EVE Search - For CCP:

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

For CCP:

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
goudaMob Victory or Whatever 12	Posted - 2017.02.08 00:39:16 - [1] - Quote Please do not expand anymore space. Please do not add more systems. Please cut the amount of systems already in game, by half. Thank you.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5354	Posted - 2017.02.08 00:41:43 - [2] - Quote goudaMob wrote: Please do not expand anymore space. Please do not add more systems. Please cut the amount of systems already in game, by half. Thank you. Including low-sec. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
goudaMob Victory or Whatever 12	Posted - 2017.02.08 00:47:16 - [3] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: goudaMob wrote: Please do not expand anymore space. Please do not add more systems. Please cut the amount of systems already in game, by half. Thank you. Including low-sec. Most specifically low sec.
Akaro Tripar School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 2	Posted - 2017.02.08 00:48:02 - [4] - Quote Make low sec to high sec and let concord respond in under 1 sec everywhere.....
goudaMob Victory or Whatever 12	Posted - 2017.02.08 00:49:33 - [5] - Quote Akaro Tripar wrote: Make low sec to high sec and let concord respond in under 1 sec everywhere..... Make everything Null Sec, get rid of concord, and gate guns.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5354	Posted - 2017.02.08 00:59:02 - [6] - Quote goudaMob wrote: Make everything Null Sec, get rid of concord, and gate guns. I was actually thinking they should double or triple the number of guns, maybe even add some ECM scrammers and sensor dampening fields... I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Sweet Adamas Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 41	Posted - 2017.02.08 01:00:34 - [7] - Quote Is there any slight chance that you might just be a pirate/gate camper who has trouble finding targets Would you also like all missions moved to lowsec?
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5361	Posted - 2017.02.08 01:12:56 - [8] - Quote Sweet Adamas wrote: Is there any slight chance that you might just be a pirate/gate camper who has trouble finding targets Would you also like all missions moved to lowsec? Whatever gave you that impression...? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
DeMichael Crimson Republic University Minmatar Republic 58399	Posted - 2017.02.08 07:40:31 - [9] - Quote Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space. DMC 'The Plan' \| California Eve Players \| Proposal - The Endless Battle
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5376	Posted - 2017.02.08 07:47:22 - [10] - Quote DeMichael Crimson wrote: Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space. Interesting idea. Any changes to what kind of capitals could operate in low-sec? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Scipio Artelius Savage Moon Society 46810	Posted - 2017.02.08 08:00:21 - [11] - Quote goudaMob wrote: Please do not expand anymore space. Please do not add more systems. Please cut the amount of systems already in game, by half. Thank you. Just use only half. Your problem solved?
Aves Asio 44	Posted - 2017.02.08 08:05:16 - [12] - Quote goudaMob wrote: Make everything Null Sec, get rid of concord, and gate guns. How would i sell you tags then
Hello Meow Kitty Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde 12	Posted - 2017.02.08 10:25:20 - [13] - Quote I say remove nullsec, problems since day one solved.
Lan Wang Knights of the Posing Meat Snuffed Out 3903	Posted - 2017.02.08 10:30:57 - [14] - Quote DeMichael Crimson wrote: Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space. DMC this is just a stealth lvl 5 missions in highsec post Alliance Logo Design Service -- Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel
renwahh Wiking Brigade The Devil's Warrior Alliance 100	Posted - 2017.02.08 10:31:05 - [15] - Quote I say move to features and ideas. Oh while were there bring back the jove and kick everyones butt
Wolfgang Jannesen The Evesploratory Society 21	Posted - 2017.02.08 13:25:29 - [16] - Quote DeMichael Crimson wrote: Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space. DMC Let's make space boring as hell, basically.
Lan Wang Knights of the Posing Meat Snuffed Out 3903	Posted - 2017.02.08 13:35:19 - [17] - Quote Wolfgang Jannesen wrote: DeMichael Crimson wrote: Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space. DMC Let's make space boring as hell, basically. will someone think of the solo pve players... Alliance Logo Design Service -- Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel
Mr Mieyli Hedion University Amarr Empire 397	Posted - 2017.02.08 13:41:51 - [18] - Quote Lan Wang wrote: will someone think of the solo pve players... Nah they do more than enough of that themselves. A case for more AoE in EvE
Wolfgang Jannesen The Evesploratory Society 21	Posted - 2017.02.08 13:43:57 - [19] - Quote Lan Wang wrote: Wolfgang Jannesen wrote: DeMichael Crimson wrote: Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space. DMC Let's make space boring as hell, basically. will someone think of the solo pve players... I'm a fan of lowsec for roams, Providence for ratting, but there's a distinct difference between the two in terms of sovereignty and pilots. Making it all one big highsec bordering on null isn't very exciting
morion Lighting Build 183	Posted - 2017.02.08 13:46:08 - [20] - Quote i"m sensing a logistics parade you will fun with for years.
Lan Wang Knights of the Posing Meat Snuffed Out 3903	Posted - 2017.02.08 13:56:01 - [21] - Quote Wolfgang Jannesen wrote: Lan Wang wrote: Wolfgang Jannesen wrote: DeMichael Crimson wrote: Having Concord patrol low sec would definitely get more players going into it. Basically just have the current high sec game mechanics expanded to include low sec. Don't need to have the system security difference between low and high sec, just make it all Empire space and keep null sec as Alliance space. DMC Let's make space boring as hell, basically. will someone think of the solo pve players... I'm a fan of lowsec for roams, Providence for ratting, but there's a distinct difference between the two in terms of sovereignty and pilots. Making it all one big highsec bordering on null isn't very exciting lowsec is great, we dont need to change space because some highsec players are to scared to to leave the little bubble they live in Alliance Logo Design Service -- Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5382	Posted - 2017.02.08 14:54:55 - [22] - Quote You do realize that 'some' of the players in high-sec actually account for about 75% of the total player base, yes? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
goudaMob Victory or Whatever 14	Posted - 2017.02.08 16:39:47 - [23] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: You do realize that 'some' of the players in high-sec actually account for about 75% of the total player base, yes? Where did you get that number? How many of that 75% lasts over a month? We should focus on consistently subbed players instead of alpha trials.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5382	Posted - 2017.02.08 16:46:22 - [24] - Quote goudaMob wrote: Where did you get that number? How many of that 75% lasts over a month? We should focus on consistently subbed players instead of alpha trials. CCP. These aren't Alpha numbers - these is the pre-Alpha active player distribution, and it's been hovering around that level for well over a year. I have no idea what the numbers have been recently, but my guess is that since Ascendency the numbers for high-sec probably trended up. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Lan Wang Knights of the Posing Meat Snuffed Out 3905	Posted - 2017.02.08 16:48:43 - [25] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: goudaMob wrote: Where did you get that number? How many of that 75% lasts over a month? We should focus on consistently subbed players instead of alpha trials. CCP. These aren't Alpha numbers - these is the pre-Alpha active player distribution, and it's been hovering around that level for well over a year. I have no idea what the numbers have been recently, but my guess is that since Ascendency the numbers for high-sec probably trended up. wonder how many are alts for lowsec, null and wormholers Alliance Logo Design Service -- Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel
Jenn aSide Shinigami Miners Test Alliance Please Ignore 15124	Posted - 2017.02.08 16:51:15 - [26] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: You do realize that 'some' of the players in high-sec actually account for about 75% of the total player base, yes? No it does not. Every time CCP tells us about population distribution they tell us about CHARACTERS , not players. More than half my characters (7 of the 12) are in high sec, but no one would call me a high sec player. Most of the corp mates have high sec alts as well.
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5382	Posted - 2017.02.08 16:59:28 - [27] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: No it does not. Every time CCP tells us about population distribution they tell us about CHARACTERS , not players. More than half my characters (7 of the 12) are in high sec, but no one would call me a high sec player. Most of the corp mates have high sec alts as well. So you're saying null-sec is way more active than high-sec? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Nat Silverguard Aideron Robotics 677	Posted - 2017.02.08 17:09:59 - [28] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: You do realize that 'some' of the players in high-sec actually account for about 75% of the total player base, yes? well, you do know that almost all the players have an account or 2 in hisec, right? Just Add Water
Jenn aSide Shinigami Miners Test Alliance Please Ignore 15124	Posted - 2017.02.08 17:14:20 - [29] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: No it does not. Every time CCP tells us about population distribution they tell us about CHARACTERS , not players. More than half my characters (7 of the 12) are in high sec, but no one would call me a high sec player. Most of the corp mates have high sec alts as well. So you're saying null-sec is way more active than high-sec? Who said anything about null sec?
Salvos Rhoska 2066	Posted - 2017.02.08 17:15:44 - [30] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: Arthur Aihaken wrote: You do realize that 'some' of the players in high-sec actually account for about 75% of the total player base, yes? No it does not. Every time CCP tells us about population distribution they tell us about CHARACTERS , not players. More than half my characters (7 of the 12) are in high sec, but no one would call me a high sec player. Most of the corp mates have high sec alts as well. The fact you have 12 characters, of which 7 are in HS, still means that 7 of your 12 are in HS. Ironically that is almost exactly equal to Arthur's statement of 75% of total player base being present in HS, as a factor of # of existing characters. The distinction between location of players, as opposed to characters, is arbitrary and mutable. No player is located anywhere except in their IRL home, only characters are located ingame. Arthur Aihaken wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: So you're saying null-sec is way more active than high-sec? Who said anything about null sec? He asked you a question. Answer it. PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.