EVE Search - Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Update on investigation into allegations of misconduct

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
ElweSingollo Starlancers Mordus Angels	Posted - 2007.05.28 12:31:00 - [1] Originally by: Avon Originally by: Frannkie BoB involvement with CCP via MSN has been proved and admitted on these forums in the past. Yeah, they have said they have chatted, so what? need anyone say any more, this SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED by anyone WHATEVER alliance they are in .... So everyone who was invited to the IRC dev-chats back in the day should be banned, because they had access to the devs that was not open to everyone? That is obscuring the point Avon the point that some people are worried about is that certain players because they have a "special" relationship with the Gods of the game if you will might try to abuse that and I don't think that it's BoB only that have this I am sure there are guys in other alliances that do as well... the point being if you were happen to say over MSN to your friendly Dev "were having this fleet fight down in EC-P and can't get our fleet in because they are are stuck in the dreaded Q" and that friendly Dev did his job and re-inforced said node and the battle turned to your/D2/ an other alliance that has a special line then that gives you an unfair advantage over an allaince who has to rely on the petition system which dependent on how busy it is could take anything from a couple of minutes to an hour to a week. As per my previous post the above goes back to the T20 incicent a seed of distrust was sown there which has since blossomed and people nwo are more ready to believe wrong in CCP than they used to for better or worse. CCP and Eve Online... It's not a bug, it's a feature
ElweSingollo Starlancers Mordus Angels	Posted - 2007.05.28 12:52:00 - [2] Originally by: DrAtomic Originally by: CCP kieron Originally by: Fofalus Also the response to the deleted petition a separate issue or is just being buried with this one? It is not possible for a GM or Developer to delete petitions. Those tools quite simply, do not exist. Claims of petitions being deleted are therefore utter fabrication and completely groundless. Sorry to be the devils advocate, but simply looking at my account... There are petitions gone, removed, vaporized (i petitioned a loss of a destroyer in a mission due to EvE crashing when I started playing and was awarded a new destroyer (LOL), thing is that petition is gone. Also didnt CCP delete their entire queue of petitions due to being overwhelmed a couple of times? Petitions can be vapourised yes but I rather imagine there is a trail when that is done Oveur as ever in his fantastic way with words has suggested that petitions cannot be deleted at all which isn't entirely true but what he probably meant is they cannot be deleted without leaving a visible trail. CCP and Eve Online... It's not a bug, it's a feature
ElweSingollo Starlancers Mordus Angels	Posted - 2007.05.28 13:13:00 - [3] Originally by: Cozmo I Imho: I didnt see any accusations yet that - even if true - would change anything about how the game is running. T20 Selection of BPO was a joke on a big alliance level and nothing on the table atm seems to change the game. The Only thing that really gets down my fun in playing this is those stupid drama bombs by people that seem to have no intention to even try and see the big picture. Come back if you have anything that would really change the game. I know how M-Corp got their Mothership and I know it was not a rigged event, but that would be something. I know RA used the carrier bug (endless storage) to refuel all their POSes in the last system they held while we had a blockade running, that was a history-changing event. A couple of relatively cheap T2 BPOs? an ISD reporter fired wrongfully? Get real, learn to play the game and try to understand what's going on on a big level - you'll see very quickly that Goons are pulling drama bombs about nothing. Cheating is ok as long as it is only "SMALL" cheating is that basically what your saying? Any cheating in this game should not be tolerated period regardless of whether it's a small cheat or a big cheat . CCP and Eve Online... It's not a bug, it's a feature
ElweSingollo Starlancers Mordus Angels	Posted - 2007.05.28 13:22:00 - [4] Originally by: Cozmo I Originally by: ElweSingollo Cheating is ok as long as it is only "SMALL" cheating is that basically what your saying? Any cheating in this game should not be tolerated period regardless of whether it's a small cheat or a big cheat . 100% agreed, but the drama bombs are WAAAAAAAAYYYYYY out of proportion, that's my point. I understand that but as I said earlier this to an extent is tied up in the T20 incident the only way that it came out into the public domain was because of a "Drama Bomb" CCP tried to cover that one up and now have an image problem that associates them with ebndervouring to cover up "Shady Dealings" they would like to have the benefit of the doubt but they seem not to have learnt any PR lessons from the previous incident. I will await with interest what Aarkonon says about the "Alleged" deleted petition from the CEO of DS1 in regards to Sharkbait joining the corp did it exist/was it deleted/if so why? etc. CCP and Eve Online... It's not a bug, it's a feature
ElweSingollo Starlancers Mordus Angels	Posted - 2007.05.28 14:29:00 - [5] Edited by: ElweSingollo on 28/05/2007 14:28:35 Originally by: Alice Cholmondeley Edited by: Alice Cholmondeley on 28/05/2007 13:28:10 Originally by: ElweSingollo I understand that but as I said earlier this to an extent is tied up in the T20 incident the only way that it came out into the public domain was because of a "Drama Bomb" CCP tried to cover that one up and now have an image problem that associates them with ebndervouring to cover up "Shady Dealings" they would like to have the benefit of the doubt but they seem not to have learnt any PR lessons from the previous incident. I will await with interest what Aarkonon says about the "Alleged" deleted petition from the CEO of DS1 in regards to Sharkbait joining the corp did it exist/was it deleted/if so why? etc. You do realise that nothing changed after the T20 incident came to light, right? The matter was already closed for CCP, the culprit punished. The one thing the drama may have done is that you had some more information about it. No where did they try to cover anything up and no amount of drama changed the punishment already inflicted on the guilty party. The outcry of a tiny part of the community was pathetic then as much as it is now. Reread the facts mate it wasn't dealt with the dev involved got a slap on the hands and his characters liquidated the BPO's that were illegally given to BoB WERE NOT removed from BoB control even though they were retrieved illegally. This was changed when there was an Outcry about it. Good to know that you care so much about cheating that you consider any critism of CCP when a member of thier staff indulge in cheating "pathetic". CCP and Eve Online... It's not a bug, it's a feature

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.