relatively cheap POS's to keep your enemy guessing which one has a capital in build. Now you have to throw down a really expensive one and everyone can see what you're building there. I only see positives here. Less supercaps and more conflict drivers. There's really very little reason to attack an armed Keepstar. There will be ample reason to attack an armed Sotiyo.
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
Obil Que
Star Explorers Reckoning Star Alliance
454
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:57:44 -
[23] - Quote
Opner Dresden wrote:The docking restrictions are goofy and unintuitive to players. They should be Small, Medium, Large for consistency. I'm disappointed that CCP continues to push pilots into mega-alliance groups and encourage blue donut mentality by forcing the choice of coffining players in supers or joining those who can afford a Keepstar.
Today, you can store and build a supercapital in a 2b isk POS... now it's a 30b+ structure with no ability to store them? This is a horrible shift of power to larger groups.
If anything, it again reinforces the idea that the cost/benefit ratio of the POS is severely out of whack and being corrected through these new structures. It was the same with Citadels with people complaining that a 1B ISK POS could fight better than a Medium Citadel. I'm not sure what argument you're making about large groups and supercapitals. Those ships are arguably the domain of organized larger groups, not small groups and solo players.
Sir SmashAlot wrote:Looks like I am going to need to replace my user unfriendly POS with roughly 5 to 6 "easy to use" structures to get similar utility that I already have.
Same point as above. |
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc Tactical-Retreat
2080
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 16:58:59 -
[24] - Quote
A bit sad over the higher vulnerability timers and the retaining of the system cost manufacturing index, but I understand why both of these aspects are necessary.
What of the ability to use a Market Service Module? Is it limited to L and XL or only for XL?
Signature Tanking Best Tanking
[Ex-F] CEO - Eve-guides.fr
Ultimate Citadel Guide - 2016 EVE Career Chart
|
Obil Que
Star Explorers Reckoning Star Alliance
454
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:00:52 -
[25] - Quote
Altrue wrote:A bit sad over the higher vulnerability timers and the retaining of the system cost manufacturing index, but I understand why both of these aspects are necessary.
What of the ability to use a Market Service Module? Is it limited to L and XL or only for XL?
The market service module can only be fit to Fortizars, Keepstars, and the Palatine Keepstar. Not the engineering complexes
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate Naquatech Syndicate
1928
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:01:26 -
[26] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Opner Dresden wrote:The docking restrictions are goofy and unintuitive to players. They should be Small, Medium, Large for consistency. I'm disappointed that CCP continues to push pilots into mega-alliance groups and encourage blue donut mentality by forcing the choice of coffining players in supers or joining those who can afford a Keepstar.
Today, you can store and build a supercapital in a 2b isk POS... now it's a 30b+ structure with no ability to store them? This is a horrible shift of power to larger groups. Requiring a 30b+ structure to even build these ships, with huge vulnerability on top, hopefully means that super caps will become a bit more rare again over time. The ease with which you can build them today is kind of silly really. It should be the larger groups who have the power to build and wield these ships. That's the payoff for their investment into owning sov. No longer can you throw down 20 relatively cheap POS's to keep your enemy guessing which one has a capital in build. Now you have to throw down a really expensive one and everyone can see what you're building there. I only see positives here. Less supercaps and more conflict drivers. There's really very little reason to attack an armed Keepstar. There will be ample reason to attack an armed Sotiyo.
This after POS removal can lead to monopolization of supercapital producion... in theory.
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Arden Elenduil
Unlimited Ripoff Works
428
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:02:27 -
[27] - Quote
In the devblog, there was an avatar visible under construction from thhe outside. Will this be the case for all ships under construction? And will there be visible indicators from the outside if certain types of job are running? |
Zappity
Horde Vanguard. Pandemic Horde
3036
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:02:45 -
[28] - Quote
Looks pretty good. Will the larger Shipyards be able to produce smaller ships? So can you use the Capital Shipyard to also produce subcaps and the Supercap Shipyard for caps?
It would be good to know whether the Shipyards will also require PI materials or if they are limited to minerals.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.
|
Henry Plantgenet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:03:14 -
[29] - Quote
Will you be able to fit doomsdays onto the sotiyo for defense? or will this only be able to be fitted on keepstars? |
Zakarumit CZ
Zakarum Industries Exiliar Syndicate
194
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:03:51 -
[30] - Quote
Considering Standup capital shipyard I is allowed only in low/0.0/WH, does it mean it wont be possible anymore to build for example Freighters and JF's in high sec? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |