|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.07 22:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Wolf is OP by far. CCP, this is not Minmatar Wins Online. Seriously, wtf are you guys doing. STOP MAKING MINMATAR SO DAMN OP |
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.12 17:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Why are people complaining about AFs being potentially overpowered (they won't be) when no one made a peep about how the latest destroyer buffs totally made Arty Thrashers OP? Why am I still seeing a lot folks asking for even more Jaguar and Wolf love when they are already the best AFs? Please take your minmatar bullshit somewhere else and go stfu
Unless you fly AFs regularly, you won't know how useless they are now. They are too slow and die easily against anything besides another frigate...that is if the other frigate doesn't just run away. T1 destroyers can rip apart AFs now, making a Day 1 Newbie ship capable of killing even the best frigate pilots. Cruisers can simply neut frigs to death (oh except minmatar because of capless guns. But wait, minmatar need more buffs right? Righhhtt??). The only consistent targets I get in my Ishkur are other assault frigates, which are not that popular of course. AFs have absolutely no usage right now unless you happen to get lucky and stumble into a fight. They are basically on the same level of usefulness as t1 mining frigates, maybe even less as at least you can cyno in a t1 mining frigate without feeling guilty if you lose it
CCP please go through with some buffs on AFs. I think your idea to buff MWD (sucks ass because now we have two interceptor class ships (a balanced ab bonus or overheating bonuses would be much more useful and help diversify ship roles) , but I would take anything at this point to make AFs even a little more marginally useful. Everyone else complaining about AFs being OP, go lay face down in a bathtub |
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.12 17:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Buffing the minmatar AFs any more would massively OP then over the other races when considering all of the advantages minmatar has already with their turrets. Jaguars and Wolves are single-handidly the most useful AFs on the market right now. Also, the retribution already has massive damage output and does not need any buffs that increase it's damage. It was designed to be a gank ship with no mids, and now it has an extra mid, eliminating it's previous disadvantage... |
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.12 18:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:Prometheus Exenthal wrote:You must be completely oblivious to the world to think that the Firetail can even compare to the Hookbill, Comet, or Slicer.. Not at all, my experience with comes from fighting the damn things in my Coercer's, Slicer's, Punisher's and Nomen's .. what point of reference do you use .. and no EFT/SiSi shenanigans does not count. It is one of the two frigates that I actually hesitate engaging when in my brawling Slicer, what you call super-punisher I reckon, the other being Daredevil's. FW breeds the best frigate/cruiser pilots in game .. I have been in FW since beginning (missed first week or so) .. dismiss my evaluation of frigates at your own peril (not that I expect you to care about a snooty FW monkey). PS: Poke the Devs on the CSM board and get those damned blogs out already!
Holy ****, you mean you have formed your opinions based on your actual flight experience with the ships discussed? SOMEONE GET THIS MAN A BEER
|
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.12 18:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Zarnak Wulf wrote: The Jag definitely lost alot of shine. It's fitting is too gimped to have an impressive arty setup. Three turrets where most AF now have four too is meh.
I really disagree with this. If the jag had 4xProject Turret, it would be really overpowered. The fact that it only has 3 turret hardpoints is what keeps it balanced against other ships...and plenty of other AFs have only 3 hardpoints as well
I feel that people have started to believe that if a Minmatar ship isn't automatically easy-mode, it's a vastly underpowered and unbalanced ship |
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.12 18:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yes, so let's take the fastest assault frigate, give it even more of a long-range advantage, and leave everyone else holding their limp dicks trying to figure out how to counter it. |
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.12 19:05:00 -
[7] - Quote
m0cking bird wrote:Seriously though! This is how it would look. I've not tried this on SISI and I have not used a artillery-Jaguar on TQ. No Idea how it will preform. I can only use the Wolf or Thrasher as a reference. Also, no matter what. Using artillery will limit tank.
Jagabond
280mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP S 280mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP S 280mm Howitzer Artillery II, Republic Fleet EMP S [Empty High slot]
Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters Small F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I Warp Disruptor II
Fourier Transform Tracking Program Gyrostabilizer II Pseudoelectron Containment Field I Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Small Ancillary Current Router I Small Projectile Collision Accelerator II
-proxyyyy
Did you mean to use a t2 rig? And I don't see what the problem is with these jag fittings..they seem pretty on par to me with other AFs. |
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 00:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mirei Jun wrote:one of the best replies on this thread
I am giving you a virtual standing oviation |
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
11
|
Posted - 2012.01.14 22:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
So the point of the role bonus is to make AFs more usable in big fleets, though if I was going to take a t2 frigate for the purpose of tackling in a fleet I would just take an inty. Or am I missing something? It's not like AFs can be really of any use for DPS output in bigger engagements |
Ninevite
Shiva White Noise.
11
|
Posted - 2012.01.15 21:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
As my question went unanswered, I am asking it again:
So the point of the role bonus is to make AFs more usable in big fleets, though if I was going to take a t2 frigate for the purpose of tackling in a fleet I would just take an inty. Or am I missing something? It's not like AFs can be really of any use for DPS output in bigger engagements |
|
Ninevite
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 04:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
these changes were dumb as **** and CCP still implemented them even after 53 pages of thread telling them not too
edit: I enjoy flying my new ishkur with an extra low slot yet no leftover cpu to fit anything and weapon systems that still suck. thanks ccp, my ass hairs could do a better job at balancing this game than you all can |
|
|
|