|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
prsr
Gallente
JuBa Corp
Vigilance Infinitas
   |
Posted - 2007.05.30 18:55:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Iraf Thaiberd
... once the people who own the game say "Here are 10 things that don't have much to do with any of your complaints but we're going to call you liars based on them and ignore what you were actually complaining about...
So uhm, about those goalposts, did you say you wanted them 14 or 40 au apart now?
Don't whine about what you really ment or get someone else to write a coherent open letter. People tried this line about unfair access to devs before and it got shot down because it is BS.
Nevermind that any favoratism would still show in logs AND that all players have had equal access to the devs ears if they really wanted to. I'm just amazed at the level of personal hostility towards the people making this game. First people try to work the devs personal "pay" accounts out of the game at any cost and now you want CCP to tell them who they can and cannot communicate with at any time during their employment?!
All this drama and so little evidence of anything... Insane is the word that comes to mind.
Bring something new please.
--
.sig apathy ftw |
prsr
Gallente
JuBa Corp
Vigilance Infinitas
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 19:32:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Sekket
Have you ever heard of a crime called insider trading? Look it up.
What i know about insider trading is that it happens all the time and practically nobody gets caught because there are no decent records kept and jailing influential rich people is bad for business.
What i know about eve is that they have logs of everything that anyone does and Arkanon heading up the IA department. He seems to be on top of things even if people are out to ruin his long weekend.
--
.sig apathy ftw |
prsr
Gallente
JuBa Corp
Vigilance Infinitas
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 19:38:00 -
[3]
Edited by: prsr on 30/05/2007 19:37:39
Originally by: Sekket
Yes, but my point being, companies can and do contractually require their employees not to certain people of certain things. Take for example any NDA agreement. I've not yet seen any legal exemptions for "RL friends" in any NDA I've seen.
Well then, I suppose you got your work cut out for you then. CCP has al their employees and volunteers sign nda's.
Instead of trying to score points "accusing" devs of having chats (ohnoes) with some of the playerbase, you need to show ***WHAT*** it was they talked about and how that adversely affected the rest of the playerbase.
Good luck.
--
.sig apathy ftw |
prsr
Gallente
JuBa Corp
Vigilance Infinitas
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 20:48:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Rex Dangerstein
2.) Since Iceland has no seperation of church and state any case they would make againist an American institution or persons can be instantly thrown out of court by claiming the first amendment.
Having a state religion doesn't mean that there is no freedom of religion.
It's a rather strange argument anyway, the first amendment of the US constitution is a rule that the US congress needs to abide by. What does that have to do with a US citizen in court vs ccp from iceland?
--
.sig apathy ftw |
prsr
Gallente
JuBa Corp
Vigilance Infinitas
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 21:02:00 -
[5]
Edited by: prsr on 30/05/2007 21:02:25
Originally by: Rex Dangerstein
Believe it or not, Iceland is different in the fact that there is no law protecting freedom of religion, ergo, conflicting with US law, so it can be thrown out.
1. The US state dept. says there is freedom of religion provided by the constitution of Iceland. (here)
2. How does a non-existant conflict with US law enter into a case about internet spaceships.
3. I'm sure Icelandic tax laws are different from US law, maybe thats enough ground to get it thrown out on?
--
.sig apathy ftw |
|
|
| |
|