Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6420
|
Posted - 2017.02.03 23:18:16 -
[1] - Quote
With the summit over (The minutes are in progress, and will hopefully be with you within a fortnight or so) the election season is now in full swing.
That's why I'm here to ask you to consider voting for me. With three terms under my belt, I have a good handle on the duties and responsibilities involved. As such, I'm not going to tell you "I'm going to make CCP make this change", because that's not what the CSM does. Anyone who does promise you a change, is either lying to you, or completely misunderstands the CSM.
What I am going to do is tell you the areas in the game I'm suited to giving advice to CCP. The interest groups that I understand and will represent.
- Third party Development
- Industry
- Highsec in general.
- Mining (and other resource gathering such as PI, gas reactions and so on)
I'm seriously plugged into the third party community, providing resources and tools to other developers and the wider eve community ( https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk is my main site)
Highsec industry is how I make my living in Eve, both invention, and general production.
I'm a great believer that there should be a mix of group and individual content. Some of it should be the same content, with more options opening up with more people.
Mining needs some work, mostly in game play around mining, rather than the core mechanic. (Though I'd like more options there too.
PI needs UI changes. I've proposed a few, though that's mostly to draw attention to problems, than to actually have them implemented.
Solo play is entirely valid. While that doesn't mean that all content has to work for it, it should always be considered. (By solo, I mean a player who, while engaging with the rest of Eve, does it on their own terms, without being beholden to larger organisations. See me for an example.)
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6420
|
Posted - 2017.02.03 23:18:44 -
[2] - Quote
Reserved
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Forlorn Wongraven
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
170
|
Posted - 2017.02.03 23:21:20 -
[3] - Quote
Thanks for your hard work in previous CSMs. After three terms I think you should consider not running.
Winner ATXI , 3rd place ATXII, winner ATXIII, 2nd ATXIV - follow me on twitter: @ForlornW
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6420
|
Posted - 2017.02.03 23:38:38 -
[4] - Quote
Forlorn Wongraven wrote:Thanks for your hard work in previous CSMs. After three terms I think you should consider not running.
I did consider it. However, I'm not close to burn out, and I feel I still have good feedback to pass to CCP.
The institutional knowledge that builds up is valuable (Not just from myself, but other members running again), letting newcomers skip some of the start up phase.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Bam Stroker
Van Diemen's Demise Northern Coalition.
485
|
Posted - 2017.02.04 02:22:02 -
[5] - Quote
A vote for Steve is a no-brainer. He's the only guy on the ticket that does what he does and a CSM without Steve Ronuken will be lacking a huge amount of experience and expertise.
Hard work, no drama and a focus on areas that nobody else can bring. Vote Steve!
EVE Down Under - a community for players in the AUTZ
In-game channel: evedownunder // Twitter: @evedownunder
https://www.facebook.com/evedownunder
|
Shawn Clark
Clark Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.04 13:20:48 -
[6] - Quote
TBH, you are a no brainier for us high sec nerds who love industry and spread sheets.
+1 |
Erebus 'TheChin' Sundance
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2017.02.04 17:00:57 -
[7] - Quote
Sterling work again this year Steve, look forward to reading the minutes.
As the only representative that is (a) not in a large alliance that rigs the voting blocks in their favor with the sole intention of benefiting said alliance, and (b) the only chap who solidly represents solo play styles and industry, you can count on my vote again this year.
I wish you all the best with CSM XII
o7 |
NoobMan
Hard Knocks Inc. Hard Knocks Citizens
307
|
Posted - 2017.02.04 18:21:56 -
[8] - Quote
Steve is a great man. He has been an amazing help to the current CSM as a knowledgeable and trustworthy incumbent. I hope to see you on next term!
Operations Director of Hard K(n)ocks Inc.
|
Petit Julot
Hedion University Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 08:56:55 -
[9] - Quote
Well, since you're apparently willing to do CCP's work for free, you'll have my vote. Not because you're doing it for free, but because you're doing it right. But I still believe you've got scammed into this. |
Prometheus Hinken
Tr0pa de elite. Northern Coalition.
13
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 10:53:09 -
[10] - Quote
CCP should hire Steve already, but until that happens, he gets a solid +1 from me. |
|
Mr Hyde113
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
309
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 13:37:27 -
[11] - Quote
With most people you would be right to get a little weary of someone who has been on the CSM as long as Steve has - but he really is the exception to the incumbency rule. From the moment CSM 11 stepped in, he was the font of institutional knowledge that we all relied upon to ease the transition period, and kept up that positive helpful attitude all the way through. His areas of expertise are those which very few candidates can offer insight on, making him a great representative for third party developers and market nerds alike. High Sec and Industry nerds need not look any further for their go-to candidate for CSM 12 and I hope you all will cast your support behind the man - the myth - the beard - fuzzy Steve Ronuken.
Mr Hyde - CSM XI Permanent Attendee
Youtube Channel
Twitter
|
Mishra San
1063
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 16:44:03 -
[12] - Quote
Has my vote (again).
Steve Ronuken for CSM XII !
sending virtual hug, virtual hug sent !
|
The Judge
Balkan Mafia Circle-Of-Two
51
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 22:03:47 -
[13] - Quote
Steve is an amazing man, and it's not just because he has the beard of a god. I pity anyone running on a market/industry/highsec platform, because you will never find a better candidate than Steve. I can't imagine a CSM without Steve Ronuken! He will be on my ballot!
CSM XI Permanent Attendee
Diplomat for Circle-Of-Two
@_TheJudge on Twitter | TheJudge on Tweetfleet Slack
[email protected]
|
Penance Toralen
Compass Fox
28
|
Posted - 2017.02.06 22:10:32 -
[14] - Quote
Hello Steve, thanks for running again. Me, my alt and I will be voting for you.
If I can pose a few questions;
1) Mining Crystals is one of the most complex munitions in Eve with a specialization down to individual ores. Yet the refining rigs from Upwell are simplified into primary groups. What is your view here?
2) Outer Ring Excavations is restricted to Null Sec, whilst Sisters of Eve and Thukker are available within high-sec without restriction. Why do you think this is so?
3) The values of Faction Standings have been eroded with loss of Anchorage and Jump Clone.What do you think can be added to restore the prestige of having earnt Standings? |
Pestoya
Core Industry. Blades of Grass
2
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 10:38:16 -
[15] - Quote
Keep the good work, you got my voice,
I'm third party developper, i love your database conversion. If you can talk a few to improve API for POS management (or citadell management in future, if they replace moon mining pos) |
Narook
Lucifer's Hammer A Band Apart.
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 14:56:53 -
[16] - Quote
You have my accounts votes yet again (for whatever that's worth). I have some bones to pick however regarding group industry, engineering complexes and very much agree with you around mining changes. Where did you suggestion box go? Is it easier to pester you on the tweetfleet slack? |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6451
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 17:33:26 -
[17] - Quote
Penance Toralen wrote:Hello Steve, thanks for running again. Me, my alt and I will be voting for you.
If I can pose a few questions;
1) Mining Crystals is one of the most complex munitions in Eve with a specialization down to individual ores. Yet the refining rigs from Upwell are simplified into primary groups. What is your view here?
2) Outer Ring Excavations is restricted to Null Sec, whilst Sisters of Eve and Thukker are available within high-sec without restriction. Why do you think this is so?
3) The values of Faction Standings have been eroded with loss of Anchorage and Jump Clone.What do you think can be added to restore the prestige of having earnt Standings?
Sorry for that short delay in getting back to you:
1) While mining crystals are a complex munition, they also have the simplest targets. You _know_ which crystal you should use on which asteroid. It's explicit in the names. Which balances out nicely. It also gives a good reason for group play, with the more limited cargo bays of the miners being supplemented by the boosters larger general bay. Mining crystals can also be swapped at will.
The refining rigs, on the other hand, are far more limited. Once installed, they can only be changed by destroying them. If they were split more, then you'd need to have a greater number of refineries. Which isn't viable.
2) You could expand the same question to Mordus Legion. I _suspect_ the real reason is to add 'terrain' to nullsec, so there are reasons to control certain systems.
3) I'm really not a fan of standings in their current form. Gating content behind a grind isn't fun. And jump clones hadn't been a standing benefit for years. You either just joined a jump clone corp for a day, or you had someone grind out standing in a corp, and then share it with everyone else in corp (and Bob protect anyone who accidentally got standing with the donor corp)
However!: With the introduction of the Mining NPCs, we're beginning to see where high standings have a use. Where they should. Moderating NPC behavior. Sure, it's a limited number of corporations at the moment, but long term, I'd expect to see more.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6451
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 17:35:04 -
[18] - Quote
Narook wrote:You have my accounts votes yet again (for whatever that's worth). I have some bones to pick however regarding group industry, engineering complexes and very much agree with you around mining changes. Where did you suggestion box go? Is it easier to pester you on the tweetfleet slack?
tweetfleet slack's a good place to grab me. I might not respond immediately (for some reason, my Boss actually expects me to work during office hours. odd, right?) but I do try to get back to everyone.
Depending on the format, evemail or email may work better. Or if we're massively off timezone.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Christy Cloud
The Mongo Tree PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
97
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 17:38:49 -
[19] - Quote
Steve is good people.
Outside of the political posturing, the meme runs, and the general undesirables - stands Steve.
He's been a pillar of the 3rd party community for years, and hopefully will continue to be so for many more cycles
(Though if he can stop running for CSM so I can justify running myself.... ;) )
The CSM landscape changes yearly, but Steve is always guaranteed the number 1 spot on my ballot.
Keep up the good work, and keep making me resent you for the fact you keep running
:)
My Third Party Thread(Gò»°Gûí°n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+
Current Trades -
Selling 2 Travelfit Erebus 1 rigged 1 unrigged 85bil Ea
Selling 1 Rigged travelfit Avatar 86b
|
Tiberius StarGazer
Destructive Influence Northern Coalition.
483
|
Posted - 2017.02.07 19:15:56 -
[20] - Quote
+1 Pleased to see this incumbent CSM member running again, his ongoing commitment to 3rd party services and to the wider player development community as well as his long relationship with CCP will be a valuable asset to this year's CSM.
All our interactions they have been informative and level headed and has always shown a level of dedication and stamina which has rarely been matched by other CSM's. |
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
18344
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 18:21:50 -
[21] - Quote
Steve should be a shoo-in but there are no certainties until after the votes are counted. Put him on your top 3 or do like I will and #1him on all your accounts.
"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."
Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6454
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 18:32:36 -
[22] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Steve should be a shoo-in but there are no certainties until after the votes are counted. Put him on your top 3 or do like I will and #1him on all your accounts.
<3
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Sophos Mileghere
Birdsquad Project.Mayhem.
28
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 19:03:06 -
[23] - Quote
Gets my vote, guy with strong vision and even better track history of delivery
+1 |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
18346
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 19:47:01 -
[24] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Malcanis wrote:Steve should be a shoo-in but there are no certainties until after the votes are counted. Put him on your top 3 or do like I will and #1him on all your accounts. <3
Ima type out a better spag bol recipe for you.
"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."
Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
|
Utari Onzo
13. Enigma Project
1547
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 19:58:49 -
[25] - Quote
What would you say went right this year, and what went wrong?
Similar to TheJudge, how do you intend to improve representation and communication better if you're re-elected? Do you feel it doesn't need improvement?
"Face the enemy as a solid wall
For faith is your armor
And through it, the enemy will find no breach
Wrap your arms around the enemy
For faith is your fire
And with it, burn away his evil"
|
Jeronica
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
438
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 20:01:49 -
[26] - Quote
Steve will always get my vote! +1 for Steve!
EVE-Mogul: https://www.eve-mogul.com
CEO/Programmer
Trade Profit Tracking Service
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6455
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 21:15:37 -
[27] - Quote
Utari Onzo wrote:What would you say went right this year, and what went wrong?
Similar to TheJudge, how do you intend to improve representation and communication better if you're re-elected? Do you feel it doesn't need improvement?
Representation is a hard thing to improve. I mean, I try to represent the people who contact me, and I try to keep up to date with the issues people talk about, in places I see it (the forums, reddit, slack, twitter and so on) but if you're meaning people who don't contact me, that's not something I can really do?
Communication, other than through the aforementioned places, well, again, it's hard to improve? I could write more blog posts, but other than that, there's not a lot I can do? I like to think I'm easily approachable, and I do take things to CCP as I see them.
In general, this year has been a lot better than 10 was. Part of that has been having two coordinators, rather than just one, and CCP moving more communications to hipchat has helped a lot. 10 got hit by the migration phase, and communication suffered because of that.
As for things which went wrong, there was very little with the process itself. There's some changes I'd have liked to have seen earlier in the process, so more shaping input could have been given, but we're talking perfect world there.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Kosomot
Poseidon Energy and Industrial
54
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 21:39:47 -
[28] - Quote
I don't know Steve, not sure i want to..however that said.
fuzzworks saves me years of indy work life, and helps pass endless hours at work.
and those market charts are amazing.
You sir have my vote.
that is all
carry on.
I am a miner, mission runner, and explorer...
or as EVE Online would have it...
A Carebear!!
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
18347
|
Posted - 2017.02.08 21:45:04 -
[29] - Quote
Kosomot wrote:I don't know Steve, not sure i want to..however that said.
fuzzworks saves me years of indy work life, and helps pass endless hours at work.
and those market charts are amazing.
You sir have my vote.
that is all
carry on.
Can confirm he is super nice IRL too.
"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."
Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
|
Mike Azariah
The Scope Gallente Federation
3685
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 04:48:28 -
[30] - Quote
Yup. Steve is always worth a vote
m
Mike Azariah Gö¼GöÇGöÇGö¼n++ ¯|(pâä)/¯
|
|
Kenrailae
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
724
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 09:47:52 -
[31] - Quote
You have my Megathron...... Rrr.... I mean vote!
The Law is a point of View
The NPE IS a big deal
|
Moac Tor
Cyber Core Stain Confederation
767
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 01:51:26 -
[32] - Quote
One of the best members of the previous CSM in terms of productivity and contribution, so will definitely be top pick for me. Glad you are standing again this year.
Modulated ECM Effects
An Alternative to Skill Trading
|
Kaoraku Shayiskhun
The 1st Regiment Brotherhood of Spacers
7
|
Posted - 2017.02.11 10:45:58 -
[33] - Quote
No question, you have my vote in this year too, sir |
GinBar
BALKAN EXPRESS Shadow Cartel
11
|
Posted - 2017.02.11 16:53:23 -
[34] - Quote
Hey there dude. No questions but support of 7 accounts :) |
Thomas Lot
Astrocomical Warped Intentions
93
|
Posted - 2017.02.15 21:27:33 -
[35] - Quote
No doubt... Fuzzy Steve holds place 1 on my ballot. |
YeuxVerts Belle
Catastrophic Operations The Bastion
52
|
Posted - 2017.02.20 08:54:57 -
[36] - Quote
Just like last year, Steve has my vote. He runs on a platform few others do, and he does it with skill. No offense to other candidates, but there are too many bloc candidates, and they represent only a small part of Eve, nullsec.
The above message presents my opinions on the topic at hand. If there is a conflict between my views and reality, consider reality to be correct until proven otherwise.
|
Athra Sabik
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.22 00:44:13 -
[37] - Quote
To keep voting for steve or not (now that is the real question)
So Steve are you going to stand up for keeping the economic numbers (marketdata) as it is ? Or are you going to let some "Goon" with a overactive paranoia whine loud enough so ccp to takes it away or reduces the accuracy of it ? |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6493
|
Posted - 2017.02.22 13:28:27 -
[38] - Quote
Athra Sabik wrote:To keep voting for steve or not (now that is the real question)
So Steve are you going to stand up for keeping the economic numbers (marketdata) as it is ? Or are you going to let some "Goon" with a overactive paranoia whine loud enough so ccp to takes it away or reduces the accuracy of it ?
I have passed the arguments I've seen, for keeping the data at the current accuracy, on to CCP. In the end, it's their decision. I can try and influence it (and now have), but I can't force them.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
105
|
Posted - 2017.02.28 18:59:04 -
[39] - Quote
The reason this trash should never be anywhere near CFCSM of CCPL.
Get lost, *******. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6503
|
Posted - 2017.02.28 19:05:27 -
[40] - Quote
Just to save people a read, Orca Platypus is somewhat sore that bubbles have gained killmails and an expiry timer.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
|
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
105
|
Posted - 2017.02.28 19:51:08 -
[41] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Just to save people a read, Orca Platypus is somewhat sore that bubbles have gained killmails and an expiry timer.
Just to save people a vote, the murder of a change passed with this shitcandidate's full blessing. I think you have been ruining eve long enough, Steve, time for you to quit. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6503
|
Posted - 2017.02.28 20:11:14 -
[42] - Quote
I believe the appropriate comeback is 'u mad bro?' or possibly 'its only game, why you have to be mad?'
Bubbling a constellationisn't something which should be quick and easy.
Especially not to the point that people are blinded when they enter a system. Which happens.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
59671
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 11:37:55 -
[43] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Penance Toralen wrote: 3) The values of Faction Standings have been eroded with loss of Anchorage and Jump Clone. What do you think can be added to restore the prestige of having earnt Standings?
Sorry for that short delay in getting back to you: 3) I'm really not a fan of standings in their current form. Gating content behind a grind isn't fun. And jump clones hadn't been a standing benefit for years. You either just joined a jump clone corp for a day, or you had someone grind out standing in a corp, and then share it with everyone else in corp (and Bob protect anyone who accidentally got standing with the donor corp) However!: With the introduction of the Mining NPCs, we're beginning to see where high standings have a use. Where they should. Moderating NPC behavior. Sure, it's a limited number of corporations at the moment, but long term, I'd expect to see more. Well, I guess that answers half of the question that I've been posting to all CSM candidates :
My question - what is your viewpoint regarding Faction standings and as a CSM member, what changes will you propose to CCP pertaining to game mechanics for Faction standings ?
Good luck to you in the upcoming CSM election.
DMC
'The Plan' | California Eve Players | Proposal - The Endless Battle
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6517
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 12:51:39 -
[44] - Quote
Something I've already proposed is tags for faction standing, much like tags for sec. won't take it above 0, but provides an easy, if expensive, way to repair your standing, if you did what's pretty common for beginners, and took the faction missions which tanked your standing.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
59671
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 13:26:09 -
[45] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Something I've already proposed is tags for faction standing, much like tags for sec. won't take it above 0, but provides an easy, if expensive, way to repair your standing, if you did what's pretty common for beginners, and took the faction missions which tanked your standing. Thanks for the reply Steve,
This game was founded with the premise of having a balance on 'Risk vs Reward' and 'Actions vs Consequences'. It takes time for players to ruin their Faction standings and as such it should also take time for players to repair those standings. I know it's tough on new players who haven't learned the game yet. Anti-Empire missions should have a warning to alert players that accepting and completing those mission will affect their Faction standings in a negative aspect.
I agree there should be more options available for characters to repair negative Faction standings but I don't like the idea of having Tags for Standings. Just like Tags for Security, I think those are nothing more than a 'Get Out Of Jail Free Card' for actions that should merit some consequences. In the past Characters use to be accountable for their actions in-game, now most everything has been dumbed down and turned into easy mode for the instant gratification crowd.
Anyway, thanks again for the reply and good luck in the upcoming election.
DMC
'The Plan' | California Eve Players | Proposal - The Endless Battle
|
Flying Squidwolf
Indigo Bank
36
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 23:40:48 -
[46] - Quote
Until the glorious day that CCP puts you on payroll, you'll have my vote. Your tools are amazing, your proposals are excellent; and you should be a sure fixture on this CSM and future CSMs.
*tips hat* |
mkint
1520
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 00:28:23 -
[47] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Something I've already proposed is tags for faction standing, much like tags for sec. won't take it above 0, but provides an easy, if expensive, way to repair your standing, if you did what's pretty common for beginners, and took the faction missions which tanked your standing. This bothers me a little bit. Not the idea itself, but that you proposed it, as it has already been in the game for at least a decade. I'm starting to become concerned about the knowledge limits of the "carebear candidate."
Maxim 6. If violence wasnGÇÖt your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
|
Penance Toralen
Compass Fox
36
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 01:48:43 -
[48] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Just to save people a read, Orca Platypus is somewhat sore that bubbles have gained killmails and an expiry timer.
Given the complaint about excess in Trit and Pyre in another thread, you could kill two birds with one post and suggest that these be used as fuels for the bubbles. An Anchor that sinks in neat package.
Miner's Curry:
One cup of rice in the Cooker.
Cook small onion, diced, into the pan until it starts to brown. Add 2 cans of tuna (I use 185g cans x 2) having strained out the brine. Mash is down a little bit to mix in the onion and cook for a while.
One cup of full cream milk, add a heaped tablespoon of Curry Powder, one level tablespoon cornflower, one stock-cube (random flavor) added crushed. Bar-mix or stick-blender that concoction. Then pour over the cooked tuna, and stir in. Heat on low until curry sauce is fully absorbed by the fish. Serves two.
Whenever someone tries "content" to miners, give them some curry. |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3876
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 07:29:14 -
[49] - Quote
mkint wrote: This bothers me a little bit. Not the idea itself, but that you proposed it, as it has already been in the game for at least a decade. I'm starting to become concerned about the knowledge limits of the "carebear candidate."
Unless I've gone totally senile (always possible) the tags in game currently are single shot only agents related to the old Cosmos mission system, not reusable agents.
That said I don't like the instant nature of tags currently and would love it if they ran like a skill queue, where you 'fuel' it by handing in the right tags, and then over time (a week or two) it raises your standings to zero or when you run out of tags. That way it's not an instant 'free to go and gank again', but if you are actually trying to change your play-style it does let you transition to a new style.
Anyway, sorry Steve, getting a little off track here though it's something I'd love you to put forward to CCP as a possible mechanic, very much enjoyed your work and communication over the last few years. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6523
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 12:42:05 -
[50] - Quote
mkint wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Something I've already proposed is tags for faction standing, much like tags for sec. won't take it above 0, but provides an easy, if expensive, way to repair your standing, if you did what's pretty common for beginners, and took the faction missions which tanked your standing. This bothers me a little bit. Not the idea itself, but that you proposed it, as it has already been in the game for at least a decade. I'm starting to become concerned about the knowledge limits of the "carebear candidate."
You're talking about the Data Centers.
They're single shot, and have issues raising standing to 0, by themselves.
This is why the commonly referenced 'faction standing repair plan' doesn't just tell people to do them. While you can do the low level ones by themselves, the higher level ones require standing to run. If you don't have it, go enjoy your grind to get it.
Aside from that, they're in the highsec space of the people who you need to repair it with. Which can make the first few somewhat more difficult to deal with, as you're having to run from faction police while doing so.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
|
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
59700
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 13:11:56 -
[51] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:mkint wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Something I've already proposed is tags for faction standing, much like tags for sec. won't take it above 0, but provides an easy, if expensive, way to repair your standing, if you did what's pretty common for beginners, and took the faction missions which tanked your standing. This bothers me a little bit. Not the idea itself, but that you proposed it, as it has already been in the game for at least a decade. I'm starting to become concerned about the knowledge limits of the "carebear candidate." You're talking about the Data Centers. They're single shot, and have issues raising standing to 0, by themselves. This is why the commonly referenced 'faction standing repair plan' doesn't just tell people to do them. While you can do the low level ones by themselves, the higher level ones require standing to run. If you don't have it, go enjoy your grind to get it. Aside from that, they're in the highsec space of the people who you need to repair it with. Which can make the first few somewhat more difficult to deal with, as you're having to run from faction police while doing so. Hi Steve,
I agree. Repairing negative Faction standings is definitely a large task to complete. Most players in-game don't read the forums so they don't even know about that guide. Also as I said before, new players can easily mess up their Faction standings right at the start without even knowing it.
These are some options I think would help players in-game.
Faction standing repair should be implemented in-game and be very intuitive, not obscure (tutorial perhaps). Changes to Faction standings be brought to players attention with on screen pop up message (option to deactivate). Any action that would cause negative Faction standing will trigger on screen pop up warning (option to deactivate). All Anti-Empire missions should have a warning alerting players that those missions will incur negative Faction standings. Your idea to have Tags for Standings is acceptable if similar to Tags for Security. CCP could add another group of NPC Agents to the in-game Agent Finder strictly for Faction standing repair. (sorta like the proposal listed in my forum signature)
Just wanted to pass that along to you. Once again good luck with the up-coming election.
DMC
'The Plan' | California Eve Players | Proposal - The Endless Battle
|
Andrei Rianovski
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2017.03.04 06:41:29 -
[52] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Just to save people a read, Orca Platypus is somewhat sore that bubbles have gained killmails and an expiry timer. Just to save people a vote, the murder of a change passed with this shitcandidate's full blessing. I think you have been ruining eve long enough, Steve, time for you to quit.
It's actually comical, how you have such a strong and hateful opinion about something that doesn't really matter a lot; or about having to spend a little more ISK and time to keep your trap locations bubbled.
It IS, actually, comical! |
Andrard Andrard
60 Squadron Black Armada
0
|
Posted - 2017.03.05 14:27:43 -
[53] - Quote
Getting my vote itGÇÖs important the counsel has fair and measured representation and I think you bring this on the behalf of high sec, industry and solo play.
Keep up the good work.
|
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
5899
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 14:36:55 -
[54] - Quote
Hey Steve, keep up the great work! You got my #1 vote(s) again this year.
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|
Mbube
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 05:39:46 -
[55] - Quote
Hi Steve.
What is your opinion on ganking?
Which one of those three statements is close to your position? : 1. Danger level in highsec is just right. 2. Life is too easy for gankers. We need more security in highsec. 3. Highsec dwellers are too lazy and complacent. We need to make highsec more dangerous.
P.S. Love your indy tools :)
Thanks. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6541
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 12:58:43 -
[56] - Quote
Mbube wrote:Hi Steve.
What is your opinion on ganking?
Which one of those three statements is close to your position? : 1. Danger level in highsec is just right. 2. Life is too easy for gankers. We need more security in highsec. 3. Highsec dwellers are too lazy and complacent. We need to make highsec more dangerous.
P.S. Love your indy tools :)
Thanks.
Pretty much 1. I _would_ like to see bumping being adjusted, mostly because being bumped for 30 minutes just doesn't feel right, but other than that, fine.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Cochise Chiricahua
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 20:32:13 -
[57] - Quote
07 Candidate!
First, thank you for your time and effort (both present and future) in representing the capsuleers of New Eden! TheyGÇÖre much appreciated.
IGÇÖm preparing to cast my vote in the CSM12 elections. After reading the information you submitted, though, I still have a question.
By way of background, I started in Eve as a hauler, moving freight in T1 industrials and gradually working my way up in both ships and cargo. However, I repeatedly found my progress impeded by gankers who would destroy my ship and steal my cargo. In low- and null-sec space, thatGÇÖs to be expected. You place your bet and take your chances. In high-sec space, however, this is very frustrating. Why have high-sec space at all then? This frustration drove me into anti-ganking, and IGÇÖve been a proud member of Thomas en Chasteaux's High-Sec Militia for several months now.
So, my question. Where do you stand on high-sec ganking? IGÇÖll concede that ganking is a legitimate style of game play, as CCP has ruled. But I also feel that it should be difficult and dangerous (for the ganker) in the 30% of New Eden designated as high-sec space. In particular, IGÇÖd like to see CCP tweak the game mechanics so that the criminal flag generated by looting a ganked freighter in high-sec space follows all players who handle that loot, and otherwise make looting more realistic. (Thomas en Chasteaux's ideas, not mine.)
As a member of the CSM, would you present such an idea to CCP? Would you push for its adoption? What other game changes might you consider to make high-sec ganking more difficult and less profitable?
Regards, Cochise Chiricahua. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6542
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 21:20:54 -
[58] - Quote
The main problem I can see with the loot, is that it'll be hard to maintain a stolen flag on a stack. right now, the only thing which is maintained is the number. Then what happens when you merge it with another stack? Or split the stacks? And how long does it last? It's a nice idea in principle, but I'm not sure how practical it is.
The _main_ change I want to see is with long term bumping. So at least the people doing the ganking have to sacrifice a warp scrambler/disruptor fit ship every so often, if they want to bump a freighter for 30 minutes.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Angela Kinsey
Gierek Mininig Inc
0
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 23:03:48 -
[59] - Quote
+2 For all your hard work, don't give it up. |
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
518
|
Posted - 2017.03.09 10:02:53 -
[60] - Quote
I do not agree with everything you say, but you are the best proven candidate, voted no.1, best of luck
Eve online is :
A) mining simulator B) glorified chatroom C) spreadsheets online
D) CCP Games Pay to Win at skill leveling, with instant gratification
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
http://bit.ly/1egr4mF
|
|
Endecroix
One More Nightmare
39
|
Posted - 2017.03.09 10:06:02 -
[61] - Quote
You've got all my votes anyway because I appreciate what you do and the fact you do do it!
A question though if I may. I used to be in Es and Whizz and ran the operations in Fountain for our booster trade. We had a great roleplay component to the corp with the illegality of boosters that added something to the game (at least in my opinion) forging social connection throughout New Eden.
What are your thoughts about CCP introducing similar mechanics eg smuggling. Story rich pathways being removed from the game.
I get why boosters were made legal but in my opinion, firstly, it would have been good if CCP had reached out to Es and Whizz and the other booster producing corps to at least ask for alternatives, opinions and ideas and secondly that drug smuggling is something intrinsic to the genre as an option going back all the way to old Elite and it's a kind of a shame such mechanics aren't available. It adds another pathway to the trading career both in terms of risk, potential success and also binding the community together. In many ways they've removed one of the most social parts of trading out which seems kind of counter-intuitive for a MMO and reduced a well-respected, even if not totally legit, alliance into just another corporate trading entity. And before someone states the obvious I can see the parallels here with the real world operations and the irony of that. |
Resa Moon
New Eden Miners Association
28
|
Posted - 2017.03.10 07:06:48 -
[62] - Quote
You say you have an interest in mining and that it needs improvement.
However, what I've read of your ideas in the past focus on a solo miner, not a multi-boxer.
Most of us who mine multi-box. Please bear that in mind. What might seem engaging to a solo pilot could be tedious for someone running a crew.
Before offering elaborate changes to mining, make sure you are in touch with the multi-boxing community.
New Eden Mining Blog
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6545
|
Posted - 2017.03.10 13:04:51 -
[63] - Quote
Resa Moon wrote:You say you have an interest in mining and that it needs improvement.
However, what I've read of your ideas in the past focus on a solo miner, not a multi-boxer.
Most of us who mine multi-box. Please bear that in mind. What might seem engaging to a solo pilot could be tedious for someone running a crew.
Before offering elaborate changes to mining, make sure you are in touch with the multi-boxing community.
Whenever I've been talking about changes to mining, I've _always_ said I'd like to have the current way stay as well. At least, when it comes to the act of mining. You may be able to get an improved rate by paying attention, but not as a total replacement.
I'd like to see more gameplay around _finding_ things to mine. The only difference with multiboxing then, is that you may need to do that activity more often. (No, I'm not meaning, 'you find one roid, mine it, then have to find another'. clusters which would support someone for a while)
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6545
|
Posted - 2017.03.10 13:07:08 -
[64] - Quote
Endecroix wrote:You've got all my votes anyway because I appreciate what you do and the fact you do do it!
A question though if I may. I used to be in Es and Whizz and ran the operations in Fountain for our booster trade. We had a great roleplay component to the corp with the illegality of boosters that added something to the game (at least in my opinion) forging social connection throughout New Eden.
What are your thoughts about CCP introducing similar mechanics eg smuggling. Story rich pathways being removed from the game.
I get why boosters were made legal but in my opinion, firstly, it would have been good if CCP had reached out to Es and Whizz and the other booster producing corps to at least ask for alternatives, opinions and ideas and secondly that drug smuggling is something intrinsic to the genre as an option going back all the way to old Elite and it's a kind of a shame such mechanics aren't available. It adds another pathway to the trading career both in terms of risk, potential success and also binding the community together. In many ways they've removed one of the most social parts of trading out which seems kind of counter-intuitive for a MMO and reduced a well-respected, even if not totally legit, alliance into just another corporate trading entity. And before someone states the obvious I can see the parallels here with the real world operations and the irony of that.
The removal of smuggling gameplay was a double edged sword.
It did make things _far_ easier for the consumers. The manufacturers have the problem that it's now easier to sell, so more people may get into it.
tbh, I'm still in two minds about the change. I know it sounds like a cop out, but that's the truth.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Endecroix
One More Nightmare
39
|
Posted - 2017.03.10 15:06:51 -
[65] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:The removal of smuggling gameplay was a double edged sword.
It did make things _far_ easier for the consumers. The manufacturers have the problem that it's now easier to sell, so more people may get into it.
tbh, I'm still in two minds about the change. I know it sounds like a cop out, but that's the truth.
Thanks for the reply and good luck with the campaign. |
Drigo Segvian
Black Fox Marauders
27
|
Posted - 2017.03.13 02:12:52 -
[66] - Quote
+1 |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |