Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
11325
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 17:31:20 -
[1] - Quote
Email today:
Quote:Greetings XXXXXXXXXX,
Grab PLEX at a low price and trade for ISK to spend on your ships and interests. You can also treat yourself or a friend to an Omega upgrade and the many great items at the New Eden Store.
Act fast to get 15% off all PLEX packages until 7 June 11:00 UTC!
That's it. No dancing around what they're doing. No pretending PLEX is for game time. Get your EVE gold here!
Pretty bold RMT ad considering their stated stand on the practice.
Mr Epeen 
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
4133
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 17:38:09 -
[2] - Quote
Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

Mina Sebiestar
Minmatar Inner Space Conglomerate
1201
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 17:43:13 -
[3] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Email today: Quote:Greetings XXXXXXXXXX,
Grab PLEX at a low price and trade for ISK to spend on your ships and interests. You can also treat yourself or a friend to an Omega upgrade and the many great items at the New Eden Store.
Act fast to get 15% off all PLEX packages until 7 June 11:00 UTC! That's it. No dancing around what they're doing. No pretending PLEX is for game time. Get your EVE gold here! Pretty bold RMT ad considering their stated stand on the practice. Mr Epeen 
I am shocked are you shocked?
Were you sleeping under the rock all this years or did you forgot to read all you quoted....plex is for game time or isk since day one.
Show us on a doll where...oh nwm just woke up organic French Peru and Venice mix of coffee will straighten me up.
You choke behind a smile a fake behind the fear
Because >>I is too hard
|

JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
55
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 17:50:27 -
[4] - Quote
plex isnt just for game time its for nes store too wait... its always been sold for isk not sure why selling it for isk is suddenly a problem what else were you supposed to do with it after you bought it |

Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
34758
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 18:08:33 -
[5] - Quote
But people always sold it for ISK. To buy things for said ISK.
ߦçߦáߦç-Ç-ŠߦÿߦÇ-Çߦ¢ ߦÅ-ô ß¦Ç +óߦÇߦìߦç -£ß¦ç-ƒß¦ÿs ߦ¢ß¦Å ߦ¢ß¦ç-ƒ-ƒ ß¦Ç sߦ¢ß¦Å-Ç-Å =ƒôò
ߦí-£ß¦ç-Çߦç +¬s ߦÇ+¦+ó-Ç-ŠߦäߦÅ+¦ß¦äߦÅ-Çߦà +óߦ£-Šߦí-£ß¦ç+¦ -ÅߦÅߦ£ +¦ß¦çߦçߦà -£+¬ß¦ì
ߦÅsߦÿ-Çߦç-Å =ƒÜÇ
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ
|

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
5099
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 18:10:42 -
[6] - Quote
I find granular PLEX much to be more convenient for turning my RL money into ingame wealth. They're much more liquid, and I have some many more options. |

Chainsaw Plankton
FaDoyToy
3135
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 18:21:53 -
[7] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Email today: Quote:Greetings XXXXXXXXXX,
Grab PLEX at a low price and trade for ISK to spend on your ships and interests. You can also treat yourself or a friend to an Omega upgrade and the many great items at the New Eden Store.
Act fast to get 15% off all PLEX packages until 7 June 11:00 UTC! That's it. No dancing around what they're doing. No pretending PLEX is for game time. Get your EVE gold here! Pretty bold RMT ad considering their stated stand on the practice. Mr Epeen  I mean that's kinda the whole point of PLEX... if you wanted gametime you could have just bought that at a lower rate.
selling officer BCUs! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6872141
@ChainsawPlankto on twitter
|

Jenn aSide
Shinigami Miners ChaosTheory.
16004
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 18:36:51 -
[8] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Email today: Quote:Greetings XXXXXXXXXX,
Grab PLEX at a low price and trade for ISK to spend on your ships and interests. You can also treat yourself or a friend to an Omega upgrade and the many great items at the New Eden Store.
Act fast to get 15% off all PLEX packages until 7 June 11:00 UTC! That's it. No dancing around what they're doing. No pretending PLEX is for game time. Get your EVE gold here! Pretty bold RMT ad considering their stated stand on the practice. Mr Epeen  I mean that's kinda the whole point of PLEX... if you wanted gametime you could have just bought that at a lower rate.
+1
I think the real issue here is a dislike of the ideas of RMT and the perception of creeping Pay to win. I don't share those concerns as much as others, CCP had to do plex to combat gold seller types and plex IMO is one of the things that kept people playing beyond the point where they might have outgrown paying for a game no matter how cheap it was.
And CCP isn't selling gold ships/ ammo so as long as that's the case CCPo making some cash on skins and skill extractors etc is fine too CCP is a company not a charity, at the end of the day if one doesn't like a company seeking ever more revenue , then 'one' should stop playing games made by for profit companies and start playing games made by charities (of which there are none lol).
I might not like some of the things CCP does but complaining about them making money would be dumb on my part. |

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
5101
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 18:51:31 -
[9] - Quote
That's a good point. They're not selling more powerful Gold-only ships, mods or ammo. You can just buy things that are available to everyone, but you don't have to work in-game to earn the ISK. And that's been around since PLEX were first introduced (as other people have pointed out). |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
11330
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 18:55:13 -
[10] - Quote
I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning.
For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it.
It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe.
As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT"S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution.
Mr Epeen  |
|

Aedaxus
Digital Zone Corp
72
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 18:58:57 -
[11] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote: (1)No pretending PLEX is for game time. (2)Pretty bold RMT ad considering their stated stand on the practice.
(1) Plex from the store was bought for : * Game time (if you like to pay a lot for game time) * Getting ISK from players that want to buy 'omega game time' with ISK Now PLEX can also be bought to spend on : * NES Clothes * NES Extractors (to make injectors and sell "learn time") and that's why they had to break it into little pieces as 1 PLEX valued 1 billion ISK [~20 euro] and no one would spend that much or more on a shipskin, clothes or injectors.
(2) PLEX is to counter RMT. CCP has the right to do so and 'EULA/CodeOfConduct' accepters not. Sorry for your loss of income.
|

Aedaxus
Digital Zone Corp
72
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:03:16 -
[12] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe. As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution. Mr Epeen  Sure, It's all sunshine, lollipops and rainbows now...
At least now they fixed your "I have to wait for hours to sell a character in this FAST PACED ACTION ADVENTURE GAME", right? So you were behind that change? :D
Then they have to IMMEDIATELY stop charging for anything as I get omega benefits for using my euros instead of playing the game like it's supposed to, right? |

Jenn aSide
Shinigami Miners ChaosTheory.
16004
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:05:40 -
[13] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning. For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it. It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe. As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution. Mr Epeen 
It was the only solution. The mistake you are making here is that you are looking at it as something you don't like rather than accepting it as a necessary evil. I shudder to think of how much time and energy and money CCP would have had to waste combatting isk farmers were it not for plex, because if we know anything from the history of this game and others, people are going to buy in game money some way no matter what you do.
Also PLEX doesn't have anything with the harshness of EVE, the same people who will plex themselves out of a loss probably would have bought isk from a gold seller type for the same reason, the difference is that as it is now at least the money goes to CCP.
On top of that you are ignoring the benefits of plex for other players. PLEX gave PVE players something real and meaningful to shoot for, something to really trade with PVP jocks. If not for PLEX I'd probably have trillions of isk if I hadn't stopped playing because just making isk for the sake of it isn't fun, but knowing that what I was doing would also let me use some of it to buy PLEX to keep 60 bucks in my pocket every month , that meant something (not much, but something.
I like plex, I think it was an elegant solution to a problem and for the most part it's added something really cool to the game. I don't know for other people but i can tell you that for myself I doubt I'd have played EVE this long without plex, not because of the money (I don't spend the 60 bucks a month I set aside for EVE until I've made the isk to pay for game time, It's like i use CCPs accounting practice in real life) but because it provided another goal to shoot for. A goal that delivers.
|

Aedaxus
Digital Zone Corp
72
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:10:28 -
[14] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning. For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it. It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe. As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution. Mr Epeen  It was the only solution. The mistake you are making here is that you are looking at it as something you don't like rather than accepting it as a necessary evil. I shudder to think of how much time and energy and money CCP would have had to waste combatting isk farmers were it not for plex, because if we know anything from the history of this game and others, people are going to buy in game money some way no matter what you do. Also PLEX doesn't have anything with the harshness of EVE, the same people who will plex themselves out of a loss probably would have bought isk from a gold seller type for the same reason, the difference is that as it is now at least the money goes to CCP. On top of that you are ignoring the benefits of plex for other players. PLEX gave PVE players something real and meaningful to shoot for, something to really trade with PVP jocks. If not for PLEX I'd probably have trillions of isk if I hadn't stopped playing because just making isk for the sake of it isn't fun, but knowing that what I was doing would also let me use some of it to buy PLEX to keep 60 bucks in my pocket every month , that meant something (not much, but something). I like plex, I think it was an elegant solution to a problem and for the most part it's added something really cool to the game. I don't know for other people but i can tell you that for myself I doubt I'd have played EVE this long without plex, not because of the money (I don't spend the 60 bucks a month I set aside for EVE until I've made the isk to pay for game time, It's like i use CCPs accounting practice in real life) but because it provided another goal to shoot for. A goal that delivers.
PLEX is like Jenn aSide, we all know she is just evil but we like to have a go at here once in a while and hug and whisper in her ear. *hug*
|

Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
3371
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:24:56 -
[15] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution. Mr Epeen 
There is no effective "right" solution. The player base has a need to get ISK and they would fulfill that need illegally if there were no legal way to do it. |

Magnus Jax
83
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:26:49 -
[16] - Quote
plex is:
a) the life blood that keeps tons of accounts running year after year
b) a necessary evil to battle real RMT, it makes CCP money and it means people who want to make use of the service don't have to deal with shady Chinese websites that steal your CC info
c) a way for short attention span (or busy irl) people to achieve their long term in game goals
Plex isn't the problem, it's a solution to issues that would otherwise result in much bigger problems.
|

Blade Darth
Room for Improvement Limited Expectations
213
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:29:35 -
[17] - Quote
I just want to voice my opinion how much I despise the so called "plex vault".
As in-game "gold" it should be an in-game item, in inventory or station. Behave like real gold. Not something special for the special snowflakes to hide in a magical separate hold. It feels to me like some cheap mobile game coins. It should not be a plex, it should be THE plex. Not to mention this thing is stuck to every inventory window.
Mr BeDee 
Omen Navy Issue Tutorial
|

Felyx Ravencroft
57
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:36:07 -
[18] - Quote
PS: (I added this AFTER typing the main body :P) Please pardon the wall of text below.
RMT may be distasteful to some (hell, it is to me, even, to some extent - I certainly don't respect players who can only overcome in-game challenges by throwing money at them - but hey, it's those players who allow the rest of us to save some real money, and I'm OK with that!) but I would MUCH rather that the (real) money go to the company providing the game (and thus supporting it, helping to feed the devs and keep them in ample caffeine to keep delivering said game for us to consume) than to some Chinese or Russian parasitic gold-farming multi-multi-multi-box setup (the ethnicity is, in fact, irrelevant, that's just where most of them gold-sellers operate from, as far as I'm aware.)
I previously played an MMORPG that, years ago, switched to a F2P model with "Gold Packs" for game time - these work much the same way as PLEX, except they're used EXCLUSIVELY for 30 days of unrestricted game for an account and its entire stable of characters (akin to Alpha and Omega access distinction), and when this was implemented, illicit gold-sellers went into decline. For starters, they had to lower their prices to compete with the legitimate RMT, AND there's the factor that many players don't mind paying a little more if it goes to the providers of the game instead of to a parasite, meaning that the black-market gold-sellers had to reduce their prices even more drastically (of course, there are always those players who will selfishly go for the "best deal" possible without regard for the bigger picture.) With all the dis-incentives for black market gold sellers, many simply left (presumably they went to farm greener pastures), while the game provider also now had more incentive to crack down on the remaining ones. End result: ultimately good for the health of the game, as the game provider makes some extra revenue, while the players' experience is largely unaffected, and in fact is even improved by the drastic reduction of in-game spamming by gold-sellers. |

JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
56
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:38:04 -
[19] - Quote
yeah when they announced granular plex i thought it was something different i thought it meant people could plex a few hours at a time and people would have plex in their cargo hold so they can add some more time while in the middle of a roam and when they die they will drop some plex i figured a whole bunch of plex would be dropping from part-time pvpers and it would encourage more pvp and fun sadly not the case |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
8536
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:46:24 -
[20] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem.
This'll blow your mind: I don't care. And I'm certain a lot of other players don't care either.
BTW you reminded me of Gevlon with your post.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
|

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
1656
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 19:52:06 -
[21] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning. For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it. It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe. As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution. Mr Epeen  While I'm with you here, I don't want to complain too much either. CCP did a pretty good job at converting all those aurum gifts they gave us over the years since incarna. I don't buy stuff on the store, so it was all still there and is now easily used as a decent chunk of either gametime or isk.
Remove standings and insurance.
|

Skorpynekomimi
698
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 20:00:20 -
[22] - Quote
Mara Pahrdi wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning. For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it. It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe. As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution. Mr Epeen  While I'm with you here, I don't want to complain too much either. CCP did a pretty good job at converting all those aurum gifts they gave us over the years since incarna. I don't buy stuff on the store, so it was all still there and is now easily used as a decent chunk of either gametime or isk.
Back in my day, we had to extract ISK from Aurum the hard way. Check prices against the Aurum cost of stuff in the store, but with Aurum, sell for ISK. Although I kept the goggles. I like my opaque goggles, and it hides just how godawful I am with facial construction. Shirts are still overrated, though.
Economic PVP
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
4139
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 20:18:09 -
[23] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This'll blow your mind: I don't care. And I'm certain a lot of other players don't care either. BTW you reminded me of Gevlon with your post. From the looks of it CCP isn't finished yet. What are they working on currently? Any ideas? All those pushes to more monetization came out of the blue and even the CSM was never informed beforehand.
Let's talk in a year or two again if we are both still around.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

Chainsaw Plankton
FaDoyToy
3144
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 20:27:37 -
[24] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This'll blow your mind: I don't care. And I'm certain a lot of other players don't care either. BTW you reminded me of Gevlon with your post. From the looks of it CCP isn't finished yet. What are they working on currently? Any ideas? All those pushes to more monetization came out of the blue and even the CSM was never informed beforehand. Let's talk in a year or two again if we are both still around. they were looking for a vp of microtransactions for a while and hired some guy from EA
selling officer BCUs! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6872141
@ChainsawPlankto on twitter
|

Scialt
Universal Sanitation Corporation
157
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 20:36:11 -
[25] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning. For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it. It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe. As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution. Mr Epeen 
I guess the point is that it's not new.
The idea of buying plex with real money and changing it into isk has been around as long as plex has. Nothing about the latest changes (or the e-mail) is new in that regard.
It is RMT... where the profits go to CCP instead of a third party. We can discuss that I suppose... but there's nothing new about it. |

Orin Solette
The Scope Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 20:49:49 -
[26] - Quote
What else are you supposed to do with PLEX? Either you buy your character some new sunglasses/vest or you sell it. If you're using it for Omega, you're doing it wrong (unless you are activating a 2nd/3rd skill queue - not sure if PLEX on discount is cheaper than the extra queues). |

tiberiusric
Comply Or Die Fidelas Constans
266
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 21:00:02 -
[27] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Email today: Quote:Greetings XXXXXXXXXX,
Grab PLEX at a low price and trade for ISK to spend on your ships and interests. You can also treat yourself or a friend to an Omega upgrade and the many great items at the New Eden Store.
Act fast to get 15% off all PLEX packages until 7 June 11:00 UTC! That's it. No dancing around what they're doing. No pretending PLEX is for game time. Get your EVE gold here! Pretty bold RMT ad considering their stated stand on the practice. Mr Epeen 
did you miss the memo?
All my views are my own - never be afraid to post with your main, unless you're going to post some dumb shit
|

JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
56
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 21:21:05 -
[28] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:they were looking for a vp of microtransactions for a while and hired some guy from EA oh yeah i rememebr that what was his name again hell-something maybe |

Endecroix
The Quiet Joys of Brotherhood Hedonistic Imperative
57
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 21:43:03 -
[29] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning.
For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it.
It was especially noticeable as a character seller.
So let me get this straight, just so I am totally clear, PLEX is bad because it negates the harshness in the game in relation to consequences and yet you ... are a character seller.
So if:
CCP sells Plex so a player can shortcut flying a new ship = bad Mr Epeen sells a character so someone can shortcut to flying a new ship = good |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
11339
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 21:51:57 -
[30] - Quote
Endecroix wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning.
For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it.
It was especially noticeable as a character seller. So let me get this straight, just so I am totally clear, PLEX is bad because it negates the harshness in the game in relation to consequences and yet you ... are a character seller. So if: CCP sells Plex so a player can shortcut flying a new ship = bad Mr Epeen sells a character so someone can shortcut to flying a new ship = good So let me get this straight. Just so I'm totally clear.
You like to selectively quote because if you showed the whole thing people would see the idiocy of what you are saying.
Mr Epeen  |
|

JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
57
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 22:05:47 -
[31] - Quote
well no she just quoted what we all saw just none of us bothered to bring it up because we know logic is pointless in an argument like this |

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6555
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 22:12:25 -
[32] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Endecroix wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning.
For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it.
It was especially noticeable as a character seller. So let me get this straight, just so I am totally clear, PLEX is bad because it negates the harshness in the game in relation to consequences and yet you ... are a character seller. So if: CCP sells Plex so a player can shortcut flying a new ship = bad Mr Epeen sells a character so someone can shortcut to flying a new ship = good So let me get this straight. Just so I'm totally clear. You like to selectively quote because if you showed the whole thing people would see the idiocy of what you are saying. Mr Epeen 
Quoting your entire post below...
Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning.
For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it.
It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe.
As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution.
You would routinely benefit directly from this RMT over the years, but you were completely against it.
And even the notion of selling characters....after all, if you need to wait months or longer for that pilot you need, isn't that "cold" and "harsh"?
Preach on oh principled one....
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
225
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 22:16:03 -
[33] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Endecroix wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning.
For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it.
It was especially noticeable as a character seller. So let me get this straight, just so I am totally clear, PLEX is bad because it negates the harshness in the game in relation to consequences and yet you ... are a character seller. So if: CCP sells Plex so a player can shortcut flying a new ship = bad Mr Epeen sells a character so someone can shortcut to flying a new ship = good So let me get this straight. Just so I'm totally clear. You like to selectively quote because if you showed the whole thing people would see the idiocy of what you are saying. Mr Epeen 
No...I think she pretty much captured the point. This is a perfect example of the adage "Where you stand is based on where you sit." In your view, PLEX negates the harshness of the game, but character sales don't...because you're a character seller.
I understand your point - that before PLEX people had to earn the necessary isk for your services in-game. But citing the importance of "harshness" as an argument for why PLEX is bad still makes no logical sense from a character seller.
Besides, hasn't this PLEX ship sailed long ago? CCP isn't going to reverse course at this point. Either get on board or don't. But whining about it seems like a waste of keyboard clicks. |

Gimme Sake
State War Academy Caldari State
574
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 23:18:14 -
[34] - Quote
You people are so funny, in a game where you can have as many accounts you want or can afford, talking about pay2win and game play consequences...
"Never not blob!" ~ Plato
|

Ebony Texas
The Alabaster Albatross Sev3rance
15
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 23:40:50 -
[35] - Quote
Plex is here to stay forever..
this community got hooked and so did Helmar so guess what..
its all your fault.. you can fuss, you can whine, you can rage all you want to.. but fact remains ccp is now swimming in the cash. don't hate on a cash cow.. think about it.
if we all end up buying more plex.. eventually ccp will fire all its staff and hire new real unbiased talent.
there's always a bright side to look at.
o7 |

Coralas
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
157
|
Posted - 2017.06.06 23:48:08 -
[36] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Endecroix wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning.
For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it.
It was especially noticeable as a character seller. So let me get this straight, just so I am totally clear, PLEX is bad because it negates the harshness in the game in relation to consequences and yet you ... are a character seller. So if: CCP sells Plex so a player can shortcut flying a new ship = bad Mr Epeen sells a character so someone can shortcut to flying a new ship = good So let me get this straight. Just so I'm totally clear. You like to selectively quote because if you showed the whole thing people would see the idiocy of what you are saying. Mr Epeen 
My understanding of most character traders is that they held the character for a few months to finish up the most valuable skills to give the character a saleable focus. ie you were paying real life money to sub a docked entity to grow isk for nothing, which is in my opinion, morally equivalent to buying plex to sell.
lol@people complaining about harsh in a game where what they do is trade docked objects that grow value whilst docked.
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
8538
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 01:00:32 -
[37] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This'll blow your mind: I don't care. And I'm certain a lot of other players don't care either. BTW you reminded me of Gevlon with your post. From the looks of it CCP isn't finished yet. What are they working on currently? Any ideas? All those pushes to more monetization came out of the blue and even the CSM was never informed beforehand. Let's talk in a year or two again if we are both still around.
How would you know what the CSM was informed of? Are you in it?
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
11345
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 03:09:24 -
[38] - Quote
Zarek Kree wrote:
No...I think she pretty much captured the point. This is a perfect example of the adage "Where you stand is based on where you sit." In your view, PLEX negates the harshness of the game, but character sales don't...because you're a character seller.
If you are feeling dedicated enough, go back, way back, and look at all the posts I made that characters should be bound to the acct that created them and be untradeable. And yes, I was a character trader when I said that. Over and over.
But...much like even though I think lottos are a governmental tax on the stupid, if someone gifted me a winning ticket I'd be first in line to cash it. By the same token, CCP introducing RMT to buy characters is handing me a winning ticket. I'd be a fool not to take advantage of it.
So there you go. Like every other person playing, I'll take advantage of a **** poor mechanic. In real life I'll stick to my principles occasionally, but never in a video game. That doesn't mean I won't be vocal about my disdain for the very mechanic that has helped make me rich.
Mr Epeen 
|

JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
59
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 04:08:20 -
[39] - Quote
mr epeen you used to seem a lot smarter but i figured it out you deleted your sig why did you do that? I used to enjoy reading how typing u saved a whole two seconds i wasted two seconds every time i read it |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
11346
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 04:21:42 -
[40] - Quote
JC Mieyli wrote:mr epeen you used to seem a lot smarter but i figured it out you deleted your sig why did you do that? I used to enjoy reading how typing u saved a whole two seconds i wasted two seconds every time i read it I didn't delete it. One day I logged in and it was gone.
So it goes. vOv
Mr Epeen 
|
|

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
227
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 04:32:30 -
[41] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:So there you go. Like every other person playing, I'll take advantage of a **** poor mechanic. In real life I'll stick to my principles occasionally, but never in a video game. That doesn't mean I won't be vocal about my disdain for the very mechanic that has helped make me rich.
So principled hypocrisy...Okay. I can respect that. But it still doesn't change the fact that the PLEX ship sailed a long time ago and it's not coming back - primarily because most players are fine with it. I don't see the inherent evil that you insist it represents, but I absolutely see the advantages in terms of (younger) player retention. And CCP makes a little money along the way. And apparently so do you. When it's a win-win-win all around, I have trouble seeing how that adds up to a losing strategy.
I get that you don't like it because...reasons. But, so what? You're still here, so you obviously don't care about it THAT much. So why should CCP? |

JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
60
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 04:38:30 -
[42] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:JC Mieyli wrote:mr epeen you used to seem a lot smarter but i figured it out you deleted your sig why did you do that? I used to enjoy reading how typing u saved a whole two seconds i wasted two seconds every time i read it I didn't delete it. One day I logged in and it was gone. So it goes. vOv Mr Epeen  well im sad to see it go its the whole reason i stopped using proper punctuation look how much time ive saved
|

Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
34839
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 05:41:47 -
[43] - Quote
You dont have to read things actually. You can save a lot of time that you could spend sleeping or making out in a grass.
ߦçߦáߦç-Ç-ŠߦÿߦÇ-Çߦ¢ ߦÅ-ô ß¦Ç +óߦÇߦìߦç -£ß¦ç-ƒß¦ÿs ߦ¢ß¦Å ߦ¢ß¦ç-ƒ-ƒ ß¦Ç sߦ¢ß¦Å-Ç-Å =ƒôò
ߦí-£ß¦ç-Çߦç +¬s ߦÇ+¦+ó-Ç-ŠߦäߦÅ+¦ß¦äߦÅ-Çߦà +óߦ£-Šߦí-£ß¦ç+¦ -ÅߦÅߦ£ +¦ß¦çߦçߦà -£+¬ß¦ì
ߦÅsߦÿ-Çߦç-Å =ƒÜÇ
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
8538
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 05:44:11 -
[44] - Quote
I'll start getting concerned when Eve starts getting like this.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|

Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
34839
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 05:54:20 -
[45] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:I'll start getting concerned when Eve starts getting like this. I told them to put pachinko machines inside stations and bring WIS, am I terrible? But they would get a lot of cash, and you would get something TOTALLY AMAZING, randomly. 
ߦçߦáߦç-Ç-ŠߦÿߦÇ-Çߦ¢ ߦÅ-ô ß¦Ç +óߦÇߦìߦç -£ß¦ç-ƒß¦ÿs ߦ¢ß¦Å ߦ¢ß¦ç-ƒ-ƒ ß¦Ç sߦ¢ß¦Å-Ç-Å =ƒôò
ߦí-£ß¦ç-Çߦç +¬s ߦÇ+¦+ó-Ç-ŠߦäߦÅ+¦ß¦äߦÅ-Çߦà +óߦ£-Šߦí-£ß¦ç+¦ -ÅߦÅߦ£ +¦ß¦çߦçߦà -£+¬ß¦ì
ߦÅsߦÿ-Çߦç-Å =ƒÜÇ
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ
|

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6557
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 05:57:42 -
[46] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Zarek Kree wrote:
No...I think she pretty much captured the point. This is a perfect example of the adage "Where you stand is based on where you sit." In your view, PLEX negates the harshness of the game, but character sales don't...because you're a character seller.
If you are feeling dedicated enough, go back, way back, and look at all the posts I made that characters should be bound to the acct that created them and be untradeable. And yes, I was a character trader when I said that. Over and over. But...much like even though I think lottos are a governmental tax on the stupid, if someone gifted me a winning ticket I'd be first in line to cash it. By the same token, CCP introducing RMT to buy characters is handing me a winning ticket. I'd be a fool not to take advantage of it. So there you go. Like every other person playing, I'll take advantage of a **** poor mechanic. In real life I'll stick to my principles occasionally, but never in a video game. That doesn't mean I won't be vocal about my disdain for the very mechanic that has helped make me rich. Mr Epeen 
Nobody gifted you characters to sell. You used your RL money to train them up in terms of SP then you cashed them in for ISK. That isn't RMT how precisely? And here are a couple of other points, you were facilitating the softening of the game by making it easier for people who needed a specific type of character quickly vs. telling them to HTFU and go train what they needed. Further, character trading is about as passive an income stream as one can have. These are things many people tend to look down their noses at (personally I don't mind).
And if you aren't going to stick to your principles why are you so upset when CCP does not stick to your principles?
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|

Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
3489
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 07:40:52 -
[47] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:Nobody gifted you characters to sell. You used your RL money to train them up in terms of SP then you cashed them in for ISK. That isn't RMT how precisely? And here are a couple of other points, you were facilitating the softening of the game by making it easier for people who needed a specific type of character quickly vs. telling them to HTFU and go train what they needed. Further, character trading is about as passive an income stream as one can have. These are things many people tend to look down their noses at (personally I don't mind).
And if you aren't going to stick to your principles why are you so upset when CCP does not stick to your principles? Indeed. Character trading is straight-up RMT. It is exchanging in-game resources and power for cash albeit in a sanctioned way. It is why I didn't get all the uproar over P2W and "making the game less harsh" that went on last year when Skill Injectors were introduced. It is the exact same thing for crying out loud, and has been in the game for years and years. I think the loudest moaning game from players who trained and traded characters basically out of the game, in order to skim some in-game resources for themselves at no risk. All CCP did was find a way to cut out these greedy middle-men and make the RMT market more efficient (while probably increasing their real-world currency take per unit SP traded). But the fundamental mechanic has been there forever.
Same with the OP's complaint about the purpose of PLEX. Back when game codes were originally traded the sole purpose of the exchange was to trade in-game power for real-world resources. CCP, nor anyone else pretended otherwise. I wasn't around, but I believe when PLEX was first introduced its only purpose was the same - to allow players to exchange real-world game time for in-game resources. There were no other purposes. They eventually added some account related ones, and after the unification with Aurum, it inherited a whole set of additional uses to buy (largely vanity) in-game items via micro-transaction, but it is sort of missing the point to say that PLEX was not always intended to allow legal RMT between the players, or that CCP was trying to hide that fact.
As was said, there is no point in whining about that now. You are about a decade late if you can't handle a game with blatant and sanctioned RMT. Personally, I think for the type of game Eve is, trading SP is perfectly fine and fits with the free market theme of the game. I think Eve would be a more authentic game without any RMT, but I get the realities of a persistent MMO and realize that RMT of the illicit sort would still go on even if CCP didn't bring it into the open.
What is annoying is how in your face CCP is making the micro-transaction thing, which becomes insulting at some point when you are paying a monthly subscription to supposedly play the game. As long as the things they are selling amount to optional vanity items and taxes on RMT the integrity of the game will stay intact (well, as intact as it has been for years), but at some point that is going to turn off the regular paying customers who will just go somewhere else. One of the main attraction of a subscription is I don't have to deal with constant, and often deceitful, attempts at nickle-and-diming by the developer and while I can just ignore it like I have all along, it is tiring, and will get more tiring the more they increasingly wave it in my face.
The 8 Golden Rules of Eve
Why Do They Gank?
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
4144
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 08:35:03 -
[48] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:How would you know what the CSM was informed of? Are you in it? Because they told us on the forums they where not informed?
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
4144
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 09:11:58 -
[49] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:As was said, there is no point in whining about that now. You are about a decade late if you can't handle a game with blatant and sanctioned RMT. Personally, I think for the type of game Eve is, trading SP is perfectly fine and fits with the free market theme of the game. I think Eve would be a more authentic game without any RMT, but I get the realities of a persistent MMO and realize that RMT of the illicit sort would still go on even if CCP didn't bring it into the open. Oh I think we have come to a point where it is perfectly fine to whine about it. Actually we have come to that point a long time ago.
PLEX started as a legit way to RMT ISK to battle ISK sellers with CCP getting the profit instead of some other guy. This was always totally ok in my books since it was the lesser evil and almost completely eradicated the ISK spamers.
In the recent years CCP iterated on it in a massive way by first adding micro-transactions which I always thought was completely over the top for a subscription MMO which costs 15$ per month and then starting to adding non-vanity items, despite the promise to never do so, to the store. And now they basically turned PLEX into space gold while at the same time they created a magic item hangar which transcends characters and does not drop stuff.
I don't think those developments are in any way healthy for the game, For CCPs wallets perhaps, but I would say they managed to survive for over 10 years before they started to turning EVE into a store front with ads to purchase more stuff everywhere which in my opinion is heavily nagging on the immersion.
If they would stop right now, maybe I could still have hopes. I would still despise the micro-transactions and the space gold, but to be honest I don't believe for a second they are finished yet. They are quite clever iterating on it in a slow pace, while being able to argue at any point that the new thing is basically just a small change and everything you can do now you could do before in some way. I have absolutely no illusions that they are done yet. It is pretty obvious this will continue, and in my opinion this destroys the game I like bit for bit.
I used to pay 3 chars out of my wallet, now it is just 1, since the game lost value in my eyes and I am hardly playing anymore, watching from afar as they turn a perfectly fine space game where I was ok with paying 45 bucks a month into a store front. In my opinion I can get a lot more value for those 30$ somewhere else where I get all the content and not more an more locked away behind more and more paywalls on top of the 15$ monthly one.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
3489
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 09:50:00 -
[50] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Oh I think we have come to a point where it is perfectly fine to whine about it. Actually we have come to that point a long time ago.
PLEX started as a legit way to RMT ISK to battle ISK sellers with CCP getting the profit instead of some other guy. This was always totally ok in my books since it was the lesser evil and almost completely eradicated the ISK spamers.
In the recent years CCP iterated on it in a massive way by first adding micro-transactions which I always thought was completely over the top for a subscription MMO which costs 15$ per month and then starting to adding non-vanity items, despite the promise to never do so, to the store. And now they basically turned PLEX into space gold while at the same time they created a magic item hangar which transcends characters and does not drop stuff.
I don't think those developments are in any way healthy for the game, For CCPs wallets perhaps, but I would say they managed to survive for over 10 years before they started to turning EVE into a store front with ads to purchase more stuff everywhere which in my opinion is heavily nagging on the immersion. Don't worry then. 2016 was the best year ever for CCP financially, and it can only get better with the new unified PLEX system they just introduced. Clearly CCP has solved the monetization of Eve Online and they can get put that team back onto adding fixing or adding to the game itself. Eve Updates is bare, and at FanFest CCP Seagull all but said they were nowhere close to completing the grand vision of her roadmap for Eve online.
They could do that and provide some real reasons for players to remain interested, or become interested in the game, or, they could spend more time on coming up with more ways to make Eve look more like an online casino and squeeze a few more pennies out of the dwindling player base. I guess only time will tell.
The 8 Golden Rules of Eve
Why Do They Gank?
|
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
4144
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 10:35:25 -
[51] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Don't worry then. 2016 was the best year ever for CCP financially, and it can only get better with the new unified PLEX system they just introduced. Clearly CCP has solved the monetization of Eve Online and they can get put that team back onto adding fixing or adding to the game itself. Eve Updates is bare, and at FanFest CCP Seagull all but said they were nowhere close to completing the grand vision of her roadmap for Eve online. They could do that and provide some real reasons for players to remain interested, or become interested in the game, or, they could spend more time on coming up with more ways to make Eve look more like an online casino and squeeze a few more pennies out of the dwindling player base. I guess only time will tell. But I am worried, exactly because this updates page is so bare. All those additional monetization efforts came out of the blue almost completely implemented.
There are basically 3 possibilities here why it is so empty: 1) It is another step with even more monetization, therefor secrecy. 2) Fewer teams work on EVE and therefor only balancing and small features make it to the game, so the page is accurate. 3) There is a really big expansion in the works and they don't want to spoil the surprise.
Now I would be really really surprised in a very positive way and channel those 30 bucks back into EVE if it was number 3. However, there is no real good reason at the moment to think that. It is far more likely it is 1 or 2.
As for the more money CCP makes with EVE, don't think for a second this will in any way influence how much resources they spend on it. CCP is a company and has more projects than EVE. Their newest thing is the whole VR crap which in my opinion is just another obvious dead end. I mean they have only one successful game and now they gut it for money to fuel development in a market which is just incredibly small and still at a high risk of never taking off.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
34840
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 10:48:50 -
[52] - Quote
Quote:There is a really big expansion in the works There is something about new opportunities in high sec and mining platforms.
ߦçߦáߦç-Ç-ŠߦÿߦÇ-Çߦ¢ ߦÅ-ô ß¦Ç +óߦÇߦìߦç -£ß¦ç-ƒß¦ÿs ߦ¢ß¦Å ߦ¢ß¦ç-ƒ-ƒ ß¦Ç sߦ¢ß¦Å-Ç-Å =ƒôò
ߦí-£ß¦ç-Çߦç +¬s ߦÇ+¦+ó-Ç-ŠߦäߦÅ+¦ß¦äߦÅ-Çߦà +óߦ£-Šߦí-£ß¦ç+¦ -ÅߦÅߦ£ +¦ß¦çߦçߦà -£+¬ß¦ì
ߦÅsߦÿ-Çߦç-Å =ƒÜÇ
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ
|

Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
3489
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 11:26:36 -
[53] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Black Pedro wrote:Don't worry then. 2016 was the best year ever for CCP financially, and it can only get better with the new unified PLEX system they just introduced. Clearly CCP has solved the monetization of Eve Online and they can get put that team back onto adding fixing or adding to the game itself. Eve Updates is bare, and at FanFest CCP Seagull all but said they were nowhere close to completing the grand vision of her roadmap for Eve online. They could do that and provide some real reasons for players to remain interested, or become interested in the game, or, they could spend more time on coming up with more ways to make Eve look more like an online casino and squeeze a few more pennies out of the dwindling player base. I guess only time will tell. But I am worried, exactly because this updates page is so bare. All those additional monetization efforts came out of the blue almost completely implemented. There are basically 3 possibilities here why it is so empty: 1) It is another step with even more monetization, therefor secrecy. 2) Fewer teams work on EVE and therefor only balancing and small features make it to the game, so the page is accurate. 3) There is a really big expansion in the works and they don't want to spoil the surprise. Now I would be really really surprised in a very positive way and channel those 30 bucks back into EVE if it was number 3. However, there is no real good reason at the moment to think that. It is far more likely it is 1 or 2. As for the more money CCP makes with EVE, don't think for a second this will in any way influence how much resources they spend on it. CCP is a company and has more projects than EVE. Their newest thing is the whole VR crap which in my opinion is just another obvious dead end. I mean they have only one successful game and now they gut it for money to fuel development in a market which is just incredibly small and still at a high risk of never taking off. I share all your concerns. I was attempting to be sardonic there.
The big warning flag for me was when mining platforms, the only thing of significance on the updates page for the last half of 2016 got unceremoniously delayed a whole year, and replaced with nothing but a vague reference to a mysterious Empire expansion at Fanfest. That could mean they have been working in complete silence on some amazing new content that will completely revitalize the PvE in the game, or it could mean they basically stopped investment in the game, aside from some token maintenance and effort towards what Seagull promised, and switched most of the remaining resources to monetizing the game via micro transaction. I suspect you are right though and it is the latter meaning there is only moderate, and glacial iteration ahead for the game and, likely, continued decline because of it.
We shall see in the winter if there really is some meat on the promised Empire expansion, or if it is just a permanent implementation of the events they have been running with some of this slightly-better AI thrown in. And then one can all make a choice of whether to continue sending money to CCP every month for the product they have made if one has stuck around until then.
The 8 Golden Rules of Eve
Why Do They Gank?
|

Trixi Laminer
The Scope Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 13:01:20 -
[54] - Quote
Plex has always been available through ccp or one of its resellers for as long as i can remember. Either you afford the price or you grind isk for the plex or you do the alpha player stuff. Plex opens up the game for both casual people who maybe dont want to subscribe for 6 months but maybe for 1 month at a time and the hardcore folks who need to buy 20 new pvp ships  |

Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries VOID Intergalactic Forces
430
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 15:34:19 -
[55] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning. For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it. It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe. As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution. Mr Epeen 
yeah I know pve and pvp pilots alike that just make up for losses buying plex.
had a ceo I know that's been buying plex to get injectors and rorqs + some other ships and have lost them wonderfully, buys more plex to make up for the losses
I know PVP pilots that have 0 reason to do any pve for isk now because when they need isk for new ships they just buy more plex so they can stay on their gates more
"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith
|

TigerXtrm
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1938
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 16:30:50 -
[56] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem.
This isn't pay to win.
You have to win with what you buy to make it pay to win. 99% of the people buying PLEX for ships lose them almost instantly.
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|

April rabbit
Mosquito Squadron The-Culture
15
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 17:11:07 -
[57] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This isn't pay to win. You have to win with what you buy to make it pay to win. 99% of the people buying PLEX for ships lose them almost instantly. Isn't it any different in any other game? Is it really possible somewhere to simply pay and get others killed without using your stuff?  |

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6563
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 17:35:55 -
[58] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This isn't pay to win. You have to win with what you buy to make it pay to win. 99% of the people buying PLEX for ships lose them almost instantly.
Okay, so I saw ImaGÇÖs initial post and now this post quoting it gives me a chance to address my issue with ImaGÇÖs position.
The implication is that ISK => winning/more capable. I have two issues with this view.
The first is that having ISK conveys some sort of strong advantage. Yes, having ISK means I can go out and buy expensive stuff in game, but I question whether or not this means that one is assured of victory or that victory is more likely. After all, look at ImaGÇÖs organization. There they routinely use ships that cost a fraction of the hull they are going to blow up (I am referring to suicide ganking of freighters). The notion of ISK tanking or even more questionable ISK based DPS does not seem like dubious concepts.
One can argue that it makes to reship, but this strikes me as a weak argument in support of pay2win. First off, reshipping does not mean future success, it can, but it is not a given. Second, isnGÇÖt reshipping and getting back out there and playing the game a good thing?
The second problem I have with this is that PLEX for ISK for new players, time constrained players and players who just loathe in game ISK making activities is a way of reducing whatever ISK advantage older more established players have and shifting it to these other classes of players. And it is one that is completely voluntary. The person handing over the ISK clearly values the PLEX more than the ISK and the person handing over the PLEX values the ISK more than the PLEX. Both parties are clearly better off. And has been alluded to in previous comments those of us not party to this exchange may also benefit. We benefit by keeping the both players in the game and doing stuff. Some of these in-game rich player stays in game by PLEXing account. Also, the player buying ISK is not willing to go out into space and do stuff. In other words, we have the potential for more content not less.
Does this make the game a bit less Gǣharsh and coldGǥ? Maybe, but whether you are using that ISK you got via a PLEX to sit with your buddies on a gate and slaughter everyone coming through, or you are getting slaughtered by jumping through into that gate camp the game can still be pretty damn unforgiving in many ways. Making it easier to retain some players and for other players to go out and do stuff in game does not strike me as a bad thing at the end of the day. If some guy uses his RL money to buy a PLEX or 5 and then uses that ISK to buy ships I get to try and blow up that shipGǪfantastic. If it is a corp/alliance mate doing the same thing and he is now in fleet and we are going out to stir up trouble. Wonderful.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6563
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 17:37:54 -
[59] - Quote
April rabbit wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This isn't pay to win. You have to win with what you buy to make it pay to win. 99% of the people buying PLEX for ships lose them almost instantly. Isn't it any different in any other game? Is it really possible somewhere to simply pay and get others killed without using your stuff? 
In other games you pay and get items that give you an advantage. I suppose having ISK does convey some advantage, but not in terms of items--i.e. you are not using an item I cannot have except by opening my RL wallet.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|

Jenn aSide
Shinigami Miners ChaosTheory.
16027
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 17:38:02 -
[60] - Quote
The distinction between pay to win and "pay to save time" (what EVE does) is narrow, but it exists. EVE doesn't have ships and ammo that can ONLY be had by paying cash. And nothing in the New Eden store gives insane buffs to actual in game items.
If CCP had an option for me to pay 100 bucks and turn my Machariel into a "Cartel Fleet Issue Machariel" with 8 guns and a 100% damage bonus to guns and 600 ehp if you put just one shield extender on it and there was no way to get that ship with ISK, THAT would be pay to win.
(damn, why did I envision a Fleet Mach, now I want one!!!)
CCP letting you spend money to get characters or skill injectors or dual character training in EVE Online faster than you could the old fashioned way just isn't the same thing. I'm as anti P2W as anyone when it comes to games, especially EVE, but it does not exist right now and nothing CCP is doing looks like it's coming.
IMO no reason to be worried and even if there was a reason, it's CCPs game. Our choices are play or play not, that's all. |
|

Jenn aSide
Shinigami Miners ChaosTheory.
16027
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 17:40:15 -
[61] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:April rabbit wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This isn't pay to win. You have to win with what you buy to make it pay to win. 99% of the people buying PLEX for ships lose them almost instantly. Isn't it any different in any other game? Is it really possible somewhere to simply pay and get others killed without using your stuff?  In other games you pay and get items that give you an advantage. I suppose having ISK does convey some advantage, but not in terms of items--i.e. you are not using an item I cannot have except by opening my RL wallet.
Exactly. When the day comes that I can pay 5 bucks to make my Ishtar launch 10 drones instead of 5 or directl make a 5% bonus to something 10 %, that will be when the line is crossed.
|

Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale Black Marker
1502
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 17:53:09 -
[62] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I've been against PLEX as implemented since the beginning. For one reason. That was the day "cold " and "harsh" ceased to have any meaning when describing the game. Lose a ship? No problem, just buy some ISK and replace it. It was especially noticeable as a character seller. I'd have to wait for some guy to have his couple of hundred dollar PLEX purchase go through so he could buy the character I was selling. So much for the struggle in this harsh universe. As for justifying corporate RMT as a solution to unofficial RMT...IT'S STILL RMT! It's completely the wrong solution. Mr Epeen  60-day GTCs were traded for ISK on the forums right from the start in 2003. PLEX just integrated that into the game and made it easier in 2007.
When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.
|

Nasar Vyron
S0utherN Comfort Test Alliance Please Ignore
229
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 18:03:34 -
[63] - Quote
Uhh I've seen people get carriers and supers recently because they broke out the CC (FYI this is nothing totally new) but with quickly injected characters that they decided to skimp out on very important skills and need to get bailed out of bad situations they get themselves into.
First time carrier pilot because they heard it had dank wallet ticks. "How do you jump?" "I can't fit a jump portal array." ...My fit is 10 jumps away I'll just take gates. I want a super, a cyno isn't a requirement to fly it so no point in injecting. Help! I'm tackled! Someone light a cyno for me. Or I'm not a combat super I don't need a combat refit. I'll never need that passive refit so I won't train the compensation skills either that will save me a few hundred dollars in injectors and modules. Thankfully I haven't seen a full CC warrior titan yet to have any stories, but I'm sure they exist.
EVE has never been in this situation before to this extent. It's definitely not pay to win, but it is pay to be ******** and make your corps/alliances look bad. That is what pisses some vets off - their impatience and unwillingness to learn the most basic mechanics before getting into them. |

Skorpynekomimi
702
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 18:13:46 -
[64] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:I'll start getting concerned when Eve starts getting like this.
And yet, playing 15-30 minutes 5 days a week for a few months meant I end up with more resources than I know what to do with in that game. As something to waste time on my breaks at work, it was ideal. But now I'm able to get hold of newspapers again, my interest waned. Still spent no real money on it, still nothing in it you can't get from playing.
Economic PVP
|

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
229
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 18:46:00 -
[65] - Quote
Nasar Vyron wrote:Uhh I've seen people get carriers and supers recently because they broke out the CC (FYI this is nothing totally new) but with quickly injected characters that they decided to skimp out on very important skills and need to get bailed out of bad situations they get themselves into.
First time carrier pilot because they heard it had dank wallet ticks. "How do you jump?" "I can't fit a jump portal array." ...My fit is 10 jumps away I'll just take gates. I want a super, a cyno isn't a requirement to fly it so no point in injecting. Help! I'm tackled! Someone light a cyno for me. Or I'm not a combat super I don't need a combat refit. I'll never need that passive refit so I won't train the compensation skills either that will save me a few hundred dollars in injectors and modules. Thankfully I haven't seen a full CC warrior titan yet to have any stories, but I'm sure they exist.
EVE has never been in this situation before to this extent. It's definitely not pay to win, but it is pay to be ******** and make your corps/alliances look bad. That is what pisses some vets off - their impatience and unwillingness to learn the most basic mechanics before getting into them.
I think your points are valid, but it's actually an argument in support of PLEX - not against. The system is self-correcting. If you inject skills and buy ships that you aren't ready for, you get smacked. EVE rewards experience far more than it does SP.
My own personal lesson in this came during my first few months in the game. I heard all these stories about how much money you could make ratting in a VNI (as a poor man's Ishtar), but I didn't have anywhere near the ship or drone skills I needed, so I bought some PLEX and skill injected what I needed. The problem was, I didn't have the first clue about how to rat safely in LS and NS. My first VNI got killed at a gate. My 2nd lasted about 30 min before a passing roam got me. You can't PLEX away inexperience and stupidity. By the time I got some experience and figured out the right way to do things, I could have trained those skills naturally. It was a waste of money.
So what's the harm? No bitter vet honor was harmed during the making of this anecdote - only my own pride. |

Nasar Vyron
S0utherN Comfort Test Alliance Please Ignore
230
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 19:16:27 -
[66] - Quote
@Zarek Kree - for the record I'm not fighting for or against injectors. But... I really hope you can see the difference between injecting into a VNI vs a carrier vs a super. If nothing else the several hundred dollars difference in that price tag if you CC warrior it, as well as the base knowledge expected of those flying these hulls. And how it looks upon the corp/alliance when those same people turn around and lose it due to their impatience and ignorance. |

Zarek Kree
Lunatic Legion Holdings
229
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 19:24:59 -
[67] - Quote
Nasar Vyron wrote:@Zarek Kree - for the record I'm not fighting for or against injectors. But... I really hope you can see the difference between injecting into a VNI vs a carrier vs a super. If nothing else the several hundred dollars difference in that price tag if you CC warrior it, as well as the base knowledge expected of those flying these hulls. And how it looks upon the corp/alliance when those same people turn around and lose it due to their impatience and ignorance.
I think the difference is only one of degree. If you're too inexperienced to fly a ship that you skill injected into and die in a glorious explosion the moment you undock, how does this hurt anybody but the "CC warrior"? |

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6566
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 19:25:28 -
[68] - Quote
Nasar Vyron wrote:@Zarek Kree - for the record I'm not fighting for or against injectors. But... I really hope you can see the difference between injecting into a VNI vs a carrier vs a super. If nothing else the several hundred dollars difference in that price tag if you CC warrior it, as well as the base knowledge expected of those flying these hulls. And how it looks upon the corp/alliance when those same people turn around and lose it due to their impatience and ignorance.
Doesn't that actually reinforce EVE as harsh though?
A guy blows hundreds of dollars and helps to pad my killboards. Thanks buddy!
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|

Nasar Vyron
S0utherN Comfort Test Alliance Please Ignore
230
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 19:51:30 -
[69] - Quote
Like I said, I don't care one way or the other. I see the benefits and drawbacks to their existence. Great for newbros trying to just catch up, bad for those who think they are actually buying power. I'd agree we are slightly better with than without as it's more money for CCP and more content for us. But as far as the long term health and perception of the game goes, that's in question. |

Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
34856
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 19:52:23 -
[70] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:Nasar Vyron wrote:@Zarek Kree - for the record I'm not fighting for or against injectors. But... I really hope you can see the difference between injecting into a VNI vs a carrier vs a super. If nothing else the several hundred dollars difference in that price tag if you CC warrior it, as well as the base knowledge expected of those flying these hulls. And how it looks upon the corp/alliance when those same people turn around and lose it due to their impatience and ignorance. Doesn't that actually reinforce EVE as harsh though? A guy blows hundreds of dollars and helps to pad my killboards. Thanks buddy! Yes, its content. Bad players are content too. We should be thankfull.
ߦçߦáߦç-Ç-ŠߦÿߦÇ-Çߦ¢ ߦÅ-ô ß¦Ç +óߦÇߦìߦç -£ß¦ç-ƒß¦ÿs ߦ¢ß¦Å ߦ¢ß¦ç-ƒ-ƒ ß¦Ç sߦ¢ß¦Å-Ç-Å =ƒôò
ߦí-£ß¦ç-Çߦç +¬s ߦÇ+¦+ó-Ç-ŠߦäߦÅ+¦ß¦äߦÅ-Çߦà +óߦ£-Šߦí-£ß¦ç+¦ -ÅߦÅߦ£ +¦ß¦çߦçߦà -£+¬ß¦ì
ߦÅsߦÿ-Çߦç-Å =ƒÜÇ
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ
|
|

NUBIARN
Brutal Ballerinas
29
|
Posted - 2017.06.07 21:12:53 -
[71] - Quote
It is content that's the problem, or lack of it really. simply put it is easier to put a few hours overtime in at work and then buy plex than it is to grind for hours on end for isk.
The basic game hasn't changed in this regard since the early days, personally I think that's the major problem why player retention has dwindled. Yes there are area`s of the game where lots of isk can be made but the majority of pilots fly solo!! I know get some friends will be the response its a group game, yet many pilots don't play like that, look at the map high sec has most pilots, and the least isk makinh meaning plex is obviously the way many would take. I do agree with the op thou that it has made the game less hardcore. I remeneber when a battleship was a corp owned thing that required significant effort to obtain !!
PS above is not a moan I more than enough isk I am just pointing out why I think plex is so popular method of gaining isk. |

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
4151
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 07:35:07 -
[72] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:April rabbit wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This isn't pay to win. You have to win with what you buy to make it pay to win. 99% of the people buying PLEX for ships lose them almost instantly. Isn't it any different in any other game? Is it really possible somewhere to simply pay and get others killed without using your stuff?  In other games you pay and get items that give you an advantage. I suppose having ISK does convey some advantage, but not in terms of items--i.e. you are not using an item I cannot have except by opening my RL wallet. Exactly. When the day comes that I can pay 5 bucks to make my Ishtar launch 10 drones instead of 5 or directl make a 5% bonus to something 10 %, that will be when the line is crossed. Oh if you replace the example you made with something that is actually possible you can do that. You can pay to launch more drones by purchasing ISK for skill injectors instead of waiting for the small trickle of SP you get normally. This resembles a typical paywall found in many other pay2win games.
Let me address you and also Teckos here and clarify my position on this.
First of all, the term pay2win is used to describe a game where you can purchase game advancement, non-vanity items and lower timers with RL money instead of having to play the game for it. It does not mean "winning" in the literal sense, since in every game you also need player skill and such a thing can not be sold, and that is just true for every game. So pretending a game is not pay2win because they don't sell player skill (because it is not possible) is a bit disingenuous, since that would be true for all games anyway.
I know very well that PLEX was introduced to battle illegal RMT, but while it technically always resembled pay2win, it was the lesser of two evils and advertised as simple player2player transactions of ISK for game time.
But they recently started to heavily expand on it. And while you always had the knowledge somewhere back in your head that you could refill your space pockets with your RL money, it wasn't all that visible and dominating the game experience like it is today. There are literally ads to purchase advancements like skill injectors and ISK or access to more stuff and faster training time (Omega) at every corner now.
Now I know that most of this was possible for years. That does not mean I was in favour of it. As I said it was the lesser evil for a specific purpose. What I have a serious problem with is that they turn EVE from a game which was a immersive experience where the purpose was to flourish and make your way in this harsh universe to a something that looks more and more like a store front with small ads and reminders which nag you to purchase more stuff with RL money.
The page linked in the OP is the perfect example for this and the reactions and reciting of fallacies like "pay2win is only a given when you literally win" shows how blind people are to this tremendous change in how EVE is advertised.
It is true that EVE has some game mechanics which dwarf the advantages of stuff you can just purchase with RL money. However, think about how this game looks to you if you where new to the game and did not even know that. I bet if you would discover EVE at this time and day you would be appalled, since what it communicates is "paywalls everywhere".
This is how it looks now: - Want to stop the endless and slow grind to get that new shiny ship? => give money. - Want to stop the endless waiting for a skill with that awfully slow SP trickle? => give money - Want to access more ships and skills to even be competitive? => give money - Oh you purchased SP for a skill with RL money which was an OMEGA skill and now you are alpha again? => give more money to access the skill you purchased - every - month!
Now before you post "but this was possible before!!" think for a moment! Would you play a game where the above was your first impression if you don't have an investment already which makes you come here and defend it? Why isn't the "free2play" push attracting new players? Did you take a look at the PCU? It is back to where it was before they changed it and I am really not surprised, I would not start to play EVE if what I would encounter is the above.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

Mark Marconi
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
170
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 07:39:08 -
[73] - Quote
Welcome to the world of the golden rule.
He who has the gold makes the rules.
The CSM gets in the way of CCP communicating properly with the players of this game.
After all we are not just players, we are customers.
Time for the CSM to be disbanded.
|

April rabbit
Mosquito Squadron The-Culture
16
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 09:34:57 -
[74] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:April rabbit wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This isn't pay to win. You have to win with what you buy to make it pay to win. 99% of the people buying PLEX for ships lose them almost instantly. Isn't it any different in any other game? Is it really possible somewhere to simply pay and get others killed without using your stuff?  In other games you pay and get items that give you an advantage. I suppose having ISK does convey some advantage, but not in terms of items--i.e. you are not using an item I cannot have except by opening my RL wallet. I see your point. However i don't agree with the notion that pay2win does not work if items obtained with RL money can be exchanged in-game (just to be sure: this is what i got from your post, i can be wrong for sure).
You mentioned CODE. But this is pretty nice example of advantage of ISK: having ISK allows you to bring more pilots and spend more ships on kills. Just imagine if CODE has no big wallet? They will not be able to kill empty freighters or maybe they won't be able to kill freighters at all. Because pilots need PLEX and ISK for ships. So CODE is perfect example of what happens when game entity has too deep wallet.
Look at other side of killmail: freighter pilots. People constantly tell then to bring webbing alt, scouting alt, etc... But all these alts need to be paid. And here we go again: ISK makes a difference. And good example of it: Red Frog. They have enough money to "do it right".
High-sec "mercenaries"? You have money - you can recruit them to hurt your competitor. Your competitor has enough money - you might get into trouble of wardecs.
0.0 sec? The same: alliance with bigger wallet can bring more pilots and better doctrines using SRP.
Trading? Small scale trader will have tough time competing with whales who can corner the market if he wants.
ISK is not straight 'Pay to win" but having more of it gives pretty nice advantage. |

SupaL33tH4x0r Regime
Minmatar Gallente VOID
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 11:34:06 -
[75] - Quote
Skorpynekomimi wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:I'll start getting concerned when Eve starts getting like this. And yet, playing 15-30 minutes 5 days a week for a few months meant I end up with more resources than I know what to do with in that game. As something to waste time on my breaks at work, it was ideal. But now I'm able to get hold of newspapers again, my interest waned. Still spent no real money on it, still nothing in it you can't get from playing.
There was a guy that CC'd his way into a Sansha super carrier for like 15k usd and his alliance killed him for the killmail, its not a titan but the price tag I believe surpasses that. |

Jenn aSide
Shinigami Miners ChaosTheory.
16039
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 12:07:06 -
[76] - Quote
April rabbit wrote:
ISK is not straight 'Pay to win" but having more of it gives pretty nice advantage.
And without plex, the only people who would have that advantage would be those who played longer. Plex helps level the playing field, and while this isn't all that important to me, it is important to many players 'obsessed' with being able to 'catch up' in an MMO.
Which is why plex is a necessary evil in so many ways, The people who complain about plex and pay to win do so from the comfort of a virtual game world that might not exist were it not for plex, or would exist but be WAY crappier with an economy skewed and screwed by isk sellers too numerous for even CCP to deal with.
|

April rabbit
Mosquito Squadron The-Culture
17
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 13:24:17 -
[77] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:April rabbit wrote:
ISK is not straight 'Pay to win" but having more of it gives pretty nice advantage.
And without plex, the only people who would have that advantage would be those who played longer. Plex helps level the playing field, and while this isn't all that important to me, it is important to many players 'obsessed' with being able to 'catch up' in an MMO. Which is why plex is a necessary evil in so many ways, The people who complain about plex and pay to win do so from the comfort of a virtual game world that might not exist were it not for plex, or would exist but be WAY crappier with an economy skewed and screwed by isk sellers too numerous for even CCP to deal with. True |

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6574
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 16:52:20 -
[78] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
[snipping; too many quotes]
Oh if you replace the example you made with something that is actually possible you can do that. You can pay to launch more drones by purchasing ISK for skill injectors instead of waiting for the small trickle of SP you get normally. This resembles a typical paywall found in many other pay2win games.
Let me address you and also Teckos here and clarify my position on this.
First of all, the term pay2win is used to describe a game where you can purchase game advancement, non-vanity items and lower timers with RL money instead of having to play the game for it. It does not mean "winning" in the literal sense, since in every game you also need player skill and such a thing can not be sold, and that is just true for every game. So pretending a game is not pay2win because they don't sell player skill (because it is not possible) is a bit disingenuous, since that would be true for all games anyway.
I know very well that PLEX was introduced to battle illegal RMT, but while it technically always resembled pay2win, it was the lesser of two evils and advertised as simple player2player transactions of ISK for game time.
But they recently started to heavily expand on it. And while you always had the knowledge somewhere back in your head that you could refill your space pockets with your RL money, it wasn't all that visible and dominating the game experience like it is today. There are literally ads to purchase advancements like skill injectors and ISK or access to more stuff and faster training time (Omega) at every corner now.
Now I know that most of this was possible for years. That does not mean I was in favour of it. As I said it was the lesser evil for a specific purpose. What I have a serious problem with is that they turn EVE from a game which was a immersive experience where the purpose was to flourish and make your way in this harsh universe to a something that looks more and more like a store front with small ads and reminders which nag you to purchase more stuff with RL money.
The page linked in the OP is the perfect example for this and the reactions and reciting of fallacies like "pay2win is only a given when you literally win" shows how blind people are to this tremendous change in how EVE is advertised.
It is true that EVE has some game mechanics which dwarf the advantages of stuff you can just purchase with RL money. However, think about how this game looks to you if you where new to the game and did not even know that. I bet if you would discover EVE at this time and day you would be appalled, since what it communicates is "paywalls everywhere".
This is how it looks now: - Want to stop the endless and slow grind to get that new shiny ship? => give money. - Want to stop the endless waiting for a skill with that awfully slow SP trickle? => give money - Want to access more ships and skills to even be competitive? => give money - Oh you purchased SP for a skill with RL money which was an OMEGA skill and now you are alpha again? => give more money to access the skill you purchased - every - month!
Now before you post "but this was possible before!!" think for a moment! Would you play a game where the above was your first impression if you don't have an investment already which makes you come here and defend it? Why isn't the "free2play" push attracting new players? Did you take a look at the PCU? It is back to where it was before they changed it and I am really not surprised, I would not start to play EVE if what I would encounter is the above.
You don't play the game for SP. That is, I can pay a sub and simply not log except to change/modify the skill queue. In short, that is "pay2win" under your definition. By paying my sub I get more SP. All the character bazaar and injectors do is let a player speed up this process at a premium....and often ending up doing dumb things. Those who do not do dumb things have acquired considerable in game ISK--i.e. they are veterans which makes for a powerful advantage. Lots of SP and lots of ISK, so much so for the latter that they too can speed up the training process for a premium. But somehow when a new player does pretty much the same thing with his RL credit card it is now bad?
Also, how big of a problem is this? I just looked at skill injector prices, nuPLEX prices, subscription costs, etc. And if I did the math right (or at least a close approximation) it would cost quite a bit for a player to go from brand new starting SP to say 50 million SP, about $1,200. That is 329% more than paying an annual subscription and waiting the 2.2 years (26 months or so) to get to the same point...also paying RL money. How many new players take advantage of this and do this vs. veterans who are sitting veritable mountains of ISK?
Serious question: is it the use of RL money or that one can side-step the time requirements? After all it seems to me that the people who are going to take the most advantage of the new system in this way are going to be established players. Sure a new player might drop say $40 and 2-3 injectors and jump up 1-1.5 million SP here and there. But exactly how many new players are going open their wallets for $500 let alone $1,000 or more?
And I'll note that in each of your items above it is voluntary. All of them have "want" in them. I want a porsche, a house on the ocean, one in the mountains too, and wouldn't mind a nice collection of single malt whiskies too. But since I can't have them...well let's make it so nobody can?
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6575
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 17:04:15 -
[79] - Quote
And this notion of "To be competitive you have to open your wallet". That view has ALWAYS been here. In fact, I think one can argue it was even worse in the past. A player's options were far smaller in the past and when that new guy runs into that veteran....a player with 3 million SP vs. 72 million SP. Why it is so unfair, the new player never stands a chance.
This is the logical conclusion of these arguments, IMO. It is hilarious, really people complain about people using RL money to over come SP differences and whatever advantages that may imply, but it is actually better when the only option is to simply wait? There have been mega-threads on this forum where people complain bitterly about gating, SP walls, and such. Whining about just pay or sub, but don't bother to log in because you can't compete.
It strikes me that some people really want to go back to the old days (and amusing Herzog accuses me of not being in favor of change--whatever) where a player's options were more limited and there might be more validity to the complaints about gating, SP walls, etc.
And to be clear, I am not validating those complaints about gating, SP walls, etc. I am just pointing out that this view very much appears to have considerable over lap with the "SP wall" position. Maybe we should just remove SP entirely...nothing left to "RMT" and everyone can use any and all hulls, modules, etc. right out of the gate?
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|

Jenn aSide
Shinigami Miners ChaosTheory.
16046
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 17:35:25 -
[80] - Quote
Man, wtf is wrong with the world When it falls to Jenn to be the voice of reason? Rather than jump on the OP and tell him how stupid he is for feeling the way he does, I'm honestly trying to see the irritation from his and others point of view.
I should say "tried" though, because I'm still not with it, and few people are as passionate as I am at maintaining the ideals of EVE online as I am. I get that CCPs recent efforts coupled with the lack of exciting news of future updates strike some as money grabbing and stagnation. I also get that some people don't like the idea that outside influences (money) can affect the game.
Like I said, NO ONE is more sensitive to the idea of EVE sliding down to become crappy like other games as CCP tries to 'mainstream' it for ever great profits. I'm the one who points at the "easy to learn hard to master" thing starting in 2012 as a bad turning point from the game.
But honestly CCP hasn't done anything outrageous here, they didn't add gold ammo or game warping things that can ONLY be bought with real money, they didn't add a "pay 250 plex and have your next 5 pvp ship deaths fully refunded/restored" option or anything like that. They simply consolidated currencies and practices that have existed since the beginning of the game. Instead of buying GTCs for isk to then pay to Mr Epeen and people like him for a character that has the skills they want, a player can buy plex to sell for isk to then use for skill injectors to accomplish the same goal (and at greater expense than in the past). The guy who lost a pvp or pve ship doesn't buy a GTC or some illegal for isk to replace it, now he just buys plex.
We play in a space-world made possible by people buying short cuts for isk (GTCs way back when, then PLEX and Aurum until recently, nuPLEX now). Whole entire game play lifestyles revolve around the exchange that plex makes possible. Now that my kids are grown I have time and patience to play EVE and I like to PVE I can use plex for game time (and skins and sometimes skill injection), the people I buy PLEX from tend to not have time/patience and/or despise EVE's version of PVE, PLEX unites us both , gives us something to trade with each other, and keeps both types in the game.
I'm not trying to break any rules about talking about real life, just want to mention than in general I find the 'plex protesting' to resemble what happens in the real word ie people being mad about something that not only benefits society as a whole, but that helped produce and enrich them as well. |
|

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6575
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 17:44:29 -
[81] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:April rabbit wrote:
ISK is not straight 'Pay to win" but having more of it gives pretty nice advantage.
And without plex, the only people who would have that advantage would be those who played longer. Plex helps level the playing field, and while this isn't all that important to me, it is important to many players 'obsessed' with being able to 'catch up' in an MMO. Which is why plex is a necessary evil in so many ways, The people who complain about plex and pay to win do so from the comfort of a virtual game world that might not exist were it not for plex, or would exist but be WAY crappier with an economy skewed and screwed by isk sellers too numerous for even CCP to deal with.
Exactly, this allows for redistribution form those players with lots of ISK/SP to those without....and it is done in a voluntary manner.
As for PCU....the issue with this measure and all arguments surrounding it is, we don't have the counter factual time series. That is we don't know what PCU would look like without skill injectors. Or without various changes to in game mechanics. These kinds of arguments are very hard to settle which is why so many arguments revolving around time series data simply go on and on and on. Both in game and IRL. Hell, even things like panel data does not seem to help. The notion of "we just need more data" may very well not be true for some issues/topics.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
4155
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 19:13:12 -
[82] - Quote
So I'm probably not going to bring my point across here, but at least I tried.
So I went back to contemplate some more about the problem and looked one more time at the space gold (nuPLEX) ads when it hit me:
https://secure.eveonline.com/PLEX/
What do those bars look like? They look like a stack of gold-pressed Latinum. Seriously. It's true.
gold-pressed Latinum
qed.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
11365
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 22:23:58 -
[83] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:April rabbit wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This isn't pay to win. You have to win with what you buy to make it pay to win. 99% of the people buying PLEX for ships lose them almost instantly. Isn't it any different in any other game? Is it really possible somewhere to simply pay and get others killed without using your stuff?  In other games you pay and get items that give you an advantage. I suppose having ISK does convey some advantage, but not in terms of items--i.e. you are not using an item I cannot have except by opening my RL wallet. Some advantage? No...total advantage.
The corp that spent a year mining ore and building a fleet goes up against a corp that crowd funded their members for PLEX enough to easily outgun and unendingly replace ships as they're lost. Alliance wars are a numbers game needing only one or two skilled players per fleet. The guys with the money have the numbers, so they win.
Not pay to win in the traditional MMO meaning. But pay to win, nonetheless.
Mr Epeen 
|

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6575
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 22:56:03 -
[84] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:April rabbit wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Ima Wreckyou wrote:Inb4 some serious spin-doctoring about why this is not a blantant pay2win ad and absolutely no problem. This isn't pay to win. You have to win with what you buy to make it pay to win. 99% of the people buying PLEX for ships lose them almost instantly. Isn't it any different in any other game? Is it really possible somewhere to simply pay and get others killed without using your stuff?  In other games you pay and get items that give you an advantage. I suppose having ISK does convey some advantage, but not in terms of items--i.e. you are not using an item I cannot have except by opening my RL wallet. Some advantage? No...total advantage. The corp that spent a year mining ore and building a fleet goes up against a corp that crowd funded their members for PLEX enough to easily outgun and unendingly replace ships as they're lost. Alliance wars are a numbers game needing only one or two skilled players per fleet. The guys with the money have the numbers, so they win. Not pay to win in the traditional MMO meaning. But pay to win, nonetheless. Mr Epeen 
Says the RMTer. 
You really shot your credibility in the head when you announced you were a character trader which is you converting your RL money into ISK. Tell me...how many of those crowd funding guys did you supply characters too? 
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
11365
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 23:03:40 -
[85] - Quote
Teckos, you must have been Prom king. Because you can dance like a mother*******.
Mr Epeen  |

Teckos Pech
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
6575
|
Posted - 2017.06.08 23:33:15 -
[86] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Teckos, you must have been Prom king. Because you can dance like a mother*******. Mr Epeen 
And it's too bad you turned out to be such a hypocrite.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
8 Golden Rules for EVE Online
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |