| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Hellspawn01
Amarr
Falcon Advanced Industries
   |
Posted - 2007.06.29 22:05:00 -
[1]
I fully agree with voogru here.
If any alliance is harouring ISK farmers, then they are supporting ISK sellers. If the GMs find buyers, then they should all get banned for those actions including the alliance.
Ship lovers click here |
Hellspawn01
Amarr
Falcon Advanced Industries
|
Posted - 2007.06.29 22:35:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Mud Pandemonium
They want to pay us to NPC, they can be our welcomed guests as long as they meet our asking price. You have no say in the matter whatsoever.
Nice excuse for hiding ISK sellers.
Originally by: Mud Pandemonium
With any luck ISD will spot what you've done for what it is, a massive troll and use their good judgement to lock thisn thread.
I dont see any trolling, only you trying to cover your alliances acts against the community.
Ship lovers click here |
Hellspawn01
Amarr
Falcon Advanced Industries
|
Posted - 2007.06.29 22:46:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Hunin
Personally I think CCP tolerates these ISK sellers. If CCP wanted to, they would buy a bit of ISK from these businesses you say are all over the internet and find out how the businesses sell the ISK. They would then data mine their databases looking for similar patterns and ban them. Then rinse and repeat if the sellers change methods. It is sort of like drug busting here in the US but in the virtual world.
Looks like CCP isnt all that clever. On the other side, they bann some here and there to make us feel they are doing something. But behind the scenes they rub their hands cuz they make a buttload of money off them with the account fees.
Ship lovers click here |
Hellspawn01
Amarr
Falcon Advanced Industries
|
Posted - 2007.06.29 22:58:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Cedric Diggory
I asked this question once, and I believe it could be relevant here.
Quote:
"Would I be considered an accessory to the EULA violation if I were to ransom a macro miner / isk farmer to leave them be?"
"Yup"
"What if I didn't honour the ransom?"
"That's different..."
So, do you honour your agreement IAC? Surely by allowing them into your alliance - as if giving positive standings wouldn't have been bad enough - shows that you do indeed condone their actions, and that if indeed there is a breach of the EULA here, you would be an accessory to it.
If the GMs do find evidence that hose are ISK sellers, then I wonder what they do to IAC cuz they admitted to know what they possibly could be.
Ship lovers click here |
Hellspawn01
Amarr
Falcon Advanced Industries
|
Posted - 2007.06.29 23:33:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Mia Archer
So basicaly the entire point of this thread is your too lazy to go look at killboards to get a member list yourself so we are stonewalling you? God knows its not like we have anything more important to do than spend time getting a list of members of a 70 man corp because 1 person asked for it... ya know like... fighting a huge multi alliance war... or anything like that...
TT said NO, he doesnt care, so its stonewalling. He could have said, I look into it, or something along the line to show some interest.
Ship lovers click here |
Hellspawn01
Amarr
Falcon Advanced Industries
|
Posted - 2007.06.30 00:45:00 -
[6]
Originally by: sartorii
IAC does not knowingly support ISK Selling or any other violations of the EULA.
See below:
Quote:
2007.06.14 05:27
Sir, chinese sweatshops put rice on tables and roofs over heads !
Also there is nothing funnier than having people pay you a billion a week to npc in delve.
IAC leadership doesnt care.
Ship lovers click here |
Hellspawn01
Amarr
Falcon Advanced Industries
|
Posted - 2007.06.30 00:54:00 -
[7]
Originally by: n sx
and IAC really DON'T care about the fate of the corp in question.
IAC knows and will feel the hammer of GM justice too. Think about it. Grim Faust pointed out much evidence that IAC is involved and so they are partially violating the EULA like the ISK farmers/seller/buyers. Get rid of them and IAC can safe its face and show that you do care about the whole issue. Would it be so wrong if you kick them out? In the end, its just ISK for you.
Ship lovers click here |
Hellspawn01
Amarr
Falcon Advanced Industries
|
Posted - 2007.06.30 01:52:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Hellspawn01 on 30/06/2007 01:52:12
Originally by: sartorii
1. NPCers not PvPers NPC ship die every time to any semi competent PvPer.
Normal NPCers take a break inbetween. These are online 23/7 AND ratting/missioning. Very good bot, account sharing or ppl that dont need sleep ever.
Originally by: sartorii
2. they fly the BEST NPCing ship in the game. oh wait.. they are NPCer.. i guess they should fly Minmatar to make you feel better??
They pay 1bil every week to you, make billions while ratting but cant afford a proper setup to rat....c¦mon.
Originally by: sartorii
3. You cant parse their name to some nice western object (gee they might use an entirely different character set so all the names are 'gibberish' to them too)
My english isnt that good too so I skip this one.
Originally by: sartorii
4. they make bad business deals (the only thing that qualifies as 'suspicious' but it proved nothing of itself)
Bad business with eachother while normal players would scream "scammer" after the 2nd time?
Originally by: sartorii
5. I have. its not alot of fun playing Cut and Paste thru web translators, and since they have nothing I want or need isnt a productive use of my playing time..
Exactly. Why have them in the alliance at all if nobody wants anything from them (apart from the 1bil a week)?
Originally by: sartorii
non-english speaking NPCers who make bad business deals..
Believe it or not, I know some of those. The players voogru is after dont fit this description. (see 1. above)
Ship lovers click here |
| |
|