
SengH
Black Omega Security GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.05.29 05:00:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Namingway
Originally by: Revan Neferis Edited by: Revan Neferis on 28/05/2007 19:29:11
Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne Edited by: Udyr Vulpayne on 28/05/2007 19:12:36
Originally by: Revan Neferis
No, I was very happy to spend billions against the amarrians at the wars while Tetrimon was giving billions to AM in gifts to replace their loses.
your failures in those wars and everything else you have done since then have nothing at all to do with AM recieving a few faction ships after several years of working for the tetrimon order.
instead you should consider looking into your shortcomings when it comes to understanding the game (especially the pvp part of it), the backstory and the existing player alliances/corps and their history.
(the same goes for astarte and his alts as they were all on revans side in those wars)
Sorry but I won't let you use this thread to asshatery . This is an ooc thread and the fact that I was involved in a rp event where my enemies received faction and replacement of ships while a wars has nothing to do with wether you are PIE or Sani Sabik. Failures regarding what? unless you are saying that your ships were also miraculously modified to better performance, what makes you think that the outcome of the amarrian wars were so special for you? To the contrary. And yes, did I fail to destroy a war where my enemies had several advantages? perhaps. Is this something to be aken into account as failure? Perhaps playing virtual history, I would gladly think about an outcome where a Sani Sabik representant would have come with billions in gifts to my favour :) Anyway, take you hate speeches somewhere else, this is a discussion about rigged events. I'm sure as I said, that you will have other people willing to participate at events under these conditions.
And as for the post related to RP, I agree. We all play a role. And if this is a contained role, the " actors" have to be informed of the role they will play, not blind misleaded.
So rewards for long-time service for your enemies is bad, because it didn't happen to you, i what you are saying. Besides, how could a 'sani sabik representative' come forward, the PF makes no mention of any sort of structure for the ancient cult whose name you've taken. Maybe a Blood Raider could've aided you, but perhaps they didn't care about the incident, or wanted to watch and see if both sides destroyed each other and made their goals easier to obtain. You, like many others, are making the mistake of thinking that because EVE is open-ended, that players have say over everything, including NPCs which, incidentally, are not player controlled entities. If the TC wanted to declare open season on Tetrimon, nothing short of being able to kill all of them, would change their minds.
And even then, killing them would only make more case to go after Tetrimon imo. The actions of NPCs are not ours to control freely.
As for Astarte, investing thousands of Euros into a war, were you funding the war with GTCs or do you have a dozen accounts? I am curious as to how this is possible (I'm guessing it's one of the above two things).
Besides, if the Guristas were fighting the Caldari state, would someone like Naphitalia honestly be surprised at the idea of a large (yet likely small when compared to the empires) pirate faction gets beaten down by the Caldari State? If major alliances are backing the Guristas that'd be different, but just pure faction vs empire, why is it so shocking that the Amarr Empire was able to manhandle the Blood Raiders?
FYI the .5. was supposed to have backed the Guristas. Thats why Guristas dreadnoughts aided us in attacking a D2 tower. They were going to deploy an outpost somewhere in Tribute (at least thats what I was told by the CEOs and directors of Suprm/BOS ). If script had not retired ATUK you'd be looking at a very different eve today in both the political and npc enviroment.
|