EVE Search - New Tech 2 BattleCrusiers

All Channels

Ships and Modules

New Tech 2 BattleCrusiers

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Toddigus Jones	Posted - 2007.04.19 20:18:00 - [1] Anyone have a clue , maybe a tech 2 drake, or myrmidon when we might see one.
Fierce Fury Caliber Corp	Posted - 2007.04.19 20:36:00 - [2] It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution
Vaine Amarr Amarr Upright Citizens Brigade	Posted - 2007.04.19 20:38:00 - [3] Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution drools __________________________ It's great beeing Amarr, ain't it?
korrey Taurus Inc	Posted - 2007.04.19 20:42:00 - [4] Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution The issue with that is, people will complain. Example- Theres no way I'm letting CCP ruin my Absolution hull with that of the Harbinger...I hate the harbinger, and if they did, then they better give me my 140mil back. Unless they can find a new role for the BC's (which I doubt they can) then I don't want them touching the ships I spent time to train for. And if they do change one of the hulls, it better be the Fleet Command ships. They are pretty much useless anyways except the Claymore and the Eos. ----------- 24.01.06 Small patch that addresses some minor balancing issues 1) All minmatar pilots have been deleted
xHalcyonx Amarr EmpiresMod	Posted - 2007.04.19 20:42:00 - [5] Originally by: Vaine Amarr Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution drools Negative. I like the Nighthawk just how it is.
Marquis Dean Indigo Fade	Posted - 2007.04.19 20:46:00 - [6] What the... have CCP ever given any indication that the new BCs are getting T2 variants? --- Indigo Fade is now selling jumpclones for superb prices, please see Marquis Dean's bio and/or evemail/convo him ingame.
Marduk Felzhen	Posted - 2007.04.19 20:47:00 - [7] Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution The problem with your arguement is that i dont see how its 'logical' at all. I dont think ccp has ever replaced hulls before and i dont think they ever will. If they were to use the tech 2 bc's templates, it would be for another ship class entirely.
Riho Gallente Magnificent Beavers Exquisite Malevolence	Posted - 2007.04.19 20:52:00 - [8] Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: 1. Myrm -> Eos 2 .Hurricane -> Sleipnir 3. Drake -> Nighthawk 4. HArbinger -> Absolution in my oppinion 1. heck no.... myrm looks ugly 2. ok 3. ok 4. no... damnation yes.... black harb ftw :D --------------------------------------- Sig killed by MODs.... reworking it Great being Gallente... aint it ? ----------------- YARRRR, sig hijack! -HornFrog -----------------
Durethia Momentum. Dusk and Dawn	Posted - 2007.04.19 21:11:00 - [9] The Brutix hull is just awesome, especially if it is brown and named Astarte. The Myrmidon... I think Gallente got hit with the ugly stick with the new ships, it really is a strange looking ship and only "looks good" because of high-res textures. I think the T2 BCs are fine how they are, across the board. Though, I think if CCP creates T2 variants of the tier 2 BCs, they will fall in line with the difference between HAC and RECON ships (both bing T2 cruisers), or AFs versus Covert Ops (both being T2 frigates). A T2 Myrmidon, might be optimized, in a fleet role, for further increasing the effectiveness of all warp scrambler strength/range et al. Even for the RECONs. But in a way, where solo, is just not feasible.... gang bonuses only. Or, maybe T2 variants of Tier 2 BCs can serve field logistics operations. The current logistic ships kinda suck and are too frail to use on the battlefield. Give that role with the offerings of a BC, and we might see people actually flying around with Logistics support in their gangs.
Dark Kavar Caldari Aionios Diadochi	Posted - 2007.04.19 23:15:00 - [10] My dream tech II drake would have the following bonuses (boni?) for each level of battlecruiser: 5% bonus per level to shield resistances 10% bonus per level to missile velocity (long range hams drools) for each level of command ship: 5% bonus to ROF of missile launchers per level 5% bonus to missile damage per level oh and of course 8 launcher points, and enough pg for a rack of ham launchers and a full passive tank of course Kind of like the Triforce in Zelda, only not quite as potent.
Xoduse Gallente Beasts of Burden YouWhat	Posted - 2007.04.20 00:05:00 - [11] Originally by: Dark Kavar My dream tech II drake would have the following bonuses (boni?) for each level of battlecruiser: 5% bonus per level to shield resistances 10% bonus per level to missile velocity (long range hams drools) for each level of command ship: 5% bonus to ROF of missile launchers per level 5% bonus to missile damage per level oh and of course 8 launcher points, and enough pg for a rack of ham launchers and a full passive tank of course If I ever somehow came across a ship like that in space, I would be extremely angry... ---------------------
korrey Taurus Inc	Posted - 2007.04.20 00:12:00 - [12] Originally by: Xoduse Originally by: Dark Kavar My dream tech II drake would have the following bonuses (boni?) for each level of battlecruiser: 5% bonus per level to shield resistances 10% bonus per level to missile velocity (long range hams drools) for each level of command ship: 5% bonus to ROF of missile launchers per level 5% bonus to missile damage per level oh and of course 8 launcher points, and enough pg for a rack of ham launchers and a full passive tank of course If I ever somehow came across a ship like that in space, I would be extremely angry... And extremely dead ----------- 24.01.06 Small patch that addresses some minor balancing issues 1) All minmatar pilots have been deleted
Morgaine Legray	Posted - 2007.04.20 01:04:00 - [13] that sounds a lot like your t2 gallante ships, dual damage bonuses and a range bonus sound overpowerd? cause it is lol
Phrixus Zephyr D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.04.20 01:20:00 - [14] Originally by: Dark Kavar My dream tech II drake would have the following bonuses (boni?) for each level of battlecruiser: 5% bonus per level to shield resistances 10% bonus per level to missile velocity (long range hams drools) for each level of command ship: 5% bonus to ROF of missile launchers per level 5% bonus to missile damage per level oh and of course 8 launcher points, and enough pg for a rack of ham launchers and a full passive tank of course ...you left out the ability to fit a doomsday device Originally by: Benglada And whos going to tackle for them? Jesus?
Ishmael Hansen No Quarter.	Posted - 2007.04.20 01:21:00 - [15] Originally by: korrey Originally by: Xoduse Originally by: Dark Kavar My dream tech II drake would have the following bonuses (boni?) for each level of battlecruiser: 5% bonus per level to shield resistances 10% bonus per level to missile velocity (long range hams drools) for each level of command ship: 5% bonus to ROF of missile launchers per level 5% bonus to missile damage per level oh and of course 8 launcher points, and enough pg for a rack of ham launchers and a full passive tank of course If I ever somehow came across a ship like that in space, I would be extremely angry... And extremely dead PAssive tank and room for tackling? There is a reason Caldari ships don't pvp solo, except the crow.
Dark Kavar Caldari Aionios Diadochi	Posted - 2007.04.20 02:44:00 - [16] Originally by: Ishmael Hansen Originally by: korrey Originally by: Xoduse Originally by: Dark Kavar My dream tech II drake would have the following bonuses (boni?) for each level of battlecruiser: 5% bonus per level to shield resistances 10% bonus per level to missile velocity (long range hams drools) for each level of command ship: 5% bonus to ROF of missile launchers per level 5% bonus to missile damage per level oh and of course 8 launcher points, and enough pg for a rack of ham launchers and a full passive tank of course If I ever somehow came across a ship like that in space, I would be extremely angry... And extremely dead PAssive tank and room for tackling? There is a reason Caldari ships don't pvp solo, except the crow. It's possible to passive tank and tackle, just harder and more expensive and you have to hope they aren't too much faster than you Kind of like the Triforce in Zelda, only not quite as potent.
Jackal79	Posted - 2007.04.20 05:33:00 - [17] Originally by: Morgaine Legray that sounds a lot like your t2 gallante ships, dual damage bonuses and a range bonus sound overpowerd? cause it is lol ++
Father Weebles North Face Force Anarchy Empire	Posted - 2007.04.20 05:54:00 - [18] seeing that the myrmidon's tank is already overpowered in comparison to the rest of the bcs, id hate to see a t2 version of it, and the drake as well. "Welcome to EVE, where inflation is out of control."
Akira Cortana	Posted - 2007.04.20 06:56:00 - [19] Originally by: xHalcyonx Originally by: Vaine Amarr Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution drools Negative. I like the Nighthawk just how it is. Your right, i love the nighthawk having less shield/armor/hull/PG than a drake, with 1 less launcher(with rof bonus nighthawk squeeks past with a little more dps). seriously nighthawk is the pwn :S Akira Cortana
Nian Banks Minmatar Berserkers of Aesir	Posted - 2007.04.20 08:08:00 - [20] Enough with the "Swap Field Command Ship Hulls with Tier2 Battlecruiser's" crap, We want more t2 ships not the same amount but with some removed and some added. Lets just have new T2 BC's, How about if they all gain an Ewar and Velocity bonus? Could be fun. Other than that, give them a slightly increased base resist and a little more cpu/grid.
Aioa Planetary Assault Systems	Posted - 2007.04.20 10:12:00 - [21] Originally by: Fierce Fury Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution Doesnt make much sense - Eos is a fleet command, all the others are field commands...
Fon Revedhort Aeria Gloris Inc United Legion	Posted - 2007.04.20 10:57:00 - [22] Edited by: Fon Revedhort on 20/04/2007 10:56:23 Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution Please, go check slot amounts on tier 2 and tech 2 BCs. Why the hell this stupid transplantation idea has been risen again?
Tassill Minmatar GREY COUNCIL	Posted - 2007.04.20 11:45:00 - [23] Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution This isnt a good idea if u ask me. The reason being that the bonus's and slot layouts of the tier 2 bc's dont fit the slot layouts of the command ships they would become. eg the hurrcane has 6 lows and the Sleipnir only has 5 who heard of a t2 ship loosing slots???
Sniser 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2007.04.20 12:22:00 - [24] i would love a tier3 command with tier2bc hull. One harbinger with: - 10% cap energy weapons reduction per level - 5% damage energy weapons per level - 10% optimal energy weapons per level - 5% rof energy weapons per level and 8 turrets would be my dream :D
Horus Dark	Posted - 2007.04.20 12:32:00 - [25] WTB faction BC's aswell we got frigs/cruis and BS. where are the bcs? :)
Galen Silas Gallente Lucky Hydra Corp SMASH Alliance	Posted - 2007.04.20 14:07:00 - [26] Eos = Myrmidon Hull Nighthawk = Drake Hull Absolution = Harbinger Hull Sleipnir = Hurricane Seems right, I have been thinking the same thing for a long time, would certainly vary things up a bit as far as looks go Keep the same bonus's though, though I don't think they would change em anyways. NIIIIIIIIIIIICE!!
Rhaegor Stormborn Sturmgrenadier Inc R i s e	Posted - 2007.04.20 14:10:00 - [27] Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution Oh Hurricane please!
Haniblecter Teg F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control	Posted - 2007.04.20 14:39:00 - [28] Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution I agree whole heartedly! ---------------------------------------- Friends Forever
Nian Banks Minmatar Berserkers of Aesir	Posted - 2007.04.20 21:57:00 - [29] Originally by: Haniblecter Teg Originally by: Fierce Fury It would be logical for the current coomand ships' hull to be changed into tier 2 battlecruiser hulls respectively: Myrm -> Eos Hurricane -> Sleipnir Drake -> Nighthawk HArbinger -> Absolution I agree whole heartedly! You unholy sods leave my our bloody Sleipnir alone, Many people like the shield tanking tank + gank bonuses of the Sleipnir and wouldn't want some mongrels stuffing it up. If you must have a t2 hurricane then get ccp to make a new T2 BC class. Also as someone said before, Where the hell are our faction BC's?
lofty29 Athanasius Inc. SMASH Alliance	Posted - 2007.04.20 22:16:00 - [30] Originally by: Xoduse Originally by: Dark Kavar My dream tech II drake would have the following bonuses (boni?) for each level of battlecruiser: 5% bonus per level to shield resistances 10% bonus per level to missile velocity (long range hams drools) for each level of command ship: 5% bonus to ROF of missile launchers per level 5% bonus to missile damage per level oh and of course 8 launcher points, and enough pg for a rack of ham launchers and a full passive tank of course If I ever somehow came across a ship like that in space, I would be extremely angry... If you get that, can I get a myrmidon with - 7.5% bonus to armor repair amount per level 20% (or is it 10? dunno) Bonus to Drone damage + HP per level 100m3 more dronebay per level (double bonus) Raep! --- Sig under maintainance

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.