| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
   |
Posted - 2007.05.27 20:57:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 27/05/2007 21:03:23
I figured the allegations against Sharkbait would amount to nothing. He's got no real motive to do anything malicious, and even if he did... He's a database administrator  If for some reason he wanted to change something, all he has to do is modify a few table entries, which is what made this piece of allegation so silly to me in the first place 
...And First
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 21:27:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Takahashi Arran
Edited by: Takahashi Arran on 27/05/2007 21:20:20
CCP Arkanon you have investigated the issue thoughogly and well. However i fear you have missed the main IA point. I doubt anyone (cept maybe a few goons) had enough tinfoil on them to seriously suspect ccp sharkbait of wrongdoing. however the IA issue which was really raised and which ****ed off GS was why the petition that was filed (assuming goons weren't making that up) was deleted without response? Some clarification here would be nice .
My theory into that issue is that its simply a case of the right hand not talking to the left.
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 22:12:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Andrus Delai
Thanks for the partial reply, Arkanon. However, there are still outstanding issues regarding the incident.
1) Why was the petition requesting more information deleted?
2) Why wasn't the CEO of the Corp informed of a GM joining the Corp either before or after it happened?
It's good to hear that there was actually a reason why Sharkbait joined the Corp, however the procedure of his joining and the response to questions regarding it afterward were handled *extremely* poorly. I understand that these are not necessarily questions for IA, but they need to be answered to close this incident in a satisfactory manner.
Pardon the tinfoil hat moment, but... There is a possibility that a BoB member filed the petition because he noticed some function or behavior that appeared bugged (possibly due to past experience), and it was then dealt with as needed. The GMs could potentially have not responded to the petitions due to fear that the rabid lot that is fueling the current thread would go bat-****-insane about accusations of the developers being in BoB's pocket.
Kind of how things ended up anyway though 
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.27 23:25:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 27/05/2007 23:26:49
Originally by: Kaplanelle
Originally by: CCP kieron
The question that you should be asking is why this became an issue with the corporation three weeks after their player submitted a petition.
Whoa, back up there pal. That's not the tone you take with paying customers, ever.
It is, however, the tone you use when you're addressing a little child who is being naughty - which is precisely how many people have handled this whole affair.
Edit: And to the guy above me, they're only done with about 1/4th of the allegations, and this was the easy one. Chill out and let IA do its job 
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 01:38:00 -
[5]
*snip* removed ref to deleted post -Eldo ([email protected])
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
| |
|