Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zkillz kun
Beets and Gravy Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 20:22:00 -
[1]
So today a corp mate of mine ransomed a drake at a gate in lowsec(let him go of course). then seeing taht he is over a year old i go ahead and throw out a gang invite and attack his drake in an ishkur. i kiled him cause neither of us could have survived long enough(rats actually stole my kill mail). after i poped him i locked the pod but warped out cause i didn't want to wait to contemplate the ethics of killing him with lvl3 blocade beating up my af.
anyway i was wondering what you guys think about this. my corp mates think i shouldn't have killed him because he had been ransomed just a bit earlier. My defense: 1. he accepted a gang invite 2. i wasn't involved in the ransom 3. it was only 15m from a nearly 1yr old drake (my corp mate sent it back)
plz tell me what you guys think about that ____________ Beets, You're among friends. |
DarkElf
Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 20:26:00 -
[2]
Putting aside the ganging thing. If your corp mate ransomed him at a gate and then as a seperate incident while he was in a mission later on you killed him i see no problem with it.
DE
|
Plaetean
Hybrid Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 20:28:00 -
[3]
A ransom means you're let go, the pirates deactivate the warp scram and let you escape. What a ransom is not, is a free day in low sec where no-one can attack you. He was ransomed, he was let go, it's his own fault for getting caught again.
-----
|
Joe Shooter
Thunderstruck.
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 21:08:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Plaetean A ransom means you're let go, the pirates deactivate the warp scram and let you escape. What a ransom is not, is a free day in low sec where no-one can attack you. He was ransomed, he was let go, it's his own fault for getting caught again.
Signed...
Wait...
The ISK was given back? ___________
ThUnDeRsTrUcK |
Jimer Lins
Gallente Sanctuary
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 21:50:00 -
[5]
It sounds like from your description that you wouldn't have known about this person if your corpmate hadn't ransomed him already, correct?
SEARCh- we find sites for you! |
Zardenim
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 22:00:00 -
[6]
Perfectly legit imo. Platean covered it nicely.
Originally by: LastTraitorStanding Back in my day we pirated backwards! Uphill! In the snow! for 120km with really crappy optimal!
And get off my lawn you punks!
|
Speed Devil
Caldari Mean Machines
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 22:56:00 -
[7]
youre free to do anything u want really
ransom and kill em, double profit
|
Rylet VanDorn
Pastafarians Novus Ordos Seclorum
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 23:08:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Plaetean A ransom means you're let go, the pirates deactivate the warp scram and let you escape. What a ransom is not, is a free day in low sec where no-one can attack you. He was ransomed, he was let go, it's his own fault for getting caught again.
By that logic, you would be perfectly justified ransoming someone, then following them through the next gate they jump through, and ransoming them again.
I seriously don't understand why people still pay ransoms. Actually TRUSTING people to honor their word in this game? WTF are you smoking?
|
IRS Informant
Income Redistribution Service
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 23:09:00 -
[9]
Depends..
If you (or your buddy) ransom as your primary means of ISK, then it was probably a very bad idea.. You don't get many repeat customers when carebears lose their ships (they're a bit touchy about that)..
If you just ransom on a whim, then it doesn't really matter.. You make life harder for those of us that do ransom for a living, but you're not here to make our lives easier..
|
B1G DAVE
Veto. Academy Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 00:06:00 -
[10]
If it were two seperate incidents, then you did fine
But if your corp mate yelled "oo I just ransomed this drake, and watched him go to this spot, go kill him" then that would be not so good
Imo
|
|
Stakhanov
kleptomaniacs
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 00:21:00 -
[11]
I doubt the 15m included protection , though he could see the gang invite as safe since he paid already - very silly nonetheless.
It can be pretty hard to enforce a corp wide protection (without standings for a long term agreement) so if the victim wants it , he clearly has to pay an extra for it.
|
Mawrin Skel
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 02:49:00 -
[12]
Maybe the fact you'd gang someone and then kill 'em after they just got ransomed by your corpy does show that you are a bit of a scumbag - I mean your corp should maybe kick you just cos you have no honour, but then....they let you in so standards are probably low.
You didn't even get the kill cos your lil ishkur was only tipping the balance a little... The funniest thing is you then high tail it out (without even looting?) cos you can't tank a lvl3 in your AF.... So in the end you failed to gain much by the sound of it and also proved beyond all reasonable doubt that you are a sneaky sh1t..... Bravo
|
Karlemgne
The Malevolent
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 02:53:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Zkillz kun So today a corp mate of mine ransomed a drake at a gate in lowsec(let him go of course). then seeing taht he is over a year old i go ahead and throw out a gang invite and attack his drake in an ishkur. i kiled him cause neither of us could have survived long enough(rats actually stole my kill mail). after i poped him i locked the pod but warped out cause i didn't want to wait to contemplate the ethics of killing him with lvl3 blocade beating up my af.
anyway i was wondering what you guys think about this. my corp mates think i shouldn't have killed him because he had been ransomed just a bit earlier. My defense: 1. he accepted a gang invite 2. i wasn't involved in the ransom 3. it was only 15m from a nearly 1yr old drake (my corp mate sent it back)
plz tell me what you guys think about that
Some might say that a ransom isn't permanent, and evaporates as soon as you let the guy go.
I, on the otherhand don't. If you ransomed him, you should have given him 24 hours. I suppose you could plead ignorance, but if you killed him in the same system, I wouldn't buy that as a decent excuse.
Whatever the case, *I* think you should pay the man for his loss.
-Karlemgne
|
Dapanman1
Amarr Beets and Gravy Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 03:32:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Mawrin Skel ...I mean your corp should maybe kick you just cos you have no honour, but then....they let you in so standards are probably low...
Well we wouldn't be much of a pirate corp if we kicked out our pirates, especially our founding members, now would we? But thanks for your input on the topic at hand.
Beets, you're among friends. |
Talpa Iute
Murder-Death-Kill Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 06:38:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Rylet VanDorn ....... By that logic, you would be perfectly justified ransoming someone, then following them through the next gate they jump through, and ransoming them again.
I seriously don't understand why people still pay ransoms. Actually TRUSTING people to honor their word in this game? WTF are you smoking?
well then you'll die every time someone gives you a fair chance to make it out alive .. for a fair price.. _____________________________________________
|
Don Z0LA
Caldari TunDraGon
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 07:42:00 -
[16]
afaik ganking people by gang exploit is bannable. killing people who payed for ransom is very very lame. you fail at piracy and you are shame for our sort.
|
RuleoftheBone
Minmatar Veto. Academy Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 07:47:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Speed Devil youre free to do anything u want really
ransom and kill em, double profit
Yeah...that really encourages "clients" to pay ransoms. Way to go...amateur
"Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the **** out of my way" General George Patton USA
|
Corwain
Gallente Zero Team
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 08:43:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Don Z0LA afaik ganking people by gang exploit is bannable. killing people who payed for ransom is very very lame. you fail at piracy and you are shame for our sort.
Um...inviting your enemies to your gang is no exploit. He didn't say he spammed him with invites or anything here...
And I agree with the others, ransom means you can leave. this guy obviously did no such thing.
|
DarkElf
Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 09:45:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Rylet VanDorn
Originally by: Plaetean A ransom means you're let go, the pirates deactivate the warp scram and let you escape. What a ransom is not, is a free day in low sec where no-one can attack you. He was ransomed, he was let go, it's his own fault for getting caught again.
By that logic, you would be perfectly justified ransoming someone, then following them through the next gate they jump through, and ransoming them again.
I seriously don't understand why people still pay ransoms. Actually TRUSTING people to honor their word in this game? WTF are you smoking?
you don't understand why ppl pay ransoms? Let's just say you come across a Veto pirate who offers a ransom. I don't think it's too far fetched to suggest that the vast majority of eve knows full well that a veto pilot will honor it and if it saves them isk and time then why wouldn't you pay it?
I have only once been offered a ransom which was by a respectable corp that i turned down simply because it was on my pod which had no implants in at the time, if it was 1 of my implanted clones then i would have paid, no questions asked.
DE
|
flashfresh
Independent Pilots
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 10:11:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Rylet VanDorn ......By that logic, you would be perfectly justified ransoming someone, then following them through the next gate they jump through, and ransoming them again.
I seriously don't understand why people still pay ransoms. Actually TRUSTING people to honor their word in this game? WTF are you smoking?
Well, that would be difficult as more than likely you're flagged and the gate will not immediately activate for you. If the ransomed pilot jumped through to the other side and SAT there long enough for me to come back through - he deserves to get caught and ransomed again. The ransom isn't a protection pass you know? Once let go, the ransomed (ransomee?) needs to GTFO of the system.
However, I personally always tell the pilot he has a 15 minute grace period. However, thats just me.
F
---------------------------------------------- ôMe, I'm dishonest, and you can always trust a dishonest man to be dishonest. Honestly, it's the honest ones you have to watch out for...'ö
|
|
Max Godsnottlingson
Amarr Freelancing Corp Confederation of Independent Corporations
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 10:32:00 -
[21]
Talking as one who gets ransomed on occasion. Just make sure that you make it clear during 'the negotiations' that it is a "one off and if we catch you again will attack again."
For those who get ransomed. I've also found that so long as you don't get snotty you can often negotiate longer deals, granted for more isk, and "touch wood" all pirates I have delt with have honoured the agreement. I've been able to negotiate several 'day passes' with guys camping gate/systems that I need to travel through regularly.
|
Sir Lex
Thunderstruck.
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 16:36:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Karlemgne I, on the otherhand don't. If you ransomed him, you should have given him 24 hours.
24 hours...
Thunderstruck For Hire |
Lord Zoran
Caldari House of Tempers
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 17:10:00 -
[23]
ransom is just let them escape nothin else --------------------------------------------- no sig for you !!! |
Agent Li
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 17:25:00 -
[24]
Originally by: DarkElf
you don't understand why ppl pay ransoms? Let's just say you come across a Veto pirate who offers a ransom. I don't think it's too far fetched to suggest that the vast majority of eve knows full well that a veto pilot will honor it and if it saves them isk and time then why wouldn't you pay it?
I have only once been offered a ransom which was by a respectable corp that i turned down simply because it was on my pod which had no implants in at the time, if it was 1 of my implanted clones then i would have paid, no questions asked.
DE
Well, although I get the impression Veto is respectable, I don't think I'd pay a ransom, if only because it turns the whole pirate/victim thing into mere mining of people who pass by.
Where's the excitement in that?
You are responsible for keeping the reputation of low sec in the RED - i.e., "low sec is dangerous".
How can it be dangerous if there aren't frozen corpses floating about?
BTW, I have quite a collection of frozen corpses now... ------------------
"Don't be afraid to take advantage of your enemy's weaknesses. Becasuse winning is everything after all." |
Jimer Lins
Gallente Sanctuary
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 18:10:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Lord Zoran ransom is just let them escape nothin else
But is it OK to then give their location to your corpmates so they can go ransom the guy also?
Seems like that would be another reason why people wouldn't pay ransoms. If your victims think they'll be treated like an ATM by your entire corp, they won't pay any longer.
SEARCh- we find sites for you! |
Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 18:33:00 -
[26]
I remember a thread about a guy who ransomed someone in a belt for, say, five million (don't remember the exact figure), the victim was let go but remained in the belt. A corp mate of the pirate jumps in and ransoms the same guy for another five million. Then a third corpmate does it, as the victim still didn't warp away, and then a fourth one. When being ransomed the forth time the victim was like "Yeah, yeah, I know. Five million, right?"
Made me lol.
/Ki
Joy to the world Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |
Aslovi
Caldari Repo Industries
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 22:41:00 -
[27]
I have to agree with the majority of the post's, ransom means that you are set free no "free pass". However this post has openned up another point, some of the so called merc's and pirates out there give the rest of us a bad name when it comes to ransoms.
Not just players but corps, due to another corp not honoring a ransom deal with our current target we are left out of pocket (well except the few 100 mill in loot) as they won't pay the ransom/ surrender fee. So now we are forced to destory there allaince, which is sad because on the main they have been a great target to figth they just can't afford to lose anymore ships.
so i'll sign off with good figths G.U.A.R.D and good bye and good luck.
|
Jaedar Metron
I G N O T U S
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 23:18:00 -
[28]
in my opinion you didnt dishonor the ransom, but I myself wouldnt want to do anytihng like that.
A ransom is a "Safe passage" ticket IMO, if someone pays an IGN memeber a ransom I would want to ensure the ransomed isnt killed by an IGN memebr waiting on hte other side of the only gate leading back home.
|
Speed Devil
Caldari Mean Machines
|
Posted - 2007.06.29 00:11:00 -
[29]
Originally by: RuleoftheBone
Originally by: Speed Devil youre free to do anything u want really
ransom and kill em, double profit
Yeah...that really encourages "clients" to pay ransoms. Way to go...amateur
hey, i play my game, u play yours
i dont really care about an other pirates business even when everything i do is bad for the others. i only look out for myself. there aint much chance ill ransom the same player twice so i might aswell blow them up to get double profit
owyeah, for me they arent clients, but victims, since they dont like to see me twice in local _______________________________ victim > WTH was that for? Speed Devil > hihihi =D victim > Dumbass victim > Suicided on me some guy > to much asses think that is funny another guy > Remember th |
Tau IX
Amarr Beach Boys C0VEN
|
Posted - 2007.06.29 00:18:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Ki An I remember a thread about a guy who ransomed someone in a belt for, say, five million (don't remember the exact figure), the victim was let go but remained in the belt. A corp mate of the pirate jumps in and ransoms the same guy for another five million. Then a third corpmate does it, as the victim still didn't warp away, and then a fourth one. When being ransomed the forth time the victim was like "Yeah, yeah, I know. Five million, right?"
Made me lol.
/Ki
Made my day.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |