| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
   |
Posted - 2007.05.28 00:46:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 28/05/2007 00:45:48
 Originally by: Overdone
Originally by: CCP kieron
In short, it simply gives CCP the option of deciding which direction to move EVEÆs Prime Fiction at the end of the arc or to allow unfolding events to determine what is to follow. The claims of CCP rigging events to benefit a player, corporation or alliance are groundless.
This is interesting the first sentence disproves the second and vice versa.
Not in the slightest. They weren't rigging it in favor of any player group, they were setting it up for a foregone, NPC affecting conclusion that they were trying to involve the players in.
For the tin foil mad-hatters, that doesn't mean they wanted to set up certain players to benefit from it 
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 01:22:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Evelgrivion on 28/05/2007 01:21:32
Originally by: ZeroForce
ok how about this im sick of your fool comments therfore im not commenting in this thread as i have said enough CCP is guilty and over half the EVE community agrees reply however the hell you want child i wont be looking
4000 posts, with perhaps 10 to 20 posts (probably more) per person who is actually involved there is a far cry from the 140,000 subscriptions CCP maintains.
We're quite aware of what your opinions are, and we're quite frankly disgusted with how you decide to express them. If you hate it, just quit. We're better off without your attitude. A population of people like you could ruin any game for anybody.
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 01:28:00 -
[3]
Originally by: FlamingErictilePhaillicy
Why is there no sticky regarding bob contacts to devs high up via msn?.......
I think its because those allegations are still under investigation. As such, one will appear in due time, I'm sure.
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 01:32:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Flaming Lemming
Originally by: FlamingErictilePhaillicy
Why is there no sticky regarding bob contacts to devs high up via msn?.......
Harder to spin.
What spin? Kieron is just unnecessarily vague 
The allegations that CCP was rigging these events to end in the favor of a few players was proven to be false. However, the issue of them being completely inflexible with a foregone conclusion is something aurora should address. They're somewhat less fun if the players cant affect the outcome 
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 01:35:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Andrus Delai
Originally by: CCP kieron
ôAs said earlier, we can have the ending open if allowed by you or we can stack the cards in favor of Theology Council so that we after the arc go back to a T2 status quo for the Empire, but without any Tetrimon Cult (who will be forever branded traitors of the Empire and utterly wiped out).ö
In short, it simply gives CCP the option of deciding which direction to move EVEÆs Prime Fiction at the end of the arc or to allow unfolding events to determine what is to follow. The claims of CCP rigging events to benefit a player, corporation or alliance are groundless.
How is stacking the cards to favor a Theology Coucil win, not rigging the event?
It is, but see the post above yours.
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.05.28 01:44:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Shadow Elk
Is this the line to the developer MSN handout?
Is it really that hard to stay on-topic? Can you at least wait until they actually respond to those allegations? 
This isn't the signature you're looking for. |
| |
|